Skip to content

Long-term Study of Nateglinide+Valsartan to Prevent or Delay Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Complications

A Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Forced-titration, 2 x 2 Factorial Design Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of Nateglinide and Valsartan in the Prevention of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00097786
Acronym
Navigator
Enrollment
9306
Registered
2004-12-01
Start date
2002-01-31
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2023-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

Prevention, Diabetes type 2, valsartan, nateglinide

Brief summary

This study is a test of the safety and effectiveness of two drugs, one for diabetes and one for hypertension, in keeping patients with high lab values of glucose from progressing to frank diabetes and developing cardiovascular complications. People in this study cannot have frank diabetes but are considered borderline based on blood tests. People in the study take none, one or both of the drugs and do not know which one(s) they are taking.

Interventions

DRUGValsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

DRUGValsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

DRUGNateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

DRUGValsartan placebo + nateglinide placebo

The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults * Impaired glucose tolerance * Age dependent risk factors

Exclusion criteria

* Frank diabetes For detailed information, call contact person.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartanMean patient duration of 4.2 yearsProgression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartanMean patient duration of 5.6 yearsThe extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartanMean patient duration of 5.8 yearsThe core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinideMean patient duration of 4.2 yearsProgression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinideMean patient duration of 5.6 yearsThe extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.
Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinideMean patient duration of 5.8 yearsThe core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Initially enrolled 9518, 212 excluded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Valsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg ac
For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took the combination of nateglinide 30 mg (3 times daily ante cibum \[ac, before meals\]) and valsartan 80 mg (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to nateglinide 60 mg ac and valsartan 160 mg od.
2,316
Valsartan 160 mg od + Placebo Nateglinide
For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took valsartan 80 mg once daily (od) once in the morning. After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 160 mg valsartan od. Patient also received placebo matching nateglinide tablets identical to the active nateglinide tablets (ac, before meals).
2,315
Nateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo Valsartan
For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took one 30 mg tablet of nateglinide with a glass of water 1-30 minutes before each main meal of the day, ie, 3 times daily ante cibum (ac, before meals). If a meal was missed, the patient was not to take a tablet. After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 60 mg nateglinide ac. Patients also received placebo matching valsartan capsules identical to the active valsartan capsules.
2,329
Placebo
Patients took 3 placebo tablets identical to nateglinide tablets 3 times daily ac and 1 placebo capsule identical to valsartan capsule once daily in the morning.
2,346
Total9,306

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall Studylost to follow-up for all-cause death296292313310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicValsartan 160 mg od + Nateglinide 60 mg acValsartan 160 mg od + Placebo NateglinideNateglinide 60 mg ac + Placebo ValsartanPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.75
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.91
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.82
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.88
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.84
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1174 Participants1140 Participants1194 Participants1203 Participants4711 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1142 Participants1175 Participants1135 Participants1143 Participants4595 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1,970 / 2,2971,932 / 2,2831,951 / 2,3051,934 / 2,316
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1,031 / 2,2971,040 / 2,2831,035 / 2,3051,049 / 2,316

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.8 years

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ValsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide7.9 Percentage of patients
Non-valsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide8.3 Percentage of patients
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

The core cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalization for congestive heart failure.

Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.8 years

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ValsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan8.1 Percentage of patients
Non-valsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Core Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan8.1 Percentage of patients
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.6 years

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ValsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide14.2 Percentage of patients
Non-valsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide15.2 Percentage of patients
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

The extended cardiovascular endpoint was defined as a cardiovascular morbidity/mortality event including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, revascularization procedure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and hospitalization for unstable angina.

Time frame: Mean patient duration of 5.6 years

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ValsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan14.5 Percentage of patients
Non-valsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Extended Morbidity and Mortality Event - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan14.8 Percentage of patients
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide

Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

Time frame: Mean patient duration of 4.2 years

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ValsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide36.0 Percentage of patients
Non-valsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Nateglinide Versus Non-nateglinide33.9 Percentage of patients
Primary

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan

Progression to diabetes was determined by (a) an algorithm based on central laboratory measurements of fasting plasma glucose and/or a 2 hour oral glucose tolerance test or (b) adjudication by the Diabetes Endpoint Adjudication Committee.

Time frame: Mean patient duration of 4.2 years

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients in the randomized set with the exception of patients from 10 Mexican sites closed for severe Good Clinical Practice deficiencies.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ValsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan33.1 Percentage of patients
Non-valsartanPercentage of Patients Reaching the Endpoint: Progression to Diabetes - Valsartan Versus Non-valsartan36.8 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026