Skip to content

Staccato: A Trial of CD4 Guided Treatment Interruption, Compared to Continuous Treatment, for HIV Infection

A Randomized Trial of CD4 Guided Treatment Interruption, Compared to Continuous Treatment, for HIV Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00113126
Enrollment
526
Registered
2005-06-06
Start date
2002-01-31
Completion date
2005-10-31
Last updated
2006-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infection, AIDS

Keywords

Scheduled treatment interruptions, STI

Brief summary

Treatment of HIV repairs the immune system, but continuous treatment is expensive and causes side effects. Would it not be better to treat intermittently, e.g. stop treatment when the immune system has recovered, and start again only when damage reappears? That is the question which STACCATO proposes to answer. Approximately 500 patients were recruited for this trial from 2002 to 2004. One third were treated continuously; in two thirds, the treatment was interrupted whenever the CD4 count, a measure of immune recovery, exceeded 350. At the end of 2005, the two treatment groups will be compared in order to see which fared better regarding amount of drugs used, side effects, CD4 counts, and development of resistance to treatment.

Detailed description

Continuous treatment has been very successful in diminishing the diseases and deaths caused by HIV. However, continuous treatment is expensive. Intermittent treatment will always cost less than continuous treatment, and therefore has the potential to facilitate access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in developing countries. HAART also causes many undesirable effects. Intermittent treatment decreases exposure to drugs and is therefore expected to decrease side effects. STACCATO is a randomised trial of intermittent versus continuous anti-retroviral treatment. At least 600 patients on HAART, with viremia below 50 copies/ml and CD4 count above 350 cells/ml were randomised to one of two arms, in 1:2 proportions: * Arm 1: Continuation (control) arm: Drugs are continued or changed according to current guidelines and good clinical practice. * Arm 2: CD4-guided arm: Drugs discontinued and reintroduced according to CD4 counts, with HAART being administered only if CD4 count is \< 350 cells/ml. Randomized treatment will continue during an average of approximately 2 years, and will be followed by a period of 12 to 24 weeks' continuous treatment, for patients in both arms. Endpoints: The amount of drugs used, side effects, viremia and CD4 counts, number of clinical events, at the end of the randomized treatment period, and again 12 to 24 weeks later. A subproject will study the effect of treatment interruption on resistance development, mutations in proviral DNA and proviral DNA levels.

Interventions

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* CD4 lymphocyte count above 350/microliter and viral HIV1-RNA below 50 copies/ml on antiretroviral treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Virologic failure of treatment. Failure of treatment defined as a treatment switch motivated by high viral loads on treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Amounts of drugs used
Response of viral load to retreatment after interruption

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Opportunistic infections and deaths
Adverse effects
CD4 counts
Resistance development

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026