Skip to content

Non-cutting Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Acne

Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00113425
Enrollment
44
Registered
2005-06-08
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2016-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Vulgaris

Keywords

non-ablative laser, acne, photosensitizer, photodynamic therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this research project is to study the effect of non-ablative (non-cutting) laser therapy, a technique that uses laser energy to try to improve the appearance of the skin. This type of laser treatment creates changes in a layer of the skin called the dermis without causing an open wound in the skin. The use of non-ablative laser therapy, together with application of a photo-sensitizer (substance that makes the skin more sensitive to light), may improve the appearance of acne. The idea behind the photo-sensitizer is that it is supposed to make the laser more effective than using just the laser alone. It is not yet clear how much improvement can be seen with these treatments or exactly how the skin's response causes these improvements. In this study, we are interested in learning how well such a laser works to improve the symptoms of acne, as well as how much the photo-sensitizer actually enhances the efficacy of the laser.

Detailed description

Acne vulgaris remains among the most common cutaneous disorders, impacting the vast majority of people at some point during their lives. It is associated with significant psychosocial morbidity, and there remains the need for efficacious and low risk therapeutic options. Recently, the FDA has approved various lasers for the treatment of acne. However, few randomized, controlled clinical trials have been performed. In addition, the use of topical photosensitizers preceding laser therapy for acne has also been examined in a preliminary way with some initial evidence of efficacy. However, these small trials have primarily focused on back acne and have included modest numbers of subjects. Photodynamic therapy for facial acne is being performed by physicians across the country but little objective data regarding this practice is available. We propose to evaluate the efficacy and confirm the safety of pulsed dye laser therapy (V-Beam laser, Candela Corp., Wayland, MA, 595 nm wavelength) used in conjunction with a topical photosensitizer in the treatment of acne vulgaris. This is a split-face comparison study in which one half of the face will be treated with photo-sensitizer and laser, and the contralateral side will be left untreated. Because one proposed mechanism of action for such treatments includes altered sebaceous gland activity, we also seek to examine the effects of this treatment on cutaneous sebum production.

Interventions

DEVICEV-Beam laser, Candela Corp., 595 nm wavelength

Subjects will receive a series of up to 6 laser therapy sessions with a treatment interval of from approximately 1 to 4 weeks. In all cases, laser treatment parameters will be within the guidelines normally used clinically with the V-Beam laser, and thus fluences used will not exceed 15 J/cm2.

Sponsors

University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 15 years or older of either gender and of any racial/ethnic group. * Presence of clinically-evident facial acne. * Subjects must be in generally good health. * Subjects must be able and willing to comply with the requirements of the protocol. * You must live within a reasonable driving distance of Ann Arbor, Michigan, and/or be able to attend all of the scheduled appointments during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Oral retinoid (Accutane) use within 6 months of entry into the study. * Systemic acne therapies (oral antibiotics) within 4 weeks of entry into the study. * Topical acne therapies (retinoids, antibiotics) within 2 weeks of entry into the study. * Microdermabrasion or superficial chemical peels at the sites to be treated within 2 months of entry into the study. * Subjects with a history of dermabrasion or laser resurfacing at the sites to be treated. * Use of topical lipid absorbing substances (Clinac AC) within 2 weeks of entry into the study. * Non-compliant subjects. * Subjects with a significant medical history or concurrent illness/condition which the investigator(s) feel is not safe for study participation. * Subjects using alcohol-based topical solutions or exfoliating agents within 2 weeks of entry into the study. * Subjects with a history of very frequent herpes simplex infections of the face or with clinical evidence of active herpes simplex infections. * History of keloid (excessive scar) formation for subjects undergoing biopsies. * Pregnant or nursing females. * Subjects with known allergy or hypersensitivity to topical photosensitizing agents. * Subjects with known photosensitivity disorders felt by the investigators to preclude safe inclusion in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 10Baseline and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Cysts at Week 10Baseline and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 10Baseline and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 10Baseline and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 10Baseline and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 10Baseline and Week 10
Change From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 10Baseline and Week 10The Leeds scale is a 12-point ordinal photonumeric global acne severity scale where a rating of 1 denotes the mildest acne and a rating of 12 represents the most severe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 16Baseline and Week 16The Leeds scale is a 12-point ordinal photonumeric global acne severity scale where a rating of 1 denotes the mildest acne and a rating of 12 represents the most severe.
Change From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Cysts at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 16Baseline and Week 16

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treated Group Pulsed Dye Laser Therapy and Untreated Group
Patients were randomized to receive topical photosensitizer applications followed by pulsed dye laser therapy to one side of the face and the contralateral side of the face remained untreated, thus serving as an internal control.
44
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreated Group Pulsed Dye Laser Therapy and Untreated Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
43 Participants
Age, Continuous25.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.46
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black / African American
3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
30 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic, Latina
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 440 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 440 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 10

The Leeds scale is a 12-point ordinal photonumeric global acne severity scale where a rating of 1 denotes the mildest acne and a rating of 12 represents the most severe.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 10Change from Baseline on Treated Side-0.90 units on a scale
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 10Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-0.30 units on a scale
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in acne severity for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.003paired t-test, 2-sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 10

Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 10Change from Baseline on Treated Side-5.07 closed comedones
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 10Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-1.17 closed comedones
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in closed comedones for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.1paired t-test, 2-sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cysts at Week 10

Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Cysts at Week 10Change from Baseline on Treated Side0.10 cysts
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Cysts at Week 10Change from Baseline on Untreated Side0.07 cysts
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in cysts for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.79paired t-test, 2-sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 10

Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 10Change from Baseline on Treated Side-1.88 erythematous macules
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 10Change from Baseline on Untreated Side1.28 erythematous macules
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in erythematous macules for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.02paired t-test, 2-sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 10

Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 10Change from Baseline on Treated Side-1.00 open comedones
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 10Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-0.63 open comedones
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in open comedones for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.73paired t-test, 2-sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 10

Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 10Change from Baseline on Treated Side-4.63 papule acne lesions
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 10Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-0.13 papule acne lesions
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in papule acne lesions for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.01paired t-test, 2-sided
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 10

Time frame: Baseline and Week 10

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 10Change from Baseline on Treated Side-1.80 pustule acne lesions
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 10Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-1.20 pustule acne lesions
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in pustule acne lesions for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.43paired t-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 16

The Leeds scale is a 12-point ordinal photonumeric global acne severity scale where a rating of 1 denotes the mildest acne and a rating of 12 represents the most severe.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 16Change from Baseline on Treated Side-1.07 units on a scale
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Acne Severity at Week 16Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-0.52 units on a scale
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in acne severity for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.01paired t-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 16

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 16Change from Baseline on Treated Side-6.97 closed comedones
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Closed Comedones at Week 16Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-4.07 closed comedones
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in closed comedones for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.21paired t-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cysts at Week 16

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Cysts at Week 16Change from Baseline on Treated Side0.38 cysts
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Cysts at Week 16Change from Baseline on Untreated Side0.24 cysts
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in cysts for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.49paired t-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 16

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 16Change from Baseline on Treated Side-5.89 erythematous macules
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Erythematous Macules at Week 16Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-2.50 erythematous macules
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in erythematous macules for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.04paired t-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 16

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 16Change from Baseline on Treated Side-4.79 open comedones
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Open Comedones at Week 16Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-6.79 open comedones
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in open comedones for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.27paired t-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 16

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 16Change from Baseline on Treated Side-1.79 papule acne lesions
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Papule Acne Lesions at Week 16Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-0.97 papule acne lesions
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in papule acne lesions for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.62paired t-test, 2-sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 16

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 16Change from Baseline on Treated Side-2.72 pustule acne lesions
All Study ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Pustule Acne Lesions at Week 16Change from Baseline on Untreated Side-2.62 pustule acne lesions
Comparison: Null Hypothesis = There is no difference between change from baseline in pustule acne lesions for the treated side of the face compared to the change from baseline for the untreated side of the face in all patientsp-value: 0.85paired t-test, 2-sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026