Skip to content

Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)

Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (I-Preserve)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00095238
Enrollment
4128
Registered
2004-11-02
Start date
2002-06-30
Completion date
2008-07-31
Last updated
2015-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congestive Heart Failure

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if Irbesartan is superior to placebo in reducing mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in subjects with heart failure with preserved systolic function. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Interventions

DRUGIrbesartan

Tablets, Oral, titration from 75 to 300 mg, once daily up to 6 years

DRUGPlacebo

Tablets, Oral, titration from 75 to 300 mg, once daily up to 6 years

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female age \>= 60 years with current symptoms of heart failure consistent with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV * Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \> = 45% * Willing to provide written informed consent AND hospitalization for heart failure within the past 6 months OR various abnormalities in electrocardiogram, echocardiogram or chest x-ray indicating heart disease.

Exclusion criteria

* Acute myocardial infarction within 3 months; * Heart revascularization procedure within 3 months; * Hospitalization for angina within 3 months; * Other heart surgery * Life-threatening or uncontrolled arrhythmia * Subjects with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator that has discharged in the past 3 months; * Stroke or surgery of the arteries in the brain within 3 months; * Serious lung disease which requires use of home oxygen. * Significantly low blood pressure * Significantly high blood pressure * Other known diseases that may limit life expectancy to \<3 years; * Known or suspected bilateral kidney artery narrowing; * Geographic or social factors making study participation and follow-up impractical.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Baseline, Month 6, Month 14Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure.
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final VisitBaseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke.
Change From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 14Baseline, Month 6, Month 14Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death
Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitBaseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form \[CRF\] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event.
Physician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineBaseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death
Participant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineBaseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.
Participant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineBaseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization.
Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsYear 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes.
Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean.
Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean.
Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)Baseline, Final VisitFrequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator.
Participant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineBaseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Irbesartan
titration from 75 to 300 mg, once daily (QD), up to 6 years
2,067
Placebo
titration from 75 to 300 mg, once daily (QD), up to 6 years
2,061
Total4,128

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event331287
Overall StudyDeath154170
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy99
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1924
Overall StudyMissing10
Overall StudyNo longer met study criteria45
Overall StudyNoncompliance4445
Overall StudyOther Reasons8788
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor01
Overall StudySubject Withdrew Consent208223

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboIrbesartan
Age, Continuous71.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.95
71.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
71.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
Age, Customized
< 65 years
740 participants364 participants376 participants
Age, Customized
>=75 years
1413 participants716 participants697 participants
Age, Customized
Between 65 and 74 years
1975 participants981 participants994 participants
B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP)353.9 pg/mL345.2 pg/mL363.0 pg/mL
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Class III (Moderate)
3144 participants1562 participants1582 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Class II (Mild)
870 participants444 participants426 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Class I (Mild)
1 participants1 participants0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Class IV (Severe)
112 participants53 participants59 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
34 participants15 participants19 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
82 participants43 participants39 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
152 participants77 participants75 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
3859 participants1925 participants1934 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2491 Participants1264 Participants1227 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1637 Participants797 Participants840 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1,255 / 2,0641,191 / 2,062
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1,146 / 2,0641,155 / 2,062

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to first occurrence of composite outcome of all-cause death (composite outcome of death) or protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include those ≥24 hrs or involving a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular or atrial dysrhythmia, or stroke, that also require intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. In addition, MI or stroke during any hospitalization are included.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

Population: Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years20.7 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years32.9 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years26.4 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years39.2 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year12.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years39.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year12.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years21.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years28.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With First Occurrence of the Composite Outcome of Death (All Cause) or Protocol-Specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years34.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 14

Adjusted ratio to baseline in geometric mean in Pro-BNP in the blood. Ratio to Baseline = On-therapy geometric mean divided by baseline geometric mean. A lower score signifies improvement. Change from baseline adjusted for baseline value and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline. Analysis uses natural logarithms of excretion rate values.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

Population: number of participants with measurement at baseline and at timepoint

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 140.98 pg/mLStandard Error 0.023
PlaceboChange From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 140.93 pg/mLStandard Error 0.022
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 141.00 pg/mLStandard Error 0.026
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP) at Month 6 and Month 141.01 pg/mLStandard Error 0.026
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final Visit

NYHA functional classification=4-tiered system relating symptoms to everyday activities & quality of life. (See Reporting Groups for description of each class.) Change of NYHA functional class from baseline was grouped into 3 categories: improved, unchanged, or worsened (based on case report form \[CRF\] assessment). If a post-randomization CRF assessment was missing or participant died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the participant was classified as Major Event.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

Population: Randomized participants with measurement at baseline and Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final Visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Improved42 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Unchanged310 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Improved44 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Worsened68 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Unchanged230 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Worsened50 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - No Data29 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Worsened41 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Major Event10 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - No Data11 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Improved38 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Worsened53 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Unchanged294 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Improved55 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - No Data18 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Major Event75 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Unchanged287 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - No Data25 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Major Event2 participants
IrbesartanChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Major Event22 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Improved881 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - No Data89 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - No Data103 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Improved904 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Unchanged617 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Major Event53 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Unchanged656 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Worsened11 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Worsened7 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Unchanged428 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Unchanged579 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Worsened29 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Improved886 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Major Event249 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Improved895 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - No Data49 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - No Data84 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Major Event31 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Major Event8 participants
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Worsened5 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Improved933 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Improved936 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Improved948 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Major Event324 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - No Data109 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Improved928 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Unchanged911 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - No Data132 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Worsened58 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Worsened48 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - No Data60 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Worsened61 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Unchanged658 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Unchanged866 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Major Event10 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Unchanged966 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Major Event41 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Worsened97 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - No Data107 participants
Placebo - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Major Event75 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Unchanged317 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Improved42 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Major Event16 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Improved47 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Unchanged338 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Worsened47 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Unchanged254 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Worsened78 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Major Event66 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - No Data5 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Major Event2 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - No Data11 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Improved42 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Worsened63 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Major Event9 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - No Data14 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Improved39 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Unchanged312 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Worsened62 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Change From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - No Data16 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Improved834 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - No Data52 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Major Event33 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Major Event64 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - No Data92 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Major Event254 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Improved863 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Worsened29 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Unchanged440 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Improved840 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Unchanged578 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Worsened4 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Unchanged678 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - No Data103 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Worsened7 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Unchanged622 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Improved860 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - No Data87 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Major Event12 participants
Placebo Class III or IVChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Worsened8 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - No Data119 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Worsened71 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Worsened51 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - No Data57 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Improved881 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Major Event80 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Unchanged890 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Major Event42 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - No Data98 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Unchanged1016 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - No Data106 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Major Event320 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Unchanged939 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Worsened107 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Improved882 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 10 - Improved902 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Improved902 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 6 - Major Event14 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitFinal Visit - Unchanged694 participants
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedChange From Baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at Month 6, Month 10, Month 14, and Final VisitMonth 14 - Worsened69 participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 42, Month 54, Month 66

Population: Participants with baseline score and score at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IrbesartanMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Post-Baseline Mean71.34 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.7
IrbesartanMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Baseline Mean74.37 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.715
IrbesartanMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Adjusted Mean Change-3.14 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.559
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Post-Baseline Mean67.48 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.715
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Baseline Mean74.95 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.711
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Adjusted Mean Change-7.36 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.561
Placebo - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Post-Baseline Mean72.65 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 1.048
Placebo - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Baseline Mean75.29 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 1.075
Placebo - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Adjusted Mean Change-2.63 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.863
Irbesartan - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Post-Baseline Mean68.24 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 1.055
Irbesartan - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Baseline Mean75.17 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 1.052
Irbesartan - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Adjusted Mean Change-6.93 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.838
Placebo Class III or IVMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Post-Baseline Mean60.09 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 5.832
Placebo Class III or IVMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Baseline Mean63.47 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 5.596
Placebo Class III or IVMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Adjusted Mean Change-4.91 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 4.534
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Baseline Mean71.84 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 5.919
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Adjusted Mean Change-5.46 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 4.534
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)at Month 42, Month 54, Month 66Post-Baseline Mean64.85 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 6.301
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30

Based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula calculation, a commonly used surrogate marker to estimate creatinine clearance, which in turn is an approximate measure of GFR. It employs serum creatinine measurements and a patient's weight to predict the creatinine clearance. Adjusted for baseline GFR and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use at baseline (ACE-I). A decrease from baseline signifies worsening. The adjusted mean change from baseline value is from the model (calculated prior to rounding), whereas the other two points are the baseline mean and post mean.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 18, Month 30

Population: Participants with baseline score and score at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IrbesartanMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Post-Baseline Mean71.97 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.527
IrbesartanMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Baseline Mean73.02 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.536
IrbesartanMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Adjusted Mean Change-1.07 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.393
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Post-Baseline Mean69.21 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.562
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Baseline Mean73.13 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.538
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Adjusted Mean Change-3.91 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.394
Placebo - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Post-Baseline Mean70.88 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.583
Placebo - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Baseline Mean73.58 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.589
Placebo - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Adjusted Mean Change-2.69 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.436
Irbesartan - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Post-Baseline Mean68.00 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.596
Irbesartan - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Baseline Mean73.49 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.591
Irbesartan - Month 14Mean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Adjusted Mean Change-5.50 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.44
Placebo Class III or IVMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Post-Baseline Mean69.51 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.589
Placebo Class III or IVMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Baseline Mean73.34 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.606
Placebo Class III or IVMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Adjusted Mean Change-4.02 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.442
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Baseline Mean74.37 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.63
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Adjusted Mean Change-7.12 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.45
Placebo Baseline All Classes CombinedMean Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at Month 6, Month 18, and Month 30Post-Baseline Mean67.05 mL/min/1.73m2Standard Error 0.595
Secondary

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final Visit

Mean score at baseline and final visit in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure.

Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit=last scheduled visit specified in the protocol at conclusion of the entire study by the sponsor. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

Population: Participants with baseline score and score at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IrbesartanMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final VisitBaseline Mean42.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
IrbesartanMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final VisitFinal Visit Mean42.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final VisitBaseline Mean38.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
PlaceboMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Final VisitFinal Visit Mean38.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
Secondary

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14

Mean score and adjusted mean change from baseline in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire, a 21-item, patient-reported, 6-point (ranging from 0-5; higher score=poorer quality of life; highest possible score=105) measurement of quality of life in persons with heart failure.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14

Population: Participants with baseline score and score at timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IrbesartanMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Baseline Mean Score42.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.52
IrbesartanMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline-10.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
IrbesartanMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Mean Score at Timepoint32.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
PlaceboMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Baseline Mean Score43.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline-9.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
PlaceboMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Mean Score at Timepoint33.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Placebo - Month 14Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Mean Score at Timepoint31.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Placebo - Month 14Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Baseline Mean Score42.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Placebo - Month 14Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline-11.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Irbesartan - Month 14Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Baseline Mean Score42.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Irbesartan - Month 14Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Adjusted Mean Change from Baseline-10.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Irbesartan - Month 14Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLwHF) Total Score (Sum of Questions 1-21) at Month 6 and Month 14Mean Score at Timepoint32.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Comparison: Comparison of 2 treatment arms at Month 6 (first 2 columns)95% CI: [-0.8, 1.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: comparison of 2 treatment arms at Month 14 (columns 3 and 4)95% CI: [-0.5, 1.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)

Frequency of new onset AF in participants with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG. Stratified by use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and measured by adverse events reporting and final ECG recording read by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit

Population: Randomized subjects (total=4128) with no prior AF history or evidence of AF on baseline ECG, stratified by use of ACE-I

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanNumber of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG366 participants
IrbesartanNumber of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation35 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation29 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG344 participants
Placebo - Month 14Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG1089 participants
Placebo - Month 14Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation103 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)No prior AF history or Evidence on Baseline ECG1102 participants
Irbesartan - Month 14Number of Participants With New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Among Those With No Prior AF History or Evidence of AF on Baseline Electrocardiograph (ECG)Participants with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation99 participants
Secondary

Participant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

Population: Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly512 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged508 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly83 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately22 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly9 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event8 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data121 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly247 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately519 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly460 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged476 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly103 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately28 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly13 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event68 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data153 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly213 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately382 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly328 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged460 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly114 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately64 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly35 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event395 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - No Data76 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly255 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately549 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - No Data78 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event74 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged510 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately75 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly83 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data146 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately22 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately536 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly10 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly212 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event7 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly32 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data116 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately339 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly232 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly276 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately531 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly335 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly430 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event384 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged509 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged461 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly90 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly501 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately39 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly145 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Dyspnea at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly10 Participants
Secondary

Participant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

Population: Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event8 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately48 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly97 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly11 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data122 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event68 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately523 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data153 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly195 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly157 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately28 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately361 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately513 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly319 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged579 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged479 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly439 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly166 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly13 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately80 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged525 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly34 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly504 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event395 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly115 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - No Data76 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly193 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - No Data78 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly200 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately519 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly471 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged596 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly101 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately38 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly13 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event7 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data116 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly182 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately489 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly443 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged559 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly109 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately43 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly16 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event74 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data146 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly178 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately300 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly337 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged477 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly176 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately90 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly42 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Fatigue at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event383 Participants
Secondary

Participant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

Population: Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event8 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately30 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly63 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly8 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data122 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event68 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately552 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data153 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly234 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly207 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately13 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately378 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately532 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly332 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged537 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged480 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly461 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly121 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly8 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately52 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged503 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly25 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly529 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event396 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly78 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Event - No Data76 Participants
IrbesartanParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly235 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Event - No Data78 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly230 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately563 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly519 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged529 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly69 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately20 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly8 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event7 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data116 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly206 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately534 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly450 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged527 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly82 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately35 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly7 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event74 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data146 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly201 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately339 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly352 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged495 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly109 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately76 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly28 Participants
PlaceboParticipant Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event383 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to all-cause death

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

Population: Randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 2 Years8.1 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 4 Years17.9 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 3 Years12.8 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 5 Years25.0 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 1 Year4.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 5 Years23.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 1 Year3.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 2 Years8.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 3 Years13.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing All-cause Death at Given Time PointsPercentage at 4 Years18.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

Population: Randomized Subjects

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage 2 Years6.2 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years13.0 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage 3 Years9.6 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years18.0 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage 1 Year3.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years17.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage 1 Year3.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage 2 Years6.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage 3 Years10.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Death at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years13.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

Population: Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years8.7 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years17.2 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years12.9 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years23.0 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year5.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years22.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year4.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years9.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years13.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death, Non-Fatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), or Non-Fatal Stroke at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years17.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to CV death or CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

Population: randomized participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years24.2 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years30.0 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years35.0 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year11.6 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years19.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years20.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year11.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years30.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years25.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing CV Death or CV Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years35.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time Points

Treatment comparisons for time to heart failure mortality or heart failure hospitalization

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

Population: Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 2 Years12.9 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 4 Years19.8 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 3 Years15.7 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 5 Years23.6 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 1 Year7.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 5 Years23.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 1 Year8.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 2 Years13.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 3 Years17.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Heart Failure Mortality or Heart Failure Hospitalization at Given Time PointsPercentage at 4 Years20.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to protocol-specified CV hospitalization. Protocol-specified CV hospitalizations include hospitalizations ≥24 hrs or involve a calendar date change for a primary cause of worsening heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ventricular dysrhythmia, atrial dysrhythmia or stroke that also requires intravenous or intramuscular therapy or a related procedure or significant augmentation of oral therapy. Protocol specified CV hospitalizations also include myocardial infarction or stroke occurring during any hospitalization.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years16.3 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years24.8 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years20.5 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years28.5 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year9.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years29.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year9.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years17.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years21.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Experiencing Protocol-specified Cardiovascular (CV) Hospitalization at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years25.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given Timepoints

Treatment comparisons for time to new onset of diabetes (from adverse event reporting) among subjects with no prior history of diabetes.

Time frame: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5

Population: Randomized participants with no prior diabetes history

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years2.1 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years4.6 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years3.1 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years5.2 percentage of participants
IrbesartanPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year0.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 5 Years6.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 1 Year1.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 2 Years2.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 3 Years3.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With New Onset of Diabetes Among Subjects With No Prior Diabetes History at Given TimepointsPercentage at 4 Years5.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With Baseline

This was an assessment of the change in overall physician opinion of change from baseline status. Assessments are directly based on the Case Report Form (CRF). If the post-randomization CRF assessment was missing and the subject died, was hospitalized for worsening heart failure, or discontinued study medication for worsening heart failure, the subject was considered as having a Major Event. Participants who are summarized under Major Events are categorized as Worsened Markedly.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 14, Final Visit. The trial was designed to end after 1440 primary endpoint events, projected duration=6.0 ± 0.5 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly230 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately562 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly533 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged528 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately17 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly0 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event8 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly214 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately546 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly442 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged507 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly72 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately21 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly5 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event75 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data185 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly180 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately430 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged477 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly117 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately41 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly23 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event364 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - No Data91 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly60 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data129 participants
IrbesartanPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly344 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Major Event350 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Markedly198 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Markedly6 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Moderately575 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Slightly117 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Improved Slightly529 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Major Event79 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Unchanged541 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Slightly58 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Markedly28 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Moderately16 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - No Data169 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Worsened Markedly4 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Worsened Moderately56 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - Major Event8 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 6 - No Data132 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Markedly186 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - No Data92 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Moderately537 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Moderately367 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Slightly435 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Improved Slightly361 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Unchanged548 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Improved Markedly195 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Slightly73 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineFinal Visit - Unchanged504 participants
PlaceboPhysician Assessment of Heart Failure Status at Month 6, Month 14, and Final Visit Compared With BaselineMonth 14 - Worsened Moderately19 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026