Skip to content

A Low-Carbohydrate, Ketogenic Diet Versus Orlistat for Weight Loss

A Low-Carbohydrate, Ketogenic Diet Versus Orlistat for Weight Loss

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00108524
Enrollment
146
Registered
2005-04-18
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2014-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity

Keywords

anti-obesity agents, diet therapy, diet, reducing, obesity, overweight, risk factors, weight loss

Brief summary

This study compares two types of diet interventions: a low carbohydrate ketogenic diet (Atkins) and a low-fat diet combined with a medication (Orlistat).

Detailed description

Overweight and obesity are increasingly prevalent in the veteran population as well as the general public. For patients with obesity-associated illnesses, there are few effective treatment options available after failed attempts at diet and exercise, even though weight loss has been shown to alleviate these conditions. The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet (Atkins) with a combination of a low-fat diet and Orlistat. The outcomes examined over a 48 week duration will include body weight, risk factors for heart disease (e.g., lipid profiles), and blood sugar. This is a randomized, parallel-intervention trial. Subjects (n=150) will be recruited from the Durham VAMC Ambulatory Care Clinics. All patients receive one of the two intensive weight loss interventions.

Interventions

A low-carb diet limits carbohydrates - such as grains, starchy vegetables and fruit - and emphasizes dietary protein and fat.

DRUGOrlistat

In addition to the low fat diet, Orlistat is taken 3 times daily.

BEHAVIORALLow-fat diet

Participants receive counseling on a low fat diet over 48 weeks aimed at reducing fat and calorie intake

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must have a VA medical center primary care provider; * Failed first line diet and exercise recommendations; * In stable health by screening physical and lab tests; * Agrees to make regular visits per study protocol; * Has access to telephone; * Body mass index (BMI) \> or = 27 with obesity-related illness OR BMI \> or = 30 with no risk factors; * No contraindications to Orlistat; * Not pregnant or breast-feeding; * No serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; * No use of a weight loss therapy in the month prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

* No VAMC primary care provider * Unable to attend regular study visits * No access to telephone * BMI \< 27 * Contraindications to Orlistat * Pregnancy, breast feeding or planning to become pregnant * Unstable mental health illness * Use of a weight loss therapy in the month prior to screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 48 Weeksbaseline and 48 weeksBody weight was measured using the same calibrated scale (Tanita Corp, Arlington Heights, Illinois) at each visit at the same time of day, with the participant wearing light clothing and no shoes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Risk Factors for Heart Disease (e.g., Lipid Profiles) at 48 Weeksbaseline and 48 weeksMeasured change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or LDL-C, from baseline to 48 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Blood Sugar at 48 WeeksBaseline and 48 weeksMeasured change in Fasting glucose, mg/dL, from baseline to 48 weeks.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, between April 2005 and October 2006.

Pre-assignment details

18-70yo,BMI 27-30+obesity-related disease or BMI\>30 regardless of comorbidity. Excluded:weight loss in \<30 days;pregnant,breastfeeding,DM-1;unstable heart disease or psych illness,dementia,substance abuse;HTN \>160/100; creatinine\>1.5men,\>1.3women; HemA1c\>11%; triglyceride\>600; LDL-C\>190. Not considered enrolled if not told group assignment (n=14).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1
Participants receive dietary counseling over 48 weeks aimed at helping them to lower starch and sugar intake. Low carbohydrate ketogenic diet: Participants were instructed to restrict carbohydrate intake initially to less than 20 g/d using pocket guides and handouts. Participants could eat unlimited meat and eggs, 112 g of hard cheese, 0.48 L of low-carbohydrate vegetables (eg, leafy greens), and 0.24 L of moderate-carbohydrate vegetables (eg, broccoli, asparagus) daily; calorie intake was not restricted. As participants approached their goal weight or if cravings threatened their adherence to the diet, they were advised to add approximately 5 g of carbohydrates to their daily intake each week until weight was maintained or cravings diminished.
72
Arm 2
Participants receive dietary counseling over 48 weeks aimed at reducing fat and calorie intake and additionally receive Orlistat taken 3 times daily. Orlistat plus a low-fat diet: Participants were instructed to restrict intake of total fat (\<30% of daily energy), saturated fat (\<10% of daily energy), cholesterol (\<300 mg daily), and calories using pocket guides, handouts, and individualized goals. Recommended calorie intake was 500 to 1000 kcal below a participant's calculated weight maintenance intake. In addition, a 30-day supply of orlistat (120 mg before meals 3 times a day) was provided monthly.
74
Total146

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 2Arm 1Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
74 Participants72 Participants146 Participants
Age, Continuous52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
52.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
United States
74 participants72 participants146 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants20 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants52 Participants105 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 7230 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 722 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 48 Weeks

Body weight was measured using the same calibrated scale (Tanita Corp, Arlington Heights, Illinois) at each visit at the same time of day, with the participant wearing light clothing and no shoes.

Time frame: baseline and 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm 1Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 48 Weeks-9.5 percentage of weight loss
Arm 2Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 48 Weeks-8.5 percentage of weight loss
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Sugar at 48 Weeks

Measured change in Fasting glucose, mg/dL, from baseline to 48 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline and 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm 1Change From Baseline in Blood Sugar at 48 Weeks-9.74 mg/dL
Arm 2Change From Baseline in Blood Sugar at 48 Weeks-3.54 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Risk Factors for Heart Disease (e.g., Lipid Profiles) at 48 Weeks

Measured change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or LDL-C, from baseline to 48 weeks.

Time frame: baseline and 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm 1Change From Baseline in Risk Factors for Heart Disease (e.g., Lipid Profiles) at 48 Weeks-1.91 mg/dL
Arm 2Change From Baseline in Risk Factors for Heart Disease (e.g., Lipid Profiles) at 48 Weeks-8.29 mg/dL

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026