Skip to content

Treatment for Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma

Phase II Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of Sorafenib in Repeated Cycles of 21 Days in Combination With Dacarbazine (DTIC) Chemotherapy in Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00110994
Enrollment
101
Registered
2005-05-17
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2015-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Melanoma

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, phase II study to compare the anti-tumor activity as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and the tolerability of Sorafenib in combination with Dacarbazine (DTIC) versus DTIC in combination with placebo in subjects with unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma who have not received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy. A total of approximately 98 subjects will be randomized to receive DTIC + Sorafenib or DTIC + Placebo.

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)

Sorafenib, 400 mg, 2 tablets (200 mg each) po (per os) bid (twice daily) Study days 1-21

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo, 2 tablets, po (per os) bid (twice daily) Study days 1-21

DRUGDacarbazine

Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m\^2 intravenous on Study Day 1

Sponsors

Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks * Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable (Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma * Patients who have an ECOG PS of 0, or 1 * Measurable disease defined as at least one lesion that can be accurately and serially measured per the modified RECIST criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma * Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study except cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors (Ta \[Noninvasive papillary carcinoma\], Tis \[Carcinoma in situ: flat tumor\] & T1 \[Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue\]) or any cancer curatively treated \< 3 years prior to study entry * History of cardiac disease * Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Time from randomization to documented tumor progression or death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks)PFS was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed DP (per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before progression was documented. The actual date of tumor assessments was used for this calculation. PFS for subjects without progression or death was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. PFS for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline and did not die was censored at 1 day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesEvery 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 daysTumor response was defined as the best response (confirmed complete response \[CR\], partial response \[PR\], stable disease \[SD\], or progressive disease \[PD\]) assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter \[SLD\] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. SD: Does not qualify for CR or PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Time to Progression (TTP)Time from randomization to documented tumor progression (median time of 148 days)TTP was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed disease progression (per modified RECIST or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease). The actual dates of tumor assessments were used for this calculation. TTP for subjects without disease progression at the time of analysis, including subjects with death prior to progression, was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. TTP for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline was censored at 1 day.
Duration of Response (DOR)Time from initial response to documented tumor progression or death (median time of 188 days)Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response of Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter \[SLD\] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD or better) or Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions), whichever was noted earlier, to disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was documented). Duration of response for subjects who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.
Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was NotedBaseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 daysChange in ECOG PS is defined as an improvement (increase) or worsening (decrease) of at least one grade from the baseline ECOG score (from 0 \[fully active\] to 5 \[dead\]). Change in ECOG PS was recorded at the visit at which best confirmed response (BCR) using the modified RECIST (PR, CR, stable disease or Progressive Disease (PD)) was first noted (the change was 7% for both Sorafenib and Placebo). The BCR is the BCR recorded from the start of the treatment until DP/recurrence (taking as reference for DP, the smallest measurements recorded since treatment started).
Overall Survival (OS)Time from randomization to death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks)Overall Survival (OS) was calculated as the number of days from date of randomization to death date. Subjects who had not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last contact date.
Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the End of TreatmentBaseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 daysEuropean Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health.
Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First NotedBaseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 daysEuropean Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100.
Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the End of TreatmentBaseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 daysEuropean Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100.
Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First NotedBaseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 daysEuropean Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 121 subjects were enrolled at 17 centers in the United States. There were 20 screening failures; 12 subjects did not meet 1 or more entry criteria, 4 subjects withdrew consent before randomization, and 4 subjects were not randomized for other reasons. 101 subjects were randomized between 21 Mar 2005 and 27 Apr 2006.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 101 subjects were randomized (50 to Placebo + Dacarbazine (DTIC) and 51 to Sorafenib + DTIC) and were included in the population valid for intent to treat (ITT) analyses. All randomized subjects received study drug and were included in the population valid for safety analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + Dacarbazine
Sorafenib, 2 tablets (200 mg each) orally twice daily (bid) on study days 1-21 + Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m\^2 intravenous on study day 1 (21 days per cycle) for double-blind (DB) treatment. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) entered active follow up period. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with disease progression (DP) entered long term follow up period.
51
Placebo + Dacarbazine
Placebo, 2 tablets orally twice daily on study days 1-21 + Dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m\^2 intravenous on study day 1 (21 days per cycle) for double-blind (DB) treatment. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) entered active follow up period. Subjects who discontinued DB treatment with disease progression (DP) entered long term follow up period.
50
Total101

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Active Follow-upDisease progression/recurrence/replace10
Active Follow-upOther reasons02
Double-blind (DB) TreatmentAdverse Event30
Double-blind (DB) TreatmentDeath10
Double-blind (DB) Treatmentother reasons23
Double-blind (DB) TreatmentProgression by clinical judgement21
Double-blind (DB) TreatmentRadiological and symptomatic progression3441
Double-blind (DB) TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject02
Long Term Follow-upDeath1917

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazinePlacebo + DacarbazineTotal
Age, Continuous56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Age, Customized
>=65 and <75 years
11 participants8 participants19 participants
Age, Customized
<65 years
36 participants33 participants69 participants
Age, Customized
>=75 years
4 participants9 participants13 participants
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage at Study Entry
Stage III
2 participants1 participants3 participants
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage at Study Entry
Stage IV M1a
3 participants7 participants10 participants
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage at Study Entry
Stage IV M1b
18 participants17 participants35 participants
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage at Study Entry
Stage IV M1c
28 participants25 participants53 participants
Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Status 0
31 participants31 participants62 participants
Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Status 1
20 participants19 participants39 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at study entry
High
12 participants17 participants29 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at study entry
Low
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at study entry
Missing
5 participants2 participants7 participants
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at study entry
Normal
33 participants29 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants17 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants33 Participants71 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 5145 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 5114 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed DP (per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before progression was documented. The actual date of tumor assessments was used for this calculation. PFS for subjects without progression or death was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. PFS for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline and did not die was censored at 1 day.

Time frame: Time from randomization to documented tumor progression or death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks)

Population: PFS was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineProgression Free Survival (PFS)148 days
Placebo + DacarbazineProgression Free Survival (PFS)82 days
p-value: 0.06895% CI: [0.428, 1.034]log rank test
Secondary

Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Noted

Change in ECOG PS is defined as an improvement (increase) or worsening (decrease) of at least one grade from the baseline ECOG score (from 0 \[fully active\] to 5 \[dead\]). Change in ECOG PS was recorded at the visit at which best confirmed response (BCR) using the modified RECIST (PR, CR, stable disease or Progressive Disease (PD)) was first noted (the change was 7% for both Sorafenib and Placebo). The BCR is the BCR recorded from the start of the treatment until DP/recurrence (taking as reference for DP, the smallest measurements recorded since treatment started).

Time frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Population: Change in ECOG performance status was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedmissing1 participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedbetter1 participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedno change34 participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedworse15 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedworse13 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedmissing1 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedno change34 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineChange in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to the Visit When the Best Tumor Response Was Notedbetter2 participants
Secondary

Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment

European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health.

Time frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Population: Change of EQ-5D questionnaire index score was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment-0.015 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.124
Placebo + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment-0.019 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.161
p-value: 0.89t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted

European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure health status across 5 dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). The five dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score, which ranges between 0 and 1, with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state or death and 1 representing perfect health.

Time frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Population: Change of EQ-5D questionnaire index score was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted-0.004 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.142
Placebo + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Index Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted-0.008 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.125
p-value: 0.908t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment

European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100.

Time frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Population: Change of EQ-VAS score was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment-2.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.612
Placebo + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the End of Treatment-8.146 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.905
p-value: 0.168t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted

European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) is a self-administered test that records the respondents' self-rated health status on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Responders specify their scales by indicating a position along a continuous line between 0 and 100.

Time frame: Baseline and every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Population: Change of EQ-VAS score was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted0.558 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.86
Placebo + DacarbazineChange of European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score From Baseline to the Visit at Which Best Response Was First Noted-4.425 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.28
p-value: 0.201t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response of Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter \[SLD\] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD or better) or Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions), whichever was noted earlier, to disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was documented). Duration of response for subjects who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.

Time frame: Time from initial response to documented tumor progression or death (median time of 188 days)

Population: DOR was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineDuration of Response (DOR)188 days
Placebo + DacarbazineDuration of Response (DOR)161 days
p-value: 0.19495% CI: [0.114, 1.601]log rank test
Secondary

Number of Participants in Tumor Response Categories

Tumor response was defined as the best response (confirmed complete response \[CR\], partial response \[PR\], stable disease \[SD\], or progressive disease \[PD\]) assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter \[SLD\] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. SD: Does not qualify for CR or PR. PD: at least a 20% increase in SLD taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

Time frame: Every 6 weeks from the start of the treatment until the end of treatment visit with a median of 134 days

Population: Tumor response was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesPR12 participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesPD15 participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesSD24 participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesNot Evaluated0 participants
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesCR0 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesNot Evaluated1 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesCR0 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesPR6 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesSD22 participants
Placebo + DacarbazineNumber of Participants in Tumor Response CategoriesPD21 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was calculated as the number of days from date of randomization to death date. Subjects who had not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last contact date.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death (the maximum treatment duration of 71.1 weeks)

Population: OS was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineOverall Survival (OS)319 days
Placebo + DacarbazineOverall Survival (OS)359 days
p-value: 0.97395% CI: [0.627, 1.57]log rank test
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was calculated as the time (days) from date of randomization to date of first observed disease progression (per modified RECIST or clinical judgment, whichever was earlier: CR, PR, stable disease, progressive disease). The actual dates of tumor assessments were used for this calculation. TTP for subjects without disease progression at the time of analysis, including subjects with death prior to progression, was censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. TTP for subjects who had no tumor assessments after baseline was censored at 1 day.

Time frame: Time from randomization to documented tumor progression (median time of 148 days)

Population: TTP was analyzed for the intent to treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + DacarbazineTime to Progression (TTP)148 days
Placebo + DacarbazineTime to Progression (TTP)82 days
p-value: 0.03995% CI: [0.391, 0.98]log rank test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026