Skip to content

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER System With Active Fixation Leads in Subjects With Heart Failure Resulting From Systolic Dysfunction: FIX-HF-5

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00112125
Enrollment
428
Registered
2005-05-30
Start date
2005-02-28
Completion date
2019-03-19
Last updated
2020-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Congestive

Keywords

cardiac contractility modulation, heart failure, cardiopulmonary exercise test, chronic heart disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with the OPTIMIZER System is safe and effective in patients with moderate to severe heart failure symptoms.

Detailed description

IMPULSE Dynamics' FIX HF 5 US Study is a prospective, multi-center, study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals delivered by the implantable OPTIMIZER™ System in patients with NYHA class III/IV heart failure. The study will involve the recruitment of approximately 420 subjects at a total of up to 50 sites nationwide. Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomized to receive the OPTIMIZER™ System or to a control group. All subjects randomized will be followed for 1 year and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive optimal medical therapy for the treatment of their heart failure. The primary efficacy assessment consists of a change in exercise tolerance measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 6 months. Safety variables, such as the rate and cause of hospitalizations or death, shall be collected in both groups and shall be compared at 12 months.

Interventions

Sponsors

Impulse Dynamics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who are 18 years of age or older * Subjects who are either male or female * Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction of 35% or less by echocardiography. * Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the patient is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III or IV at the time of enrollment. * Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose. * Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principle Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons. * Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects whose baseline VO2,max is \<9 ml 02/min/kg. * Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease. * Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or electrocardiography (ECG) changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation. * Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment. * Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring. * Subjects who have chronic atrial fibrillation or chronic atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment. * Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease \[COPD\], peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to participate in a 6-minute walk or a cardiopulmonary stress test. * Subjects who are scheduled for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment. * Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system or who have an accepted indication for such a device. * Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment. * Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid or aortic valves. * Subjects who have a prior heart transplant. * Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol. * Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT)24 weeksNumber of participants with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as quantified by VO2 at ventilatory anerobic threshold (VAT) measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if VAT increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.
Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations50-weeksThe proportion of patients experiencing a composite event of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations evaluated at 50-weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak VO224 weeksNumber of participants with improvement in peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if peak VO2 increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification24 weeksNumber of participants with improvement in heart failure symptoms as quantified by a blinded clinician using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification at 24 weeks compared to baseline. The NYHA Class ranges from I - IV, with a lower class indicating a better status. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the NYHA class decreases by ≥ 1 at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline class.
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire24 weeksNumber of subjects will improvement in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of life. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the MLWHFQ score decreases by ≥10 points at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline score.
Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test24 weeksNumber of subjects with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the the six minute hall walk (6MW) test. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder with \>40-meter increase in distance walked at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline distance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group (OMT)
Optimal medical treatment (OMT). Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and B-blocker.
213
Treatment (OMT + CCM)
Treatment group: Subjects receiving OMT and cardiac contractility modulation therapy with the Optimizer System.
215
Total428

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl Group (OMT)Treatment (OMT + CCM)Total
6 Minute Hall Walk Distance324 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 92.4
326.4 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 82.1
325.2 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.28
Age, Continuous58.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
58.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
58.35 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
MLWHFQ score57.4 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6
60.5 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23
58.95 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.282
NYHA Class III183 Participants196 Participants379 Participants
NYHA Class IV29 Participants19 Participants48 Participants
Peak VO214.71 ml/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92
14.74 ml/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.06
14.725 ml/kg/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
45 Participants36 Participants81 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
21 Participants18 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
142 Participants154 Participants296 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
213 participants215 participants428 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants57 Participants119 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
151 Participants158 Participants309 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 21213 / 210
other
Total, other adverse events
135 / 212152 / 210
serious
Total, serious adverse events
115 / 212129 / 210

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT)

Number of participants with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as quantified by VO2 at ventilatory anerobic threshold (VAT) measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if VAT increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Intention to treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control Group (OMT)Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT)28 Participants
Treatment (CCM + OMT)Efficacy Endpoint: Ventilatory Anerobic Threshold (VAT)38 Participants
p-value: 0.31Fisher Exact
Primary

Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations

The proportion of patients experiencing a composite event of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations evaluated at 50-weeks

Time frame: 50-weeks

Population: Intention-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control Group (OMT)Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations103 Participants
Treatment (CCM + OMT)Safety Endpoint: Composite All-cause Mortality and All-cause Hospitalizations112 Participants
p-value: 0.125Blackwelder
Secondary

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire

Number of subjects will improvement in quality of life at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire. The MLWHFQ score could range from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating more significant impairment in health-related quality of life. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the MLWHFQ score decreases by ≥10 points at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline score.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Completed cases

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control Group (OMT)Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire77 Participants
Treatment (CCM + OMT)Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) Questionnaire110 Participants
Secondary

New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification

Number of participants with improvement in heart failure symptoms as quantified by a blinded clinician using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification at 24 weeks compared to baseline. The NYHA Class ranges from I - IV, with a lower class indicating a better status. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if the NYHA class decreases by ≥ 1 at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline class.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Completed cases

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control Group (OMT)New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification63 Participants
Treatment (CCM + OMT)New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification94 Participants
Secondary

Peak VO2

Number of participants with improvement in peak VO2 measured on cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPX), and evaluated by a blinded core lab. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder if peak VO2 increases by ≥20% at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline value.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Completed cases

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control Group (OMT)Peak VO223 Participants
Treatment (CCM + OMT)Peak VO231 Participants
Secondary

Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test

Number of subjects with improvement in exercise tolerance at 24 weeks compared to baseline, as assessed by the the six minute hall walk (6MW) test. Note: An individual subject is considered a responder with \>40-meter increase in distance walked at 24 weeks compared to their respective baseline distance.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Completed cases

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control Group (OMT)Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test51 Participants
Treatment (CCM + OMT)Six Minute Hall Walk (6MW) Test65 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026