Skip to content

Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Young Patients Who Have Undergone Biopsy or Surgery for Medulloblastoma or Pineoblastoma

Phase II Study of Craniospinal and Posterior Fossa Irradiation Using Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Medulloblastoma and Pineoblastoma: Assessment of Acute and Long Term Sequelae

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00105560
Enrollment
59
Registered
2005-03-16
Start date
2002-05-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors, Long-term Effects Secondary to Cancer Therapy in Children

Keywords

long-term effects secondary to cancer therapy in children, untreated childhood medulloblastoma, untreated childhood pineoblastoma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers radiation directly to the area where a tumor was surgically removed may kill any remaining tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well proton beam radiation therapy works in treating young patients who have undergone biopsy or surgery for medulloblastoma or pineoblastoma.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Determine the 3-year incidence and severity of ototoxicity in young patients with medulloblastoma or pineoblastoma treated with adjuvant proton beam craniospinal and posterior fossa radiotherapy. * Determine the incidence of primary hypothyroidism and other endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ) in patients treated with this regimen. * Determine the incidence and severity of neurocognitive abnormalities in patients treated with this regimen. * Determine the acute side effects of this regimen, including esophagitis, upper and lower gastrointestinal tract disease, and weight loss, in these patients. * Determine the 3-year progression-free survival rate of patients treated with this regimen. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to risk (standard vs high). Patients receive proton beam craniospinal and posterior fossa radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6-8 weeks\*. NOTE: \*Unless otherwise specified by a co-existing protocol. Patients undergo neurocognitive evaluation at baseline or within 3 months after completion of radiotherapy and then at 1, 3, and 5 years. Patients also undergo endocrine evaluation at baseline and then annually for 5 years; and audiology evaluation at baseline, before each course of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (if receiving this), and then annually for 5 years. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3-6 months for 2-5 years. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 60 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

RADIATIONradiation therapy

Radiation therapy with proton beam to standard doses

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed medulloblastoma or pineoblastoma * Standard-risk or high-risk disease * Must have undergone biopsy or attempted surgical resection of the tumor within the past 35 days * Requires craniospinal irradiation PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age * 3 to 21 Performance status * Not specified Life expectancy * Not specified Hematopoietic * Not specified Hepatic * Not specified Renal * Not specified Other * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy * Not specified Chemotherapy * No more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen * No prior IV or intrathecal methotrexate * No prior intrathecal thiotepa * Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, including chemotherapy administered on another study, allowed Endocrine therapy * Not specified Radiotherapy * No prior radiotherapy Surgery * See Disease Characteristics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity3 Years, 5 years, 7 years, 10 yearsPercentage participants who experienced ototoxicity as measured by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 after the completion of radiation therapy in the overall participant population and by baseline measure subgroups. Incidence is shown after follow-up of 3 years, 5 years, 7 years, and 10 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 Years5 yearsPercentage of participants who experienced endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ defects) after 5 years of follow-up (as determined by CTCAE 3.0). Incidence is shown by hormone type and risk group.
Cumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 Years7 yearsPercentage of participants who experienced endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ defects) after 7 years of follow-up, as determined by CTCAE 3.0. Incidence is shown by hormone type and risk group
Cumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 Years3 yearsPercentage of participants who experienced endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ defects) after 3 years of follow-up (as determined by CTCAE 3.0). Incidence is grouped by hormone type and risk group
Progression Free Survival5 years, 7 years, 10 yearsThe percentage of participants with progression free survival after five, seven, and ten years in the overall population and by risk and histological group.
Overall Survival5 years, 7 years, 10 yearsthe percentage of participants surviving after five and seven years and at the end of follow-up in the overall population. Survival is shown by risk and histological group.
Mean Change Per-Year in Neurocognitive OutcomesBaseline, 1, 3, 5, 7 yearsThe mean change per-year in neurocognitive outcomes as assessed by Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children version 4 (WISC-IV). The test measures the Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) of children with the use of four indices; the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), working memory test, and a processing speed test. FSIQ and the four indices are all assessed on a bell curve scale that has an average score of 100 and standard deviation of 15 points in the general population, meaning on average 68% of test takers would be within +/- 15 points of 100 and 95% within +/- 30 points. Higher scores represent higher intelligence and lower score represent reduced intelligence. Participants were assessed for changes in score with the use of repeated testing during a median follow-up time of 5.2 years. Repeated measures were taken at baseline, 1, 3, 5, and 7 years or until the participant was not available for evaluation (whichever comes first).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radiation Therapy
radiation therapy: Radiation therapy with proton beam to standard doses
59
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadiation Therapy
Age, Continuous6.6 years
Age, Customized
< 8 Years
37 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 8 Years
22 Participants
Boost Dose
>54 GyRBE
2 Participants
Boost Dose
54 GyRBE
57 Participants
Boost Field
Posterior Fossa
23 Participants
Boost Field
Tumor Bed Involved Field
36 Participants
Cisplatin Cumulative Dose
≤300 mg/m2
17 participants
Cisplatin Cumulative Dose
>300 mg/m2
34 participants
Cochlear Mean Dose to Each Ear (D50)
<30 GyRBE
61 Ears
Cochlear Mean Dose to Each Ear (D50)
≥30 GyRBE
57 Ears
Craniospinal Radiation Doses
18-27 GyRBE
45 Participants
Craniospinal Radiation Doses
36 GyRBE
14 Participants
Enrolled on a Children's Oncology Group Protocol
No
47 participants
Enrolled on a Children's Oncology Group Protocol
Yes : A9961
1 participants
Enrolled on a Children's Oncology Group Protocol
Yes : ACNS0331
8 participants
Enrolled on a Children's Oncology Group Protocol
Yes : ACNS0332
2 participants
Enrolled on a Children's Oncology Group Protocol
Yes : ACNS0334
1 participants
Histological Subtype (Dominant Pattern)
Anaplastic or Large Cell Variant
8 Participants
Histological Subtype (Dominant Pattern)
Classic
45 Participants
Histological Subtype (Dominant Pattern)
Desmoplastic or Nodular Variant
6 Participants
Hypothalamus Mean Dose (D50)
<40 GyRBE
37 Participants
Hypothalamus Mean Dose (D50)
≥40 GyRBE
22 Participants
Posterior Fossa Syndrome
No
45 Participants
Posterior Fossa Syndrome
Yes
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
59 Participants
Risk Group
High
14 Participants
Risk Group
Intermediate
6 Participants
Risk Group
Standard
39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants
Use of Photons for <20% radiation dose
No
53 Participants
Use of Photons for <20% radiation dose
Yes
6 Participants
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
No
47 Participants
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
Yes
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
13 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
59 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity

Percentage participants who experienced ototoxicity as measured by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 after the completion of radiation therapy in the overall participant population and by baseline measure subgroups. Incidence is shown after follow-up of 3 years, 5 years, 7 years, and 10 years.

Time frame: 3 Years, 5 years, 7 years, 10 years

Population: The overall study population after the stated durations of follow-up. Follow-up is ongoing and data is not yet available for the 10 year time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityVetriculoperitoneal shunt22 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityFemale20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityCisplatin total dose ≤300 mg/m218 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity≥8 years old6 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity<8 years old15 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityAll Participants12 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityIntermediate-high risk7 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityStandard Risk15 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityNo vetriculoperitoneal shunt10 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityMale4 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityCisplatin total dose >300 mg/m212 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity<8 years old20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityAll Participants16 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityStandard Risk20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityIntermediate-high risk7 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityMale4 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityFemale27 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity≥8 years old6 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityVetriculoperitoneal shunt22 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityNo vetriculoperitoneal shunt14 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityCisplatin total dose ≤300 mg/m218 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityCisplatin total dose >300 mg/m217 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityCisplatin total dose ≤300 mg/m218 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityVetriculoperitoneal shunt22 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityIntermediate-high risk7 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityAll Participants16 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityNo vetriculoperitoneal shunt14 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityStandard Risk20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity<8 years old20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityFemale27 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityCisplatin total dose >300 mg/m217 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Ototoxicity≥8 years old6 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of OtotoxicityMale4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 Years

Percentage of participants who experienced endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ defects) after 3 years of follow-up (as determined by CTCAE 3.0). Incidence is grouped by hormone type and risk group

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit5 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsThyroid deficiency12 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsAny hormone deficit27 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsGrowth hormone deficit22 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsSex hormone deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsThyroid deficiency10 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsAny hormone deficit28 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsGrowth hormone deficit23 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsSex hormone deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsSex hormone deficit5 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit10 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsAny hormone deficit25 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsThyroid deficiency15 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 3 YearsGrowth hormone deficit20 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 Years

Percentage of participants who experienced endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ defects) after 5 years of follow-up (as determined by CTCAE 3.0). Incidence is shown by hormone type and risk group.

Time frame: 5 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit9 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsThyroid deficiency21 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsAny hormone deficit55 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsGrowth hormone deficit46 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsSex hormone deficit : Overall study population3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsThyroid deficiency21 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsAny hormone deficit58 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsGrowth hormone deficit50 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsSex hormone deficit : Overall study population3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsSex hormone deficit : Overall study population5 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsAny hormone deficit50 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsThyroid deficiency20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 5 YearsGrowth hormone deficit40 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 Years

Percentage of participants who experienced endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ defects) after 7 years of follow-up, as determined by CTCAE 3.0. Incidence is shown by hormone type and risk group

Time frame: 7 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit9 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsThyroid deficiency26 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAny hormone deficit63 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsGrowth hormone deficit55 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsSex hormone deficit : Overall study population3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsThyroid deficiency25 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAny hormone deficit68 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsGrowth hormone deficit62 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsSex hormone deficit : Overall study population3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsSex hormone deficit : Overall study population5 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit20 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAny hormone deficit50 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsThyroid deficiency29 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsGrowth hormone deficit40 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 Years

percentage of participants who experienced endocrine dysfunction (neuroendocrine and end organ defects) as determined by CTCAE 3.0) at year 3, year 5, and year 7 of follow-up.

Time frame: 3 years, 5 years, 7 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit5 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsThyroid deficiency12 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAny hormone deficit27 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsGrowth hormone deficit22 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsSex hormone deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsThyroid deficiency21 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAny hormone deficit55 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsGrowth hormone deficit46 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit9 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsSex hormone deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsSex hormone deficit3 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAdrenal or cortisol deficit9 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsAny hormone deficit63 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsThyroid deficiency26 percentage of participants
Radiation Therapy - 7 Years Follow-upCumulative Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction (Neuroendocrine and End Organ Defects) at 7 YearsGrowth hormone deficit55 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Change Per-Year in Neurocognitive Outcomes

The mean change per-year in neurocognitive outcomes as assessed by Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children version 4 (WISC-IV). The test measures the Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) of children with the use of four indices; the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), working memory test, and a processing speed test. FSIQ and the four indices are all assessed on a bell curve scale that has an average score of 100 and standard deviation of 15 points in the general population, meaning on average 68% of test takers would be within +/- 15 points of 100 and 95% within +/- 30 points. Higher scores represent higher intelligence and lower score represent reduced intelligence. Participants were assessed for changes in score with the use of repeated testing during a median follow-up time of 5.2 years. Repeated measures were taken at baseline, 1, 3, 5, and 7 years or until the participant was not available for evaluation (whichever comes first).

Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 5, 7 years

Population: The study participants that were evaluated for changes in neurocognitive outcomes

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upMean Change Per-Year in Neurocognitive OutcomesFSIQ-1.5 units on a scale
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upMean Change Per-Year in Neurocognitive OutcomesVCI-1.3 units on a scale
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upMean Change Per-Year in Neurocognitive OutcomesPRI-.4 units on a scale
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upMean Change Per-Year in Neurocognitive OutcomesWorking Memory-0.8 units on a scale
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upMean Change Per-Year in Neurocognitive OutcomesProcessing speed-2.4 units on a scale
Secondary

Overall Survival

the percentage of participants surviving after five and seven years and at the end of follow-up in the overall population. Survival is shown by risk and histological group.

Time frame: 5 years, 7 years, 10 years

Population: Follow-up for the 10 year follow-up is still ongoing and the data is not yet available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalStandard Risk86 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalClassic or desmoplastic histological subtype84 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalIntermediate-high risk75 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalAnaplastic or large cell histological subtype75 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalAll Participants83 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalAnaplastic or large cell histological subtype75 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalAll Participants81 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalStandard Risk86 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalIntermediate-high risk68 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upOverall SurvivalClassic or desmoplastic histological subtype82 percentage of participants surviving
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

The percentage of participants with progression free survival after five, seven, and ten years in the overall population and by risk and histological group.

Time frame: 5 years, 7 years, 10 years

Population: Follow-up is ongoing and data is not yet available for the 10 year follow-up time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalStandard Risk85 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalClassic or desmoplastic histological subtype80 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalIntermediate-high risk70 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalAnaplastic or large cell histological subtype75 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 3 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalAll Participants80 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalAnaplastic or large cell histological subtype75 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalAll Participants75 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalStandard Risk81 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalIntermediate-high risk63 percentage of participants surviving
Radiation Therapy - 5 Years Follow-upProgression Free SurvivalClassic or desmoplastic histological subtype75 percentage of participants surviving

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026