Skip to content

Cool.Click™ Adolescent Transition Study: Study of Saizen® in Subjects With Childhood-onset Growth Hormone Deficiency

A Phase IIIb, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Dosing Regimens of Saizen® (Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (r-hGH), Using Cool.Click™ in Subjects With Childhood-onset Growth Hormone Deficiency During the Adolescent Transition Phase (CATS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00109733
Enrollment
31
Registered
2005-05-03
Start date
2005-01-31
Completion date
2006-07-31
Last updated
2013-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Childhood-onset Growth Hormone Deficiency, Pituitary Dwarfism

Keywords

Childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency (COGHD), Saizen®

Brief summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different dose regimens of r-hGH (Saizen®) in subjects with childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency (COGHD) during the transition phase from childhood to adulthood.

Detailed description

This is a phase IIIb, prospective, multicenter, randomised, open label study to determine the safety and efficacy of two different dose regimens of r-hGH with a dose escalation scheme. Screening assessments must be completed 30 days prior to SD1 (Study Day 1). Eligible subjects ages 13 to 25 years will be randomised in equal allocation in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups (30 subjects/group). Daily subcutaneous injections will be self-administered or received from a designated individual using cool.click™, the needle-free growth hormone (GH) delivery device. The study consists of three periods: screening (up to 30 days prior to Study Day 1), active treatment (up to 24 weeks), and follow-up (4 week safety evaluation after the last dose of study medication). Each subject will be required to complete a daily treatment diary to assess dosing compliance, adverse events, and concomitant medications. Each subject will receive one treatment diary at SD1, weeks 8, 12, and 24. Subjects will be required to record daily diary entries that will capture dosing compliance, adverse events, and concomitant medications. Depending upon treatment allocation and subject tolerability, dose titration will be increased as follows: * Group A: 0.005 mg/kg/day for 30 days then increasing, with the Investigator's approval, to 0.010 mg/kg/day from day 31 to week 24. * Group B: 0.010 mg/kg/day for 14 days with the opportunity to dose escalate, with the Investigator's approval, on day 15 to 0.02 mg/kg/day and day 29 to 0.03 mg/kg/day. Scheduled study visits include screening, baseline, and weeks 8, 12, and 24. Dosage adjustments will be based on subject tolerability and telephone assessments from study drug initiation through week 6. Trunk fat will be measured at SD1, weeks 12 and 24 (or early termination visit). Routine clinical laboratory assessments (hematology, blood chemistries, and urinalysis) will be performed pre-treatment (-30 to -1 SD1) and post-treatment on week 24 (or early termination visit). Special laboratory assessments include the central analysis of lipid panel, fasting insulin, fasting glucose, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), free thyroxine (T4) , total T4, C-reactive protein (CRP). Physical exams will be performed at screening, weeks 12 and 24. Safety evaluations will occur during scheduled study visits, through telephone assessments, and by the review of adverse events and concomitant events on the subject treatment diary.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALrecombinant human growth hormone

0.005 mg/kg/day for 30 days then increasing, with the Investigator's approval, to 0.010 mg/kg/day from Day 31 to Week 24.

Sponsors

EMD Serono
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The day of entry or Study Day 1 is defined as the first day of study treatment. To be eligible for inclusion into this study, the subjects must fulfill all of the following criteria within 30 days prior to Study Day 1. * Male or female from 13 to 25 years of age, inclusive * Diagnosis of childhood onset growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and prior completed growth hormone (GH) treatment as evidenced by bone age greater than 14 years for girls and 16 years for boys or no height increase \> 0.5 cm in the 6 months prior to Screen. * Have documented GH deficiency (acquired or idiopathic), established by a standard provocative test, such as insulin (\<5 ng/mL) or growth hormone releasing hormone plus arginine (\<9 ng/mL) at least 30 days after GH has been discontinued. If a subject is hypopituitary with two or more pituitary disorders and has a low IGF-1, the stimulation test does not need to be performed to confirm GHD. * If hypopituitary, must have been on adequate replacement therapy (if required) of glucocorticosteroids, thyroid and sex hormones (hormone levels on replacement being in normal/mildly elevated range) for at least 6 months prior to Screen. * Be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study. * Have given written informed consent before any study-related procedure not part of the subject's normal medical care, with the understanding that the subject may withdraw consent at any time without prejudice to future medical care. * Female subjects of childbearing potential must use a hormonal contraceptive, intra-uterine device, diaphragm with spermicide or condom with spermicide for the duration of the study. Confirmation that a female patient is not pregnant must be established by a negative human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days of study enrolment (SD1).

Exclusion criteria

To be eligible for inclusion in this study the subjects must not meet any of the following criteria: * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to growth hormone or diluent. * Previous treatment with GH within six months prior to Screen. * Severe illness during the previous six months. * Active malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin malignancies). * Diabetes mellitus (type I or II). * Seropositivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) and/or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) serology. * Pregnancy or lactation. * History of drug and/or alcohol abuse or use of drugs for non-therapeutic purposes. * Any medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would jeopardize the patient's safety following exposure to study drug. * Clinically significant abnormal hematology, chemistry or urinalysis results at screening in the judgment of the Investigator. * Have taken another investigational drug or had any experimental procedure in the six months preceding study entry.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk FatBaseline to Week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Lean Body MassBaseline to Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Body FatBaseline to Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Limb FatBaseline to Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk to Limb Fat RatioBaseline to Week 24

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study Initiation Date: 06 Jan 2005 (date of first subject, first dose) Study Completion Date 11 Jun 2006 (date of last subject, last visit) 19 study centres in the United States received IRB approval to participate in this study; 13 of the centres enrolled at least one subject into the study.

Pre-assignment details

All study screening assessments were to be performed within a 30-day period prior to study entry. A total of 40 subjects were screened for the study and 31 of them (77.5%) were randomised and received study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Dose Group
0.005 mg/kg/day recombinant human growth hormone(r-hGH)for 30 days then increasing, with the Investigator's approval, to 0.010 mg/kg/day from Day 31 to Week 24.
15
High Dose Group
0.010 mg/kg/day recombinant human growth hormone for 14 days with the opportunity to dose escalate, with the Investigator's approval, on Day 15 to 0.02 mg/kg/day and Day 29 to 0.03 mg/kg/day.
16
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCould not commit time for study11
Overall StudyNon-compliant01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyStopped taking study drug11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Dose GroupHigh Dose GroupTotal
Age Continuous17.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
18.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
17.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Lean body mass44.03 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.09
44.38 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.98
44.21 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Limb fat11.47 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.49
12.92 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28
12.22 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.59
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants16 participants31 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Total body fat24.02 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81
25.11 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.29
24.58 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
Trunk fat11.73 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.58
11.40 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.09
11.56 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.47
Trunk to limb fat ratio1.05 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29
0.87 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.17
0.96 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.25

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 1514 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 151 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk Fat

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intention To Treat, Last Observation Carried Forward

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk Fat-6.27 percent changeStandard Deviation 12.72
High Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk Fat-8.36 percent changeStandard Deviation 17.69
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in trunk fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in trunk fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.177ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in trunk fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in trunk fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.004ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Lean Body Mass

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intention To Treat, Last Observation Carried Forward

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Lean Body Mass3.85 percent changeStandard Deviation 4.05
High Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Lean Body Mass7.10 percent changeStandard Deviation 5.02
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in lean body mass (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in lean body mass (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.004ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in lean body mass (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in lean body mass (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Limb Fat

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intention To Treat, Last Observation Carried Forward

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Limb Fat-3.77 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.85
High Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Limb Fat-11.09 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.97
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in limb fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in limb fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.755ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in limb fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in limb fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Body Fat

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intention To Treat, Last Observation Carried Forward

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Body Fat-4.62 percent changeStandard Deviation 9.96
High Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Total Body Fat-9.69 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.54
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in total body fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in total body fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.653ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in total body fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in total body fat (kg) from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.002ANOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk to Limb Fat Ratio

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Intention To Treat, Last Observation Carried Forward

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk to Limb Fat Ratio-2.86 percent changeStandard Deviation 6.77
High Dose GroupPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Trunk to Limb Fat Ratio2.92 percent changeStandard Deviation 16.16
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in trunk to limb fat ratio from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in trunk to limb fat ratio from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.041ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis (% change in trunk to limb fat ratio from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group = 0) was tested against the alternative hypothesis (% change in trunk to limb fat ratio from baseline to Wk24 within the treatment group ≠0).~P-Values for testing this hypothesis for each treatment group are from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on ranked data with effects for treatment group, gender and their interaction.p-value: 0.044ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026