Skip to content

A Study Of SU011248 As Therapy In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Phase 2 Study Of SU011248 As Consolidation Therapy In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00113516
Enrollment
84
Registered
2005-06-09
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2010-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Lung Neoplasms

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if SU011248 (sunitinib) provides additional benefit when it is given after treatment with two chemotherapy drugs carboplatin and paclitaxel and also if sunitinib is safe for patients with locally advanced and metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Interventions

DRUGcarboplatin

AUC of 6 mg\*min/mL via IV infusion every 21 days for 4 cycles as per institutional practices.

DRUGpaclitaxel

175-225 mg/m2 via IV infusion every 21 days for 4 cycles as per institutional practices.

DRUGsunitinib

50 mg orally daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment up to 1 year (after completing 1 year of treatment, pts deriving clinical benefit may continue to receive sunitinib in a separate continuation protocol).

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically proven NSCLC * Stage IIIB (locally advanced with malignant effusion) or Stage IV disease * No prior therapy for NSCLC * Evidence of unidimensionally measurable disease

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with systemic chemotherapy for lung cancer * History of or known brain metastases * NCI CTCAE Grade 3 hemorrhage within 4 weeks of starting study treatment * Evidence of hemoptysis within 4 weeks of starting study treatment * Serious acute or chronic illness or recent history of significant cardiac abnormality * Previous treatment with anti-angiogenesis agents including thalidomide, or inhibitors of EGFR and PDGFR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects Surviving at One YearFrom start of treatment until 1 year or deathProportion of those surviving at the end of one year from the first dose of study treatment. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond the day of first dose had their survival time censored at Day 1 of treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)From start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib)TTP was defined as the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date - first paclitaxel/carboplatin dose date +1)/7.02.
Duration of Response (DR)From start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib) or deathDR=time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]) that was subsequently confirmed to first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. CR=disappearance of all target lesions. PR=a \> = 30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference baseline sum longest dimensions. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, first date was used. DR (in weeks) was calculated as (the end date for DR - first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed +1)/7.02.
Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease ResponseFrom start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib)Objective disease response = subjects with confirmed CR or PR according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Version 1.0). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
Overall Survival (OS)From start of study treatment until deathOS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death - date of paclitaxel/carboplatin first dose +1)/30.4. For subjects not expiring, their survival times were censored at the last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond the day of first dose of paclitaxel/carboplatin had their survival time censored at Day 1 of paclitaxel/carboplatin treatment.
Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Sunitinibpredose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. On Day 28, this parameter provided and idea of the concentration at steady state since no big fluctuation was expected in a 24 hour interval.
Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. On Day 28, this parameter provided and idea of the concentration at steady state since no big fluctuation was expected in a 24 hour interval.
Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. On Day 28, this parameter provided and idea of the concentration at steady state since no big fluctuation was expected in a 24 hour interval.
Dose-Corrected Ctrough of Sunitinibpredose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. This was determined due to potential dose changes throughout the study in different subjects. It was calculated as the observed values multiplied by the reference dose (50 mg) divided by the actual dose. For dose-corrected trough concentration, only trough concentration values from subjects who received sunitinib during at least the last 10 consecutive days of dosing at the same dose level were included.
Dose-Corrected Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. This was determined due to potential dose changes throughout the study in different subjects. It was calculated as the observed values multiplied by the reference dose (50 mg) divided by the actual dose. For dose-corrected trough concentration, only trough concentration values from subjects who received sunitinib during at least the last 10 consecutive days of dosing at the same dose level were included.
Dose-Corrected Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. This was determined due to potential dose changes throughout the study in different subjects. It was calculated as the observed values multiplied by the reference dose (50 mg) divided by the actual dose. For dose-corrected trough concentration, only trough concentration values from subjects who received sunitinib during at least the last 10 consecutive days of dosing at the same dose level were included.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3) Concentration at BaselineBaseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2Concentration of VEGFR3 at baseline.
VEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2VEGFR3 concentration at each time point divided by VEGFR3 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline).
VEGF-C Concentration at BaselineBaseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2Concentration of VEGF-C at baseline.
VEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2VEGF-C concentration at each time point divided by VEGF-C concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline).
Soluble E-Selectin at BaselineBaseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2Concentration of soluble E-Selectin at baseline.
Soluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2Soluble E-Selectin concentration at each time point divided by soluble E-Selectin concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline).
VEGFR3 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2Median concentration of VEGFR3 at baseline stratified by tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 Weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a nonparametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib) or deathPFS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date - first paclitaxel/carboplatin dose date +1)/7.02.
VEGF-C at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2Median concentration of VEGF-C at baseline stratified by tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 Weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a nonparametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).
VEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2Median VEGF-C concentration at each time point divided by median VEGF-C concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a non-parametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).
Immunohistochemical Staining of Paraffin Embedded Tumor TissueScreeningPreviously collected tumor paraffin block (or 12-20 10-micron slides prepared for the paraffin block) for correlative laboratory analysis.
Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2Median concentration of soluble E-selectin at baseline stratified by tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 Weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a nonparametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).
Soluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2Median soluble E-selectin concentration at each time point divided by median soluble E-selectin concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a non-parametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2PFS = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1)divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and after Stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGFR3 at each time point.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2PFS = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGF-C at each time point.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From Baseline[Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2PFS = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of soluble E-selectin at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in soluble E-selectin at each time point.
Correlation of Polymorphisms in c-Kit, Flt-3 and c-Fms to Safety of SunitinibWithin 7 days of Day 1A blood sample (6 mL) was collected and used to isolate DNA. These samples were not anonymized.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2TTP = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from baseline in VEGFR3 at each time point.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2TTP = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGF-C at each time point.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2TTP = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of soluble E-selectin at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in soluble E-selectin at each time point.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2OS = time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death minus date of sunitinib first dose +1)divided by 30.4. For subjects not expiring, their survival times were censored at the last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond the day of first dose of sunitinib had their survival time censored at Day 1 of sunitinib treatment. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGFR3 at each time point.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2OS = time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death minus date of sunitinib first dose +1) divided by 30.4. For subjects not expiring, their survival times were censored at the last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond the day of first dose of sunitinib had their survival time censored at Day 1 of sunitinib treatment. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGF-C at each time point.
Comparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineBaseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2OS=time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) calculated as (date of death minus date of sunitinib first dose +1) divided by 30.4. For subjects not expiring their survival times were censored at last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond day of first dose of sunitinib had their survival time censored at Day 1 of sunitinib treatment. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of soluble E-selectin at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in soluble E-selectin at each time point.
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline (Part 1) to Cycle1 (Days 1 [baseline], 28), Cycles 2 and 3 (Days 1, 28), and Cycle 4 (Day 1) in Part 2EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms. Change: score at each visit in Part 2 minus baseline score in Part 1.
Change From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Baseline (Part 1) to Cycle1 (Days 1 [baseline], 28), Cycles 2 and 3 (Days 1, 28), and Cycle 4 (Day 1) in Part 2QLQ-LC13 assessed lung cancer symptoms (dyspnea, coughing, dysphasia, hemoptysis, sore mouth, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, chest pain, arm pain, shoulder pain, and pain in other parts). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms. Change: score at each visit in Part 2 minus baseline score in Part 1.
VEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2Median VEGFR3 concentration at each time point divided by median VEGFR3 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a non-parametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).

Countries

Canada, France, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

During Part 1, subjects received carboplatin plus paclitaxel 172-225 mg/m2. Those same subjects were eligible for continuation in Part 2 where they received sunitinib 50 mg. 66 subjects continued in Part 2.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then Sunitinib
Part 1 = Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel 172-225 mg/m2. Part 2 = Sunitinib 50 mg
84
Total84

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Part 1Adverse Event60
Part 1Death30
Part 1Did Not Meet Entrance Criteria10
Part 1Laboratory Abnormality10
Part 1Lack of Efficacy20
Part 1Missing650
Part 1Ongoing10
Part 1Other30
Part 1Withdrawal by Subject20
Part 2Adverse Event016
Part 2Death05
Part 2Laboratory Abnormality01
Part 2Lack of Efficacy037
Part 2Ongoing01
Part 2Other03
Part 2Withdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFirst Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then Sunitinib
Age, Customized
< 65 years
53 participants
Age, Customized
> = 65 years
31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 8460 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
29 / 8429 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Subjects Surviving at One Year

Proportion of those surviving at the end of one year from the first dose of study treatment. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond the day of first dose had their survival time censored at Day 1 of treatment.

Time frame: From start of treatment until 1 year or death

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population = all subjects enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of paclitaxel/carboplatin.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibProportion of Subjects Surviving at One Year0.405 proportion
Comparison: The study was designed to test the null hypothesis that the true one-year probability of survival is 0.40 versus the alternative hypothesis that the true one-year probability of survival is at least 0.55. The sample size was determined using a One-Sample Survival design, assuming alpha=0.05 (1-sided), power= 0.90, 6 month accrual, a minimum follow-up period of 12 months, and an expectation that approximately 5% of subjects may be lost to follow-up.90% CI: [0.315, 0.494]Kaplan-Meier
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

EORTC QLQ-C30 scales: global health/QoL, functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much, global/QOL range: very poor to excellent. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms. Change: score at each visit in Part 2 minus baseline score in Part 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Part 1) to Cycle1 (Days 1 [baseline], 28), Cycles 2 and 3 (Days 1, 28), and Cycle 4 (Day 1) in Part 2

Population: ITT. Number of participants analyzed = number of subjects with EORTC response (defined as having at least 1 item response on the EORTC). n=number of subjects with EORTC scale score at baseline and each specified time point. Data in cycles with less than 9 subjects are not reported due to lack of statistical reliability.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Global Health Status /QoL (n=54)-1.54 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.58
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Global Health Status /QoL (n=42)-9.13 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.964
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Global Health Status /QoL (n=35)-2.62 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.361
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Global Health Status /QoL (n=21)-9.13 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.704
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Global Health Status /QoL (n=14)0.60 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.175
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Global Health Status /QoL (n=10)-2.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 8.056
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Global Health Status /QoL (n=10)7.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.883
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Physical Functioning (n=54)-6.79 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.806
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Physical Functioning (n=42)-9.68 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.363
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Physical Functioning (n=35)-7.43 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.941
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Physical Functioning (n=22)-12.42 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.771
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Physical Functioning (n=15)-5.78 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.178
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Physical Functioning (n=10)-9.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.647
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Physical Functioning (n=10)-2.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.072
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Role Functioning (n=54)-16.05 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.641
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Role Functioning (n=35)-13.81 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.95
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Role Functioning (n=22)-28.03 scores on a scaleStandard Error 8.234
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Role Functioning (n=15)-16.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.968
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Role Functioning (n=10)-15.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 13.017
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Role Functioning (n=10)8.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 11.18
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Emotional Functioning (n=54)-2.16 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.512
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Emotional Functioning (n=42)3.57 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.139
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Emotional Functioning (n=35)1.90 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.649
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Emotional Functioning (n=21)1.98 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.668
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Emotional Functioning (n=14)13.10 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.571
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Emotional Functioning (n=10)12.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.348
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Emotional Functioning (n=10)24.17 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.038
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Cognitive Functioning (n=54)-8.95 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.138
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Cognitive Functioning (n=42)-3.57 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.704
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Cognitive Functioning (n=35)-10.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.817
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Cognitive Functioning (n=21)-10.32 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.573
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Cognitive Functioning (n=14)1.19 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.692
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Cognitive Functioning (n=10)-1.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.615
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Cognitive Functioning (n=10)5.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Social Functioning (n=53)-11.64 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.25
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Social Functioning (n=41)-10.98 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.417
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Social Functioning (n=34)-9.31 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.228
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Social Functioning (n=20)-25.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.204
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Social Functioning (n=14)-7.14 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.98
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Social Functioning (n=10)-8.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 11.453
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Social Functioning (n=10)1.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.222
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Fatigue (n=54)13.48 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.411
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Fatigue (n=42)16.40 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.921
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Fatigue (n=35)8.25 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.083
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Fatigue (n=22)19.70 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.025
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Fatigue (n=15)8.15 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.548
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Fatigue (n=10)22.22 scores on a scaleStandard Error 11.355
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Nausea and Vomiting (n=54)5.56 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.988
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Nausea and Vomiting (n=42)11.90 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.822
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Nausea and Vomiting (n=35)6.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.491
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Nausea and Vomiting (n=22)6.82 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.608
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Nausea and Vomiting (n=15)5.56 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.789
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=15)-8.89 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.94
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Role Functioning (n=42)-20.63 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.383
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Fatigue (n=10)-1.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.49
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Nausea and Vomiting (n=10)11.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.049
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Nausea and Vomiting (n=10)1.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.31
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Pain (n=54)3.09 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.228
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Pain (n=42)-0.79 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.766
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Pain (n=35)5.24 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.572
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Pain (n=22)0.76 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.748
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Pain (n=15)5.56 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.64
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Pain (n=10)-1.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 8.767
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Pain (n=10)-3.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.778
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=54)2.47 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.396
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Dyspnea (n=42)1.59 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.76
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=35)-4.76 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.352
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Dyspnea (n=22)-13.64 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.454
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Dyspnea (n=10)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 8.607
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=10)-13.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.37
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Insomnia (n=54)-3.09 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.006
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Insomnia (n=42)-5.56 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.671
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Insomnia (n=35)-2.86 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.529
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Insomnia (n=22)6.06 scores on a scaleStandard Error 8.672
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Insomnia (n=15)-2.22 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.057
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Insomnia (n=10)6.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 10.887
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Insomnia (n=10)-20.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.37
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Appetite Loss (n=54)11.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.138
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Appetite Loss (n=42)20.63 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.898
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Appetite Loss (n=35)13.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.633
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Appetite Loss (n=22)10.61 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.068
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Appetite Loss (n=15)2.22 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.606
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Appetite Loss (n=10)13.3 scores on a scaleStandard Error 12.373
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Appetite Loss (n=10)-6.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 10.887
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Constipation (n=54)5.56 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.109
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Constipation (n=42)-0.79 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.266
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Constipation (n=35)13.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.965
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Constipation (n=22)-4.55 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.317
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Constipation (n=15)-4.44 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.397
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Constipation (n=10)-6.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.667
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Constipation (n=10)-10.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.092
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Diarrhea (n=54)-3.09 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.206
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Diarrhea (n=41)13.01 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.058
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Diarrhea (n=35)11.43 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.916
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Diarrhea (n=21)7.94 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.589
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Diarrhea (n=14)16.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.767
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Diarrhea (n=10)26.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 9.686
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Diarrhea (n=10)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 9.938
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 1 Financial Difficulties (n=54)5.56 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.607
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 1, Day 28 Financial Difficulties (n=42)2.38 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.381
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 1 Financial Difficulties (n=34)5.88 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.331
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 2, Day 28 Financial Difficulties (n=21)6.35 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.453
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 1 Financial Difficulties (n=14)11.90 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.5
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 3, Day 28 Financial Difficulties (n=10)13.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 10.184
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cycle 4, Day 1 Financial Difficulties (n=10)13.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 10.184
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)

QLQ-LC13 assessed lung cancer symptoms (dyspnea, coughing, dysphasia, hemoptysis, sore mouth, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, chest pain, arm pain, shoulder pain, and pain in other parts). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all to very much. Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms. Change: score at each visit in Part 2 minus baseline score in Part 1.

Time frame: Baseline (Part 1) to Cycle1 (Days 1 [baseline], 28), Cycles 2 and 3 (Days 1, 28), and Cycle 4 (Day 1) in Part 2

Population: ITT. Number of participants analyzed = number of subjects with EORTC response (defined as having at least 1 item response on the EORTC). n=number of subjects with EORTC scale score at baseline and each specified time point. Data in cycles with less than 9 subjects are not reported due to lack of statistical reliability.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=49)3.40 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.008
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Dyspnea (n=37)4.80 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.03
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=31)4.30 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.112
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Dyspnea (n=21)1.59 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.49
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=14)-1.59 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.466
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Dyspnea (n=9)4.94 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.705
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Dyspnea (n=9)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.208
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Coughing (n=53)-14.47 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.12
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Coughing (n=40)-14.17 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.048
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Coughing (n=34)-12.75 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.077
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Coughing (n=21)-15.87 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.496
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Coughing (n=14)-9.52 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.445
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Coughing (n=10)-13.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.37
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Coughing (n=9)-11.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.857
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Hemoptysis (n=53)0.63 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.678
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Hemoptysis (n=39)5.13 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.362
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Hemoptysis (n=33)2.02 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.406
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Hemoptysis (n=21)-1.59 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.795
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Hemoptysis (n=14)-2.38 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.381
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Hemoptysis (n=10)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Hemoptysis (n=9)-3.70 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.704
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Sore Mouth (n=53)-5.66 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.782
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Sore Mouth (n=40)20.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.141
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Sore Mouth (n=34)9.80 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.111
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Sore Mouth (n=21)12.70 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.289
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Sore Mouth (n=14)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.494
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Sore Mouth (n=10)10.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 13.194
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Sore Mouth (n=9)-11.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.857
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Dysphasia (n=53)-0.63 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.298
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Dysphasia (n=40)7.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.697
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Dysphasia (n=34)2.94 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.145
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Dysphasia (n=21)-1.59 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.795
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Dysphasia (n=14)-4.76 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.762
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Dysphasia (n=10)-10.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.092
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Dysphasia (n=9)-11.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.556
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Peripheral Neuropathy (n=53)42.14 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.012
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Peripheral Neuropathy (n=40)32.50 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.402
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Peripheral Neuropathy (n=34)28.43 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.825
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Peripheral Neuropathy (n=21)26.98 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.841
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Peripheral Neuropathy (n=14)23.81 scores on a scaleStandard Error 10.145
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Peripheral Neuropathy (n=10)20.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 10.184
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Peripheral Neuropathy (n=9)7.41 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.407
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Alopecia (n=53)63.52 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.407
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Alopecia (n=40)40.83 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.009
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Alopecia (n=34)30.39 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.627
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Alopecia (n=20)11.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.752
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Alopecia (n=14)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Alopecia (n=10)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Alopecia (n=9)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Pain in Chest (n=53)-8.18 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.581
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Pain in Chest (n=40)-4.17 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.415
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Pain in Chest (n=34)-0.98 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.85
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Pain in Chest (n=21)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.984
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Pain in Chest (n=14)4.76 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.906
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Pain in Chest (n=10)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.027
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Pain in Chest (n=9)7.41 scores on a scaleStandard Error 9.259
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Pain in Arm or Shoulder (n=51)-1.31 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.171
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Pain in Arm or Shoulder (n=39)0.85 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.497
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Pain in Arm or Shoulder (n=34)3.92 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.257
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Pain in Arm or Shoulder (n=21)3.17 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.545
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Pain in Arm or Shoulder (n=14)2.38 scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.228
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Pain in Arm or Shoulder (n=10)-6.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 11.967
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Pain in Arm or Shoulder (n=9)-11.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 11.111
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 1 Pain in Other Parts (n=47)3.55 scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.431
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 1, Day 28 Pain in Other Parts (n=35)-6.67 scores on a scaleStandard Error 5.925
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 1 Pain in Other Parts (n=27)12.35 scores on a scaleStandard Error 7.368
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 2, Day 28 Pain in Other Parts (n=17)13.73 scores on a scaleStandard Error 8.603
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 1 Pain in Other Parts (n=14)11.90 scores on a scaleStandard Error 8.274
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 3, Day 28 Pain in Other Parts (n=9)-11.11 scores on a scaleStandard Error 9.623
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibChange From Baseline in HRQOL and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (QLQ-LC13)Cycle 4, Day 1 Pain in Other Parts (n=9)0.00 scores on a scaleStandard Error 9.623
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From Baseline

OS=time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) calculated as (date of death minus date of sunitinib first dose +1) divided by 30.4. For subjects not expiring their survival times were censored at last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond day of first dose of sunitinib had their survival time censored at Day 1 of sunitinib treatment. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of soluble E-selectin at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in soluble E-selectin at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 3, Day 1 (\< median cutpoint), Cycle 4, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint, \> = median cutpoint)and Cycle 5, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=26)6.5 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=17)8.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=17)6.5 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=14)11.2 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)8.5 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=11)8.0 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=11)14.8 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=8)12.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=4)15.3 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=2)13.8 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=27)8.0 months
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.76695% CI: [0.51, 1.65]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.268295% CI: [0.72, 3.23]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.272695% CI: [0.69, 3.7]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.278795% CI: [0.22, 1.55]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.024195% CI: [1.09, 17.56]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.094395% CI: [0.59, 48.81]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 5, Day 28p-value: 0.808495% CI: [0.04, 11.79]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From Baseline

OS = time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death minus date of sunitinib first dose +1) divided by 30.4. For subjects not expiring, their survival times were censored at the last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond the day of first dose of sunitinib had their survival time censored at Day 1 of sunitinib treatment. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGF-C at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 3, Day 28 (\> = median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=29)8.5 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=30)5.2 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=23)8.8 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=19)9.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=20)12.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=15)8.0 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)14.8 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=10)10.2 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=10)15.8 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=6)14.2 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=2)14.2 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=2)16.6 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=23)8.5 months
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.426995% CI: [0.72, 2.21]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.92995% CI: [0.51, 1.86]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.819595% CI: [0.44, 1.91]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.22195% CI: [0.26, 1.38]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.429795% CI: [0.24, 1.85]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.052295% CI: [0.06, 1.11]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 5, Day 28p-value: 0.694995% CI: [0.05, 7]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From Baseline

OS = time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death minus date of sunitinib first dose +1)divided by 30.4. For subjects not expiring, their survival times were censored at the last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond the day of first dose of sunitinib had their survival time censored at Day 1 of sunitinib treatment. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGFR3 at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 3, Day 1 (\< median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=30)8.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=30)6.1 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=23)14.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=23)7.1 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=20)13.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=20)8.8 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=14)11.2 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)13.3 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=11)7.4 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=6)17.7 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=2)17.1 months
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier OS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=2)13.8 months
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.476895% CI: [0.7, 2.17]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.148495% CI: [0.84, 3.13]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.895795% CI: [0.5, 2.18]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.568195% CI: [0.33, 1.85]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.007495% CI: [1.35, 10.88]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.163795% CI: [0.06, 1.7]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 5, Day 28p-value: 0.432895% CI: [0.23, 29.12]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From Baseline

PFS = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of soluble E-selectin at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in soluble E-selectin at each time point.

Time frame: [Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 2, Day 28 (\> = median cutpoint), Cycle 3, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint), and Cycles 4 and 5, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint, \> = median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=26)11.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=27)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=17)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=17)10.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=14)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=11)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=8)33.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=8)22.5 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=4)43.3 weeks
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.46695% CI: [0.58, 3.29]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.527795% CI: [0.39, 1.62]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.533795% CI: [0.52, 3.44]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.071295% CI: [0.13, 1.13]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.294895% CI: [0.54, 7.07]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.3295% CI: [0.28, 38.48]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From Baseline

PFS = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGF-C at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 3, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint) and Cycle 5, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=29)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=30)10.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=23)12.4 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=23)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=19)13.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=20)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=15)10.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)31.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=10)19.7 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=10)30.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=6)32.9 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=2)37.0 weeks
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.50795% CI: [0.65, 2.39]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.447495% CI: [0.63, 2.82]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.759995% CI: [0.4, 1.95]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.010995% CI: [0.12, 0.8]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.687895% CI: [0.43, 3.58]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.463795% CI: [0.38, 8.12]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From Baseline

PFS = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1)divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and after Stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGFR3 at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 3, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint) and Cycle 5, Day 28 (\> = median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=30)13.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=30)10.3 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=23)15.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=23)10.3 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=20)22.5 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=20)11.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=14)16.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=10)32.9 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=11)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=6)32.9 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier PFS Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=2)38.3 weeks
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.678295% CI: [0.61, 2.15]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.19895% CI: [0.77, 3.3]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.134495% CI: [0.82, 3.98]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.480995% CI: [0.56, 3.39]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.015395% CI: [1.19, 11.13]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.208595% CI: [0.52, 14.37]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 5, Day 28p-value: 0.808495% CI: [0.08, 23.57]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From Baseline

TTP = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of soluble E-selectin at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in soluble E-selectin at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 2, Day 28 (\> = median cutpoint), Cycle 3, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint), and Cycles 4 and 5, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint, \> = median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=26)11.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=27)12.4 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=17)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=14)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=11)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=8)33.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint n=8)33.9 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=4)43.3 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=17)10.1 weeks
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.668295% CI: [0.39, 1.84]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.685495% CI: [0.49, 3]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.602895% CI: [0.49, 3.37]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.071295% CI: [0.13, 1.13]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.341195% CI: [0.5, 7.15]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.3295% CI: [0.28, 38.48]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From Baseline

TTP = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from Baseline in VEGF-C at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 3, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint), and Cycle 5, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint, \> = median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=30)10.3 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=23)15.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=23)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=19)13.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=20)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=15)10.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)31.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=10)16.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=10)30.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=6)32.9 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=2)37.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGF-C at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=29)16.1 weeks
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.521595% CI: [0.62, 2.53]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.250495% CI: [0.72, 3.49]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.876695% CI: [0.42, 2.11]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.010995% CI: [0.12, 0.8]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.562795% CI: [0.46, 4.18]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.463795% CI: [0.38, 8.12]Log Rank
Secondary

Comparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From Baseline

TTP = time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date minus first sunitinib dose date +1) divided by 7.02. Groups are defined by \< or \> = median levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and after stratification by \< or \> = median changes from baseline in VEGFR3 at each time point.

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 3, Day 28 (\< median cutpoint) and Cycle 5, Day 28 (\> = median cutpoint), median and/or CI were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=30)15.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=30)11.0 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=23)15.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 1, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=23)12.4 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=20)30.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=20)11.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=14)16.8 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 2, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=15)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (< Median Cutpoint, n=10)32.9 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 1 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=11)16.1 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 3, Day 28 (> = Median Cutpoint, n=6)32.9 weeks
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibComparison of Kaplan-Meier TTP Curves After Stratification by < or > = Median Levels of VEGFR3 at Baseline and Changes From BaselineCycle 5, Day 28 (< Median Cutpoint, n=2)38.3 weeks
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 1p-value: 0.782495% CI: [0.56, 2.17]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.191895% CI: [0.77, 3.47]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.109395% CI: [0.85, 4.3]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.480995% CI: [0.56, 3.39]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.01195% CI: [1.26, 13.85]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.208595% CI: [0.52, 14.37]Log Rank
Comparison: Cycle 5, Day 28p-value: 0.808495% CI: [0.08, 23.57]Log Rank
Secondary

Correlation of Polymorphisms in c-Kit, Flt-3 and c-Fms to Safety of Sunitinib

A blood sample (6 mL) was collected and used to isolate DNA. These samples were not anonymized.

Time frame: Within 7 days of Day 1

Population: c-Kit, Flt-3 and c-Fms to safety of Sunitinib samples were collected and analyzed. However, there was no statistics performed since power was insufficient.

Secondary

Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. On Day 28, this parameter provided and idea of the concentration at steady state since no big fluctuation was expected in a 24 hour interval.

Time frame: predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2

Population: PK. Subjects with plasma values below limit of quantification were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=51)27.54 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.1
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)23.47 ng/mLStandard Deviation 20.99
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=16)18.37 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9.05
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 5, Day 28 (n=6)15.67 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.12
Secondary

Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. On Day 28, this parameter provided and idea of the concentration at steady state since no big fluctuation was expected in a 24 hour interval.

Time frame: predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2

Population: PK. Subjects with plasma values below limit of quantification were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=51)85.23 ng/mLStandard Deviation 42.22
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)74.35 ng/mLStandard Deviation 51.6
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=16)59.92 ng/mLStandard Deviation 30.72
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibCtrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 5, Day 28 (n=6)54.24 ng/mLStandard Deviation 27.9
Secondary

Dose-Corrected Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. This was determined due to potential dose changes throughout the study in different subjects. It was calculated as the observed values multiplied by the reference dose (50 mg) divided by the actual dose. For dose-corrected trough concentration, only trough concentration values from subjects who received sunitinib during at least the last 10 consecutive days of dosing at the same dose level were included.

Time frame: predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2

Population: PK. Subjects with plasma values below limit of quantification were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=39)27.90 ng/mLStandard Deviation 14.66
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)27.37 ng/mLStandard Deviation 30.55
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=13)20.64 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9.97
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)Cycle 5, Day 28 (n=5)22.29 ng/mLStandard Deviation 8.35
Secondary

Dose-Corrected Ctrough of Sunitinib

Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. This was determined due to potential dose changes throughout the study in different subjects. It was calculated as the observed values multiplied by the reference dose (50 mg) divided by the actual dose. For dose-corrected trough concentration, only trough concentration values from subjects who received sunitinib during at least the last 10 consecutive days of dosing at the same dose level were included.

Time frame: predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2

Population: PK. Subjects with plasma values below limit of quantification were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SunitinibCycle 1, Day 28 (n=39)64.10 ng/mLStandard Deviation 26.84
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SunitinibCycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)59.85 ng/mLStandard Deviation 40.45
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SunitinibCycle 3, Day 28 (n=13)49.59 ng/mLStandard Deviation 21.86
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of SunitinibCycle 5, Day 28 (n=5)54.51 ng/mLStandard Deviation 13.67
Secondary

Dose-Corrected Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. This was determined due to potential dose changes throughout the study in different subjects. It was calculated as the observed values multiplied by the reference dose (50 mg) divided by the actual dose. For dose-corrected trough concentration, only trough concentration values from subjects who received sunitinib during at least the last 10 consecutive days of dosing at the same dose level were included.

Time frame: predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2

Population: PK. Subjects with plasma values below limit of quantification were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=39)92.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 40.31
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)87.22 ng/mLStandard Deviation 68.28
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=13)70.24 ng/mLStandard Deviation 28.71
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDose-Corrected Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)Cycle 5, Day 28 (n=5)76.80 ng/mLStandard Deviation 20.13
Secondary

Duration of Response (DR)

DR=time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (complete response \[CR\] or partial response \[PR\]) that was subsequently confirmed to first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever was first. CR=disappearance of all target lesions. PR=a \> = 30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference baseline sum longest dimensions. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, first date was used. DR (in weeks) was calculated as (the end date for DR - first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed +1)/7.02.

Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib) or death

Population: ITT. DR was calculated for the subgroup of subjects with objective response. 23 subjects reported CR or PR response and were analyzed for DR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibDuration of Response (DR)27.3 weeks
Secondary

Immunohistochemical Staining of Paraffin Embedded Tumor Tissue

Previously collected tumor paraffin block (or 12-20 10-micron slides prepared for the paraffin block) for correlative laboratory analysis.

Time frame: Screening

Population: Samples were collected and stained from a subset of subjects. Due to the small sample size, no correlative analyses with clinical outcome were conducted.

Secondary

Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease Response

Objective disease response = subjects with confirmed CR or PR according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (Version 1.0). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib)

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibNumber of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Objective Disease Response23 participants
95% CI: [18.2, 38.2]
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death - date of paclitaxel/carboplatin first dose +1)/30.4. For subjects not expiring, their survival times were censored at the last date of known contact they were known to be alive. Subjects lacking data beyond the day of first dose of paclitaxel/carboplatin had their survival time censored at Day 1 of paclitaxel/carboplatin treatment.

Time frame: From start of study treatment until death

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibOverall Survival (OS)10.4 months
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression or to death on study due to any cause, whichever was first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date - first paclitaxel/carboplatin dose date +1)/7.02.

Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib) or death

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibProgression-free Survival (PFS)23.1 weeks
Secondary

Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline

Concentration of soluble E-Selectin at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2

Population: MITT. Number of participants analyzed = number of subjects with soluble E-Selectin data at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin at Baseline27.06 nanograms (ng)/mLStandard Deviation 11.474
Secondary

Soluble E-Selectin at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)

Median concentration of soluble E-selectin at baseline stratified by tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 Weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a nonparametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).

Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with levels of soluble protein biomarkers and tumor response at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=17)26.40 pg/mL
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=21)27.40 pg/mL
p-value: 0.537Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Soluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point

Soluble E-Selectin concentration at each time point divided by soluble E-Selectin concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline).

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with levels of soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. At Cycle 4, Day 28, median and/or standard deviation were not able to be estimated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 1, Day 28 (n=34)0.83 ratioStandard Deviation 0.222
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 2, Day 1 (n=29)0.89 ratioStandard Deviation 0.287
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 2, Day 28 (n=22)0.77 ratioStandard Deviation 0.246
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 3, Day 1 (n=16)0.81 ratioStandard Deviation 0.224
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 3, Day 28 (n=8)0.69 ratioStandard Deviation 0.126
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 5, Day 28 (n=3)0.76 ratioStandard Deviation 0.354
Secondary

Soluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)

Median soluble E-selectin concentration at each time point divided by median soluble E-selectin concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a non-parametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 4 (Day 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. No subjects had PD at Cycle 4, Day 28 and Cycle 5, Day 28.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=10)0.84 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 28 (PD, n=16)0.84 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=13)0.84 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 1 (PD, n=12)0.76 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=10)0.86 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 28 (PD, n=10)0.64 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=10)0.74 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 1 (PD, n=5)0.77 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=7)0.67 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 28 (PD, n=1)0.78 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 4, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=1)1.13 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibSoluble E-Selectin Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 5, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=3)0.64 ratio
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.813Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.849Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.121Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.582Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.383Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective disease progression. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. TTP (in weeks) was calculated as (first event date - first paclitaxel/carboplatin dose date +1)/7.02.

Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 21 of Cycles 2 and 4 (Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel), Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, and even cycles thereafter (Sunitinib)

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibTime to Tumor Progression (TTP)23.6 weeks
Secondary

Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Sunitinib

Ctrough = the plasma concentration prior to study drug administration. On Day 28, this parameter provided and idea of the concentration at steady state since no big fluctuation was expected in a 24 hour interval.

Time frame: predose on Day 28 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, and 5 of Part 2

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) = all subjects enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of carboplatin/paclitaxel or sunitinib. Subjects with plasma values below limit of quantification were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibTrough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SunitinibCycle 1, Day 28 (n=51)57.69 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)Standard Deviation 29.37
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibTrough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SunitinibCycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)50.88 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)Standard Deviation 33.67
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibTrough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SunitinibCycle 3, Day 28 (n=16)41.55 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)Standard Deviation 24.28
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibTrough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SunitinibCycle 5, Day 28 (n=6)38.57 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)Standard Deviation 21.83
Secondary

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3) Concentration at Baseline

Concentration of VEGFR3 at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2

Population: Modified ITT population (MITT) = all subjects enrolled in the study who received at least 1 dose of paclitaxel/carboplatin and at least 1 dose of Sunitinib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3) Concentration at Baseline30382.83 picograms (pg)/milliliter (mL)Standard Deviation 19134.12
Secondary

VEGF-C at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)

Median concentration of VEGF-C at baseline stratified by tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 Weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a nonparametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).

Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with levels of soluble protein biomarkers and tumor response at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=20)704.80 pg/mL
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=24)766.45 pg/mL
p-value: 0.305Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

VEGF-C Concentration at Baseline

Concentration of VEGF-C at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2

Population: MITT. Number of participants analyzed = number of subjects with VEGF-C data at Baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Concentration at Baseline793.19 pg/mLStandard Deviation 323.77
Secondary

VEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point

VEGF-C concentration at each time point divided by VEGF-C concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline).

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with levels of soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 1, Day 28 (n=46)0.81 ratioStandard Deviation 0.342
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 2, Day 1 (n=39)0.90 ratioStandard Deviation 0.396
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 2, Day 28 (n=30)0.91 ratioStandard Deviation 0.577
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 3, Day 1 (n=20)1.00 ratioStandard Deviation 0.46
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 3, Day 28 (n=12)0.91 ratioStandard Deviation 0.34
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 5, Day 28 (n=4)0.89 ratioStandard Deviation 0.269
Secondary

VEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)

Median VEGF-C concentration at each time point divided by median VEGF-C concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a non-parametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. No subjects had PD at Cycle 5, Day 28.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=16)0.73 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 28 (PD, n=20)0.81 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=18)0.87 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 1 (PD, n=16)0.85 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=16)0.89 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 28 (PD, n=12)0.69 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=14)0.89 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 1 (PD, n=5)0.78 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=11)0.85 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 28 (PD, n=1)0.90 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 5, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=4)0.78 ratio
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.738Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.438Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.236Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.287Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.772Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

VEGFR3 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)

Median concentration of VEGFR3 at baseline stratified by tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 Weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a nonparametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).

Time frame: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with levels of soluble protein biomarkers and tumor response at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=21)21660.00 pg/mL
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=24)27740.00 pg/mL
p-value: 0.474Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

VEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point

VEGFR3 concentration at each time point divided by VEGFR3 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline).

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with levels of soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 1, Day 28 (n=46)0.39 ratioStandard Deviation 0.201
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 2, Day 1 (n=40)0.74 ratioStandard Deviation 0.255
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 2, Day 28 (n=29)0.36 ratioStandard Deviation 0.165
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 3, Day 1 (n=21)0.70 ratioStandard Deviation 0.288
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 3, Day 28 (n=12)0.31 ratioStandard Deviation 0.111
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time PointCycle 5, Day 28 (n=4)0.31 ratioStandard Deviation 0.163
Secondary

VEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)

Median VEGFR3 concentration at each time point divided by median VEGFR3 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or \[SD \> = 6 weeks\] or PD). A measure of dispersion is not included because the Wilcoxon rank sum test is a non-parametric test that makes no assumptions about the distribution of the data (eg, normality).

Time frame: Baseline to Cycle 1 (Day 28), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 3 (Days 1, 28), Cycle 5 (Day 28) of Part 2

Population: MITT. n=number of subjects with levels of soluble protein biomarkers at baseline and at the specified time point. No subjects had PD at Cycle 5, Day 28.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=16)0.34 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 1, Day 28 (PD, n=20)0.35 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=19)0.75 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 1 (PD, n=16)0.84 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=15)0.32 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 2, Day 28 (PD, n=12)0.38 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=15)0.57 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 1 (PD, n=5)0.92 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=11)0.38 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 3, Day 28 (pd, n=1)0.43 ratio
First Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel, Then SunitinibVEGFR3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 6 Weeks] or PD)Cycle 5, Day 28 (CR or PR or SD, n=4)0.30 ratio
Comparison: Cycle 1, Day 28p-value: 0.836Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 1p-value: 0.071Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 2, Day 28p-value: 0.393Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 1p-value: 0.029Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Comparison: Cycle 3, Day 28p-value: 0.247Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026