Spinal Cord Injuries
Conditions
Keywords
Adult, Depression, Employment, supported, Health Service/ut, Humans, Outcomes, Quality of life, Veterans/rh (rehabilitation), Workplace, Spinal Cord Injuries
Brief summary
This study involves research about how to help Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) gain employment. During the first couple of years following SCI, many people are concentrating on their rehabilitation and are unable to afford the time for return to work. However, studies have shown people often regain the necessary strength and function about two years after SCI to resume activities of daily living very similar to what they experienced prior to the SCI. Even though many social and legal efforts have been made in the last decade to improve chances for people with disabilities to return to work, Veterans with SCI are sometimes hindered in finding employment because of age, past work history, and many other factors. Other Veterans with SCI are very successful at finding employment either working for themselves or working for a company. The investigators know very little about what issues Veterans with SCI face when they attempt to find employment after SCI. The study will analyze both quantitative and qualitative measures to maximize its findings.
Detailed description
Legal mandates, such as the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, have been implemented to improve employment opportunities for disabled persons and yet the proportion of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) who are employed remains about 9%. For the Veteran population with SCI, the return to work rate is most likely much lower. This study will be conducted to evaluate whether a vocational rehabilitation program patterned after the VA Community Employment and Support approach improves rehabilitation outcomes for the SCI Veteran population as compared with vocational rehabilitation practices currently used in most Veteran Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). The vocational rehabilitation program developed for the SCI Veterans is referred to as SCI-VIP and it will be implemented at the Dallas VA Medical Center (VAMC), Houston VAMC, San Diego VAMC, and Cleveland VAMC. A five year evaluative research will be conducted to test the following hypothesized outcomes (HO) from the subjects who participate in the SCI-VIP program and a control group of subjects who receive conventional methods of vocational rehabilitation: Primary HO: Veterans with SCI who participate in the SCI-VIP will demonstrate significantly greater changes in vocational rehabilitation after twelve months than those who do not receive this intervention. Vocational rehabilitation will be a measure of change from baseline to one-year in the subject's scores on instruments which measure employment indices, perceived barriers to employment, level of handicap, quality of life, depression, and sustaining care needs. Secondary HO 1: Veterans with SCI who participate in the SCI-VIP will exhibit lower VA and non-VA costs for medical, non-rehabilitation treatment, offsetting the higher SCI-VIP program costs. Secondary HO 2: The program fidelity will be equally adequate in terms of accomplishing program objectives relative to operations, cost-benefit balance, subject and stakeholder satisfaction, and outcomes when comparing the four SCI-VIP programs and when comparing conventional vocational rehabilitation approaches applied at six different VAMCs. Program evaluation and cost-benefit analysis will be conducted using a fidelity instrument developed by the researchers and patterned after fidelity instruments conventionally used to evaluate psychiatric rehabilitation programs. Veterans at each VAMC who express an interest in vocational rehabilitation and consent to participate in this study will be randomized to either the experimental or the control group. It is expected that at least 96 subjects will participate in the SCI-VIP approach to vocational rehabilitation and 144 Veterans who receive conventional vocational rehabilitation will form the control group. Data will be collected from subjects upon enrollment into either the experimental or control group and every three months for one year. Descriptive analysis will be used to compare differences between groups of subjects drawn from each VAMC and to compare participants in the experimental and control groups. Analysis of variance will be computed to determine degree of difference between experimental group and control group subjects' scores on each dependent variable. The study hypotheses will be tested using the Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and odds ratio statistical procedures. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel along with relative risk scores will indicate the likelihood that any change in performance between baseline and program completion for ether experimental or control group subjects could be attributed to the subjects' degree of participation in the SCI-VIP, which VAMC vocational rehabilitation services were received, SCI factors, and age.
Interventions
SCI-VIP: Supported employment implemented for veterans with spinal cord injury.
Standard Care: varies slightly between participating VA SCI centers, however, usually involves referral outside SCI center
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Between the ages of 18 and 65 years old - Spinal cord injured as a result of trauma or disease * Medically and neurologically stable * Lives within the metropolitan area that is proximal to the VAMC (Cleveland, Dallas, Houston, San Diego, St. Louis) * Has access to transportation * Expresses an interest in competitive employment as an outcome of participation * Willingly signs a consent form indicating voluntary and informed participation in the study
Exclusion criteria
* Medically and/or surgically unstable * Unwilling to complete the consenting process * Mentally impaired such that independent reasoning and judgment jeopardize safety of self and others * Currently involved in untreated alcohol and/or drug dependency * Employed in a compensated job at the time of recruitment and earning above SGA ($940/month in 2008) - Lives more than approximately 100 miles from the participating VAMC SCI Center
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Employment-Total Jobs | 12 months | Competitive employment (a job in the community paying minimum wage ) during year 1 among those subjects obtaining employment. |
| Competitive Employment-Participants With Competitive Employment | 12 months | Competitive employment (a job in the community paying minimum wage ) during year 1 among those subjects obtaining employment. |
| Competitive Employment-Percentage of Participants With Competitive Employment | 12 months | Employment outcomes during year 1 among those subjects obtaining competitive employment. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Two-hundred forty-nine subjects were enrolled in the study which, 48 were excluded for various reasons including benefits (n=19), age \>65 (n=10), currently employed (n=6), and other (n=13), leaving 201 subjects. For the purposes of reporting the 44 veterans in the observational site were not included, therefore there are only 157 subjects included.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Supported Employment SCI-VIP: evidence-based supported employment implemented for veterans with spinal cord injury
Evidence-Based Supported Employment Vocational Rehabilitation: SCI-VIP: evidence-based supported employment implemented for veterans with spinal cord injury. | 81 |
| Treatment As Usual Standard Care: varies slightly between participating VA SCI centers, however, usually involves referral outside SCI center | 76 |
| Total | 157 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Supported Employment | Treatment As Usual | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 81 Participants | 76 Participants | 157 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 48.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 | 49.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 | 49.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 |
| AIS and neurological Level AIS D/E | 25 participants | 25 participants | 50 participants |
| AIS and neurological Level High tetraplegia, AIS A, B,C | 12 participants | 13 participants | 25 participants |
| AIS and neurological Level Low tetraplegia, AIS A, B, C | 5 participants | 10 participants | 15 participants |
| AIS and neurological Level Paraplegia, AIS A, B, C | 38 participants | 27 participants | 65 participants |
| ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A-Complete | 26 participants | 20 participants | 46 participants |
| ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) B-Sensory Incomplete | 11 participants | 13 participants | 24 participants |
| ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) C-Motor Incomplete | 18 participants | 18 participants | 36 participants |
| ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) D-Motor Incomplete | 25 participants | 21 participants | 46 participants |
| ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) E-Normal | 0 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants |
| Education Years | 13.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 | 13.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 | 13.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 |
| Functional Independence Measure Cognitive | 33.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 | 33.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 | 33.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 |
| Functional Independence Measure Motor | 66.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.6 | 66.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.2 | 66.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.8 |
| Functional Independence Measure Total | 98.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8 | 98.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.7 | 98.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.6 |
| Marital Status Divorced | 28 participants | 34 participants | 62 participants |
| Marital Status Married | 30 participants | 15 participants | 45 participants |
| Marital Status Other | 23 participants | 27 participants | 50 participants |
| Measures of Handicap (CHART) Cognitive | 89.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6 | 90.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 | 90.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 |
| Measures of Handicap (CHART) Economic Self Sufficiency | 51.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.8 | 52.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.9 | 52.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 |
| Measures of Handicap (CHART) Mobility | 80.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 | 80.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.4 | 80.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7 |
| Measures of Handicap (CHART) Occupation | 51.5 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.9 | 50.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.6 | 51.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.7 |
| Measures of Handicap (CHART) Physical | 85.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.9 | 87.2 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.1 | 86.4 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4 |
| Measures of Handicap (CHART) Social Integration | 82.0 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 | 84.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 83.3 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 |
| Monthly non-service-connected amount | 1024 dollars STANDARD_DEVIATION 482 | 986 dollars STANDARD_DEVIATION 421 | 1005.7 dollars STANDARD_DEVIATION 447.9 |
| Neither Social Security Income/Social Security Disability Insurance recipient | 26 participants | 20 participants | 46 participants |
| Non-service-connected pension | 18 participants | 18 participants | 36 participants |
| No Service-connected/Non-service-connected benefits | 26 participants | 20 participants | 46 participants |
| Quality of Life VR-36 Mental Component Score | 54.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 | 55.6 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 | 55.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 |
| Quality of Life VR-36 Physical Component Score | 27.7 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 | 28.1 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 | 27.9 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American | 29 participants | 37 participants | 66 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 5 participants | 1 participants | 6 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 10 participants | 5 participants | 15 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 37 participants | 33 participants | 70 participants |
| Service-connected 100% | 16 participants | 13 participants | 29 participants |
| Service-connected benefits for SCI recipient | 19 participants | 15 participants | 34 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 77 Participants | 72 Participants | 149 Participants |
| Social Security Disability Insurance recipient | 45 participants | 46 participants | 91 participants |
| Social Security Income recipient | 10 participants | 11 participants | 21 participants |
| VA benefits recipient | 50 participants | 43 participants | 93 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 81 | 0 / 76 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 81 | 0 / 76 |
Outcome results
Competitive Employment-Participants With Competitive Employment
Competitive employment (a job in the community paying minimum wage ) during year 1 among those subjects obtaining employment.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Supported Employment | Competitive Employment-Participants With Competitive Employment | 21 Participants with competitive employment |
| Treatment As Usual | Competitive Employment-Participants With Competitive Employment | 8 Participants with competitive employment |
Competitive Employment-Percentage of Participants With Competitive Employment
Employment outcomes during year 1 among those subjects obtaining competitive employment.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Supported Employment | Competitive Employment-Percentage of Participants With Competitive Employment | 25.9 percentage of participants |
| Treatment As Usual | Competitive Employment-Percentage of Participants With Competitive Employment | 10.5 percentage of participants |
Competitive Employment-Total Jobs
Competitive employment (a job in the community paying minimum wage ) during year 1 among those subjects obtaining employment.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Supported Employment | Competitive Employment-Total Jobs | 50 Total Competitive Employments |
| Treatment As Usual | Competitive Employment-Total Jobs | 21 Total Competitive Employments |