Skip to content

Eldery High Dose TIV 2005

Comparisons of the Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity in Ambulatory Elderly Subjects of a Standard-Dose Fluzone® (15 µg HA/Virus Strain) and a High-Dose (60 µg HA/Virus Strain) of a Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00115531
Enrollment
414
Registered
2005-06-23
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2005-11-30
Last updated
2014-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza

Keywords

Elderly, influenza, vaccine, parent protocol

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare a new higher-dose influenza virus vaccine to the standard dose vaccine in elderly adults who can walk. Current influenza vaccines protect elderly against viral influenza but not as well as desired. It is expected that the higher doses vaccine can be given with little reaction, but this needs to be tested. Up to 410 people ages 65 years and older will be recruited from the community and from existing volunteer populations. Participants will receive either the high or standard dose injected in the muscle, remain in the clinic for 20 minutes afterward, and maintain a daily memory aid for 7 days. The memory aid will be reviewed by telephone 8-12 days after the injection and return to the clinic or contacted by telephone 6 months after the injection.

Detailed description

Influenza is a common respiratory infection caused by several related viruses. Epidemics of influenza occur each winter and are responsible for an average of about 36,000 deaths each year in the United States. Most of these deaths occur among elderly persons and among people of all ages who suffer from chronic diseases, particularly of the lungs and the heart. Current influenza virus vaccines protect elderly persons against influenza, but not as well as desired. One consideration for trying to increase protection is to increase the vaccine dose, but there is some concern that increasing the dose may increase reactions to the vaccine (such as sore arm, aches, or fever). One of the vaccine manufacturers has prepared an experimental influenza virus vaccine with a dose that is higher than the currently used dose. A previous study with the same high dose of the vaccine showed that it was well tolerated with only increased reactions at the injection site compared to the usual vaccine. Since the study, the high-dose vaccine has also been made without preservative (thimerosal) and gelatin, which are in the standard vaccine. It is expected that this vaccine can be given with little reaction, but this needs to be determined. It also needs to be shown whether such a vaccine stimulates higher levels of infection-fighting proteins (or antibodies) in the blood than standard doses of influenza vaccine. The purpose of this research is to compare reactions and antibody responses following standard flu vaccine to those following the experimental vaccine. Up to 410 people ages 65 years and older will be recruited from the community and from existing volunteer populations. Participants will receive either the high or standard dose injected in the muscle, remain in the clinic for 20 minutes afterward, and maintain a daily memory aid for 7 days. The memory aid will be reviewed by telephone 8-12 days after the injection and return to the clinic or contacted by telephone 6 months after the injection. This study is linked to DMID protocol 05-0028.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALTrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine

Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine Fluzone® (15 µg HA / viral strain; 45 µg/0.5 mL dose) will be administered to Arm 1: 200 subjects intramuscularly on day 0.

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for study participation: * Ambulatory medically stable persons \>= 65 years of age on the date of vaccination * Provides written informed consent and will be available for all study visits * Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures Subjects will be considered ambulatory if they are not institutionalized, bedridden, or homebound. Medically stable subjects may have underlying illnesses such as hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, or hypothyroidism, but their symptoms/signs must be controlled with medical therapy. Subjects with acute febrile illnesses \[oral temperature equal to or exceeding 99.5ºF (37.5ºC)\] will be deferred until 3 days after illness resolution.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects must not meet any of the following

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026