Skip to content

Latino Study - A Study of PEGASYS (Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD)) and COPEGUS (Ribavirin) in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-Genotype 1.

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Comparative, Efficacy Study of Pegasys® Plus Copegus® in Treatment-naïve Latino Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1, as Compared to Treatment-naïve Non- Latino Caucasian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00107653
Enrollment
569
Registered
2005-04-07
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2007-09-30
Last updated
2016-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C, Chronic

Brief summary

This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEGASYS (180 micrograms sc weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200mg po daily) in treatment-naive Latino patients versus non-Latino Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis C- genotype 1. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months and the target sample size is 500+ patients.

Interventions

DRUGRibavirin

1000-1200mg po daily for 48 weeks

DRUGPeginterferon alfa-2a

180 micrograms sc/week for 48 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients 18-65 years of age * chronic hepatitis C , genotype 1 * serologic evidence of CHC infection by an antibody test * chronic liver disease, consistent with CHC infection on a liver biopsy obtained within the past 18 months * compensated liver disease * use of 2 forms of contraception during the study in both men and women

Exclusion criteria

* previous interferon or ribavirin therapy * systemic antiviral therapy less than 24 weeks before first dose of study drug or expected need for this treatment any time during the study * medical condition associated with chronic liver disease (eg, hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, toxin exposure) * decompensated liver disease * women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 72At Week 72Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) is defined as percentage of participants with an undetectable hepatitis C virus-RNA (HCV-RNA) measurement (\<28 International Unit (IU)/millilitre (mL)) assessed 24 weeks post-treatment (week 72) which was assessed by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 4At Week 4Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCVRNA \>=1 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 4 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12At Week 12Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCV-RNA \>=2 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 12 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).
Change From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeFrom Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72The table below shows HCV-RNA log10 titers change from baseline values by study week and by study group. Analysis was performed for participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HCV-RNA assessment. HCV-RNA quantitation was performed using Roche High Pure System/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Monitor Test. HCV-RNA measurement lower limit of detection was 28 IU/mL.
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72Biochemical response was defined as normal serum alanine transaminase (ALT) measurement. For ALT measurement the normal range is 5-37 IU/L.
Percentage of Participants With ISHAK Histological Activity Index ResponseAt Week 72ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) in the ISHAK modified HAI (necroinflammatory) score at week 72. ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of periportal ± bridging (P/B) necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5 = zone 3 multiple; 6 = panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis grading as 0: absent; 1: \< = 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: \> 10 foci; Portal Inflammation grading: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal.
Mean Change From Baseline in ISHAK HAI Activity (Necroinflammatory) at Week 72From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of P/B necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each Participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5= zone 3 multiple; 6= panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis as 0: absent; 1: \<= 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: \> 10 foci; Portal Inflammation: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was tested using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with ethnicity and baseline ISHAK HAI score as the fixed effects.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) score at week 72. Baseline prognostic factors in the original model include ethnicity, sex, age, baseline ALT quotient, baseline HCV-RNA level, and ISHAK fibrosis and activity scores at baseline. ISHAK modified HAI fibrosis scale by fibrosis grading category as F0= no fibrosis; F1= some portal areas; F2= most portal areas; F3= bridging fibrosis; F4= bridging and portal to central; F5 = marked bridging; F6 = Cirrhosis; where '0' being the best and '6' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was analysed.
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis ScoreAt Week 72Overall ISHAK Fibrosis Score is defined as Improved: \>= 1 category decrease in fibrosis scale; Stable: no change in fibrosis scale; Worsened: \>1 category increase in fibrosis scale.
Mean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72METAVIR activity scores are categorised as histological activity (A) 0 = none; A1 = mild; A2 = moderate; A3 = severe where '0' being 'No activity' and '3' being 'the sever activity'. Changes in liver inflammation defined as Improved: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline; stable: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 is the same as the baseline score; worsened: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline. METAVIR fibrosis scores are categorised as fibrosis (F) 0 = no fibrosis; F1 = without septa; F 2 = with septa; F3 = many septa; F4 = cirrhosis where; '0' being the best and '4' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in activity and fibrosis scores based on METAVIR at week 72 was analysed.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, and 72Percentage of participants achieving a virologic response defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA measurement (HCV-RNA \<28 IU/mL by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test)
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis ScoreAt Week 72METAVIR fibrosis score is categorized as, Improved: \>= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: \>= 1 category increase in activity score.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fat Score at Week 72From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72Grading categories for the fat scale were as follows: 1 = \<5% hepatocytes; 2 = 6 - 33% hepatocytes; 3 = 34 - 66% hepatocytes; 4 = 67 - 100% hepatocytes.
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72Fat scores are categorised as Improved: \> 1 category decrease in fat scale; stable: no change in fat scale; worsened: \>= 1 category increase in fat scale.
Percentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis ScoreAt Week 72The Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) included an assessment of sinusoidal fibrosis, Mallory bodies, and hepatocyte ballooning (HB). Grading categories for the NASH scales were as: Sinusoidal fibrosis: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules, without diffuse interstitial sinusoidal collagen deposition; 3 = Involvement of most or all lobules;, with diffuse interstitial fibrosis involving some or most of the lobules Mallory bodies: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules; and Hepatocyte ballooning: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules.
Mean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess tiredness, lack of energy, or total body give-out. Participants were to react to nine statements regarding fatigue over the previous 2 weeks, each on a scale (1 = completely agree, 7 = completely disagree). The FSS is the average of the scores on the 9 questions; ranging from 1-7, with lower scores indicating less fatigue. In addition, participants were to react to how much fatigue they had in the past 2 weeks by marking on a visual analogue scale (VAS) labelled at one end with no fatigue ('0' being the best) and at the other end with greater fatigue ('100' being the worst). Longer distance on the scale from no fatigue indicated greater fatigue. FSS values are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale. FSS values at week 48 and 72 are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale.
Mean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that includes 8 domain scales The 8 domains are incorporated into 2 components: mental and physical. The mental component (MC) includes social functioning, role limitations-emotional, mental health, and vitality. The physical component (PC) includes physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, and general health perception. Raw domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, \[0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score\]. Two summary scale scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores (Physical and the Mental Component) where no minimum or maximum score; higher score indicate better health status. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in SF-36 score at week 48 and 72 was analysed.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsUp to Week 72An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, or results in disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersUp to Week 72The below table includes participants with marked abnormal lab parameters. Standard reference ranges include: Hematocrit: (fraction) 0.37 - 0.49, Hemoglobin 130 - 180 g/L, Platelets 150 - 350 10\^9/L, White Blood Cell (WBC) 4.5 - 11.0 10\^9/L, Lymphocytes 1.00 - 4.80 10\^9/L, Neutrophils 1.80 - 7.70 10\^9/L, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 0-40 U/L, ALT 0 - 55 U/L, Total bilirubin 0 - 17 μmol/L, Thyroxine T4 58 - 140 nmol/L, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) 0.0 - 5.0 million units (mU)/L, Albumin 35.0 - 55.0 g/L, Chloride 100 - 108 mmol/L, Calcium 2.10 - 2.60 mmol/L, Phosphate 0.84 - 1.45 mmol/L, Uric acid 214 - 506 μmol/L.
Number of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to Week 72The table below includes participants with premature withdrawals due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities.
Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity ScoreAt Week 72METAVIR activity scale included activity defines as, Improved: \>= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: \> = 1 category increase in activity score.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 569 participants were recruited at 52 centers in the United States in the study conducted from 26 October 2004 and 07 September 2007.

Pre-assignment details

Out of 1038 screened participants, 569 were enrolled and 469 were screen failures because of eligibility criteria was not met. Of the 569 enrolled participants, 269 participants were assigned to Latino and 300 participants were assigned to non-Latino White group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Latino
Eligible participants received peginterferon alfa-2a 180 microgram (mcg)/0.5 mL by subcutaneous injection once a week in combination with ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg per day, which was taken orally in split doses for 48 weeks. Participants with \<75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1000 mg/day (400 mg in the morning and 600 mg in the evening). Participants with \>=75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1200 mg/day (600 mg in the morning and 600 mg in the evening).
269
Non-Latino White
Eligible participants received peginterferon alfa-2a 180 mcg/0.5 mL by subcutaneous injection once a week in combination with ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg per day which was taken orally in split doses. Participants with \<75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1000 mg/day. Participants with \>=75 kg (165 lbs) of body weight received 1200 mg/day for 48 weeks.
300
Total569

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative Reasons33
Overall StudyAdverse Event2443
Overall StudyInsufficient Therapeutic Response2511
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up135
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyViolation of Selection Criteria at Entry11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1213

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLatinoNon-Latino WhiteTotal
Age, Continuous45.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.79
48.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.34
46.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
Sex: Female, Male
Female
86 Participants108 Participants194 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
183 Participants192 Participants375 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
256 / 269290 / 299
serious
Total, serious adverse events
42 / 26948 / 299

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 72

Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) is defined as percentage of participants with an undetectable hepatitis C virus-RNA (HCV-RNA) measurement (\<28 International Unit (IU)/millilitre (mL)) assessed 24 weeks post-treatment (week 72) which was assessed by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test.

Time frame: At Week 72

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 7233.5 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 7249.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: SVR for Latino Versus (VS) Non-Latino Whitep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.24, -0.08]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of Time

The table below shows HCV-RNA log10 titers change from baseline values by study week and by study group. Analysis was performed for participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HCV-RNA assessment. HCV-RNA quantitation was performed using Roche High Pure System/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Monitor Test. HCV-RNA measurement lower limit of detection was 28 IU/mL.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). 'n'=number of evaluable participants available at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LatinoChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 4 (n=262, 280)-2.3 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.1
LatinoChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 12 (n=251,279)-3.9 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.1
LatinoChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 24 (n=235, 264)-4.2 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.11
LatinoChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 48 (n=207, 246)-4.1 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.11
LatinoChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 60 (n=181, 217)-2.7 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.17
LatinoChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 72 (n=174, 212)-2.7 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.17
Non-Latino WhiteChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 60 (n=181, 217)-3.7 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.15
Non-Latino WhiteChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 4 (n=262, 280)-2.9 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.09
Non-Latino WhiteChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 48 (n=207, 246)-4.8 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.1
Non-Latino WhiteChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 12 (n=251,279)-4.5 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.09
Non-Latino WhiteChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 72 (n=174, 212)-3.6 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.16
Non-Latino WhiteChange From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of TimeAt Week 24 (n=235, 264)-4.8 Log10 IU/mLStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72

METAVIR activity scores are categorised as histological activity (A) 0 = none; A1 = mild; A2 = moderate; A3 = severe where '0' being 'No activity' and '3' being 'the sever activity'. Changes in liver inflammation defined as Improved: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline; stable: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 is the same as the baseline score; worsened: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline. METAVIR fibrosis scores are categorised as fibrosis (F) 0 = no fibrosis; F1 = without septa; F 2 = with septa; F3 = many septa; F4 = cirrhosis where; '0' being the best and '4' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in activity and fibrosis scores based on METAVIR at week 72 was analysed.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LatinoMean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72Activity scores based on METAVIR-0.34 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
LatinoMean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72Fibrosis scores based on METAVIR0.04 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72Activity scores based on METAVIR-0.51 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72Fibrosis scores based on METAVIR-0.12 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Fat Score at Week 72

Grading categories for the fat scale were as follows: 1 = \<5% hepatocytes; 2 = 6 - 33% hepatocytes; 3 = 34 - 66% hepatocytes; 4 = 67 - 100% hepatocytes.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LatinoMean Change From Baseline in Fat Score at Week 72-0.15 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change From Baseline in Fat Score at Week 72-0.25 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72

ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) score at week 72. Baseline prognostic factors in the original model include ethnicity, sex, age, baseline ALT quotient, baseline HCV-RNA level, and ISHAK fibrosis and activity scores at baseline. ISHAK modified HAI fibrosis scale by fibrosis grading category as F0= no fibrosis; F1= some portal areas; F2= most portal areas; F3= bridging fibrosis; F4= bridging and portal to central; F5 = marked bridging; F6 = Cirrhosis; where '0' being the best and '6' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was analysed.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy. 'n'=number of evaluable participants available at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LatinoMean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72F5-F6 (n=21,11)-1.05 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
LatinoMean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72F0-F4 (n=136,190)-1.49 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72F5-F6 (n=21,11)-2.64 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72F0-F4 (n=136,190)-2.04 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in ISHAK HAI Activity (Necroinflammatory) at Week 72

ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of P/B necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each Participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5= zone 3 multiple; 6= panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis as 0: absent; 1: \<= 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: \> 10 foci; Portal Inflammation: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was tested using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with ethnicity and baseline ISHAK HAI score as the fixed effects.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LatinoMean Change From Baseline in ISHAK HAI Activity (Necroinflammatory) at Week 72-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change From Baseline in ISHAK HAI Activity (Necroinflammatory) at Week 72-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Comparison: ISHAK HAI activity For Latino VS Non-Latino Whitep-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.5, 1.3]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Secondary

Mean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72

The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that includes 8 domain scales The 8 domains are incorporated into 2 components: mental and physical. The mental component (MC) includes social functioning, role limitations-emotional, mental health, and vitality. The physical component (PC) includes physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, and general health perception. Raw domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, \[0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score\]. Two summary scale scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores (Physical and the Mental Component) where no minimum or maximum score; higher score indicate better health status. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in SF-36 score at week 48 and 72 was analysed.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy. 'n'=number of evaluable participants available at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LatinoMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized PC, At Week 48 (n=178,224)-4.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
LatinoMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized PC, At Week 72 (n=172,213)-1.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
LatinoMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized MC, At Week 48 (n=178,224)-6.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
LatinoMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized MC, At Week 72 (n=172,213)-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized MC, At Week 72 (n=172,213)-0.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized PC, At Week 48 (n=178,224)-8.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized MC, At Week 48 (n=178,224)-6.3 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72Standardized PC, At Week 72 (n=172,213)-1.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Comparison: Standardized Physical Component of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 48p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.79, 5.18]ANCOVA
Comparison: Standardized Physical Component of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 72p-value: 0.904795% CI: [-1.49, 1.68]ANCOVA
Comparison: Standardized Mental Component of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 48p-value: 0.928695% CI: [-1.88, 1.71]ANCOVA
Comparison: Standardized Mental Component of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 72p-value: 0.165395% CI: [-2.98, 0.51]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess tiredness, lack of energy, or total body give-out. Participants were to react to nine statements regarding fatigue over the previous 2 weeks, each on a scale (1 = completely agree, 7 = completely disagree). The FSS is the average of the scores on the 9 questions; ranging from 1-7, with lower scores indicating less fatigue. In addition, participants were to react to how much fatigue they had in the past 2 weeks by marking on a visual analogue scale (VAS) labelled at one end with no fatigue ('0' being the best) and at the other end with greater fatigue ('100' being the worst). Longer distance on the scale from no fatigue indicated greater fatigue. FSS values are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale. FSS values at week 48 and 72 are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). 'n'=number of evaluable participants available at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LatinoMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS Score,From Baseline At Week 48 (n=180,224)0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LatinoMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS Score,From Baseline At Week 72 (n=174,214)-0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
LatinoMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS VAS Score,From Baseline At Week 48 (n=177,221)14.8 Score on a scaleStandard Error 2.84
LatinoMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS VAS Score,From Baseline At Week72 (n=173,212)1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Error 2.75
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS VAS Score,From Baseline At Week72 (n=173,212)-2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.57
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS Score,From Baseline At Week 48 (n=180,224)1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS VAS Score,From Baseline At Week 48 (n=177,221)25.4 Score on a scaleStandard Error 2.09
Non-Latino WhiteMean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72FSS Score,From Baseline At Week 72 (n=174,214)0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Comparison: FSS Score of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 48p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.96, -0.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: FSS Score of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 72p-value: 0.092195% CI: [-0.57, 0.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: FSS VAS Score of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 48p-value: 0.001595% CI: [-14.07, -3.36]ANCOVA
Comparison: FSS VAS Score of Latino VS Non-Latino White at week 72p-value: 0.042195% CI: [0.18, 9.49]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, or results in disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: Up to Week 72

Population: The Safety Population included participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAny AEs264 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAny SAEs42 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAny AEs292 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAny SAEs48 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory Parameters

The below table includes participants with marked abnormal lab parameters. Standard reference ranges include: Hematocrit: (fraction) 0.37 - 0.49, Hemoglobin 130 - 180 g/L, Platelets 150 - 350 10\^9/L, White Blood Cell (WBC) 4.5 - 11.0 10\^9/L, Lymphocytes 1.00 - 4.80 10\^9/L, Neutrophils 1.80 - 7.70 10\^9/L, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 0-40 U/L, ALT 0 - 55 U/L, Total bilirubin 0 - 17 μmol/L, Thyroxine T4 58 - 140 nmol/L, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) 0.0 - 5.0 million units (mU)/L, Albumin 35.0 - 55.0 g/L, Chloride 100 - 108 mmol/L, Calcium 2.10 - 2.60 mmol/L, Phosphate 0.84 - 1.45 mmol/L, Uric acid 214 - 506 μmol/L.

Time frame: Up to Week 72

Population: The Safety Population included participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment. 'n'=number of evaluable participants available at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersHematocrit low (n=269,298)49 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersHemoglobin low (n=269,298)99 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersPlatelets, low (n=269,298)78 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersWBC, high (n=269,298)2 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersWBC low (n=269,298)192 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersLymphocytes low (n=269,298)80 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersNeutrophils, high (n=269,298)7 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersNeutrophils, low (n=269,298)208 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersAST, high (n=269,296)51 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersALT, high (n=269,296)46 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersTotal bilirubin, high (n=269,296)4 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersT4, high (n=17,16)2 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersT4, low (n=17,16)8 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersTSH, high (n=64,65)6 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersAlbumin, low (n=269,296)2 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersChloride, low (n=269,296)0 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersCalcium, low (n=269,296)4 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersPhosphate, high (n=269,296)16 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersPhosphate, low (n=269,296)51 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersUric acid, high (n=269,296)12 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersPhosphate, high (n=269,296)18 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersHematocrit low (n=269,298)67 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersTotal bilirubin, high (n=269,296)6 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersHemoglobin low (n=269,298)126 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersChloride, low (n=269,296)6 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersPlatelets, low (n=269,298)103 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersT4, high (n=17,16)2 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersWBC, high (n=269,298)7 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersUric acid, high (n=269,296)9 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersWBC low (n=269,298)253 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersT4, low (n=17,16)4 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersLymphocytes low (n=269,298)159 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersCalcium, low (n=269,296)16 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersNeutrophils, high (n=269,298)15 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersTSH, high (n=64,65)11 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersNeutrophils, low (n=269,298)261 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersPhosphate, low (n=269,296)50 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersAST, high (n=269,296)47 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersAlbumin, low (n=269,296)5 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory ParametersALT, high (n=269,296)47 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory Abnormalities

The table below includes participants with premature withdrawals due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities.

Time frame: Up to Week 72

Population: The Safety Population included participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug and had at least 1 post baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesPsychiatric disorders8 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesNervous system disorders3 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesInvestigations3 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesInfections and infestations1 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesBlood and lymphatic system disorders3 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesSocial circumstances0 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesGeneral disorders4 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesCardiac disorders1 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesEndocrine disorders1 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesGastrointestinal disorders2 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesVascular disorders0 Participants
LatinoNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesEye disorders0 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesVascular disorders1 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesPsychiatric disorders12 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesGeneral disorders5 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesBlood and lymphatic system disorders6 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesGastrointestinal disorders4 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesNervous system disorders3 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesEye disorders4 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesInfections and infestations1 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesSocial circumstances2 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesCardiac disorders0 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesEndocrine disorders0 Participants
Non-Latino WhiteNumber of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory AbnormalitiesInvestigations0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response

Percentage of participants achieving a virologic response defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA measurement (HCV-RNA \<28 IU/mL by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test)

Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, and 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 413.8 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 1248.0 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 2459.5 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 4856.1 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 6033.1 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 7233.5 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 6050.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 420.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 4872.7 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 1263.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 7249.3 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants Achieving Virologic ResponseAt Week 2473.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 4p-value: 0.045495% CI: [-0.12, 0]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 12p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.23, -0.07]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 24p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-0.22, -0.06]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 48p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.24, -0.09]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 60p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.25, -0.09]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 72p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.24, -0.08]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Response

Biochemical response was defined as normal serum alanine transaminase (ALT) measurement. For ALT measurement the normal range is 5-37 IU/L.

Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 442.8 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 1256.1 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 2453.2 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 6035.3 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 7237.5 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 4845.7 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 7256.7 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 457.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 6053.7 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 1272.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 4859.7 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Biochemical ResponseAt Week 2468.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Normal Serum ALT level for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 4p-value: 0.000695% CI: [-0.22, -0.06]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Normal Serum ALT level for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.24, -0.08]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Normal Serum ALT level for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 24p-value: 0.000395% CI: [-0.23, -0.07]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Normal Serum ALT level for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 48p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-0.22, -0.06]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Normal Serum ALT level for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 60p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.26, -0.1]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Comparison: Normal Serum ALT level for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 72p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.27, -0.11]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12

Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCV-RNA \>=2 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 12 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 1275.5 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 1286.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 12p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-0.17, -0.04]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 4

Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCVRNA \>=1 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 4 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).

Time frame: At Week 4

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 471.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 478.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Virologic Response for Latino VS Non-Latino White at Week 4p-value: 0.035395% CI: [-0.15, -0.01]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72

Fat scores are categorised as Improved: \> 1 category decrease in fat scale; stable: no change in fat scale; worsened: \>= 1 category increase in fat scale.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72Stable Fat Score47.8 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72Worsened Fat Score20.4 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72Improved Fat Score31.8 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72Stable Fat Score51.2 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72Worsened Fat Score16.4 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72Improved Fat Score32.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis Score

Overall ISHAK Fibrosis Score is defined as Improved: \>= 1 category decrease in fibrosis scale; Stable: no change in fibrosis scale; Worsened: \>1 category increase in fibrosis scale.

Time frame: At Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis ScoreImproved Fibrosis Score24.8 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis ScoreStable Fibrosis Score52.9 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis ScoreWorsened Fibrosis Score22.3 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis ScoreImproved Fibrosis Score42.3 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis ScoreStable Fibrosis Score39.8 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis ScoreWorsened Fibrosis Score17.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity Score

METAVIR activity scale included activity defines as, Improved: \>= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: \> = 1 category increase in activity score.

Time frame: At Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity ScoreStable Activity Score54.1 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity ScoreWorsened Activity Score7.0 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity ScoreImproved Activity Score38.9 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity ScoreStable Activity Score48.8 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity ScoreWorsened Activity Score3.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity ScoreImproved Activity Score48.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis Score

METAVIR fibrosis score is categorized as, Improved: \>= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: \>= 1 category increase in activity score.

Time frame: At Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis ScoreStable Fibrosis Score71.3 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis ScoreWorsened Fibrosis Score15.3 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis ScoreImproved Fibrosis Score13.4 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis ScoreStable Fibrosis Score66.2 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis ScoreWorsened Fibrosis Score11.4 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis ScoreImproved Fibrosis Score22.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ISHAK Histological Activity Index Response

ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) in the ISHAK modified HAI (necroinflammatory) score at week 72. ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of periportal ± bridging (P/B) necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5 = zone 3 multiple; 6 = panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis grading as 0: absent; 1: \< = 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: \> 10 foci; Portal Inflammation grading: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal.

Time frame: At Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With ISHAK Histological Activity Index Response47.1 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With ISHAK Histological Activity Index Response58.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: ISHAK HAI Response For Latino VS Non-Latino Whitep-value: 0.028595% CI: [-0.2, 0]Normal approximation to the binomial.
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Score

The Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) included an assessment of sinusoidal fibrosis, Mallory bodies, and hepatocyte ballooning (HB). Grading categories for the NASH scales were as: Sinusoidal fibrosis: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules, without diffuse interstitial sinusoidal collagen deposition; 3 = Involvement of most or all lobules;, with diffuse interstitial fibrosis involving some or most of the lobules Mallory bodies: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules; and Hepatocyte ballooning: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules.

Time frame: At Week 72

Population: ITT Population included all participants who were enrolled and took at least 1 dose of study drug (Pegasys or Copegus). Analysis was performed for ITT participants with paired biopsy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis ScoreSinusoidal Fibrosis Non-zero NASH Score at Week 7219.1 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis ScoreMallory Bodies Non-zero NASH Score at Week 723.2 Percentage of participants
LatinoPercentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis ScoreHB Non-zero NASH Score at Week 7219.7 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis ScoreSinusoidal Fibrosis Non-zero NASH Score at Week 7218.4 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis ScoreMallory Bodies Non-zero NASH Score at Week 722.0 Percentage of participants
Non-Latino WhitePercentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis ScoreHB Non-zero NASH Score at Week 729.5 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026