Skip to content

Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Multicenter Study of High-Dose Immunosuppressive Therapy Using Total Body Irradiation, Cyclophosphamide, ATGAM, and Autologous Transplantation With Auto-CD34+HPC Versus Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide for the Treatment of Severe Systemic Sclerosis (SCSSc-01)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00114530
Acronym
SCOT
Enrollment
75
Registered
2005-06-16
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2023-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autoimmune Disease, Scleroderma, Systemic, Sclerosis

Keywords

systemic sclerosis, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, clinical trial, global rank composite score

Brief summary

SCOT is a clinical research study designed for people with severe forms of scleroderma. SCOT stands for Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide Or Transplantation. The SCOT study will compare the potential benefits of stem cell transplant and high-dose monthly cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) in the treatment of scleroderma.

Detailed description

Severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a serious autoimmune disorder in which a person's own immune cells attack organs in the body. SSc affects the skin, joints, lungs, heart, intestinal tract, and kidneys, and half of the patients with the most severe organ involvement die within 5 years. Treatment for SSc usually includes supportive care or immunosuppressive drugs (drugs to suppress the immune system). As the immune cells are believed to be causing the disease, researchers are looking for new therapies that either slow down or stop this process, while not being too toxic. The main purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of high-dose immunosuppressive therapy followed by reinfusion (transplantation) of the participant's own autologous (self) peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) compared to treatment with monthly (for 12 months) intravenous doses of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) therapy for the treatment of severe systemic sclerosis (SSc). These treatments are being given in order to determine if they will slow down or stop SSc from becoming more severe, and if they can reverse the effects of the disease. The researchers are evaluating the effects of the two treatments on serious organ damage and survival related to SSc, while also looking at the side effects of the two treatments. This trial also includes three optional mechanistic sub-studies open to a subset of participants enrolled in the SCOT trial: 1. Pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in Patients Receiving Cyclophosphamide for the SCOT trial (Originally listed separately as DAIT SCSSc-01-01, NCT00848614). The purpose of this study is to determine the plasma concentration and exposure time required for cyclophosphamide to produce optimal immunosuppressive activity with minimal toxicity in participants with severe systemic sclerosis. 2. Vascular Progenitor Cells and the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis(Originally listed separately as DAIT SCSSc-01-02, NCT00871221). The purpose of this study is to measure and characterize the circulating endothelial progenitor cells from the blood of 30 participants and also to determine the extent of vascular cell apoptosis and proliferation in cutaneous microvasculature in these participants before and after the receipt of the two SCOT treatment regimens. 3. Molecular Analysis of T Cell Immune Recovery for the SCOT Trial(Originally listed separately as DAIT SCSSc-01-03, NCT00872508). The purpose of this study is \[1\] to describe the condition of peripheral T cell reactivity and repertoire diversity in SSc patients and evaluate evidence for potential defects prior to randomization, \[2\] to gain a better understanding of the impact of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) and high-dose immunosuppressive therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation on thymopoiesis, and \[3\] to describe the kinetics and breadth of T cell immune recovery in SSc patients treated with these interventions.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALmHSCT

Hematopoietic progenitors were mobilized with G-CSF. After leukapheresis and CD34+ cell enrichment, the autologous product was cryopreserved. Fractionated TBI (800 cGy), CY (120 mg/kg) and equine antithymocyte globulin (90 mg/kg) were administered as previously reported (References provided in citation section of this ClinicalTrials.gov record: PubMed ID: 17452515 citation and 2.) PubMed ID: 12176878 citation).

DRUGcyclophosphamide

An initial intravenous dose of 500 mg/m\^2 was followed by 11 infusions of 750 mg/m\^2 with mesna given for bladder protection.

Sponsors

Rho Federal Systems Division, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR); * SSc, including extensive skin and internal organ involvement involving either the lungs or the kidneys, that threatens participant's life; and * Willingness to use accepted methods of contraception for at least 15 months after starting study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Lung, heart, liver, or kidney impairment that would interfere with the study or compromise participant's survival; * Active blood vessel dilation in the stomach (Active Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia/GAVE, also known as watermelon stomach). Patients found to have this disorder at study screening can receive treatment outside the study and then be re-screened. For more information about this study criterion, refer to the study protocol. * Previous treatment with cyclophosphamide, as defined by: a) prior IV cyclophosphamide administration for more than 6 months OR a total cumulative IV dose greater than 3 g/m\^2; b) prior oral cyclophosphamide administration for more than 4 months, regardless of dose; or c) combination of prior oral and IV cyclophosphamide administration for more than 6 months, independent of dose. * Steroid therapy at doses of greater than 10 mg/day, or more than 2 pulses for concurrent illnesses within prior 12 months; * Unwillingness or inability to discontinue certain disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the treatment of SSc; * Presence of clinically significant rheumatic diseases other than scleroderma requiring significant immunosuppression; * Any active uncontrolled infection that would interfere with high-dose therapy or pulse cyclophosphamide regimens: * Hepatitis B virus infected * Hepatitis C virus infected or * HIV infected. * Blood abnormalities; * Diagnosis of cancer within 2 years prior to study entry. Participants with adequately treated squamous cell skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma, and carcinoma in situ are not excluded. * Other comorbid illnesses with an estimated life expectancy of less than 5 years; * Defective formation of bone marrow cells (myelodysplasia); * Uncontrolled hypertension; * History of hypersensitivity to murine or Escherichia coli (e.g., E. coli) proteins; History of noncompliance with prior medical care; * History of substance abuse within 5 years prior to study entry; or * Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationThe GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, ITT)48 Months Post-RandomizationThe GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).
Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, PP)48 Months Post-RandomizationThe GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).
Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationEvent-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in diffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted or \>20% in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.
Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationEvent-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.
Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, ITT)48 Months Post-RandomizationEvent-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.
Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, PP)48 Months Post-RandomizationEvent-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.
Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationDeath, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.
Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationDeath, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.
Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, ITT)48 Months Post-RandomizationDeath, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.
Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, PP)48 Months Post-RandomizationDeath, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.
All-Cause Mortality (Month 54, ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationAny death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.
All-Cause Mortality (Month 54, PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationAny death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.
All-Cause Mortality (Month 48, ITT)48 Months Post-RandomizationAny death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.
All-Cause Mortality (Month 48, PP)48 Months Post-RandomizationAny death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationHAQ-DI is a self-reported questionnaire of functionality that includes questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities). The final score ranges from 0 to 3, where a higher HAQ-DI score indicates a worse outcome. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: a decrease of \>0.4 from baseline in the HAQ-DI score was considered disease improvement, an increase of \>0.4 was considered disease worsening, and any change less than 0.4 was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationHAQ-DI is a self-reported questionnaire of functionality that includes questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities). The final score ranges from 0 to 3, where a higher HAQ-DI score indicates a worse outcome. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: a decrease of \>0.4 from baseline in the HAQ-DI score was considered disease improvement, an increase of \>0.4 was considered disease worsening, and any change less than 0.4 was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationThe SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. Each component was transformed into a 0-100 scale (higher numbers indicate greater quality of life) and normalized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the 1998 general US population. Analysis was based on ordinal response, defined as follows for each component: a \>= 10 point increase indicated disease improvement, a \>= 10 point decrease indicated disease worsening, and a change \<10 points indicated no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationThe SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. Each component was transformed into a 0-100 scale (higher numbers indicate greater quality of life) and normalized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the 1998 general US population. Analysis was based on ordinal response, defined as follows for each component: a \>= 10 point increase indicated disease improvement, a \>= 10 point decrease indicated disease worsening, and a change \<10 points indicated no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationDiffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a measure of lung function. Predicted values for DLCO were computed using the Crapo Morris equations and adjusted per the Cotes formula for anemia, if a participant's hemoglobin was \<13 or \>17 gm/dL, and altitude (Calgary site only). Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>15% in DLCO % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>15% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=15% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationDiffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a measure of lung function. Predicted values for DLCO were computed using the Crapo Morris equations and adjusted per the Cotes formula for anemia, if a participant's hemoglobin was \<13 or \>17 gm/dL, and altitude (Calgary site only). Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>15% in DLCO % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>15% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=15% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled after a full breath and is a measure of lung function. Predicted FVC was based on institutional standards. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>10% in FVC % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>10% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=10% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationForced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled after a full breath and is a measure of lung function. Predicted FVC was based on institutional standards. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>10% in FVC % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>10% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=10% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationThe Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) is a measure of skin thickness. Skin thickness in 17 anatomic areas was rated on a 0-3 scale and scores are summed to obtain the mRSS (range from 0 - 51), with higher mRSS scores indicating worse disease activity. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: if the baseline mRSS was \<=20, a decrease \>=5 points from baseline indicated disease improvement and an increase \>= 5 points indicated disease worsening; if the baseline mRSS was \>20, then a decrease of \>25% indicated disease improvement and an increase of \>25% indicated disease worsening. Participants who do not meet the disease criteria outlined above were considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationThe Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) is a measure of skin thickness. Skin thickness in 17 anatomic areas was rated on a 0-3 scale and scores are summed to obtain the mRSS (range from 0 - 51), with higher mRSS scores indicating worse disease activity. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: if the baseline mRSS was \<=20, a decrease \>=5 points from baseline indicated disease improvement and an increase \>= 5 points indicated disease worsening; if the baseline mRSS was \>20, then a decrease of \>25% indicated disease improvement and an increase of \>25% indicated disease worsening. Participants who do not meet the disease criteria outlined above were considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.
New or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationAny events that met the criteria outlined below or were reported as adverse events between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization are summarized. 1) Development of new or worsening arrhythmias that require medical treatment for \>= 3 months or require ablative therapy or pacemaker insertion. (Note that for a participant who has medically controlled arrhythmia at randomization, worsening was defined as breakthrough episodes severe enough to prompt change in medication, an increase in the dose of a medication, or addition of a new medication to maintain control of the arrhythmia.) 2) Congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring clinical treatment for \>= 3 months develops. 3) Clinically significant pericardial effusion (excess fluid around the heart) that required pericardial window.
New or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationAny events that met the criteria outlined below or were reported as adverse events between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization are summarized. 1) Development of new or worsening arrhythmias that require medical treatment for \>= 3 months or require ablative therapy or pacemaker insertion. (Note that for a participant who has medically controlled arrhythmia at randomization, worsening will be defined as breakthrough episodes severe enough to prompt change in medication, an increase in the dose of a medication or addition of a new medication to maintain control of the arrhythmia.) 2) Congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring clinical treatment for \>= 3 months develops. 3) Clinically significant pericardial effusion (excess fluid around the heart) that required pericardial window.
New or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationAny pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) events that occurred between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization were summarized. Development of PAH occurred if the participant met the following criteria, where the measurement value(s) could not be explained by other causes such as congestive heart failure or pulmonary emboli: 1) a post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure \> 55 mmHg by echocardiogram or 2) a mean pulmonary artery pressure \> 30 mmHg at rest measured by right heart catheterization. If the post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was between 40 to 55 mmHg by echocardiogram, a right heart catheterization was done to confirm a diagnosis of pulmonary artery hypertension. The endpoint was met if the mean pulmonary artery pressure was \> 30 mmHg at rest by right heart catheterization. Additionally, any adverse event reported as PAH was included in the analysis.
New or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationAny pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) events that occurred between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization were summarized. Development of PAH occurred if the participant met the following criteria, where the measurement value(s) could not be explained by other causes such as congestive heart failure or pulmonary emboli: 1) a post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure \> 55 mmHg by echocardiogram or 2) a mean pulmonary artery pressure \> 30 mmHg at rest measured by right heart catheterization. If the post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was between 40 to 55 mmHg by echocardiogram, a right heart catheterization would be done to confirm a diagnosis of pulmonary artery hypertension. The endpoint was met if the mean pulmonary artery pressure was \> 30 mmHg at rest by right heart catheterization. Additionally, any adverse event reported as PAH was included in the analysis.
Occurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationDocumented scleroderma renal crisis (hypertensive or non-hypertensive) occurring from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization was summarized. A hypertensive scleroderma renal crisis occurred if a participant obtained both of the following: New-onset hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>= 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>= 90 mmHg, a rise in SBP \>= 30 mmHg compared to baseline, or a rise in DBP \>= 20 mmHg compared to baseline, and one of the following features: 1) increase of \>= 50 % above baseline in serum creatinine, 2) proteinuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick confirmed by protein:creatinine ratio \> 2.5), 3) hematuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick or \> 10 RBCs/HPF, without menstruation), 4) thrombocytopenia (\< 100,000 plts/mm3), or 5) hemolysis (determined by blood smear or increased reticulocyte count). Additionally, any adverse event reported as a scleroderma renal crisis was included in the analysis.
Occurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationDocumented scleroderma renal crisis (hypertensive or non-hypertensive) occurring from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization was summarized. A hypertensive scleroderma renal crisis occurred if a participant obtained both of the following: New-onset hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>= 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>= 90 mmHg, a rise in SBP \>= 30 mmHg compared to baseline, or a rise in DBP \>= 20 mmHg compared to baseline, and one of the following features: 1) increase of \>= 50 % above baseline in serum creatinine, 2) proteinuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick confirmed by protein:creatinine ratio \> 2.5), 3) hematuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick or \> 10 RBCs/HPF, without menstruation), 4) thrombocytopenia (\< 100,000 plts/mm3), or 5) hemolysis (determined by blood smear or increased reticulocyte count). Additionally, any adverse event reported as a scleroderma renal crisis was included in the analysis.
Documented Myositis (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationNumber of participants who experienced any event of myositis that occurred from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization. Documented myositis occurred if the participant had 1) elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), electromyography, and/or biopsy and 2) required \> 30 mg per day prednisone for over 1 month or another therapy such as methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of myositis. Additionally, any adverse event reported as myositis was included in the analysis.
Documented Myositis (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationNumber of participants who experienced any event of myositis that occurred from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization. Documented myositis occurred if the participant had 1) elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), electromyography, and/or biopsy and 2) required \> 30 mg per day prednisone for over 1 month or another therapy such as methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of myositis. Additionally, any adverse event reported as myositis was included in the analysis.
Initiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) by Month 54 (ITT)54 Months Post-RandomizationInitiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Participants were not expected to receive additional disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the absence of disease progression. In general, this includes the administration of any therapy clearly given for the purpose of treating the underlying SSc. It does not include concomitant treatments permitted in the protocol, such as use of methotrexate (15 g or less), anti-malarials, or minocycline for arthritis only. Systemic corticosteroids given at \> 10 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent), without clearly defined non-SSc indications, and methotrexate given for non-arthritis indications are examples of qualifying DMARDs.
Initiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs by Month 54 (DMARDs) (PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationInitiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Participants were not expected to receive additional disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the absence of disease progression. In general, this includes the administration of any therapy clearly given for the purpose of treating the underlying SSc. It does not include concomitant treatments permitted in the protocol, such as use of methotrexate (15 g or less), anti-malarials, or minocycline for arthritis only. Systemic corticosteroids given at \> 10 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent), without clearly defined non-SSc indications, and methotrexate given for non-arthritis indications are examples of qualifying DMARDs.
Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, PP)54 Months Post-RandomizationThe GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).
Number of Subjects With Regimen-Related ToxicitiesRandomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).Regimen-related toxicities are defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events reported by site physicians as possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy.
Infectious ComplicationsRandomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).Infectious complications include any events that code to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class of Infections and infestations or events that a site has classified as an infectious event. These can include bacteremia, septicemia, fungemia, fever associated with infection, infectious pneumonia, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, clinical infection (i.e. infection diagnosed with clinical features without identification of an organism) and other local/organ site-specific infections.
Number of Subjects With Infectious ComplicationsRandomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).Infectious complications include any events that code to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class of Infections and infestations or events that a site has classified as an infectious event. These can include bacteremia, septicemia, fungemia, fever associated with infection, infectious pneumonia, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, clinical infection (i.e. infection diagnosed with clinical features without identification of an organism) and other local/organ site-specific infections.
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Engraftment28 days post-transplantTime to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) engraftment is defined as the number of days post-transplant until required levels of ANC are attained (for the mHSCT arm only). If engraftment did not occur within 28 days post-transplant, then the variable was set to 28 days. ANC engraftment required an ANC of \> 500 cells/microliter, maintained for 3 consecutive days.
Regimen-Related ToxicitiesRandomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization)Regimen-related toxicities are defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events reported by site physicians as possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
mHSCT
Participants were administered granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and had hematopoietic stem cells removed from their blood. They then underwent high-dose immunosuppressive therapy using a conditioning regimen of total body irradiation (800 cGy given over 2 days with lung and kidney shielding limiting exposure to 200cGy), cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day for 2 days), IV Methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day for 3 days), and equine antithymocyte globulin (ATGAM) (15 mg/kg/day for 3 days). Purified autologous stem cell were infused at a dose of \>2.5x106 CD34+ cells/kg. After transplantation, participants received additional doses of IV Methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/day for 3 days) and ATGAM (15 mg/kg/day for 3 days.)
36
Cyclophosphamide
Participants received 12 monthly pulses of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (an initial dose of 500 mg/m\^2, followed by 11 doses of 750 mg/m\^2).
39
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyBreast Cancer10
Overall StudyDeath311
Overall StudyIneligible10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyPhysician Decision11
Overall StudySubject decision after endpoint failure01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicmHSCTCyclophosphamideTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
35 Participants38 Participants73 Participants
Age, Continuous44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.63
Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (Percent-Predicted)53.9 Percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.63
52.7 Percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.19
53.3 Percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Use27 Participants32 Participants59 Participants
Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Use Within 6 Months of Randomization26 Participants25 Participants51 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants34 Participants66 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Percent-Predicted)74.5 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.77
73.8 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.98
74.2 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.86
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)1.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65
1.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86
1.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.77
Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS)28.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.72
30.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.55
29.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.72
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants31 Participants60 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants37 participants72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants29 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants10 Participants27 Participants
Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Mental Component Score
44.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
44.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
44.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Physical Component Score
29.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
28.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46
29.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.27

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 3614 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 3437 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
25 / 3419 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, ITT)

The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
mHSCTGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, ITT)17.0 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
CyclophosphamideGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, ITT)-6.0 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
p-value: 0.013Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

All-Cause Mortality (Month 48, ITT)

Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTAll-Cause Mortality (Month 48, ITT)6 Participants
CyclophosphamideAll-Cause Mortality (Month 48, ITT)11 Participants
p-value: 0.28Fisher Exact
Secondary

All-Cause Mortality (Month 48, PP)

Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTAll-Cause Mortality (Month 48, PP)3 Participants
CyclophosphamideAll-Cause Mortality (Month 48, PP)8 Participants
p-value: 0.19Fisher Exact
Secondary

All-Cause Mortality (Month 54, ITT)

Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTAll-Cause Mortality (Month 54, ITT)6 Participants
CyclophosphamideAll-Cause Mortality (Month 54, ITT)11 Participants
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of overall survival at Month 54.p-value: 0.28Fisher Exact
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival through Month 72.p-value: 0.05Log Rank
Secondary

All-Cause Mortality (Month 54, PP)

Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTAll-Cause Mortality (Month 54, PP)3 Participants
CyclophosphamideAll-Cause Mortality (Month 54, PP)8 Participants
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of overall survival at Month 54.p-value: 0.19Fisher Exact
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival through Month 72.p-value: 0.02Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)

Diffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a measure of lung function. Predicted values for DLCO were computed using the Crapo Morris equations and adjusted per the Cotes formula for anemia, if a participant's hemoglobin was \<13 or \>17 gm/dL, and altitude (Calgary site only). Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>15% in DLCO % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>15% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=15% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Improvement4 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Worsening3 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)No Change19 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Improvement5 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Worsening6 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)No Change8 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)No Change0 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Improvement0 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Worsening10 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Improvement0 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)Worsening18 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)No Change2 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.08Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.9Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)

Diffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a measure of lung function. Predicted values for DLCO were computed using the Crapo Morris equations and adjusted per the Cotes formula for anemia, if a participant's hemoglobin was \<13 or \>17 gm/dL, and altitude (Calgary site only). Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>15% in DLCO % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>15% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=15% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Improvement4 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)No Change19 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Worsening3 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Improvement5 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)No Change8 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Worsening4 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Worsening7 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Improvement0 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)No Change0 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)No Change2 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Worsening15 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)Improvement0 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.1Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.6Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled after a full breath and is a measure of lung function. Predicted FVC was based on institutional standards. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>10% in FVC % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>10% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=10% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Improvement12 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Worsening1 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)No Change13 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Improvement7 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Worsening4 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)No Change8 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)No Change2 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Improvement0 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Worsening8 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Improvement1 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)Worsening17 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)No Change2 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.02Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.3Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled after a full breath and is a measure of lung function. Predicted FVC was based on institutional standards. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of \>10% in FVC % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of \>10% indicated disease worsening, and a change of \<=10% was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Worsening1 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Improvement12 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)No Change13 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Improvement7 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Worsening2 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)No Change8 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Worsening5 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Improvement0 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)No Change2 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)No Change2 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Worsening14 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)Improvement1 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.03Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.5Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)

HAQ-DI is a self-reported questionnaire of functionality that includes questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities). The final score ranges from 0 to 3, where a higher HAQ-DI score indicates a worse outcome. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: a decrease of \>0.4 from baseline in the HAQ-DI score was considered disease improvement, an increase of \>0.4 was considered disease worsening, and any change less than 0.4 was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Improvement17 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Worsening1 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)No Change8 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Improvement6 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Worsening2 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)No Change11 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)No Change5 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Improvement2 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Worsening3 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Improvement0 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)Worsening9 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)No Change11 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)

HAQ-DI is a self-reported questionnaire of functionality that includes questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities). The final score ranges from 0 to 3, where a higher HAQ-DI score indicates a worse outcome. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: a decrease of \>0.4 from baseline in the HAQ-DI score was considered disease improvement, an increase of \>0.4 was considered disease worsening, and any change less than 0.4 was considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)No Change8 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Improvement17 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Worsening1 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Improvement6 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)No Change10 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Worsening1 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Improvement2 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Worsening0 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)No Change5 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)No Change9 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Worsening8 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)Improvement0 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)

The Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) is a measure of skin thickness. Skin thickness in 17 anatomic areas was rated on a 0-3 scale and scores are summed to obtain the mRSS (range from 0 - 51), with higher mRSS scores indicating worse disease activity. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: if the baseline mRSS was \<=20, a decrease \>=5 points from baseline indicated disease improvement and an increase \>= 5 points indicated disease worsening; if the baseline mRSS was \>20, then a decrease of \>25% indicated disease improvement and an increase of \>25% indicated disease worsening. Participants who do not meet the disease criteria outlined above were considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Improvement26 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)No Change0 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Worsening0 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Worsening2 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)No Change3 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Improvement14 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Worsening4 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)No Change1 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Improvement5 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)No Change10 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Improvement5 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)Worsening5 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.002Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)

The Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) is a measure of skin thickness. Skin thickness in 17 anatomic areas was rated on a 0-3 scale and scores are summed to obtain the mRSS (range from 0 - 51), with higher mRSS scores indicating worse disease activity. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: if the baseline mRSS was \<=20, a decrease \>=5 points from baseline indicated disease improvement and an increase \>= 5 points indicated disease worsening; if the baseline mRSS was \>20, then a decrease of \>25% indicated disease improvement and an increase of \>25% indicated disease worsening. Participants who do not meet the disease criteria outlined above were considered no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)No Change0 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Improvement26 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Worsening0 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Worsening0 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Improvement14 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)No Change3 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Improvement5 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)No Change1 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Worsening1 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Worsening2 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)Improvement5 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)No Change10 Participants
Comparison: This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)

The SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. Each component was transformed into a 0-100 scale (higher numbers indicate greater quality of life) and normalized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the 1998 general US population. Analysis was based on ordinal response, defined as follows for each component: a \>= 10 point increase indicated disease improvement, a \>= 10 point decrease indicated disease worsening, and a change \<10 points indicated no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Worsening4 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: No Change12 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: No Change6 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Improvement10 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Worsening1 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Improvement19 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Improvement2 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: No Change9 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: No Change12 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Worsening5 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Improvement6 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Worsening4 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: No Change6 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Improvement1 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Worsening3 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: No Change5 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Worsening4 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Improvement1 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Improvement1 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: Worsening7 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: No Change16 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Improvement0 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Mental Component Score: No Change12 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)Physical Component Score: Worsening4 Participants
Comparison: Physical Component Score. This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Physical Component Score. This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.02Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Mental Component Score. This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.05Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Mental Component Score. This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)

The SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. Each component was transformed into a 0-100 scale (higher numbers indicate greater quality of life) and normalized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the 1998 general US population. Analysis was based on ordinal response, defined as follows for each component: a \>= 10 point increase indicated disease improvement, a \>= 10 point decrease indicated disease worsening, and a change \<10 points indicated no change. Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Improvement19 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: No Change6 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Worsening1 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Worsening4 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: No Change12 Participants
mHSCTChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Improvement10 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Worsening2 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Improvement6 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Improvement2 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: No Change9 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: No Change12 Participants
CyclophosphamideChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Worsening3 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: No Change6 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Worsening0 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Improvement1 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Improvement1 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Worsening1 Participants
mHSCT- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: No Change5 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Improvement0 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: No Change10 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: Worsening3 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Improvement1 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Mental Component Score: Worsening6 Participants
Cyclophosphamide- EFS FailureChange From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)Physical Component Score: No Change14 Participants
Comparison: Physical Component Score. This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Physical Component Score. This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Mental Component Score. This analysis is not stratified. EFS survivors and failures are pooled within each treatment arm.p-value: 0.02Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Mental Component Score. This analysis is stratified by EFS status.p-value: 0.07Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Documented Myositis (ITT)

Number of participants who experienced any event of myositis that occurred from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization. Documented myositis occurred if the participant had 1) elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), electromyography, and/or biopsy and 2) required \> 30 mg per day prednisone for over 1 month or another therapy such as methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of myositis. Additionally, any adverse event reported as myositis was included in the analysis.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTDocumented Myositis (ITT)1 Participants
CyclophosphamideDocumented Myositis (ITT)0 Participants
p-value: 0.3Chi-squared
Secondary

Documented Myositis (PP)

Number of participants who experienced any event of myositis that occurred from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization. Documented myositis occurred if the participant had 1) elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), electromyography, and/or biopsy and 2) required \> 30 mg per day prednisone for over 1 month or another therapy such as methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of myositis. Additionally, any adverse event reported as myositis was included in the analysis.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTDocumented Myositis (PP)1 Participants
CyclophosphamideDocumented Myositis (PP)0 Participants
p-value: 0.31Chi-squared
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, ITT)

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, ITT)EFS Failure10 Participants
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, ITT)Survived Event Free26 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, ITT)EFS Failure20 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, ITT)Survived Event Free19 Participants
p-value: 0.059Fisher Exact
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, PP)

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, PP)EFS Failure7 Participants
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, PP)Survived Event Free26 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, PP)EFS Failure17 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, PP)Survived Event Free17 Participants
p-value: 0.021Fisher Exact
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, ITT)

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in diffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted or \>20% in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, ITT)EFS Failure10 Participants
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, ITT)Survived Event Free26 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, ITT)EFS Failure20 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, ITT)Survived Event Free19 Participants
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of EFS at Month 54.p-value: 0.059Fisher Exact
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of Kaplan-Meier curves for EFS through Month 72p-value: 0.06Log Rank
Secondary

Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, PP)

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis \> 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, PP)Survived Event Free26 Participants
mHSCTEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, PP)EFS Failure7 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, PP)EFS Failure17 Participants
CyclophosphamideEvent-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, PP)Survived Event Free17 Participants
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of EFS at Month 54.p-value: 0.021Fisher Exact
Comparison: Treatment arm comparisons of Kaplan-Meier curves for EFS through Month 72p-value: 0.03Log Rank
Secondary

Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, ITT)

The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
mHSCTGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, ITT)20.0 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
CyclophosphamideGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, ITT)-8.0 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
p-value: 0.008Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, PP)

The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
mHSCTGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, PP)17.0 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
CyclophosphamideGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, PP)-13.0 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
p-value: 0.003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, PP)

The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of \>30% in DLCO % predicted or \>20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis \> 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction \<30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
mHSCTGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, PP)16 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
CyclophosphamideGlobal Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, PP)-11.0 Sum of subject-pair comparison scores
p-value: 0.004Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Infectious Complications

Infectious complications include any events that code to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class of Infections and infestations or events that a site has classified as an infectious event. These can include bacteremia, septicemia, fungemia, fever associated with infection, infectious pneumonia, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, clinical infection (i.e. infection diagnosed with clinical features without identification of an organism) and other local/organ site-specific infections.

Time frame: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).

Population: Safety population. The safety population includes all participants for whom study treatment was initiated. For the mHSCT arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of granulocyte colony stimulating factor for mobilization, and for the cyclophosphamide arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of IV cyclophosphamide.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
mHSCTInfectious Complications131 Events
CyclophosphamideInfectious Complications112 Events
p-value: 0.7Regression, Linear
Secondary

Initiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs by Month 54 (DMARDs) (PP)

Initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Participants were not expected to receive additional disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the absence of disease progression. In general, this includes the administration of any therapy clearly given for the purpose of treating the underlying SSc. It does not include concomitant treatments permitted in the protocol, such as use of methotrexate (15 g or less), anti-malarials, or minocycline for arthritis only. Systemic corticosteroids given at \> 10 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent), without clearly defined non-SSc indications, and methotrexate given for non-arthritis indications are examples of qualifying DMARDs.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTInitiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs by Month 54 (DMARDs) (PP)3 Participants
CyclophosphamideInitiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs by Month 54 (DMARDs) (PP)15 Participants
p-value: 0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Initiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) by Month 54 (ITT)

Initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Participants were not expected to receive additional disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the absence of disease progression. In general, this includes the administration of any therapy clearly given for the purpose of treating the underlying SSc. It does not include concomitant treatments permitted in the protocol, such as use of methotrexate (15 g or less), anti-malarials, or minocycline for arthritis only. Systemic corticosteroids given at \> 10 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent), without clearly defined non-SSc indications, and methotrexate given for non-arthritis indications are examples of qualifying DMARDs.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTInitiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) by Month 54 (ITT)3 Participants
CyclophosphamideInitiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) by Month 54 (ITT)15 Participants
p-value: 0.002Chi-squared
Secondary

New or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)

Any events that met the criteria outlined below or were reported as adverse events between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization are summarized. 1) Development of new or worsening arrhythmias that require medical treatment for \>= 3 months or require ablative therapy or pacemaker insertion. (Note that for a participant who has medically controlled arrhythmia at randomization, worsening was defined as breakthrough episodes severe enough to prompt change in medication, an increase in the dose of a medication, or addition of a new medication to maintain control of the arrhythmia.) 2) Congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring clinical treatment for \>= 3 months develops. 3) Clinically significant pericardial effusion (excess fluid around the heart) that required pericardial window.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)Development of new or worsening arrhythmias6 Participants
mHSCTNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)CHF requiring clinical treatment0 Participants
mHSCTNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)Clinically significant pericardial effusion2 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)Development of new or worsening arrhythmias4 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)CHF requiring clinical treatment4 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)Clinically significant pericardial effusion1 Participants
Comparison: Development of new or worsening arrhythmiasp-value: 0.42Chi-squared
Comparison: CHF requiring clinical treatmentp-value: 0.048Chi-squared
Comparison: Clinically significant pericardial effusionp-value: 0.51Chi-squared
Secondary

New or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)

Any events that met the criteria outlined below or were reported as adverse events between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization are summarized. 1) Development of new or worsening arrhythmias that require medical treatment for \>= 3 months or require ablative therapy or pacemaker insertion. (Note that for a participant who has medically controlled arrhythmia at randomization, worsening will be defined as breakthrough episodes severe enough to prompt change in medication, an increase in the dose of a medication or addition of a new medication to maintain control of the arrhythmia.) 2) Congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring clinical treatment for \>= 3 months develops. 3) Clinically significant pericardial effusion (excess fluid around the heart) that required pericardial window.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)Development of new or worsening arrhythmias6 Participants
mHSCTNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)CHF requiring clinical treatment0 Participants
mHSCTNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)Clinically significant pericardial effusion2 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)CHF requiring clinical treatment4 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)Clinically significant pericardial effusion0 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)Development of new or worsening arrhythmias4 Participants
Comparison: Development of new or worsening arrhythmiasp-value: 0.46Chi-squared
Comparison: CHF requiring clinical treatmentp-value: 0.042Chi-squared
Comparison: Clinically significant pericardial effusionp-value: 0.15Chi-squared
Secondary

New or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (ITT)

Any pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) events that occurred between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization were summarized. Development of PAH occurred if the participant met the following criteria, where the measurement value(s) could not be explained by other causes such as congestive heart failure or pulmonary emboli: 1) a post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure \> 55 mmHg by echocardiogram or 2) a mean pulmonary artery pressure \> 30 mmHg at rest measured by right heart catheterization. If the post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was between 40 to 55 mmHg by echocardiogram, a right heart catheterization was done to confirm a diagnosis of pulmonary artery hypertension. The endpoint was met if the mean pulmonary artery pressure was \> 30 mmHg at rest by right heart catheterization. Additionally, any adverse event reported as PAH was included in the analysis.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTNew or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (ITT)0 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (ITT)5 Participants
p-value: 0.026Chi-squared
Secondary

New or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (PP)

Any pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) events that occurred between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization were summarized. Development of PAH occurred if the participant met the following criteria, where the measurement value(s) could not be explained by other causes such as congestive heart failure or pulmonary emboli: 1) a post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure \> 55 mmHg by echocardiogram or 2) a mean pulmonary artery pressure \> 30 mmHg at rest measured by right heart catheterization. If the post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was between 40 to 55 mmHg by echocardiogram, a right heart catheterization would be done to confirm a diagnosis of pulmonary artery hypertension. The endpoint was met if the mean pulmonary artery pressure was \> 30 mmHg at rest by right heart catheterization. Additionally, any adverse event reported as PAH was included in the analysis.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTNew or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (PP)0 Participants
CyclophosphamideNew or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (PP)5 Participants
p-value: 0.022Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Infectious Complications

Infectious complications include any events that code to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class of Infections and infestations or events that a site has classified as an infectious event. These can include bacteremia, septicemia, fungemia, fever associated with infection, infectious pneumonia, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, clinical infection (i.e. infection diagnosed with clinical features without identification of an organism) and other local/organ site-specific infections.

Time frame: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).

Population: Safety population. The safety population includes all participants for whom study treatment was initiated. For the mHSCT arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of granulocyte colony stimulating factor for mobilization, and for the cyclophosphamide arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of IV cyclophosphamide.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTNumber of Subjects With Infectious Complications33 Participants
CyclophosphamideNumber of Subjects With Infectious Complications31 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Regimen-Related Toxicities

Regimen-related toxicities are defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events reported by site physicians as possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy.

Time frame: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).

Population: Safety population. The safety population includes all participants for whom study treatment was initiated. For the mHSCT arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of granulocyte colony stimulating factor for mobilization, and for the cyclophosphamide arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of IV cyclophosphamide.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTNumber of Subjects With Regimen-Related ToxicitiesPossibly Related33 Participants
mHSCTNumber of Subjects With Regimen-Related ToxicitiesProbably Related27 Participants
mHSCTNumber of Subjects With Regimen-Related ToxicitiesDefinitely Related26 Participants
CyclophosphamideNumber of Subjects With Regimen-Related ToxicitiesDefinitely Related3 Participants
CyclophosphamideNumber of Subjects With Regimen-Related ToxicitiesPossibly Related10 Participants
CyclophosphamideNumber of Subjects With Regimen-Related ToxicitiesProbably Related10 Participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (ITT)

Documented scleroderma renal crisis (hypertensive or non-hypertensive) occurring from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization was summarized. A hypertensive scleroderma renal crisis occurred if a participant obtained both of the following: New-onset hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>= 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>= 90 mmHg, a rise in SBP \>= 30 mmHg compared to baseline, or a rise in DBP \>= 20 mmHg compared to baseline, and one of the following features: 1) increase of \>= 50 % above baseline in serum creatinine, 2) proteinuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick confirmed by protein:creatinine ratio \> 2.5), 3) hematuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick or \> 10 RBCs/HPF, without menstruation), 4) thrombocytopenia (\< 100,000 plts/mm3), or 5) hemolysis (determined by blood smear or increased reticulocyte count). Additionally, any adverse event reported as a scleroderma renal crisis was included in the analysis.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTOccurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (ITT)2 Participants
CyclophosphamideOccurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (ITT)3 Participants
p-value: 0.71Chi-squared
Secondary

Occurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (PP)

Documented scleroderma renal crisis (hypertensive or non-hypertensive) occurring from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization was summarized. A hypertensive scleroderma renal crisis occurred if a participant obtained both of the following: New-onset hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>= 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>= 90 mmHg, a rise in SBP \>= 30 mmHg compared to baseline, or a rise in DBP \>= 20 mmHg compared to baseline, and one of the following features: 1) increase of \>= 50 % above baseline in serum creatinine, 2) proteinuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick confirmed by protein:creatinine ratio \> 2.5), 3) hematuria (\>= 2+ by dipstick or \> 10 RBCs/HPF, without menstruation), 4) thrombocytopenia (\< 100,000 plts/mm3), or 5) hemolysis (determined by blood smear or increased reticulocyte count). Additionally, any adverse event reported as a scleroderma renal crisis was included in the analysis.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTOccurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (PP)0 Participants
CyclophosphamideOccurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (PP)1 Participants
p-value: 0.32Chi-squared
Secondary

Regimen-Related Toxicities

Regimen-related toxicities are defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events reported by site physicians as possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy.

Time frame: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization)

Population: Safety population. The safety population includes all participants for whom study treatment was initiated. For the mHSCT arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of granulocyte colony stimulating factor for mobilization, and for the cyclophosphamide arm, treatment was initiated with the first dose of IV cyclophosphamide.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
mHSCTRegimen-Related ToxicitiesPossibly Related106 Events
mHSCTRegimen-Related ToxicitiesProbably Related98 Events
mHSCTRegimen-Related ToxicitiesDefinitely Related90 Events
CyclophosphamideRegimen-Related ToxicitiesPossibly Related23 Events
CyclophosphamideRegimen-Related ToxicitiesProbably Related13 Events
CyclophosphamideRegimen-Related ToxicitiesDefinitely Related5 Events
p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear
Secondary

Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Engraftment

Time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) engraftment is defined as the number of days post-transplant until required levels of ANC are attained (for the mHSCT arm only). If engraftment did not occur within 28 days post-transplant, then the variable was set to 28 days. ANC engraftment required an ANC of \> 500 cells/microliter, maintained for 3 consecutive days.

Time frame: 28 days post-transplant

Population: Per-protocol (PP) - mHSCT arm only. The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
mHSCTTime to Absolute Neutrophil Count Engraftment10 Days
Secondary

Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, ITT)

Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, ITT)1 Participants
CyclophosphamideTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, ITT)0 Participants
p-value: 0.48Fisher Exact
Secondary

Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, PP)

Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

Time frame: 48 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, PP)1 Participants
CyclophosphamideTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, PP)0 Participants
p-value: 0.49Fisher Exact
Secondary

Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, ITT)

Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Intention to treat (ITT). The ITT population includes all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, ITT)1 Participants
CyclophosphamideTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, ITT)0 Participants
p-value: 0.48Fisher Exact
Secondary

Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, PP)

Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

Time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Population: Per-protocol (PP). The PP population is defined as those participants who completed the assigned treatment protocol: undergoing autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in the mHSCT arm, or receiving at least 9 of 12 planned doses in the cyclophosphamide arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
mHSCTTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, PP)1 Participants
CyclophosphamideTreatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, PP)0 Participants
p-value: 0.49Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026