Skip to content

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Denosumab in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-dose Phase 2 Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Denosumab in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00095498
Enrollment
227
Registered
2004-11-08
Start date
2004-08-11
Completion date
2007-04-01
Last updated
2021-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

arthritis, joint pain, Methotrexate

Brief summary

This study will determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of denosumab (AMG 162) in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).

Interventions

DRUGplacebo

placebo subcutaneous injection

DRUGdenosumab

For subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of RA. * All subjects will be required to have been taking a stable dose of methotrexate. * Active RA at screening defined as greater than or equal to 6 swollen joints. * The presence of erosive disease

Exclusion criteria

* Received any biologic agent (e.g., Enbrel®, Remicade®, Humira®, Kineret®) or Arava® within 8 weeks before randomization; past use of these agents is allowed. * Steroid use greater than 15 mg/day. * Scheduled for surgery or joint replacement in the hands, wrists or feet.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Erosion Score Measured From MRI Assessments (RA-MRI ES) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Fifteen sites in each wrist and 10 sites in each hand were assessed by a blinded and independent reader. Each site was scored from 0 to 10 (in accordance with the European League Against Rheumatism \[EULAR\]-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials convention), with each unit increment representing 10% incremental loss of the peripheral 1 cm of articular bone. The Erosion Score is a sum of erosion scores from 50 joint sites in both hands/wrists and ranges from 0 (normal, no erosion) to 500 (worst possible erosion).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology eosinophils
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology eosinophils
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology eosinophils
Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology eosinophils
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology hematocrit
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology hematocrit
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology hematocrit
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry alkaline phoshatatse
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 3baseline, month 3Laboratory chemisrty alkaline phosphatase
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology hematocrit
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 6baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry alkaline phosphatase
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 12baseine, month 12Laboratory chemistry alkaline phosphatase
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 12Baseline, Month 12TSS is the sum of erosion and joint space narrowing scores obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet, assessed by 2 independent readers. The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280. Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. The TSS ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6TSS is the sum of erosion and joint space narrowing scores obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet, assessed by 2 independent readers. The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280. Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. The TSS ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 12Baseline, Month 12The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet, obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280.
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet, obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280.
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score (indicating worst joint space narrowing) of 168.
Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory Chemistry Albumin
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score (indicating worst joint space narrowing) of 168.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 1Baseline, Month 1Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 1 calculated using ((month 1 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means are based on a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 6Baseline, month 6Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to month 6 calculated using ((month 6 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means are based on a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 12 calculated using ((Month 12 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 1Baseline, Month 1Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 1 calculated using ((Month 1 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 6 calculated using ((Month 6 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 12 calculated using ((Month 12 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 1Baseline, Month 1Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 1 calculated using ((Month 1 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry albumin
Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry albumin
Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry albumin
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 6 calculated using ((Month 6 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 12 calculated using ((Month 12 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Percent change from baseline to Month 3 in serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) Type I calculated using ((Month 3 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Percent change from baseline to Month 6 in serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) Type I calculated using ((Month 6 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Percent change from Baseline to Month 12 in serum C-Telopeptide (CTX) Type I calculated using ((Month 12 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP) at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Percent change from baseline to Month 3 in procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) calculated using ((Month 3 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Percent change from baseline to Month 6 in procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) calculated using ((Month 6 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Percent change from baseline to Month 12 in procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) calculated using ((Month 12 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II Collagen C-telopeptide (C-Tx) /Creatinine at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Percent change from baseline to Month 3 in urine Type II collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX)/Creatinine calculated using ((Month 3 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Percent change from baseline to Month 6 in urine Type II collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX)/Creatinine calculated using ((Month 6 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Percent change from baseline to Month 12 in urine Type II collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX)/Creatinine calculated using ((Month 12 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.
Number of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding AntibodiesAssessed at Baseline and at Months 1, 3, 6 and 12.Serum from participants was tested for antibodies to denosumab by immuoassay at months 1, 3, 6 and 12. The number of participants with anti-denosumab antibodies at any assessment is reported.
Number of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibody and Neutralizing AntibodyBaseline to Month 12Serum from participants testing positive for anti-denosumab binding antibodies was tested in a cell-based bioassay for neutralizing activity against denosumab.
Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 3baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate
Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate
Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 12Baseline, Month 12Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 1baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin
Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen
Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen
Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen
Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 12baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen
Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 1baseline. month 1Laboratory chemistry calcium
Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry calcium
Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 6baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry calcium
Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry calcium
Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium
Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 3baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium
Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 6Baseline, Month 6Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium
Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 12Baselien, Month 12Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology hemoglobin
Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 1baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry chloride
Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry chloride
Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry chloride
Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry chloride
Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry creatinine
Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry creatinine
Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry creatinine
Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry creatinine
Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase
Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase
Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase
Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase
Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry glucose
Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry glucose
Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry glucose
Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 12baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry glucose
Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry potassium
Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry potassium
Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry potassium
Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry potassium
Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry magnesium
Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry magnesium
Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry magnesium
Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry magnesium
Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry sodium
Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 3Baseline, Month 3Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 3
Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry sodium
Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry sodium
Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry phosphorus
Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry phosphorus
Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry phosphorus
Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 12Baseline, month 12Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 12
Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry total protein
Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry total protein
Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry total protein
Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry total protein
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino TransferaseBaseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology hemoglobin
Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry alanine amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory Chemistry alanine amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory chemistry alanine amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory chemistry alanine amino transferase
Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 1baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology basophils
Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology basophils
Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology basophils
Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology basophils
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology hemoglobin
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology hemoglobin
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology lymphocytes
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology lymphocytes
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology lymphocytes
Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology lymphocytes
Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology monocytes
Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology monocytes
Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology monocytes
Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology monocytes
Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 1baseline, month 1Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate
Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology total neutrophils
Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology total neutrophils
Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology total neutrophils
Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology platelets
Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology platelets
Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology platelets
Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology platelets
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology red blood cells
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratory hematology red blood cells
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology red blood cells
Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology red blood cells
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology white blood cells
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 3Baseline, month 3Laboratpry hematology white blood cells
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 6Baseline, month 6Laboratory hematology white blood cells
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 12Baseline, month 12Laboratory hematology white blood cells
Number of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12Participants with laboratory toxicity of grade 3 or 4, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, on the following general guideline: Grade 1 - Mild AE; Grade 2 - Moderate AE; Grade 3 - Severe AE; Grade 4 - Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5 - Death related to AE.
Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 1Baseline, month 1Laboratory hematology total neutrophils

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First Subject Enrolled: 11-Aug-2004 Last Subject Enrolled: 07-Apr-2005

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Denosumab 180 mg
Participants received 180 mg denosumab by subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and at Month 6.
76
Denosumab 60 mg
Participants received 60 mg denosumab by subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and at Month 6.
73
Placebo
Participants received placebo subcutaneous injections on Day 1 and at Month 6.
78
Total227

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event101
Overall StudyDisease progression011
Overall StudyIneligibility determined302
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up112
Overall StudyNoncompliance101
Overall StudyOther676
Overall StudyPhysician Decision9108
Overall StudyProtocol Violation001
Overall StudyRequirement for alternative therapy102
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject151615

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDenosumab 180 mgDenosumab 60 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous58 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
57.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
57 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
57.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants6 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
66 Participants59 Participants62 Participants187 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants51 Participants62 Participants166 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants22 Participants16 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
47 / 7544 / 7144 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 753 / 716 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Erosion Score Measured From MRI Assessments (RA-MRI ES) at Month 6

Fifteen sites in each wrist and 10 sites in each hand were assessed by a blinded and independent reader. Each site was scored from 0 to 10 (in accordance with the European League Against Rheumatism \[EULAR\]-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials convention), with each unit increment representing 10% incremental loss of the peripheral 1 cm of articular bone. The Erosion Score is a sum of erosion scores from 50 joint sites in both hands/wrists and ranges from 0 (normal, no erosion) to 500 (worst possible erosion).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Erosion Score Measured From MRI Assessments (RA-MRI ES) at Month 60.00 units on a scaleFull Range 3.49
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Erosion Score Measured From MRI Assessments (RA-MRI ES) at Month 60.00 units on a scaleFull Range 3.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Erosion Score Measured From MRI Assessments (RA-MRI ES) at Month 60.49 units on a scaleFull Range 5.08
p-value: 0.264van Elteren stratified rank test
p-value: 0.018van Elteren stratified rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry alanine amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 1-1.84 U/LStandard Deviation 8.61
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 1-1.03 U/LStandard Deviation 12.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 11.20 U/LStandard Deviation 15.44
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry alanine amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 124.86 U/LStandard Deviation 24.46
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 121.66 U/LStandard Deviation 14.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 121.82 U/LStandard Deviation 14.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 3

Laboratory Chemistry alanine amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 30.04 U/LStandard Deviation 8.85
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 3-2.10 U/LStandard Deviation 14.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 31.54 U/LStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry alanine amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 61.20 U/LStandard Deviation 15.83
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 6-1.76 U/LStandard Deviation 14.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Amino Transferase at Month 65.44 U/LStandard Deviation 51.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 1

Laboratory Chemistry Albumin

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 1-0.36 g/LStandard Deviation 2.29
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 1-0.24 g/LStandard Deviation 2.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 1-0.30 g/LStandard Deviation 2.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry albumin

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 12-0.13 g/LStandard Deviation 2.41
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 12-0.06 g/LStandard Deviation 2.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 12-0.59 g/LStandard Deviation 2.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry albumin

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 3-0.30 g/LStandard Deviation 2.18
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 3-0.12 g/LStandard Deviation 2.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 3-0.18 g/LStandard Deviation 2.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry albumin

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 6-0.30 g/LStandard Deviation 2.49
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 6-0.90 g/LStandard Deviation 2.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin at Month 6-0.77 g/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry alkaline phoshatatse

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 1-5.87 U/LStandard Deviation 10.52
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 1-3.66 U/LStandard Deviation 11.97
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 11.18 U/LStandard Deviation 15.62
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry alkaline phosphatase

Time frame: baseine, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 12-11.92 U/LStandard Deviation 16.74
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 12-11.34 U/LStandard Deviation 18.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 12-4.63 U/LStandard Deviation 16.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 3

Laboratory chemisrty alkaline phosphatase

Time frame: baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 3-13.27 U/LStandard Deviation 15.91
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 3-12.38 U/LStandard Deviation 13.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 3-2.03 U/LStandard Deviation 8.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry alkaline phosphatase

Time frame: baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 6-7.84 U/LStandard Deviation 31.94
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 6-12.49 U/LStandard Deviation 12.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Month 6-0.54 U/LStandard Deviation 18.46
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase

Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase3.85 U/LStandard Deviation 15.66
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase0.87 U/LStandard Deviation 7.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase3.24 U/LStandard Deviation 15.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 1-0.79 U/LStandard Deviation 5.84
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 1-0.26 U/LStandard Deviation 8.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 10.90 U/LStandard Deviation 8.35
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 123.86 U/LStandard Deviation 18.62
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 123.75 U/LStandard Deviation 18.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 122.24 U/LStandard Deviation 7.32
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry aspartate amino transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 31.99 U/LStandard Deviation 5.77
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 30.40 U/LStandard Deviation 8.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Amino Transferase at Month 32.69 U/LStandard Deviation 9.37
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 1

Laboratory hematology basophils

Time frame: baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 10 *10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.07
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 10 *10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 1-0.01 *10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 12

Laboratory hematology basophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 120.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.09
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 120 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 120.03 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 3

Laboratory hematology basophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 3-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 3-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 3-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Basophils at Month 6

Laboratory hematology basophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 60 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 60 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Basophils at Month 60 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate

Time frame: baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 10.78 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.31
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 10.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 10.54 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 120.81 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.12
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 120.58 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 120.23 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate

Time frame: baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 30.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 30.39 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 3-0.67 mmol/LStandard Deviation 3.17
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry bicarbonate

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 60.45 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.29
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 6-0.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bicarbonate at Month 6-0.18 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.67
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 10 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.35
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 10.15 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 1-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen

Time frame: baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 120.32 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.37
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 120.24 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 12-0.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 30.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.35
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 30.41 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 30.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.43
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry blood urea nitrogen

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 6-0.21 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.44
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 6-0.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen at Month 6-0.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry calcium

Time frame: baseline. month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 1-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 1-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 10.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry calcium

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 12-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 120.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 120.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry calcium

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 3-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 3-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 30 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry calcium

Time frame: baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 6-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 6-0.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium at Month 6-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 1-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 1-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 10.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium

Time frame: Baselien, Month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 12-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 120.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 120 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium

Time frame: baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 3-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 3-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 30 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry albumin-adjusted calcium

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 6-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 6-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Calcium (Corrected) at Month 6-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry chloride

Time frame: baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 10.24 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.36
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 10.58 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 10.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry chloride

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 12-0.62 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.45
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 12-0.21 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 12-0.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry chloride

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 3-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.67
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 30.38 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 30.78 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chloride at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry chloride

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 6-0.57 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.85
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 60.48 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chloride at Month 60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.79
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry creatinine

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 1-0.88 µmol/LStandard Deviation 9.89
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 10.38 µmol/LStandard Deviation 8.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 11.47 µmol/LStandard Deviation 8.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry creatinine

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 125.44 µmol/LStandard Deviation 10.09
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 124.42 µmol/LStandard Deviation 9.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 123.73 µmol/LStandard Deviation 7.84
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry creatinine

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 30.62 µmol/LStandard Deviation 11.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 33.20 µmol/LStandard Deviation 8.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 33.81 µmol/LStandard Deviation 9.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry creatinine

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 63.30 µmol/LStandard Deviation 10.97
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 63.84 µmol/LStandard Deviation 9.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Creatinine at Month 63.54 µmol/LStandard Deviation 11.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 1

Laboratory hematology eosinophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 1-0.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.09
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 1-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 10.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 12

Laboratory hematology eosinophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 120.03 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.16
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 120.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 120.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 3

Laboratory hematology eosinophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 30 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.1
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 30 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 3-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 6

Laboratory hematology eosinophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 6-0.03 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.09
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 60 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Eosinophils at Month 60 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 11.04 U/LStandard Deviation 8.13
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 1-1.25 U/LStandard Deviation 9.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 10.26 U/LStandard Deviation 10.63
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 122.98 U/LStandard Deviation 10.94
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 121.08 U/LStandard Deviation 16.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 12-1.38 U/LStandard Deviation 14.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 32.32 U/LStandard Deviation 10.94
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 30.04 U/LStandard Deviation 9.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 31.51 U/LStandard Deviation 15.87
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry gamma-glutamyl transferase

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 67.37 U/LStandard Deviation 36.42
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 60.28 U/LStandard Deviation 12.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase at Month 65.67 U/LStandard Deviation 37.98
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry glucose

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 10.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.76
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 10.20 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 10.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry glucose

Time frame: baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 12-0.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.66
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 120.22 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 120.19 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry glucose

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 30.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.87
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 30.20 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 30.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glucose at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry glucose

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 60.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.85
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 60.20 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Glucose at Month 6-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 1

Laboratory hematology hematocrit

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 10 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.02
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 10 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 10 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 12

Laboratory hematology hematocrit

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 120 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.02
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 120 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 12-0.01 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 3

Laboratory hematology hematocrit

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 30.01 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.02
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 30 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 30 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 6

Laboratory hematology hematocrit

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 60.01 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.02
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 60 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematocrit at Month 60 Proportion of red blood cells in bloodStandard Deviation 0.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 1

Laboratory hematology hemoglobin

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 1-0.33 g/LStandard Deviation 6.73
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 1-1.48 g/LStandard Deviation 6.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 1-0.69 g/LStandard Deviation 6.34
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 12

Laboratory hematology hemoglobin

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 121.21 g/LStandard Deviation 9.26
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 120.02 g/LStandard Deviation 11.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 12-0.46 g/LStandard Deviation 10.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 3

Laboratory hematology hemoglobin

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 30.69 g/LStandard Deviation 7.02
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 3-1.02 g/LStandard Deviation 8.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 3-1.10 g/LStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 6

Laboratory hematology hemoglobin

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 6-0.36 g/LStandard Deviation 7.8
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 6-1.69 g/LStandard Deviation 8.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Month 6-0.69 g/LStandard Deviation 8.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 1

Laboratory hematology lymphocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 1-0.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.41
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 10.10 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 10 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 12

Laboratory hematology lymphocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 12-0.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.49
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 120.04 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 12-0.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 3

Laboratory hematology lymphocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 30.07 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.38
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 30.14 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 30.08 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.46
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 6

Laboratory hematology lymphocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 60.12 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.41
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 60.05 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Lymphocytes at Month 60.03 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry magnesium

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 10.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 10.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 10.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry magnesium

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 12-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 12-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 12-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry magnesium

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 3-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 30.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 30 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry magnesium

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 60.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Magnesium at Month 60.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 1

Laboratory hematology monocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 10.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.13
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 1-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 10.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 12

Laboratory hematology monocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 120.03 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.15
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 120 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 120.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 3

Laboratory hematology monocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 30.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 30.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 30.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.11
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 6

Laboratory hematology monocytes

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 60.05 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.17
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 60.04 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Monocytes at Month 60.04 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry phosphorus

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 1-0.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.16
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 1-0.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 10.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 12

Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 12

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 12-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.17
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 120 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 120 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry phosphorus

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 3-0.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.16
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 3-0.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 30.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry phosphorus

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 6-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.17
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 6-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phosphorus at Month 60.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 1

Laboratory hematology platelets

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 11.78 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 44.53
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 110.36 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 49.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 12.96 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 44.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 12

Laboratory hematology platelets

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 123.32 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 51.66
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 12-4.26 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 51.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 121.07 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 58.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 3

Laboratory hematology platelets

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 3-2.82 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 48.86
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 36.86 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 50.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 3-1.97 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 45.94
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Platelets at Month 6

Laboratory hematology platelets

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 61.95 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 54.95
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 61.00 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 45.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Platelets at Month 61.57 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 53.39
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry potassium

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 10.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.38
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 10.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 10.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry potassium

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 12-0.07 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.44
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 12-0.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 12-0.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry potassium

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 3-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.39
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 30.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 30.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Potassium at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry potassium

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 60.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.44
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 6-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Potassium at Month 60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.42
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 12

The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet, obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 120 units on a scale
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 120 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 120 units on a scale
p-value: 0.012van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.007van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 6

The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet, obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 60 units on a scale
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 60 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion Score at Month 60 units on a scale
p-value: 0.277van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.019van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 12

Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score (indicating worst joint space narrowing) of 168.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 120 units on a scale
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 120 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 120 units on a scale
p-value: 0.382van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.488van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 6

Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet and assessed by 2 independent readers. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score (indicating worst joint space narrowing) of 168.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 60 units on a scale
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 60 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing Score at Month 60 units on a scale
p-value: 0.236van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.712van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 12

TSS is the sum of erosion and joint space narrowing scores obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet, assessed by 2 independent readers. The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280. Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. The TSS ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 120 units on a scale
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 120 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 120.5 units on a scale
p-value: 0.032van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.18van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 6

TSS is the sum of erosion and joint space narrowing scores obtained from radiographs of the hands and feet, assessed by 2 independent readers. The joint erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands and 12 joints in the feet. Each joint was scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 (no erosion) to 5 (extensive loss of bone from more than one half of the articulating bone). Because each side of a foot joint was graded on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint was 10 and the maximal erosion score was 280. Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score summarizes the severity of JSN in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. Assessment of JSN for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, was scored from 0 (normal JSN) to 4 (complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation), with a maximum JSN score of 168. The TSS ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 60 units on a scale
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 60 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Radiographic Total Modified Sharp Score (TSS) at Month 60 units on a scale
p-value: 0.602van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.181van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 1

Laboratory hematology red blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 1-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.21
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 1-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 1-0.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 12

Laboratory hematology red blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 120.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.27
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 12-0.06 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 12-0.03 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 3

Laboratory hematology red blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 30.05 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.23
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 30.02 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 30 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 6

Laboratory hematology red blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 60.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.24
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 6-0.04 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Red Blood Cells at Month 60.01 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 0.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry sodium

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 1-0.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.93
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 1-0.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 10.33 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry sodium

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 12-0.25 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.02
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 12-0.27 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 120.33 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 3

Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 3

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 3-0.14 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.13
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 3-0.16 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 30.39 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sodium at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry sodium

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 6-0.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.98
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 6-0.06 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sodium at Month 60.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin

Time frame: baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 10.26 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.39
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 1-0.23 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 10.42 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.83
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 120.41 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.58
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 12-0.35 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.28
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 120.03 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 30.92 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.17
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 3-0.23 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 30.44 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.74
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry total bilirubin

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 61.08 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.58
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 6-0.61 umol/LStandard Deviation 2.49
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin at Month 60.34 umol/LStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 1

Laboratory hematology total neutrophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 10 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.97
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 10.18 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 1-0.13 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.68
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 12

Laboratory hematology total neutrophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 120.65 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.37
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 120.04 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 120.10 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 3

Laboratory hematology total neutrophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 30.11 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.92
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 30.26 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 3-0.11 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 6

Laboratory hematology total neutrophils

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 60.18 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.67
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 6-0.05 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Neutrophils at Month 60.27 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 1

Laboratory chemistry total protein

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 1-0.46 g/LStandard Deviation 3.56
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 1-0.40 g/LStandard Deviation 3.22
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 10.21 g/LStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 12

Laboratory chemistry total protein

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 12-0.97 g/LStandard Deviation 3.76
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 12-0.91 g/LStandard Deviation 3.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 12-0.98 g/LStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 3

Laboratory chemistry total protein

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 3-0.29 g/LStandard Deviation 3.35
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 30.07 g/LStandard Deviation 3.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 3-0.20 g/LStandard Deviation 3.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 6

Laboratory chemistry total protein

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 6-0.09 g/LStandard Deviation 4.13
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 6-0.62 g/LStandard Deviation 3.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Protein at Month 6-0.57 g/LStandard Deviation 3.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 1

Laboratory hematology white blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 1

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 1.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 1-0.03 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.07
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 10.26 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 1-0.10 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.88
Secondary

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 12

Laboratory hematology white blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 12

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 120.70 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.4
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 120.11 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 120.13 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.22
Secondary

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 3

Laboratpry hematology white blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 3

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 30.18 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.93
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 30.40 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 3-0.05 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 6

Laboratory hematology white blood cells

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: Subjects who received at least 1 dose of investigational product who had nonmissing data at baseline and month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 60.30 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.78
Denosumab 60 mgChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 60.04 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 1.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline in White Blood Cells at Month 60.35 * 10^9/LStandard Deviation 2.34
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibodies

Serum from participants was tested for antibodies to denosumab by immuoassay at months 1, 3, 6 and 12. The number of participants with anti-denosumab antibodies at any assessment is reported.

Time frame: Assessed at Baseline and at Months 1, 3, 6 and 12.

Population: Patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and with at least one postbaseline sample taken.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibodies4 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibodies0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibodies2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibody and Neutralizing Antibody

Serum from participants testing positive for anti-denosumab binding antibodies was tested in a cell-based bioassay for neutralizing activity against denosumab.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 12

Population: Patients who were positive for anti-denosumab antibodies

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibody and Neutralizing Antibody0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-Denosumab Binding Antibody and Neutralizing Antibody0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3

Participants with laboratory toxicity of grade 3 or 4, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, on the following general guideline: Grade 1 - Mild AE; Grade 2 - Moderate AE; Grade 3 - Severe AE; Grade 4 - Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5 - Death related to AE.

Time frame: Month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12

Population: Patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Alanine Amino Transferase-above normal (grade 3)0 Participants
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Aspartate Amino Transferase-above normal (grade 3)0 Participants
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Glucose-above normal (grade 3)1 Participants
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Lymphocytes-below normal (grade 3)1 Participants
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Sodium-below normal (grade 3)1 Participants
Denosumab 180 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3White Blood Cells-below normal (grade 3)0 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3White Blood Cells-below normal (grade 3)1 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Alanine Amino Transferase-above normal (grade 3)0 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Lymphocytes-below normal (grade 3)3 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Sodium-below normal (grade 3)2 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Aspartate Amino Transferase-above normal (grade 3)1 Participants
Denosumab 60 mgNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Glucose-above normal (grade 3)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Aspartate Amino Transferase-above normal (grade 3)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Glucose-above normal (grade 3)0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3White Blood Cells-below normal (grade 3)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Lymphocytes-below normal (grade 3)2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Alanine Amino Transferase-above normal (grade 3)1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade Greater or Equal to 3Sodium-below normal (grade 3)0 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 1

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 1 calculated using ((Month 1 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 1 month.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 10.64 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.38
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 1-0.15 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.38
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 1-0.16 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.38
p-value: 0.98695% CI: [-1.06, 1.08]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: 0.14195% CI: [-0.27, 1.86]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 12 calculated using ((Month 12 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 121.51 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.47
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 121.34 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 12-0.47 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.47
p-value: 0.00795% CI: [0.51, 3.12]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.67, 3.29]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 6

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 6 calculated using ((Month 6 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 60.84 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.37
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 60.89 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.37
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Month 6-0.06 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.37
p-value: 0.07395% CI: [-0.09, 1.99]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: 0.0995% CI: [-0.14, 1.93]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 1

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 1 calculated using ((month 1 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means are based on a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 1 month.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 10.25 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.29
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 10.59 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 1-0.34 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.29
p-value: 0.02695% CI: [0.11, 1.74]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: 0.15595% CI: [-0.23, 1.41]Repeated measures model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 12 calculated using ((Month 12 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 124.09 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.4
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 123.00 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.39
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 120.80 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.4
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.1, 3.29]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.18, 4.39]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 6

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to month 6 calculated using ((month 6 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means are based on a repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 62.61 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.38
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 62.40 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.37
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Month 60.73 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.38
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.62, 2.72]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.84, 2.94]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 12

Percent change from baseline to Month 12 in procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) calculated using ((Month 12 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 12-45.84 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 12-41.8 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 12-17.53 Percent change from baseline
p-value: 0.016van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 6

Percent change from baseline to Month 6 in procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) calculated using ((Month 6 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 6-57.06 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 6-51.57 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in P1NP at Month 6-22.17 Percent change from baseline
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP) at Month 3

Percent change from baseline to Month 3 in procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) calculated using ((Month 3 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP) at Month 3-55.08 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP) at Month 3-57.57 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-terminal Peptide (P1NP) at Month 3-12.23 Percent change from baseline
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Month 3

Percent change from baseline to Month 3 in serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) Type I calculated using ((Month 3 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Month 3-78.67 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Month 3-80.46 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Month 3-11.48 Percent change from baseline
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 12

Percent change from Baseline to Month 12 in serum C-Telopeptide (CTX) Type I calculated using ((Month 12 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 12-65.65 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 12-47.24 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 12-23.36 Percent change from baseline
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 6

Percent change from baseline to Month 6 in serum Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) Type I calculated using ((Month 6 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 6-62.69 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 6-50.64 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Serum CTX at Month 6-12.94 Percent change from baseline
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 1

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 1 calculated using ((Month 1 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 1 month.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 10.06 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.22
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 10.00 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 1-0.02 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.22
p-value: 0.93895% CI: [-0.58, 0.63]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: 0.78795% CI: [-0.53, 0.69]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 12

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 12 calculated using ((Month 12 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 121.67 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.33
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 121.56 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 12-0.38 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.33
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.02, 2.85]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.13, 2.96]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 6

Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry. Percent change from baseline to Month 6 calculated using ((Month 6 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100. Least squares means based on repeated measures model adjusting for treatment, visit, baseline value, and strata (4 strata from the combination of baseline use of steroid and previous use of biologic).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 61.12 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.24
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 60.95 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Month 6-0.06 Percent change from baselineStandard Error 0.24
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [0.33, 1.67]Repeated Measures Model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.51, 1.85]Repeated Measures Model
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II Collagen C-telopeptide (C-Tx) /Creatinine at Month 3

Percent change from baseline to Month 3 in urine Type II collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX)/Creatinine calculated using ((Month 3 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II Collagen C-telopeptide (C-Tx) /Creatinine at Month 3-46.59 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II Collagen C-telopeptide (C-Tx) /Creatinine at Month 3-35.8 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II Collagen C-telopeptide (C-Tx) /Creatinine at Month 32.71 Percent change from baseline
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: <0.001van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 12

Percent change from baseline to Month 12 in urine Type II collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX)/Creatinine calculated using ((Month 12 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 12 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 1236.92 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 1261.92 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 12-3.93 Percent change from baseline
p-value: 0.175van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.133van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 6

Percent change from baseline to Month 6 in urine Type II collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX)/Creatinine calculated using ((Month 6 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value ) x 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product with a non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing postbaseline measurement, and with available data at 6 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Denosumab 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 67.17 Percent change from baseline
Denosumab 60 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 69.65 Percent change from baseline
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Urine Type II C-Tx /Creatinine at Month 64.54 Percent change from baseline
p-value: 0.673van Elteren Stratified Rank Test
p-value: 0.589van Elteren Stratified Rank Test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026