Skip to content

Decitabine in Treating Patients With Myelofibrosis

A Phase II Study of Decitabine in Myelofibrosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00095784
Enrollment
21
Registered
2004-11-09
Start date
2004-09-29
Completion date
2027-02-22
Last updated
2026-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Myelofibrosis, Secondary Myelofibrosis

Brief summary

This phase II trial studies the side effects and how well decitabine works in treating patients with myelofibrosis, a cancer of the blood system associated with fibrosis (scar tissue) in the bone marrow that is advanced and for which there is no standard therapy. Decitabine may block the actions of some proteins that are responsible for turning certain genes off in various cancers including myelofibrosis.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine response rate (complete and partial responses and hematological improvement) to decitabine in patients with myelofibrosis. II. To determine the safety of decitabine in patients with myelofibrosis. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the effects of decitabine on specific epigenetic changes including methylation status of specific target genes and gene re-expression. II. To determine the effect of decitabine on hemoglobin F levels and on the absolute numbers of circulating cluster of differentiation (CD) 34+ progenitor cells and to investigate the potential utility of these markers as a surrogate for biologic activity of decitabine in myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis (MMM). OUTLINE: Patients receive decitabine subcutaneously (SC) on days 1-5 and 8-12. Treatment repeats every 42 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions

DRUGDecitabine

Given SC

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis (this includes all subtypes - chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis or angiogenic myeloid metaplasia, post thrombocythemic and post polycythemic myelofibrosis); patients must have anemia (hemoglobin \< 11 g/dL) or palpable splenomegaly (measured in cm from costal margin - to be eligible); patients with palpable splenomegaly must have spleen size documented ultrasonographically as well; they must also meet standard diagnostic criteria for MMM * Patients with morphologic evidence of advanced phases of the disease including accelerated (10-19% blasts) phase or with evidence of evolution to acute leukemia (\>= 20% blasts) are also eligible for this study * The Italian Diagnostic Criteria for MMM * Necessary criteria * Diffuse bone marrow fibrosis * Absence of the Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL rearrangement in peripheral blood cells * Optional criteria * Splenomegaly of any grade * Anisopoikilocytosis with tear drop erythrocytes * Presence of circulating immature myeloid cells * Presence of circulating erythroblasts * Presence of clusters of megakaryoblasts and anomalous megakaryocytes in bone marrow sections * Myeloid metaplasia * Diagnosis of MMM is acceptable if the following combinations are present * The two necessary criteria plus any other two optional criteria when splenomegaly is present OR * The two necessary criteria plus any other four optional criteria when splenomegaly is absent * Patients may have had prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy including splenic irradiation; prior therapy with erythropoietin, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF), other growth factors or androgenic steroids is also permitted; there is no limit to the number of prior regimens received; at least 4 weeks must have elapsed since prior chemo or radiation therapy; at least 2 weeks must have elapsed since growth factor (erythropoietin, GCSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor \[GM-CSF\]) or other therapy * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =\< 2 (Karnofsky \>= 60%) * Total bilirubin =\< 2mg/dL * In patients with associated hemolytic anemia; total bilirubin \> 2mg/dL is permissible as long as this is as a result of predominantly unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia; such patients may be enrolled only after discussion with the study chair * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase \[SGPT\]) =\< 3 x institutional upper limit of normal unless due to disease * Serum creatinine =\< 2mg/dL * Patients must not be pregnant or nursing; women of child- bearing potential and men must agree to use an effective contraceptive method; should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Prior therapy with decitabine * Patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier * Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents * Patients with known central nervous system (CNS) disease should be excluded from this clinical trial * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to decitabine * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Pregnant women are excluded from this study; breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with decitabine * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients receiving combination anti-retroviral therapy are excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, or Hematologic Improvement.Up to 36 weeks (6 cycles)Complete response is normalization of counts and transfusion-independence. Partial response is hemoglobin increase to normal levels, multilineage improvement including absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and/or platelets. Hematologic improvement is red cell transfusion-independence or \>50% increase in platelet levels.
Incidence of Toxicities, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0Up to 30 days of last dose of decitabinePercentage of patients experiencing any toxicity, any grade level. Additional details on adverse events are reported in Adverse Events section.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CD34+ CellsCycle 1, Day 1CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously.
CXCR4Cycle 1, Day 1CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT\_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL)
Hemoglobin FCycle 1, Day 1Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples. Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOROlatoyosi M Odenike

University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I
Patients receive 0.3 mg/kg/day decitabine subcutaneously on days 1-5 and 8-12. decitabine : Given SC
21
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm I
Age, Continuous67 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Toxicities, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0

Percentage of patients experiencing any toxicity, any grade level. Additional details on adverse events are reported in Adverse Events section.

Time frame: Up to 30 days of last dose of decitabine

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm IIncidence of Toxicities, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0100 percentage of patients
Primary

Response Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, or Hematologic Improvement.

Complete response is normalization of counts and transfusion-independence. Partial response is hemoglobin increase to normal levels, multilineage improvement including absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and/or platelets. Hematologic improvement is red cell transfusion-independence or \>50% increase in platelet levels.

Time frame: Up to 36 weeks (6 cycles)

Population: Two patients were non-evaluable for response.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm IResponse Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, or Hematologic Improvement.37 percentage of participants
Secondary

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 5

Population: One patient had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICD34+ Cells71 cells x 10^6/L
Secondary

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 12

Population: Three patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICD34+ Cells35 cells x 10^6/L
Secondary

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 1

Population: Five patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICD34+ Cells76 cells x 10^6/L
Secondary

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 5

Population: Six patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICD34+ Cells35 cells x 10^6/L
Secondary

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 12

Population: Six patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICD34+ Cells21 cells x 10^6/L
Comparison: Mixed effects regression analysis of change over time in CD34+ cell levels. Analysis performed on log scale.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1

Population: One patient had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICD34+ Cells117 cells x 10^6/L
Secondary

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT\_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL)

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 12

Population: Three patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICXCR46.4 ratio
Secondary

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT\_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL)

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1

Population: Four patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICXCR44.4 ratio
Secondary

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT\_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL)

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 5

Population: Three patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICXCR45.7 ratio
Secondary

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT\_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL)

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 1

Population: Seven patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICXCR44.0 ratio
Secondary

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT\_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL)

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 5

Population: Seven patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICXCR46.0 ratio
Secondary

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT\_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL)

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 12

Population: Eleven patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm ICXCR47.1 ratio
Comparison: Mixed effects regression analysis of change over time in CXCR4 levels. Analysis performed on log scale.p-value: 0.29Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Hemoglobin F

Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples. Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1

Population: Four patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm IHemoglobin F1.6 percentage of HbF
Secondary

Hemoglobin F

Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples. Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 5

Population: Three patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm IHemoglobin F1.6 percentage of HbF
Secondary

Hemoglobin F

Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples. Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 12

Population: Three patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm IHemoglobin F1.4 percentage of HbF
Secondary

Hemoglobin F

Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples. Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 1

Population: Nine patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm IHemoglobin F1.5 percentage of HbF
Secondary

Hemoglobin F

Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples. Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 5

Population: Seven patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm IHemoglobin F1.5 percentage of HbF
Secondary

Hemoglobin F

Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples. Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker.

Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 12

Population: Seven patients had missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Arm IHemoglobin F1.5 percentage of HbF
Comparison: Mixed effects regression analysis of change over time in hemoglobin F levels.p-value: 0.99Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026