Skip to content

A Study to Compare Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Evaluation of Tenofovir DF Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of Presumed Pre-Core Mutant Chronic Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00117676
Enrollment
382
Registered
2005-07-08
Start date
2005-02-28
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

tenofovir, adefovir, hepatitis B virus, HBeAg Negative

Brief summary

This primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for the treatment of pre-core mutant chronic hepatitis B. Participants will receive TDF or ADV for 48 weeks (double-blind). After 48 weeks, eligible participants switched to open-label TDF for up to 480 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGTDF

300 mg tablet administered orally once daily

DRUGADV

10 mg tablet administered orally once daily

Tablet administered orally once daily

Tablet administered orally once daily

DRUGFTC/TDF

200/300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet administered orally once daily

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, defined as positive serum hepatitis B s-antigen (HBsAg) for at least 6 months. * 18 through 69 years of age, inclusive. * Active hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic HBV infection, with all of the following: * HBeAg negative and HBeAb positive at screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels \> the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) and ≤ 10 x ULN * Serum HBV DNA \> 100,000 copies/mL at screening * Creatinine clearance ≥ 70 mL/min * Hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL * Neutrophils ≥ 1,000 /mL * Knodell necroinflammatory score ≥ 3 and a Knodell fibrosis score \< 4; however, up to 120 patients with cirrhosis, ie, a Knodell fibrosis score equal to 4, will be eligible for enrollment * Negative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) * Nucleotide naive, ie, no prior nucleotide (TDF or ADV) therapy for greater than 12 weeks * Nucleoside naive, ie, no prior nucleoside (any nucleoside) therapy for greater than 12 weeks. However, up to 120 patients with \> 12 weeks prior lamivudine experience will be eligible * Willing and able to provide written informed consent * Had a liver biopsy performed within 6 months of baseline and has readable biopsy slides or agrees to have a biopsy performed prior to baseline Key

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women, women who are breast feeding, or women who believe they may wish to become pregnant during the course of the study * Males and females of reproductive potential who are unwilling to use an effective method of contraception during the study. * Decompensated liver disease defined as conjugated bilirubin \> 1.5 x ULN, prothrombin time (PT) \> 1.5 x ULN, platelets \< 75,000/mL, serum albumin \< 3.0 g/dL, or prior history of clinical hepatic decompensation (eg, ascites, jaundice, encephalopathy, variceal hemorrhage) * Received any nucleoside, nucleotide (TDF or ADV) or interferon (pegylated or not) therapy within 6 months prior to the pre treatment biopsy * Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) * Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or hepatitis D virus (HDV) * Significant renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease * Received solid organ or bone marrow transplantation * Is currently receiving therapy with immunomodulators (eg, corticosteroids, etc.), investigational agents, nephrotoxic agents, or agents susceptible of modifying renal excretion * Has proximal tubulopathy Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Complete response was a composite endpoint defined as histological response and HBV DNA \< 400 copies/mL. Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. A participant was a nonresponder for the primary endpoint if either biopsy (baseline or end-of-treatment) was missing or if there was not an HBV DNA value available at or beyond Week 40.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 96Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Weeks 432 and 480
Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240Baseline; Week 240Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Baseline; Week 48The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Baseline; Week 240The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Baseline; Week 240Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 48Baseline; Week 48ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline and within the normal range at the end of blinded treatment. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 96Baseline; Week 96ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at Week 96. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48Week 48
Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48Baseline; Week 48HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96Baseline; Week 96HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 96. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 96.
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Week 48Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, those with viral breakthrough, and those who discontinued after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 96 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 48 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 144 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 96 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 96 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 192 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 144 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 144 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 240 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 192 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 192 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 288 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 240 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 240 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 336 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 288 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 288 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 384 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 336 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 336 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 432 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 384 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 384 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 480 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 432 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 432 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand. The first participant was screened on 07 June 2005. The last study visit occurred on 19 January 2016.

Pre-assignment details

846 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TDF-TDF
TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added emtricitabine (FTC) to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period.
250
ADV-TDF
ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period.
125
Total375

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Lost to Follow-up10
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Protocol Violation01
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Randomized but Not Treated43
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason52
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Withdrew Consent01
Open-label Period: Weeks 145 - 192Investigator's Discretion20
Open-label Period: Weeks 145 - 192Lost to Follow-up31
Open-label Period: Weeks 145 - 192Withdrew Consent52
Open-label Period: Weeks 193 - 240Investigator's Discretion11
Open-label Period: Weeks 193 - 240Lost to Follow-up01
Open-label Period: Weeks 193 - 240Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason20
Open-label Period: Weeks 193 - 240Withdrew Consent41
Open-label Period: Weeks 241 - 288Investigator's Discretion01
Open-label Period: Weeks 241 - 288Lost to Follow-up21
Open-label Period: Weeks 241 - 288Protocol Violation20
Open-label Period: Weeks 241 - 288Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason10
Open-label Period: Weeks 241 - 288Withdrew Consent51
Open-label Period: Weeks 289 - 336Investigator's Discretion74
Open-label Period: Weeks 289 - 336Lost to Follow-up22
Open-label Period: Weeks 289 - 336Withdrew Consent01
Open-label Period: Weeks 337 - 384Investigator's Discretion11
Open-label Period: Weeks 337 - 384Lost to Follow-up31
Open-label Period: Weeks 337 - 384Study Site Discontinued10
Open-label Period: Weeks 337 - 384Withdrew Consent21
Open-label Period: Weeks 385 - 432Investigator's Discretion01
Open-label Period: Weeks 385 - 432Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason01
Open-label Period: Weeks 433 - 480Lost to Follow-up10
Open-label Period: Weeks 433 - 480Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason11
Open-label Period: Weeks 433 - 480Withdrew Consent01
Open-label Period: Weeks 49 - 96Lost to Follow-up20
Open-label Period: Weeks 49 - 96Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason31
Open-label Period: Weeks 49 - 96Withdrew Consent51
Open-label Period: Weeks 97 - 144Lost to Follow-up41
Open-label Period: Weeks 97 - 144Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason10
Open-label Period: Weeks 97 - 144Withdrew Consent10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTDF-TDFTotalADV-TDF
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
247 Participants370 Participants123 Participants
Age, Continuous44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Baseline Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Above the Upper Limit of the Normal (ULN) Range
No
14 participants21 participants7 participants
Baseline Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Above the Upper Limit of the Normal (ULN) Range
Yes
236 participants354 participants118 participants
Baseline Hepatitis B Virus Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA)6.86 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.308
6.90 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.294
6.98 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.266
Baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score7.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45
7.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.37
7.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Gender
Female
57 Participants85 Participants28 Participants
Gender
Male
193 Participants290 Participants97 Participants
Prior Lamivudine or FTC Treatment
No
207 participants309 participants102 participants
Prior Lamivudine or FTC Treatment
Yes
43 participants66 participants23 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
63 participants93 participants30 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 participants12 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
7 participants9 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
11 participants19 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
161 participants242 participants81 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
14 participants22 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
49 participants72 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
29 participants47 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
7 participants12 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
13 participants18 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
19 participants30 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
19 participants28 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
6 participants6 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
24 participants36 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
13 participants24 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
15 participants21 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
11 participants14 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
5 participants7 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants36 participants11 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
121 / 25061 / 125256 / 347
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 2507 / 12590 / 347

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48

Complete response was a composite endpoint defined as histological response and HBV DNA \< 400 copies/mL. Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. A participant was a nonresponder for the primary endpoint if either biopsy (baseline or end-of-treatment) was missing or if there was not an HBV DNA value available at or beyond Week 40.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48Yes70.8 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48No29.2 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48Yes48.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48No51.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: A two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI), stratified by baseline ALT (≤ 2 x ULN or \> 2 x ULN) was used to evaluate the difference (tenofovir DF - adefovir dipivoxil) in the proportion of complete responders between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [13.2, 33.8]Z-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-95.0 units per literStandard Deviation 102.31
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-93.7 units per literStandard Deviation 106.66
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-99.1 units per literStandard Deviation 105.67
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-99.6 units per literStandard Deviation 109.46
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-97.7 units per literStandard Deviation 104.32
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-98.9 units per literStandard Deviation 104.66
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-98.9 units per literStandard Deviation 106.5
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-96.1 units per literStandard Deviation 105.43
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-97.0 units per literStandard Deviation 115.09
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-94.9 units per literStandard Deviation 117.6
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-132.6 units per literStandard Deviation 142.09
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-124.4 units per literStandard Deviation 137.23
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-134.7 units per literStandard Deviation 152.9
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-138.5 units per literStandard Deviation 155.75
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-129.2 units per literStandard Deviation 139.24
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-140.0 units per literStandard Deviation 155.43
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-143.1 units per literStandard Deviation 160.15
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-140.3 units per literStandard Deviation 153.89
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-131.9 units per literStandard Deviation 136.65
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-139.5 units per literStandard Deviation 156.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-4.57 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.347
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-4.54 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.4
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-4.61 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.285
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-4.56 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.371
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-4.59 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.288
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-4.61 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.31
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-4.61 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.329
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-4.56 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.333
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-4.60 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.376
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-4.57 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.329
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-4.79 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.314
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-4.07 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.331
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-4.81 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.31
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-4.74 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.26
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-4.75 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.349
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-4.77 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.285
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-4.81 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.307
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-4.75 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.271
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-4.69 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.37
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-4.77 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.303
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240

The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Knodell Score-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Ishak Score-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Knodell Score-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Ishak Score-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48

The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with measurements at Baseline and Week 48 were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Knodell Necroinflammatory Score-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Ishak Necroinflammatory Score-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Knodell Necroinflammatory Score-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
ADV-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Ishak Necroinflammatory Score-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-0.6 units per literStandard Deviation 12.91
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-2.6 units per literStandard Deviation 15.69
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-2.5 units per literStandard Deviation 14.64
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-2.9 units per literStandard Deviation 14.13
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 1920.7 units per literStandard Deviation 23.07
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-4.6 units per literStandard Deviation 15.65
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-3.9 units per literStandard Deviation 13.35
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-2.8 units per literStandard Deviation 15.92
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 962.4 units per literStandard Deviation 22.01
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-5.9 units per literStandard Deviation 24.12
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-0.6 units per literStandard Deviation 19.87
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-0.3 units per literStandard Deviation 22.48
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-3.6 units per literStandard Deviation 22.77
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-3.9 units per literStandard Deviation 20
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-4.1 units per literStandard Deviation 22.3
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-2.0 units per literStandard Deviation 20.61
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-3.9 units per literStandard Deviation 21
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-8.9 units per literStandard Deviation 29.12
Secondary

Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-0.03 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.378
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-0.05 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.38
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-0.04 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.299
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-0.02 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.241
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 1920.01 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.61
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-0.04 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.393
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-0.04 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.353
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-0.05 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.366
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 960.02 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 0.424
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-0.72 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.283
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-0.60 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.138
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-0.63 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.169
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-0.61 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.161
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-0.61 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.195
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-0.64 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.203
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-0.65 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.23
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-0.66 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.237
ADV-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-0.67 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.378
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 144 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 96 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 96 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 96 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated4 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 192 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 144 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 144 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 144 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated3 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 240 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 192 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 192 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 192 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated2 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype2 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated2 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 288 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 240 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 240 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 240 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated3 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 336 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 288 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 288 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 288 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 384 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 336 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 336 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 336 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 432 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 384 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 384 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 384 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 480 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 432 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 432 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 432 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to genotype0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 48, those with viral breakthrough, and those who discontinued after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)4 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase3 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated8 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated42 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase7 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase14 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)20 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 96 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 48 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 48 (ie, entered the open-label phase) were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)4 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated6 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites within HBV polymerase0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 48

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline and within the normal range at the end of blinded treatment. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline were analyzed; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 4876.3 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 4877.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.85995% CI: [-10.2, 8.5]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline and available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria; data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14474.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19268.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24070.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28869.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33665.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38465.3 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33665.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14470.0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28872.9 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19276.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38469.2 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24075.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline and with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 43286.5 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 48080.0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 43287.2 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 48088.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 96

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at Week 96. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria; data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 9672.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 9668.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.35995% CI: [-5.5, 15.3]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96

HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 96. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 96.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set. Data is included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96HBsAg Loss0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96Anti-HBs Seroconversion0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96HBsAg Loss0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96Anti-HBs Seroconversion0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set. Data is included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. Participants with missing values related to protocol criteria or who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1440 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1440 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1920 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2400 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2400 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2880 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2880 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 3360 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3360 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 3840.8 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3840.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 4321.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4320.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 4801.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4800.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4800.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1440 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 3360.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1440 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 4321.6 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1920 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3360.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1920 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 4802.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2400.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 3840.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2400 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4320.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2880.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3840.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2880.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 4893.2 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 4863.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [21.3, 39.2]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

Time frame: Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. Participants with missing values related to protocol criteria or who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14486.7 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19284.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24082.8 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28880.5 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33677.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38474.3 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33678.0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14488.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28882.9 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19286.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38476.3 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24083.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480

Time frame: Weeks 432 and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added emtricitabine to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 43297.6 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 480100.0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 43297.7 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 480100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 96

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 9690.6 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 9689.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.67295% CI: [-5.2, 8]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48

HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set were analyzed. The missing = failure approach was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48HBsAg Loss0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48Seroconversion to anti-HBs0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48HBsAg Loss0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48Seroconversion to anti-HBs0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240

Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240Yes87.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240No12.7 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240Yes85.1 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240No14.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48

Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48Yes72.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48No27.6 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48Yes68.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48No31.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.29395% CI: [-4.5, 14.9]Z-test
Secondary

Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240

Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Necroinflammation96.7 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Necroinflammation2.7 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Necroinflammation0.7 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Fibrosis62.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Fibrosis34.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Fibrosis4.0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Fibrosis33.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Necroinflammation94.6 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Fibrosis59.5 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Necroinflammation1.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Fibrosis6.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Necroinflammation4.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48

Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Necroinflammation82.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Necroinflammation6.8 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Necroinflammation4.8 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Necroinflammation6.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Fibrosis22.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Fibrosis63.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Fibrosis8.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Fibrosis6.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Fibrosis9.6 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Necroinflammation81.6 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Fibrosis25.6 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Necroinflammation8.0 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Fibrosis10.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Necroinflammation0.8 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Fibrosis54.4 percentage of participants
ADV-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Necroinflammation9.6 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026