Cognition Disorders, Gait Disorder, Neurologic, Malnutrition, Mood Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
health care services research, frail elderly, intermediate care, patient centered care, comprehensive health care, geriatric nursing, Behavioral symptoms
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to study the effects of nursing home visits in independently living elderly people on their functional performance and health-related quality of life. The general practitioner (GP) can refer elderly people to this intervention model after identification of a problem in cognition, mood, behavior, mobility, or nutrition. A specialist geriatric nurse visits the patients at home up to six times and coaches the patient in cooperation with the GP and geriatrician.
Detailed description
General practitioners (GPs) in the Western world have to anticipate the increasing age and health care demands of their patients. A considerable proportion of those older patients have reduced functional status and quality of life, which may affect their feelings of autonomy and ability to live independently. Even with considerable disability, most patients prefer to stay at home. Because of their complex clinical presentations and needs, these patients require a special approach to their evaluation and care. Intermediate care is a possible answer to these changing demands, although the efficacy of these programs is a subject of vivid debate. With the Dutch Geriatric Intermediate Care Programme (DGIP) we developed an Intermediate Care model to study efficacy aspects of problem based intermediate care. DGIP is an intermediate care program in which the GP refers elderly patients with a problem in cognition, mood, behavior, mobility, and nutrition. A geriatric specialist nurse applies a guideline based intervention in a maximum of six visits during a maximum of three months. The nurse starts the intervention with the application of the EASYcare instrument for geriatric screening. The EASYcare instrument assesses (instrumental) activities of daily life, cognition, mood, and includes a goal setting item. During the intervention the nurse regularly consults the referring GP and a geriatrician. Objectives * To determine the effects of the Dutch EASYcare Study Geriatric Intermediate care Programme compared to regular medical care in improving health related quality of life in independently living elderly persons and their informal caregivers who contact the GP with one of a variety of geriatric problems. * To determine the costs of the Dutch EASYcare Study Geriatric Intermediate care Programme.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALDutch EASYcare Study Geriatric Intermediate Care Programme
Sponsors
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Radboud University Medical Center
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 70 years of age and over * The patient lives independently or in a home for the aged * The patient has a health problem that was recently presented to the GP by the patient or informal caregiver * The request for help is related to the following problem fields: cognitive disorders, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, mood disorders, mobility disorders and falling, or malnutrition * The patient/informal caregiver and GP have determined a goal they want to achieve * Fulfill one or more of these criteria: MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) equal to or less than 26, GARS (Groningen Activity Restriction Scale) equal to or greater than 25 or MOS-20/subscale mental health equal to or less than 75
Exclusion criteria
* The problem or request for help has an acute nature, urging for action (medical or otherwise) within less than one week * The problem or request for help is merely a medical diagnostic issue, urging for action only physicians (GP or specialist) can offer * MMSE \< 20 or proved moderate to severe dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating scale \[CDR\] \> 1, 0) and no informal caregiver (no informal caregiver is defined as: no informal caregiver who meets the patient for at least once a week on average) * The patient receives other forms of intermediate care or health care from a social worker or community-based geriatrician * The patient is already on the waiting list for a nursing home because of the problem the patient is presented with in our study * Predicted prognosis \< 6 months because of terminal illness
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Functional performance (independent) activities of daily living measured using Groningen Activity Restriction Scale | 3 months |
| Mental health using subscale mental health MOS-20 | 3 months |
| Informal caregiver burden using Zarit Burden Interview | 3 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Overall health related Quality of life using MOS-20 | 3 months |
| Mortality | within a period of maximum two years |
| Well-being using Cantril Self-anchoring ladder and Dementia Quality of Life | 3 months |
| Type of residence (independent, home for the elderly, nursing home) | 3 months |
| Social functioning using Loneliness scale de Jong-Gierveld | 3 months |
| Subjective treatment effects using Patient Enablement Instrument | 3 months |
| Time spent on care by informal caregiver | 3 months |
| Cognition using Mini Mental State Examination | 6 months |
| Cost effectiveness | 6 months |
| Mobility using Timed Up and Go test | 3 months |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed