Skip to content

International Safety and Efficacy Study of Aztreonam for Inhalation Solution (AZLI) in Cystic Fibrosis Patients With P. Aeruginosa

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating Aztreonam Lysinate for Inhalation in Cystic Fibrosis Patients With Pulmonary Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (AIR-CF1)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00112359
Acronym
AIR-CF1
Enrollment
166
Registered
2005-06-02
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2007-04-30
Last updated
2011-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pulmonary Cystic Fibrosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a 28-day course of aztreonam for inhalation solution (AZLI) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and lung infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA).

Detailed description

CF patients often have lung infections that occur repeatedly or worsen over time. The lung infections are often caused by a bacteria called Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). Treatment with antibiotics can stop or slow down the growth of the bacteria. The antibiotics may be given by mouth, intravenously (IV), or by inhalation as a mist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZLI, an investigational formulation of the antibiotic aztreonam and administered TID using the PARI eFlow® electronic nebulizer, in CF patients with PA. In this study, participant eligibility was assessed at a screening visit 7 to 14 days prior to the baseline visit (Day 0). Those participants who continued to meet eligibility criteria at Day 0 were randomized and began a 28-day course of blinded study treatment (AZLI TID or placebo TID). Participants returned for clinic visits at Day 14, an end of treatment visit at Day 28, and a follow-up visit 14 days after the last dose of study drug (Day 42).

Interventions

DRUGAZLI 75 mg three times a day (TID)
DRUGPlacebo three times a day (TID)

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documentation of CF diagnosis as evidenced by one or more clinical features consistent with the CF phenotype and one or more of the following criteria: * Sweat chloride greater than or equal to 60 mEq/L by quantitative pilocarpine iontophoresis test (QPIT); * Two well-characterized mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene; or * Abnormal nasal potential difference. * PA present in expectorated sputum or throat swab culture at Screening. * FEV1 between (and including) 25% and 75% predicted at Screening. * Negative pregnancy test at Screening. * Ability to perform reproducible pulmonary function tests. * Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) greater than or equal to 90% on room air at Screening. * Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Administration of antipseudomonal antibiotics by inhalation, IV, or oral routes (including azithromycin) within 14 days of Screening. * Current use of oral corticosteroids in doses exceeding the equivalent of 10 mg prednisone/day or 20 mg prednisone every other day. * History of sputum or throat swab culture yielding Burkholderia cepacia in the previous 2 years. * History of daily continuous oxygen supplementation or requirement for more than 2 liters/minute at night. * Administration of any investigational drug or use of any investigational device within 28 days of Screening and within 6 half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever was longer). * Known local or systemic hypersensitivity to monobactam antibiotics. * Inability to tolerate short-acting bronchodilator use at least three times daily. * Changes in protocol-permitted antimicrobial, bronchodilator, anti-inflammatory, or corticosteroid medications within 7 days prior to Screening or between Screening and the next visit. * Changes in physiotherapy technique or schedule within 7 days prior to Screening or between Screening and the next visit. * History of lung transplantation. * A chest x-ray indicating abnormal findings at Screening or within the previous 90 days. * Abnormal renal or hepatic function at Screening. * Any serious or active medical or psychiatric illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with participant treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol. * Use of aerosolized hypertonic saline (except for sputum induction) during the 14 days preceding Visit 1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in CFQ-R Respiratory Symptoms Scale (RSS) ScoreDay 0 to Day 28The CFQ-R was administered at baseline and every visit thereafter. The endpoint was change in respiratory symptoms from baseline, assessed with the CFQ-R respiratory symptoms scale (RSS; range of scores: 0-100; higher scores indicate fewer symptoms).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in CFQ-R RSS ScoreDay 0 to Day 14The CFQ-R was administered at baseline and every visit thereafter. The endpoint was change in respiratory symptoms from baseline, assessed with the CFQ-R RSS (range of scores: 0-100; higher scores indicate fewer symptoms).
Percent Change in FEV1 (L)Day 0 to Day 28Spirometry was performed according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines at each visit. The percent change from baseline in forced expiratory volume (liters) in one second (FEV1) was determined at Day 28.
Change From Baseline in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PA) Log10 Colony Forming Units (CFU) Per Gram of SputumDay 0 to Day 28Sputum samples were collected at all participant visits of the study for analysis of microbiology endpoints. Sputum samples were processed for qualitative and quantitative culture of PA (each morphotype). Due to the skewness of the distribution of CFU data, the data were transformed using the base 10 logarithm, in an attempt to normalize the data and allow for parametric tests, before calculating changes. To account for zero values, 1 was added to each CFU measurement before being transformed. Any CFU data values where PA was not isolated from a valid culture were set to zero.
Number of Participants Receiving Intravenous (IV) or Inhaled Antipseudomonal Antibiotics Other Than Trial DrugDay 0 to Day 42Use of IV and inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotics was compiled from data recorded on the Concomitant Medications eCRF.
Number of Participants Hospitalized at Least Once Between Day 0 and Day 42Day 0 to Day 42Details of all hospitalizations, including the dates of admission and discharge, were recorded on the SAE eCRF.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentDay 0 to Day 28Sputum samples were collected at all visits for quantitative and qualitative culture for Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 0PA isolates from sputum samples (collected at all visits) were assessed for their susceptibility to aztreonam. MIC50 = minimum inhibitory concentration (minimum concentration of an agent that inhibits 50% of isolates from a particular organism). MIC90 = minimum inhibitory concentration (minimum concentration of an agent that inhibits 90% of isolates from a particular organism). MIC50 and MIC90 values are single measurements for the entire population and not measured on a per-participant basis.

Countries

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Phase 3, double-blind, multicenter, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating AZLI in patients with CF and PA. Participants were enrolled at 53 sites total: 40 in United States, 5 in Canada, 7 in Australia, and 1 in New Zealand. Date of first enrollment was 10 Jun 2005, and date of last participant follow-up was 3 Apr 2007.

Pre-assignment details

Planned study size was 140 participants to be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to AZLI or placebo TID, with 166 actually randomized (83 AZLI, 83 placebo). However, two participants did not receive a dose of drug, and one participant randomized to receive AZLI received placebo in error. Thus, 80 participants received AZLI and 84 received placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo TID
Placebo (5 mg/mL lactose when reconstituted in diluent \[0.17% saline\]; sterile, pH 4.2 to 7.5, and osmolality 200 to 400 mOsmol/kg). Placebo was self-administered three times a day by inhalation using the investigational nebulizer.
84
75 mg AZLI TID
AZLI (75 mg/mL aztreonam lysine when reconstituted in diluent \[0.17% saline\]; sterile, pH 4.2 to 7.0, and osmolality 300 to 550 mOsmol/kg). AZLI was self-administered by inhalation three times a day using the investigational nebulizer.
80
Total164

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyOther30
Overall StudyPersonal/administrative11
Overall StudyRelated adverse event53
Overall StudyTrial drug intolerance (adverse event)20
Overall StudyUnrelated adverse event168

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo TID75 mg AZLI TIDTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
16 Participants21 Participants37 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
66 Participants59 Participants125 Participants
Age Continuous31.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
27.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Disease severity based on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) % predicted
Disease severity: FEV1 <= 50% predicted
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Disease severity based on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) % predicted
Disease severity: FEV1 > 50% predicted
54 participants50 participants104 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
21 participants18 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
63 participants62 participants125 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants32 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants48 Participants93 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
67 / 8463 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 845 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Change in CFQ-R Respiratory Symptoms Scale (RSS) Score

The CFQ-R was administered at baseline and every visit thereafter. The endpoint was change in respiratory symptoms from baseline, assessed with the CFQ-R respiratory symptoms scale (RSS; range of scores: 0-100; higher scores indicate fewer symptoms).

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 28

Population: ITT population: participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of 1 dose of study drug. Participants summarized by actual treatment received. Missing baseline data not imputed. Missing post-baseline data imputed using worst-case value for withdrawals due to AE or study drug intolerance. All other missing data: LOCF method used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo TIDChange in CFQ-R Respiratory Symptoms Scale (RSS) Score-2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.95
75 mg AZLI TIDChange in CFQ-R Respiratory Symptoms Scale (RSS) Score7.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.98
Comparison: Null hypothesis was there was no difference between 75 mg AZLI TID and placebo treatment groups in change from baseline in CFQ-R RSS score at Day 28.~A sample size of 70 participants per treatment group provided approximately 77% power to detect an 8-point difference in CFQ-R RSS score between treatment groups, assuming a standard deviation (SD) of 20 and a Type I error rate of 0.05.p-value: 0.000595% CI: [4.31, 15.11]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PA) Log10 Colony Forming Units (CFU) Per Gram of Sputum

Sputum samples were collected at all participant visits of the study for analysis of microbiology endpoints. Sputum samples were processed for qualitative and quantitative culture of PA (each morphotype). Due to the skewness of the distribution of CFU data, the data were transformed using the base 10 logarithm, in an attempt to normalize the data and allow for parametric tests, before calculating changes. To account for zero values, 1 was added to each CFU measurement before being transformed. Any CFU data values where PA was not isolated from a valid culture were set to zero.

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 28

Population: Analysis based on ITT population (all participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of 1 dose of study drug). Participants were summarized by the actual treatment received. No imputation methods were used for the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo TIDChange From Baseline in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PA) Log10 Colony Forming Units (CFU) Per Gram of Sputum0.069 Log10 PA CFUs/gram of sputumStandard Error 0.231
75 mg AZLI TIDChange From Baseline in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PA) Log10 Colony Forming Units (CFU) Per Gram of Sputum-1.384 Log10 PA CFUs/gram of sputumStandard Error 0.247
Comparison: Null hypothesis was there was no difference between 75 mg AZLI TID and placebo treatment groups in change in log10 PA CFUs in sputum at Day 28.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-2.115, -0.791]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in CFQ-R RSS Score

The CFQ-R was administered at baseline and every visit thereafter. The endpoint was change in respiratory symptoms from baseline, assessed with the CFQ-R RSS (range of scores: 0-100; higher scores indicate fewer symptoms).

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 14

Population: ITT population: participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of 1 dose of study drug. Participants summarized by actual treatment received. Missing baseline data not imputed. Missing post-baseline data imputed using worst-case value for withdrawals due to AE or study drug intolerance. All other missing data: LOCF method used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo TIDChange in CFQ-R RSS Score0.976 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.624
75 mg AZLI TIDChange in CFQ-R RSS Score7.007 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.647
Comparison: Null hypothesis was there was no difference between 75 mg AZLI TID and placebo treatment groups in change from baseline in CFQ-R RSS score at Day 14.p-value: 0.000695% CI: [3.5, 12.47]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in CFQ-R RSS Score

The CFQ-R was administered at baseline and every visit thereafter. The endpoint was change in respiratory symptoms from baseline, assessed with the CFQ-R RSS (range of scores: 0-100; higher scores indicate fewer symptoms).

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 42

Population: ITT population: participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of 1 dose of study drug. Participants summarized by actual treatment received. Missing baseline data not imputed. Missing post-baseline data imputed using worst-case value for withdrawals due to AE or study drug intolerance. All other missing data: LOCF method used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo TIDChange in CFQ-R RSS Score-5.711 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.849
75 mg AZLI TIDChange in CFQ-R RSS Score0.618 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.875
Comparison: Null hypothesis was there was no difference between 75 mg AZLI TID and placebo treatment groups in change from baseline in CFQ-R RSS score at Day 42.p-value: 0.015495% CI: [1.22, 11.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Hospitalized at Least Once Between Day 0 and Day 42

Details of all hospitalizations, including the dates of admission and discharge, were recorded on the SAE eCRF.

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 42

Population: Analysis based on ITT population (all participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of one dose of study drug). Participants were summarized by the actual treatment received. No imputation methods were used for the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants Hospitalized at Least Once Between Day 0 and Day 4212 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants Hospitalized at Least Once Between Day 0 and Day 424 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis was there was no difference between 75 mg AZLI TID and placebo treatment groups in number of participants hospitalized at least once during the study.p-value: 0.064Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants Receiving Intravenous (IV) or Inhaled Antipseudomonal Antibiotics Other Than Trial Drug

Use of IV and inhaled antipseudomonal antibiotics was compiled from data recorded on the Concomitant Medications eCRF.

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 42

Population: Analysis based on ITT population (all participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of one dose of study drug). Participants were summarized by the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants Receiving Intravenous (IV) or Inhaled Antipseudomonal Antibiotics Other Than Trial Drug19 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants Receiving Intravenous (IV) or Inhaled Antipseudomonal Antibiotics Other Than Trial Drug12 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis was there was no difference between 75 mg AZLI TID and placebo treatment groups in number of participants using additional (nonprotocol-specified) antipseudomonal antibiotics during study.p-value: 0.2364Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percent Change in FEV1 (L)

Spirometry was performed according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines at each visit. The percent change from baseline in forced expiratory volume (liters) in one second (FEV1) was determined at Day 28.

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 28

Population: ITT population: participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of 1 dose of study drug. Participants summarized by actual treatment received. Missing baseline data not imputed. Missing post-baseline data imputed using worst-case value for withdrawals due to AE or study drug intolerance. All other missing data: LOCF method used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo TIDPercent Change in FEV1 (L)-2.408 Percent change in FEV1 (L)Standard Error 1.466
75 mg AZLI TIDPercent Change in FEV1 (L)7.886 Percent change in FEV1 (L)Standard Error 1.481
Comparison: Null hypothesis was there was no difference between 75 mg AZLI TID and placebo treatment groups in percent change in FEV1 at Day 28.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [6.288, 14.299]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)

PA isolates from sputum samples (collected at all visits) were assessed for their susceptibility to aztreonam. MIC50 = minimum inhibitory concentration (minimum concentration of an agent that inhibits 50% of isolates from a particular organism). MIC90 = minimum inhibitory concentration (minimum concentration of an agent that inhibits 90% of isolates from a particular organism). MIC50 and MIC90 values are single measurements for the entire population and not measured on a per-participant basis.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Analysis based on ITT population (all participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of one dose of study drug). Participants were summarized by the actual treatment received. No imputation methods were used for the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 28 MIC502 μg/mL
Placebo TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 28 MIC9064 μg/mL
75 mg AZLI TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 28 MIC508 μg/mL
75 mg AZLI TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 28 MIC90128 μg/mL
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)

PA isolates from sputum samples (collected at all visits) were assessed for their susceptibility to aztreonam. MIC50 = minimum inhibitory concentration (minimum concentration of an agent that inhibits 50% of isolates from a particular organism). MIC90 = minimum inhibitory concentration (minimum concentration of an agent that inhibits 90% of isolates from a particular organism). MIC50 and MIC90 values are single measurements for the entire population and not measured on a per-participant basis.

Time frame: Day 0

Population: Analysis based on ITT population (all participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of one dose of study drug). Participants were summarized by the actual treatment received. No imputation methods were used for the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 0 MIC502 μg/mL
Placebo TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 0 MIC9064 μg/mL
75 mg AZLI TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 0 MIC504 μg/mL
75 mg AZLI TIDMinimum Inhibitory Concentration of Aztreonam Inhibiting 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of All PA Isolates (μg/mL)Day 0 MIC90128 μg/mL
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Other Pathogens Present

Sputum samples were collected at all visits for quantitative and qualitative culture for Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans.

Time frame: Day 0 to Day 28

Population: Analysis based on ITT population (all participants randomized to treatment who received at least part of one dose of study drug). Participants were summarized by the actual treatment received. No imputation methods were used for the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStaphylococcus aureus - Day 030 participants
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentBurkholderia cepacia - Day 00 participants
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStenotrophomonas maltophilia - Day 282 participants
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStaphylococcus aureus - Day 2831 participants
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentAchromobacter xylosoxidans - Day 05 participants
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentBurkholderia cepacia - Day 280 participants
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentAchromobacter xylosoxidans - Day 287 participants
Placebo TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStenotrophomonas maltophilia - Day 04 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentAchromobacter xylosoxidans - Day 281 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStaphylococcus aureus - Day 037 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStaphylococcus aureus - Day 2835 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentBurkholderia cepacia - Day 01 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentBurkholderia cepacia - Day 280 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStenotrophomonas maltophilia - Day 01 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentStenotrophomonas maltophilia - Day 282 participants
75 mg AZLI TIDNumber of Participants With Other Pathogens PresentAchromobacter xylosoxidans - Day 01 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026