Skip to content

Docetaxel or Pemetrexed With or Without Cetuximab in Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel or Pemetrexed With or Without Cetuximab in Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Platinum-Based Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00095199
Enrollment
939
Registered
2004-11-02
Start date
2005-01-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2012-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Recurrent or Progressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Second-line therapy, Docetaxel, Pemetrexed, Cetuximab, Failed platinum-based therapy, NSCLC

Brief summary

This trial is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, Phase III study in patients with recurrent or progressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) after failure of an initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients will receive either Docetaxel or Pemetrexed as chemotherapy at the investigator's choice. Within each chemotherapy group, patients will be randomized to receive Cetuximab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone (Cetuximab & Pemetrexed or Pemetrexed alone; Cetuximab & Docetaxel or Docetaxel alone).

Interventions

DRUGPemetrexed

Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of 3 weeks cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to six (3-week) cycles.

BIOLOGICALCetuximab

Cetuximab 400/250 mg/m\^2 (initial/weekly) administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 (3-week) cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

DRUGDocetaxel

Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of 3 weeks cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to six (3-week) cycles.

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pathologic confirmation of metastatic, unresectable, or locally-advanced NSCLC. * Disease progression during or following one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease (stage IIIB or IV). * Bidimensionally measurable disease. * Karnofsky performance status score of 60 to 100 at study entry. * The participant has tumor tissue available for immunohistochemical determination of epidermal growth factor (EGFR) expression. * Adequate recovery from recent surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. At least 4 weeks must have elapsed from major surgery, prior chemotherapy, prior treatment with an investigational agent, or prior radiation therapy (palliative radiation therapy is allowed). * Accessible for treatment and follow-up. Participants enrolled in this trial must be treated at the participating center. * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) and fertile men with partners of childbearing potential must be using an adequate method of contraception. * WOCBP must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. * Dementia, altered mental status, or any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent. * A serious uncontrolled medical disorder that would impair the ability of the patient to receive protocol therapy. * Symptomatic or uncontrolled metastases in the brain. Participants receiving a glucocorticoid for brain metastases will be excluded, but those receiving anticonvulsants will be eligible. * Uncontrolled pleural effusion or ascites. * Peripheral neuropathy greater than grade 2, as assessed by the National Cancer Institutes-Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3.0. * Any concurrent malignancy other than basal cell skin cancer, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix. Patients with a previous malignancy, but without evidence of disease for greater than or equal 3 years will be allowed to enter the trial. * More than one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease. * Inadequate hematologic function defined by an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1,500/mm3, a platelet count \<100,000/mm3, and a hemoglobin level \<9 g/dL. Red blood cell transfusions are not permitted within 7 days of receiving cetuximab, docetaxel, or pemetrexed. * Inadequate hepatic function, defined by a total bilirubin level \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels \>2.5 times the ULN (greater than or equal to 5 times the ULN if known liver metastases), and an alkaline phosphatase level \>5.0 times the ULN. * Inadequate renal function defined by a serum creatinine level \>1.5 times the ULN. * Prior treatment with cetuximab, or any other epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib or erlotinib. Participants must not have received prior chimerized or murine monoclonal antibody therapy. Prior treatment with other monoclonal antibodies targeting receptors other than the EGFR is permitted \>30 days prior to randomization. * Prior treatment with docetaxel or pemetrexed therapy. * Inability or unwillingness to take folic acid or vitamin B12 supplementation. * Inability or unwillingness to interrupt nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for a 5-day period (8-day period for long-acting agents such as piroxicam). Aspirin will be permitted during the study. * Patients (including prisoners) who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated) for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (eg, infectious disease) illness. * Prior treatment with an experimental drug or medical device within 30 days of randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Randomization to progression of disease or death due to any cause up to 59.6 monthsPFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. Participants who were alive and without progression were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. PFS was assessed by the independent review committee (IRC) in the Pemetrexed group (Cetuximab & Pemetrexed versus Pemetrexed) and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group (Cetuximab & Docetaxel versus Docetaxel).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Randomized Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) (Overall Response Rate [ORR])Randomization until progression of disease or death from any cause up to 59.6 monthsThe best overall response rate (ORR) was the proportion of randomized participants with a best OR of CR or PR, according to modified World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. It was calculated as the total number of participants with CR or PR divided by the total number of participants treated in that arm. Participants with no post-baseline evaluation were considered as non-responders. The tumor response was assessed by the independent review committee (IRC) in the Pemetrexed group and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group.
Proportion of Randomized Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR), or Stable Disease (SD)Randomization to progression of disease or death due to any cause up to 59.6 monthsThe disease control rate (DCR) was the proportion of randomized participants with a best OR of CR, PR or SD according to modified World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. It was calculated as the total number of participants with CR, PR or SD divided by the total number of participants randomized in that arm. The tumor response was assessed by the independent review committee (IRC) in the Pemetrexed group and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group.
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Response (Symptom Response Rates) Using the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) Scores of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Participants With Lung Cancer (FACT-L)At baseline, every 3 weeks and 30 days after end of therapy up to 50 monthsThe FACT-LCS is a set of 7 questions to inventory problems specific to lung cancer symptoms. Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores range from 0-28 and higher score indicates fewer symptoms. Symptom response (improvement) was defined as ≥2 point increase from baseline in the 7-item LCS score that was maintained for 2 consecutive assessments at least 3 weeks, and not \>5 weeks apart for participants, whose baseline LCS score was ≤26. Symptom response rate was the percentage of participants with symptomatic response.
Overall Survival (OS)Randomization to the date of death from any cause up to 72.8 monthsOS was defined as the time from randomization to death. Participants without a date of death were censored on the last date participants were known to be alive, or lost to follow-up.
Duration of Overall Response (OR)Time of first occurrence of either (PR) or (CR) to the first date of progressive disease or death up to 32.5 monthsThe duration of response, in participants with best OR of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), was measured from the date criteria are met for CR/PR (not confirmation date, whichever was first recorded), until the first occurrence date that the criteria of progressive disease (PD) was met, or death. Participants who were alive and without progression were censored at the date of their last independent review committee (IRC) tumor assessment. The tumor response and progression were assessed by the IRC in the Pemetrexed group and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group.
Number of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade 3 or 4 ToxicitiesTime from first dose to 30 days after last dose of study therapy up to 28.3 months for Cetuximab & Pemetrexed (versus Pemetrexed alone) and up to 54.3 months for Cetuximab + Docetaxel (versus Docetaxel alone)National Cancer Institutes-Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0 was used by investigators to assess participant toxicities. Mapping of investigator verbatim terms to CTCAE terms was done by the sponsor/designee using CTCAE v4.0. Participants reported had grade 3 or 4 toxicities (or both potentially). Grade 3 AEs: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening;hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living. Grade 4 AEs: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Time to Symptomatic ProgressionRandomization until symptomatic progression up to 48.3 monthsThe FACT-LCS (see description in Outcome measure 5) inventories problems specific to lung cancer symptoms. Using this Scale, Symptom progression = a ≥ 2 point decrease from baseline in LCS score maintained for 2 consecutive assessments ≥3 weeks, and \<5 weeks, apart. The symptom progression date = the first of 2 consecutive assessments with a ≥2 point decline. Time to symptomatic progression = the time from randomization to the symptom progression date. For participants with no symptom progression, time to symptomatic progression was censored the date of last symptom assessment.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Although 939 participants were initially randomized, 1 participant's data was inadvertently lost by a site prior to being entered into the database. As a result, we are reporting 938 as randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cetuximab & Pemetrexed
Cetuximab 400/250 mg/m\^2 (initial/weekly) administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 (3-week) cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of 3 weeks cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to six (3-week) cycles.
301
Pemetrexed
Pemetrexed 500 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of 3 weeks cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to six (3-week) cycles.
304
Cetuximab & Docetaxel
Cetuximab 400/250 mg/m\^2 (initial/weekly) administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 (3-week) cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of 3 weeks cycle for up to six (3-week) cycles.
167
Docetaxel
Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 administered intravenously on Day 1 of 3 weeks cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to six (3-week) cycles.
166
Total938

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event40222611
Overall StudyData inadvertently lost by site1000
Overall StudyDeath106119
Overall StudyLiver function test results elevated0011
Overall StudyNot eligible1701
Overall StudyPhysician Decision5611
Overall StudyPrimary tumor removed in other surgery0100
Overall StudyProgressive disease21317910598
Overall StudyProtocol Violation4420
Overall StudyStarted Palliative Radiotherapy1000
Overall StudyStarted radiotherapy regimen0100
Overall StudySurgery needed could not start in 7 days0010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21161322

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCetuximab & PemetrexedTotalDocetaxelCetuximab & DocetaxelPemetrexed
Age Continuous62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by immunohistochemistry
0
21 participants75 participants10 participants12 participants32 participants
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by immunohistochemistry
+1
36 participants103 participants19 participants13 participants35 participants
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by immunohistochemistry
+2
46 participants159 participants34 participants26 participants53 participants
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by immunohistochemistry
+3
118 participants356 participants58 participants72 participants108 participants
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by immunohistochemistry
Missing
80 participants245 participants45 participants44 participants76 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
100
48 participants127 participants18 participants14 participants47 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
60
12 participants39 participants11 participants2 participants14 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
70
35 participants105 participants14 participants21 participants35 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
80
103 participants306 participants57 participants55 participants91 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
90
101 participants355 participants64 participants74 participants116 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
Missing/unknown
2 participants6 participants2 participants1 participants1 participants
Pathological Diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma
161 participants528 participants83 participants99 participants185 participants
Pathological Diagnosis
All other non-squamous diagnoses
45 participants135 participants29 participants20 participants41 participants
Pathological Diagnosis
Large cell carcinoma
19 participants36 participants3 participants7 participants7 participants
Pathological Diagnosis
Squamous cell carcinoma
76 participants239 participants51 participants41 participants71 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 participants16 participants2 participants5 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
25 participants82 participants20 participants13 participants24 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
4 participants16 participants2 participants2 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
1 participants4 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
268 participants820 participants141 participants146 participants265 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
36 participants100 participants15 participants15 participants34 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
265 participants838 participants151 participants152 participants270 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
128 Participants392 Participants73 Participants75 Participants116 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
173 Participants546 Participants93 Participants92 Participants188 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
289 / 292281 / 289159 / 159147 / 149
serious
Total, serious adverse events
119 / 29286 / 28984 / 15960 / 149

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. Participants who were alive and without progression were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. PFS was assessed by the independent review committee (IRC) in the Pemetrexed group (Cetuximab & Pemetrexed versus Pemetrexed) and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group (Cetuximab & Docetaxel versus Docetaxel).

Time frame: Randomization to progression of disease or death due to any cause up to 59.6 months

Population: The intent-to-treat population (ITT) included all participants classified according to the treatment arms into which they were randomized, regardless of the actual treatment received. Censored participants: 10 in Cetuximab + Pemetrexed arm; 25 in Pemetrexed arm; 6 in Cetuximab + Docetaxel arm; 16 in Docetaxel arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedProgression Free Survival (PFS)2.89 months
PemetrexedProgression Free Survival (PFS)2.76 months
Cetuximab & DocetaxelProgression Free Survival (PFS)2.37 months
DocetaxelProgression Free Survival (PFS)1.54 months
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.75695% CI: [0.87, 1.21]Log Rank
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.39195% CI: [0.73, 1.13]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Overall Response (OR)

The duration of response, in participants with best OR of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), was measured from the date criteria are met for CR/PR (not confirmation date, whichever was first recorded), until the first occurrence date that the criteria of progressive disease (PD) was met, or death. Participants who were alive and without progression were censored at the date of their last independent review committee (IRC) tumor assessment. The tumor response and progression were assessed by the IRC in the Pemetrexed group and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group.

Time frame: Time of first occurrence of either (PR) or (CR) to the first date of progressive disease or death up to 32.5 months

Population: All randomized participants with a best overall response of CR or PR. Censored participants: 1 in Cetuximab plus Pemetrexed arm; 2 in Pemetrexed arm; 1 in Cetuximab plus Docetaxel arm; 0 in Docetaxel arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedDuration of Overall Response (OR)4.17 months
PemetrexedDuration of Overall Response (OR)6.93 months
Cetuximab & DocetaxelDuration of Overall Response (OR)5.36 months
DocetaxelDuration of Overall Response (OR)5.39 months
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.23695% CI: [0.74, 3.36]Log Rank
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.88795% CI: [0.42, 2.18]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade 3 or 4 Toxicities

National Cancer Institutes-Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0 was used by investigators to assess participant toxicities. Mapping of investigator verbatim terms to CTCAE terms was done by the sponsor/designee using CTCAE v4.0. Participants reported had grade 3 or 4 toxicities (or both potentially). Grade 3 AEs: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening;hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living. Grade 4 AEs: life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.

Time frame: Time from first dose to 30 days after last dose of study therapy up to 28.3 months for Cetuximab & Pemetrexed (versus Pemetrexed alone) and up to 54.3 months for Cetuximab + Docetaxel (versus Docetaxel alone)

Population: All randomized participants receiving at least 1 dose of study drug made up the safety population for this outcome measure. Investigators graded events using CTCAE v3.0. Mapping of investigator verbatim terms for toxicity to CTCAE terms was done by the sponsor/designee using CTCAE v4.0.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade 3 or 4 Toxicities179 participants
PemetrexedNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade 3 or 4 Toxicities143 participants
Cetuximab & DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade 3 or 4 Toxicities112 participants
DocetaxelNumber of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade 3 or 4 Toxicities97 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. Participants without a date of death were censored on the last date participants were known to be alive, or lost to follow-up.

Time frame: Randomization to the date of death from any cause up to 72.8 months

Population: The intent-to-treat population (ITT) included all participants classified according to the treatment arms into which they were randomized, regardless of the actual treatment received. Censored participants: 24 in Cetuximab + Pemetrexed arm; 43 in Pemetrexed arm; 12 in Cetuximab + Docetaxel arm; 22 in Docetaxel arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedOverall Survival (OS)6.93 months
PemetrexedOverall Survival (OS)7.79 months
Cetuximab & DocetaxelOverall Survival (OS)5.75 months
DocetaxelOverall Survival (OS)8.15 months
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.86495% CI: [0.86, 1.2]Log Rank
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.30795% CI: [0.9, 1.41]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Response (Symptom Response Rates) Using the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) Scores of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Participants With Lung Cancer (FACT-L)

The FACT-LCS is a set of 7 questions to inventory problems specific to lung cancer symptoms. Participants rate each item on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores range from 0-28 and higher score indicates fewer symptoms. Symptom response (improvement) was defined as ≥2 point increase from baseline in the 7-item LCS score that was maintained for 2 consecutive assessments at least 3 weeks, and not \>5 weeks apart for participants, whose baseline LCS score was ≤26. Symptom response rate was the percentage of participants with symptomatic response.

Time frame: At baseline, every 3 weeks and 30 days after end of therapy up to 50 months

Population: The randomized participants with baseline LCS scores less than or equal to 26.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic Response (Symptom Response Rates) Using the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) Scores of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Participants With Lung Cancer (FACT-L)17.1 percentage of participants
PemetrexedPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic Response (Symptom Response Rates) Using the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) Scores of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Participants With Lung Cancer (FACT-L)22.9 percentage of participants
Cetuximab & DocetaxelPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic Response (Symptom Response Rates) Using the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) Scores of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Participants With Lung Cancer (FACT-L)17.3 percentage of participants
DocetaxelPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic Response (Symptom Response Rates) Using the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) Scores of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Participants With Lung Cancer (FACT-L)13.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.09195% CI: [0.46, 1.06]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.36195% CI: [0.72, 2.5]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Randomized Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR), or Stable Disease (SD)

The disease control rate (DCR) was the proportion of randomized participants with a best OR of CR, PR or SD according to modified World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. It was calculated as the total number of participants with CR, PR or SD divided by the total number of participants randomized in that arm. The tumor response was assessed by the independent review committee (IRC) in the Pemetrexed group and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group.

Time frame: Randomization to progression of disease or death due to any cause up to 59.6 months

Population: The intent-to-treat population (ITT) included all participants classified according to the treatment arms into which they were randomized, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedProportion of Randomized Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR), or Stable Disease (SD)0.522 proportion of participants
PemetrexedProportion of Randomized Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR), or Stable Disease (SD)0.480 proportion of participants
Cetuximab & DocetaxelProportion of Randomized Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR), or Stable Disease (SD)0.335 proportion of participants
DocetaxelProportion of Randomized Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR), Complete Response (CR), or Stable Disease (SD)0.253 proportion of participants
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.3195% CI: [0.86, 1.62]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.195% CI: [0.93, 2.4]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Randomized Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) (Overall Response Rate [ORR])

The best overall response rate (ORR) was the proportion of randomized participants with a best OR of CR or PR, according to modified World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. It was calculated as the total number of participants with CR or PR divided by the total number of participants treated in that arm. Participants with no post-baseline evaluation were considered as non-responders. The tumor response was assessed by the independent review committee (IRC) in the Pemetrexed group and by the investigator in the Docetaxel group.

Time frame: Randomization until progression of disease or death from any cause up to 59.6 months

Population: The intent-to-treat population (ITT) included all participants classified according to the treatment arms into which they were randomized, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedProportion of Randomized Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) (Overall Response Rate [ORR])0.066 proportion of participants
PemetrexedProportion of Randomized Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) (Overall Response Rate [ORR])0.043 proportion of participants
Cetuximab & DocetaxelProportion of Randomized Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) (Overall Response Rate [ORR])0.078 proportion of participants
DocetaxelProportion of Randomized Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR) of Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) (Overall Response Rate [ORR])0.066 proportion of participants
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.295% CI: [0.78, 3.26]Mantel Haenszel
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.68395% CI: [0.52, 2.74]Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Time to Symptomatic Progression

The FACT-LCS (see description in Outcome measure 5) inventories problems specific to lung cancer symptoms. Using this Scale, Symptom progression = a ≥ 2 point decrease from baseline in LCS score maintained for 2 consecutive assessments ≥3 weeks, and \<5 weeks, apart. The symptom progression date = the first of 2 consecutive assessments with a ≥2 point decline. Time to symptomatic progression = the time from randomization to the symptom progression date. For participants with no symptom progression, time to symptomatic progression was censored the date of last symptom assessment.

Time frame: Randomization until symptomatic progression up to 48.3 months

Population: All randomized participants with a baseline LCS \>= 2 were included. Censored participants: 237 in Cetuximab plus Pemetrexed arm; 244 in Pemetrexed arm; 126 in Cetuximab plus Docetaxel arm; 131 in Docetaxel arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cetuximab & PemetrexedTime to Symptomatic ProgressionNA months
PemetrexedTime to Symptomatic ProgressionNA months
Cetuximab & DocetaxelTime to Symptomatic ProgressionNA months
DocetaxelTime to Symptomatic ProgressionNA months
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.47295% CI: [0.77, 1.74]Log Rank
Comparison: The Pemetrexed comparisons (Cetuximab + Pemetrexed vs Pemetrexed) were considered the primary comparisons. The Docetaxel comparisons (Cetuximab + Docetaxel vs Docetaxel) were considered supportive as Docetaxel comparisons remained underpowered by design. No tests were conducted to compare participants who received Docetaxel to those who received Pemetrexed.p-value: 0.27295% CI: [0.42, 1.27]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026