Skip to content

A Study to Compare Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Evaluation of Tenofovir DF Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00116805
Enrollment
266
Registered
2005-07-01
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Keywords

tenofovir, adefovir, hepatitis B, HBeAg Positive

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Participants will receive TDF or ADV for 48 weeks (double-blind). After 48 weeks, eligible participants switched to open-label TDF for up to 480 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGTDF

300 mg tablet administered orally once daily

DRUGADV

10 mg tablet administered orally once daily

Tablet administered orally once daily

Tablet administered orally once daily

DRUGFTC/TDF

200/300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet administered orally once daily

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: A patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for participation in this study: * Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, defined as positive serum hepatitis B s-antigen (HBsAg) for more than 6 months * 18 through 69 years of age, inclusive * Active hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic HBV infection, with all of the following: * HBeAg positive at screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels \> 2 × ULN and ≤ 10 × the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) * Serum HBV DNA \> 1 million copies/mL at screening * creatinine clearance ≥ 70 mL/min * hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL * neutrophils ≥ 1,000 /mL * Knodell necroinflammatory score ≥ 3 and a Knodell fibrosis score \< 4; however, up to 96 patients with cirrhosis, ie, a Knodell fibrosis score equal to 4, will be eligible for enrollment * Negative serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) * Nucleotide naïve, ie, no prior nucleotide (TDF or ADV) therapy for \> 12 weeks * Nucleoside naïve, ie, no prior nucleoside (any nucleoside) therapy for \> 12 weeks * Willing and able to provide written informed consent * Liver biopsy performed within 6 months of baseline and has readable biopsy slides or agrees to have a biopsy performed prior to baseline Key

Exclusion criteria

A patient who meets any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Complete response was a composite endpoint defined as histological response and HBV DNA \< 400 copies/mL. Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. A participant was a nonresponder for the primary endpoint if either biopsy (baseline or end-of-treatment) was missing or if there was not an HBV DNA value available at or beyond Week 40.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Weeks 432 and 480
Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240Baseline; Week 240Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.
Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Baseline; Week 48The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Baseline; Week 240The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Baseline; Week 48Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Baseline; Week 240Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.
Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 48Baseline; Week 48ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline and within the normal range at the end of blinded treatment. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 96Baseline; Week 96ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at Week 96. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48Baseline; Week 48HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96Baseline; Week 96HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 96. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 96.
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48Baseline; Week 48HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96Baseline; Week 96HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Week 48Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, those with viral breakthrough, and those who discontinued after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 96 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 48 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 144 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 96 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 96 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 192 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 144 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 144 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 240 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 192 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 192 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 288 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 240 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 240 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 336 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 288 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 288 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 384 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 336 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 336 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 432 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 384 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 384 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 480 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 432 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 432 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.
Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand. The first participant was screened on 09 June 2005. The last study visit occurred on 28 January 2016.

Pre-assignment details

603 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TDF-TDF
TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added emtricitabine (FTC) to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period.
176
ADV-TDF
ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period.
90
Total266

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Lost to Follow-up62
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Protocol Violation11
Double-blind Period Through Week 48Withdrew Consent42
Open-label Period Weeks 145 - 192Completed Study11
Open-label Period Weeks 145 - 192Investigator's Discretion20
Open-label Period Weeks 145 - 192Lost to Follow-up31
Open-label Period Weeks 145 - 192Protocol Violation10
Open-label Period Weeks 145 - 192Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason01
Open-label Period Weeks 145 - 192Seroconversion01
Open-label Period Weeks 145 - 192Withdrew Consent32
Open-label Period Weeks 193 - 240Completed Study01
Open-label Period Weeks 193 - 240Investigator's Discretion10
Open-label Period Weeks 193 - 240Lost to Follow-up30
Open-label Period Weeks 193 - 240Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason22
Open-label Period Weeks 193 - 240Withdrew Consent71
Open-label Period Weeks 241 - 288Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason20
Open-label Period Weeks 241 - 288Withdrew Consent40
Open-label Period Weeks 289 - 336Completed Study01
Open-label Period Weeks 289 - 336Investigator's Discretion32
Open-label Period Weeks 289 - 336Lost to Follow-up11
Open-label Period Weeks 289 - 336Protocol Violation01
Open-label Period Weeks 289 - 336Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason01
Open-label Period Weeks 289 - 336Study Site Discontinued01
Open-label Period Weeks 289 - 336Withdrew Consent20
Open-label Period Weeks 337 - 384Completed Study10
Open-label Period Weeks 337 - 384Investigator's Discretion10
Open-label Period Weeks 337 - 384Lost to Follow-up20
Open-label Period Weeks 337 - 384Protocol Violation10
Open-label Period Weeks 337 - 384Withdrew Consent31
Open-label Period Weeks 385 - 432Investigator's Discretion10
Open-label Period Weeks 385 - 432Withdrew Consent10
Open-label Period Weeks 433 - 480Investigator's Discretion10
Open-label Period Weeks 433 - 480Withdrew Consent30
Open-label Period Weeks 49 - 96Investigator's Discretion10
Open-label Period Weeks 49 - 96Lost to Follow-up20
Open-label Period Weeks 49 - 96Protocol Violation20
Open-label Period Weeks 49 - 96Safety, Tolerability, or Efficacy Reason10
Open-label Period Weeks 49 - 96Seroconversion20
Open-label Period Weeks 49 - 96Withdrew Consent21
Open-label Period Weeks 97 - 144Completed Study10
Open-label Period Weeks 97 - 144Investigator's Discretion20
Open-label Period Weeks 97 - 144Lost to Follow-up52
Open-label Period Weeks 97 - 144Protocol Violation01
Open-label Period Weeks 97 - 144Seroconversion23
Open-label Period Weeks 97 - 144Withdrew Consent13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTDF-TDFADV-TDFTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
173 Participants89 Participants262 Participants
Age, Continuous34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Baseline Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) above the Upper Limit of the Normal (ULN) Range
No
7 participants0 participants7 participants
Baseline Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) above the Upper Limit of the Normal (ULN) Range
Yes
169 participants90 participants259 participants
Baseline Hepatitis B Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA)8.64 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.076
8.88 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93
8.72 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.033
Baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score8.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
8.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07
8.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.09
Prior Lamivudine or FTC Treatment
No
168 participants89 participants257 participants
Prior Lamivudine or FTC Treatment
Yes
8 participants1 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
22 participants6 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
17 participants11 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
17 participants10 participants27 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
3 participants5 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
11 participants3 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
20 participants8 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
6 participants4 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
10 participants11 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
16 participants8 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
7 participants2 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
10 participants4 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 participants1 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants14 participants44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants26 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
119 Participants64 Participants183 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
97 / 17649 / 90165 / 238
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 1767 / 9041 / 238

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48

Complete response was a composite endpoint defined as histological response and HBV DNA \< 400 copies/mL. Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4. A participant was a nonresponder for the primary endpoint if either biopsy (baseline or end-of-treatment) was missing or if there was not an HBV DNA value available at or beyond Week 40.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 4866.5 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 4812.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [44.6, 63.6]Z-test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-100.7 U/LStandard Deviation 105.96
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-102.3 U/LStandard Deviation 111.68
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-107.8 U/LStandard Deviation 108.07
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-101.4 U/LStandard Deviation 108.63
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-108.1 U/LStandard Deviation 118.05
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-107.2 U/LStandard Deviation 109.44
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-105.0 U/LStandard Deviation 139.61
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-95.9 U/LStandard Deviation 117.03
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-92.3 U/LStandard Deviation 83.56
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-101.9 U/LStandard Deviation 112.72
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-157.5 U/LStandard Deviation 159.96
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-106.1 U/LStandard Deviation 118.9
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-120.4 U/LStandard Deviation 138.03
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-126.2 U/LStandard Deviation 150.46
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-139.6 U/LStandard Deviation 137.95
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-134.8 U/LStandard Deviation 135.59
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-130.9 U/LStandard Deviation 123.08
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-132.3 U/LStandard Deviation 125.81
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-133.7 U/LStandard Deviation 128.57
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-162.1 U/LStandard Deviation 157.83
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-6.22 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.217
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-6.17 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.067
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-6.27 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.248
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-6.32 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.098
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-6.38 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.167
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-6.35 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.208
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-6.13 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.306
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-6.30 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.203
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-6.18 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.3
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-6.26 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.137
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-6.37 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.159
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 48-3.93 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.728
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-6.38 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.184
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-6.31 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.407
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-6.49 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.028
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-6.45 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.986
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-6.46 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.017
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-6.28 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.45
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-6.45 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.008
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-6.49 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.003
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240

The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Knodell Necroinflammatory Score-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Ishak Necroinflammatory Score-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Knodell Necroinflammatory Score-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240Ishak Necroinflammatory Score-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48

The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, and ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Ishak score measures the degree of liver fibrosis (scarring) caused by chronic necroinflammation (inflammation leading to cell death) and ranges from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with measurements at Baseline and Week 48 were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Knodell Necroinflammatory Score-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
TDF-TDFChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Ishak Necroinflammatory Score-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Knodell Necroinflammatory Score-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
ADV 10 mgChange From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48Ishak Necroinflammatory Score-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Secondary

Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-0.4 U/LStandard Deviation 21.94
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-1.2 U/LStandard Deviation 19.72
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 2403.7 U/LStandard Deviation 32.48
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-4.4 U/LStandard Deviation 24.87
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-1.3 U/LStandard Deviation 19.57
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-4.3 U/LStandard Deviation 24.27
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-1.6 U/LStandard Deviation 19.91
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-5.5 U/LStandard Deviation 19.28
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-2.0 U/LStandard Deviation 17.94
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-7.1 U/LStandard Deviation 39.76
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-6.9 U/LStandard Deviation 59.64
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-0.7 U/LStandard Deviation 82.7
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-7.8 U/LStandard Deviation 27.07
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-8.1 U/LStandard Deviation 22.92
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-10.3 U/LStandard Deviation 25.26
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-9.3 U/LStandard Deviation 22.69
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-6.9 U/LStandard Deviation 31.76
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-11.6 U/LStandard Deviation 27.09
Secondary

Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Time frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-0.19 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.475
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-0.25 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.618
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-0.14 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.706
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-0.29 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.643
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-0.20 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.565
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-0.13 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.854
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-0.18 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.762
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-0.24 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.63
TDF-TDFChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-0.10 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 0.422
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 480-2.16 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.882
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 96-2.43 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.724
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 144-2.27 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.866
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 192-2.41 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.662
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 240-2.49 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.599
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 288-2.62 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.679
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 336-2.59 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.622
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 384-2.34 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.821
ADV 10 mgChange From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Week 432-2.32 log10 IU/mLStandard Deviation 1.694
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 144 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 96 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 96 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 96 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated2 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase3 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)2 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated7 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase3 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated5 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)3 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated5 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 192 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 144 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 144 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 144 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated2 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped3 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated5 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 240 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 192 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 192 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 192 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated3 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)2 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated3 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 288 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 240 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 240 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 240 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated3 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 336 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 288 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 288 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 288 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 384 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 336 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 336 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 336 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated2 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated2 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 432 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 384 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 384 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 384 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)3 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated3 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 480 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 432 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen after Week 432 and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 432 with available data were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)2 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated3 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, those with viral breakthrough, and those who discontinued after Week 24 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)7 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase13 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped9 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated31 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped7 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated75 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase8 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase17 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)43 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)

Of the total number analyzed, participants evaluated for resistance included those with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at Week 96 on TDF monotherapy, those with viral breakthrough, those who discontinued after Week 48 with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL, and those who added emtricitabine to the open-label TDF regimen and had HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at the time of the addition.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who continued on the study after Week 48 (ie, entered the open-label phase) were analyzed to determine if they qualified for protocol criteria for resistance surveillance, and those meeting the criteria were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)10 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped3 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase3 participants
TDF-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated18 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)5 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped7 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase0 participants
ADV 10 mgNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated13 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase1 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated16 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)12 participants
ADV-TDFNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped1 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)No genotypic changes (wild-type virus)3 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at conserved sites in HBV polymerase3 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Participants evaluated10 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Changes at polymorphic sites in HBV polymerase2 participants
ADV-TDF With Addition of FTCNumber of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)Unable to be genotyped2 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 48

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> upper limit of normal (ULN) at baseline and within the normal range at the end of blinded treatment. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline were analyzed; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 4868.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Week 4854.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.03295% CI: [1.1, 26.1]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 96

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at Week 96. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria; data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 9665.2 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 9674.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.195% CI: [-21.5, 1.9]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline and available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria; data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14460.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19259.6 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24050.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28851.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33646.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38452.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33667.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14467.8 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28870.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19269.4 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38467.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24065.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480

ALT normalization was defined as ALT \> ULN at baseline and within the normal range at the subsequent time point. The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to \< 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with ALT \> ULN at baseline and with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 43279.6 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 48075.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 43278.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480Week 48082.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96

HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 96. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 96.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who were HBeAg-positive at baseline and with available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96HBeAg Loss25.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96Seroconversion to Anti-HBe22.8 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96HBeAg Loss25.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBe at Week 96Seroconversion to Anti-HBe22.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: This information pertains to HBeAg loss.p-value: 0.96395% CI: [-11.3, 11.9]Z-test
Comparison: This information pertains to seroconversion to anti-HBe.p-value: 0.90495% CI: [-10.4, 11.7]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96

HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. Data is included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96HBsAg Loss5.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96Anti-HBs Seroconversion4.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96HBsAg Loss5.8 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96Anti-HBs Seroconversion4.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: This information pertains to HBsAg loss.p-value: 0.75795% CI: [-4.8, 6.5]Z-test
Comparison: This information pertains to seroconversion to anti-HBs.p-value: 0.73395% CI: [-4.2, 5.9]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at the subsequent time point. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at the subsequent time point.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set. Data is included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. Participants with missing values related to protocol criteria or who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1447.5 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1445.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1929.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1926.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2409.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2406.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2889.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2886.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 33610.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3367.5 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 38411.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3848.1 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 43210.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4327.6 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 48010.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4808.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4807.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1448.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 3367.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1446.8 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 43210.2 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 1927.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3367.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 1926.7 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 48010.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2408.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 3849.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2408.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 4328.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480HBsAg Loss - Week 2888.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 3847.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480Anti-HBs Seroconversion - Week 2888.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 4876.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 4813.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [53.8, 72.3]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 96

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with available data were analyzed. Data included for participants who discontinued study unless the discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 9677.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 9677.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.80195% CI: [-12, 9.3]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

Time frame: Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set. Data included for participants who had discontinued unless the reason for discontinuation was unrelated to protocol criteria. Participants with missing values related to protocol criteria or who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14471.7 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19267.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24063.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28861.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33659.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38456.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 33662.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 14470.5 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 28864.8 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 19271.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 38460.5 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384Week 24066.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480

Time frame: Weeks 432 and 480

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added emtricitabine to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 43293.0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 48098.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 432100.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480Week 48096.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48

HBeAg loss was defined as HBeAg positive at baseline and HBeAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBe was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set who were HBeAg-positive at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48HBeAg Loss22.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48HBeAg Seroconversion20.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48HBeAg Loss17.5 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss/Seroconversion at Week 48HBeAg Seroconversion17.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: This information pertains to HBeAg loss.p-value: 0.24595% CI: [-4.2, 16.4]Z-test
Comparison: This information pertains to HBeAg seroconversion.p-value: 0.36395% CI: [-5.5, 14.9]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48

HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg positive at baseline and HBsAg negative at Week 48. Seroconversion to anti-HBs was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative at baseline to positive at Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48HBsAg Loss3.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48HBsAg Seroconversion1.3 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48HBsAg Loss0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion at Week 48HBsAg Seroconversion0 percentage of participants
Comparison: This information pertains to HBsAg loss.p-value: 0.01895% CI: [1.9, 19.9]Z-test
Comparison: This information pertains to HBsAg seroconversion.p-value: 0.14895% CI: [-1.5, 10.2]Z-test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240

Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240Yes88.2 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240No11.8 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240Yes89.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240No10.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48

Histological response was based on the Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens and defined as at least a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score without worsening in Knodell fibrosis score. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges from 0 to 14; the Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 to 4.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48Yes74.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48No25.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48Yes67.8 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48No32.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.3295% CI: [-5.6, 17.2]Z-test
Secondary

Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240

Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 240

Population: Participants in the Randomized and Treated Analysis Set with observed data were analyzed; the missing-equals-excluded approach was used where participants with missing data were excluded from the analysis. Data for participants who added FTC to their open-label TDF regimen were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Necroinflammation96.1 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Necroinflammation3.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Necroinflammation0 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Fibrosis56.6 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Fibrosis39.5 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Fibrosis3.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Fibrosis39.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Necroinflammation97.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Improvement - Fibrosis58.3 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240No Change - Necroinflammation2.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Fibrosis2.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240Worsening - Necroinflammation0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48

Participants were ranked as having improvement, no change, worsening, or missing data (compared to Baseline) based on the Knodell scoring system, and results are presented as the percentage of participants in each category. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains of the Knodell scoring system, which ranges from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). The Knodell fibrosis domain score ranges from 0 (best) to 4 (worst). A decrease of 1 point or more indicated improvement, and an increase of 1 point or more indicated worsening.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 48

Population: Randomized and Treated Analysis Set; the missing-equals-failure approach was used where participants with missing data were considered to have failed to reach the endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Necroinflammation81.3 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Necroinflammation4.5 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Necroinflammation3.4 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Necroinflammation10.8 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Fibrosis19.9 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Fibrosis63.6 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Fibrosis5.1 percentage of participants
TDF-TDFRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Fibrosis11.4 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Fibrosis12.2 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Necroinflammation78.9 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Improvement - Fibrosis20.0 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Necroinflammation3.3 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Fibrosis6.7 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Worsening - Necroinflammation5.6 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48No Change - Fibrosis61.1 percentage of participants
ADV 10 mgRanked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48Missing Data - Necroinflammation12.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026