Skip to content

Evaluating Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

An Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial of ABX-EGF Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00113763
Enrollment
463
Registered
2005-06-13
Start date
2004-01-01
Completion date
2009-06-01
Last updated
2022-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Metastases

Keywords

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Colon, Colorectal, Rectal Cancer, Cancer, Metastatic, EGFr, Clinical Trial, Panitumumab, ABX-EGF, Immunex, Abgenix, Amgen

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine that panitumumab, using the proposed regimen, will safely increase progression free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed available treatment options (i.e., patients who developed progressive disease or relapsed while on or after prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy).

Interventions

OTHERBest supportive care

Best supportive care as site routine excluding: antineoplastic chemotherapy, investigational agents, anti-EGFr(Epidermal growth factor receptor) targeting agents other than ABX-EGF(Panitumumab), experimental or approved anti-tumor therapies (e.g. Avastin), chemotherapy, radiotherapy (with the exception of radiotherapy for pain control limited to bone metastases).

DRUGPanitumumab

Intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pathologic diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma (diagnostic tissue obtained by tissue biopsy) * Metastatic colorectal carcinoma * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2 * Documented evidence of disease progression during, or following treatment, with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer * Radiographic documentation of disease progression during or within 6 months following the most recent chemotherapy regimen * Unidimensionally measurable disease * Tumor expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) by immunohistochemistry * At least 2 but not more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer * Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment * History or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis * Use of systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 30 days prior to enrollment * Prior epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) targeting therapies * Prior anti-tumor therapies including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumor small molecules and biologics of short (less than a week) serum half life within 30 days before enrollment, or prior experimental or approved proteins within 3 months before enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival TimeFrom randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Tumor ResponseFrom randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.Defined as the number of participants with a confirmed complete or partial tumor response, confirmed by a scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): disappearance of all target lesions, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, with no progressive disease of non-target lesions.
Duration of ResponseFrom randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from first confirmed objective tumor response to first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first).
Time to ResponseFrom randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to first partial or complete response, subsequently confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization until the data cut-off date for overall survival of 15 March 2006. The median actual follow-up time was 30 weeks for the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31 weeks for the BSC alone group.Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to death.
Time to Treatment FailureFrom randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to the date the decision was made to end treatment for any reason.
Duration of Stable DiseaseFrom randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to date of first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first) for those participants with a best response of stable disease. Stable disease defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as reference the nadir longest diameter since the treatment started, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no new lesions.
Time to Disease ProgressionFrom randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to disease progression or death due to disease progression (whichever occurs first)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from 16 January 2004 through 16 March 2005. Data are up until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Panitumumab Plus BSC
Panitumumab plus best supportive care (BSC). Panitumumab was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 6 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until participants developed progressive disease or were unable to tolerate study drug.
231
BSC Alone
Best supportive care defined as the best care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines, including antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated. For the purpose of this study, best supportive care does not include anti-neoplastic chemotherapy.
232
Total463

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event52
Overall StudyDisease Progression2814
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyNon-compliance10
Overall StudyOngoing10
Overall StudyOther276
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBSC AloneTotalPanitumumab Plus BSC
Age, Continuous61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
0 or 1
202 participants402 participants200 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
2
30 participants61 participants31 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Aborigine
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 participants2 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
228 participants457 participants229 participants
Region of Enrollment
Central and Eastern Europe
19 participants39 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Rest of World
33 participants66 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
Western Europe
180 participants358 participants178 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants169 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
148 Participants294 Participants146 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
224 / 229171 / 234
serious
Total, serious adverse events
101 / 22962 / 234

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival Time

Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression, whichever occurred first. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame: From randomization to the data cut-off date of 30 June 2005. The median follow-up time was 20.0 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 18.2 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCProgression-free Survival Time8.0 weeks
BSC AloneProgression-free Survival Time7.3 weeks
Comparison: Null hypothesis was no difference between treatment groupsp-value: <0.0001Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Response

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from first confirmed objective tumor response to first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first).

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Intention-to-treat participants who had a confirmed objective tumor response. No objective tumor responses were observed in the BSC alone treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCDuration of Response18.4 weeks
Secondary

Duration of Stable Disease

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to date of first observed progression of disease or death due to progression of disease (whichever comes first) for those participants with a best response of stable disease. Stable disease defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as reference the nadir longest diameter since the treatment started, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no new lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Participants who had a best overall response of stable disease

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCDuration of Stable Disease24.0 weeks
BSC AloneDuration of Stable Disease17.6 weeks
Secondary

Objective Tumor Response

Defined as the number of participants with a confirmed complete or partial tumor response, confirmed by a scan no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): disappearance of all target lesions, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, with no progressive disease of non-target lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Panitumumab Plus BSCObjective Tumor Response22 participants
BSC AloneObjective Tumor Response0 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to death.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date for overall survival of 15 March 2006. The median actual follow-up time was 30 weeks for the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31 weeks for the BSC alone group.

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCOverall Survival6.4 months
BSC AloneOverall Survival6.3 months
Comparison: Null hypothesis was no difference between treatment groupsp-value: 0.806Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Disease Progression

Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to disease progression or death due to disease progression (whichever occurs first)

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCTime to Disease Progression8.0 weeks
BSC AloneTime to Disease Progression7.3 weeks
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to first partial or complete response, subsequently confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) participants who had a confirmed objective tumor response. No objective tumor responses were observed in the BSC alone treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCTime to Response7.9 weeks
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to the date the decision was made to end treatment for any reason.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time was 29.6 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 31.8 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCTime to Treatment Failure9.0 weeks
BSC AloneTime to Treatment Failure7.1 weeks
Post Hoc

Progression-free Survival Time (Mutant KRAS)

Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression among participants with mutant Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time in patients with mutant KRAS was 24.4 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 23.9 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Mutant KRAS Efficacy Analysis Set, a subset of the Intention-to-Treat set with mutant Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCProgression-free Survival Time (Mutant KRAS)7.4 weeks
BSC AloneProgression-free Survival Time (Mutant KRAS)7.3 weeks
Post Hoc

Progression-free Survival Time (Wild-type KRAS)

Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time from randomization to either death or first observed disease progression among participants with wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status. Participants were evaluated for tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on the response assessment from a blinded review of radiographic scans by the Independent Review Committee. Progressive disease defined as least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SLD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cutoff of 15 March 2007. The median follow-up time in patients with wild-type KRAS was 36.8 weeks in the panitumumab plus BSC group and 35.7 weeks in the BSC alone group.

Population: Wild-type KRAS Efficacy Analysis Set, a subset of the Intention-to-Treat set with wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) status.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab Plus BSCProgression-free Survival Time (Wild-type KRAS)12.3 weeks
BSC AloneProgression-free Survival Time (Wild-type KRAS)7.3 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026