Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Conditions
Keywords
Prevention, Diabetes type 2, valsartan, nateglinide
Brief summary
This study is a test of the safety and effectiveness of two drugs, one for diabetes and one for hypertension, in keeping patients with high lab values of glucose from progressing to frank diabetes and developing cardiovascular complications. People in this study cannot have frank diabetes but are considered borderline based on blood tests. People in the study take none, one or both of the drugs and do not know which one(s) they are taking.
Interventions
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults * Impaired glucose tolerance * Age dependent risk factors
Exclusion criteria
* Frank diabetes For detailed information, call contact person.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | Mean patient duration of 4.2 years | Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee. |
| Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | Mean patient duration of 5.6 years | The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina. |
| Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | Mean patient duration of 5.8 years | The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure. |
| Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | Mean patient duration of 4.2 years | Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee. |
| Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | Mean patient duration of 5.6 years | The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina. |
| Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | Mean patient duration of 5.8 years | The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Initially enrolled 9518, 212 excluded.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Valsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg ac For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took the combination of nateglinide 30 mg (3 times daily ante cibum \[ac, before meals\]) and valsartan 80 mg (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to nateglinide 60 mg ac and valsartan 160 mg od. | 2,316 |
| Valsartan 160 mg od + Placebo Nateglinide For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took valsartan 80 mg once daily (od) once in the morning. After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 160 mg valsartan od. Patient also received placebo matching nateglinide tablets identical to the active nateglinide tablets (ac, before meals). | 2,315 |
| Nateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo Valsartan For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took one 30 mg tablet of nateglinide with a glass of water 1-30 minutes before each main meal of the day, ie, 3 times daily ante cibum (ac, before meals). If a meal was missed, the patient was not to take a tablet. After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 60 mg nateglinide ac. Patients also received placebo matching valsartan capsules identical to the active valsartan capsules. | 2,329 |
| Placebo Patients took 3 placebo tablets identical to nateglinide tablets 3 times daily ac and 1 placebo capsule identical to valsartan capsule once daily in the morning. | 2,346 |
| Total | 9,306 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | lost to follow-up for all-cause death | 296 | 292 | 313 | 310 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Valsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg ac | Valsartan 160 mg od + Placebo Nateglinide | Nateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo Valsartan | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.75 | 63.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.91 | 63.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.82 | 63.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.88 | 63.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.84 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1174 Participants | 1140 Participants | 1194 Participants | 1203 Participants | 4711 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1142 Participants | 1175 Participants | 1135 Participants | 1143 Participants | 4595 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1,970 / 2,297 | 1,932 / 2,283 | 1,951 / 2,305 | 1,934 / 2,316 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1,031 / 2,297 | 1,040 / 2,283 | 1,035 / 2,305 | 1,049 / 2,316 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.
Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.8 years
Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | 7.9 Percentage of patients |
| Non-valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | 8.3 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.
Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.8 years
Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | 8.1 Percentage of patients |
| Non-valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | 8.1 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.6 years
Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | 14.2 Percentage of patients |
| Non-valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | 15.2 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.6 years
Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | 14.5 Percentage of patients |
| Non-valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | 14.8 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide
Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
Time frame: Mean patient duration of 4.2 years
Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | 36.0 Percentage of patients |
| Non-valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide | 33.9 Percentage of patients |
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan
Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
Time frame: Mean patient duration of 4.2 years
Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | 33.1 Percentage of patients |
| Non-valsartan | Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan | 36.8 Percentage of patients |