Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Palifermin in the Reduction of Dysphagia in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Palifermin (Recombinant Human Keratinocyte Growth Factor) in the Reduction of Dysphagia in Patients Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00094861
Enrollment
100
Registered
2004-10-27
Start date
2005-01-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2017-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysphagia, Lung Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

dysphagia, palifermin, KGF, chemoradiotherapy, NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer, lung cancer, supportive care, clinical trial, consolidation chemotherapy, radiotherapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if palifermin will reduce the incidence of dysphagia in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for treatment of unresectable stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Detailed description

During the acute dysphagia evaluation phase (the period lasting from the administration of the first dose of investigational product through Week 12 (or up to Week 16 if dysphagia is not resolved to CTCAE v3.0 grade ≤ 1 by Week 12) participants underwent acute dysphagia assessments twice weekly. All participants were followed for disease progression, second primary tumors, other malignancies, and overall survival until death or loss to follow-up during the long term follow-up (still ongoing).

Interventions

DRUGPalifermin
DRUGPlacebo
RADIATIONRadiotherapy
DRUGPaclitaxel
DRUGCarboplatin

Sponsors

Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of NSCLC * Unresectable (locally advanced) stage IIIa or IIIb disease * Initial radiotherapy field of treatment to encompass greater than or equal to 30% of the esophagus * Life expectancy greater than or equal to 6 months * Estimated weight loss less than or equal to 10% in the 3 months before study randomization * Measurable disease * 18 years of age or older * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2 * Hemoglobin (hgb) greater than or equal to 10 g/dL without transfusional support or growth factor use in the 4 weeks before study randomization * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10\^9/L without growth factor use in the 2 weeks before study randomization * Platelet count greater than or equal to 100 x 10\^9/L * Serum bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) * Serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL (Note: Patients with a serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.4 and less than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL must demonstrate a 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 50 mL/min) * Females of childbearing potential: negative serum or urine pregnancy test * Patient must give written informed consent before participating in any study-specific procedure, randomization, or receiving investigational product. * Patients with reproductive capability must agree to practice adequate contraception methods.

Exclusion criteria

* Metastatic disease (M1)/stage 4 NSCLC * Pleural or pericardial effusion greater than 100 ml in volume as documented by appropriate imaging (positron emission tomography \[PET\], computed tomography \[CT\] scan or ultrasound). If an effusion greater than 100 ml is documented by cytology to be free from malignancy and the investigator feels the patient is capable of receiving chemo/radiotherapy for their primary disease/ NSCLC, the investigator should discuss the patient with the study physician at Amgen. Effusions smaller than 100 ml would be acceptable, unless the investigator suspects that the effusion is malignant, in which case the effusions should be evaluated by cytology. Sponsor approval must be obtained before patient is randomized. * Plan to remove the tumor surgically before completing the protocol chemo/radiotherapy course * Shielding of any part of the esophagus during radiotherapy (including posterior spinal cord shielding) * Prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery for NSCLC * Prior invasive malignancy during the past 3 years other than non-melanomatous skin cancer. Note: Patients with prior surgically-cured malignancies \[eg, stage I breast cancer or prostate cancer, in-situ carcinoma of the cervix, etc\] are not excluded; however, sponsor approval must be obtained before patient is randomized. * Presence or history of dysphagia or conditions predisposing to dysphagia (eg, uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease \[GERD\], dyspepsia, etc) * History of pancreatitis * Four weeks or less since completion of treatment using an investigational product/device in another clinical study or presence of any unresolved toxicity from previous treatment * Previous treatment on this study or with a fibroblast growth factor * Known to be sero-positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis B virus (HBV) * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Known sensitivity to E. coli derived products * Compromised ability of the patient to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures * Refusal to sign an informed consent form to participate in this study, and sign the hospital information release form, if applicable * Unwilling or unable to complete the patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires * Psychological, social, familial, or geographical reasons that would prevent regular follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaStart of treatment through Week 16Participants underwent acute dysphagia assessments twice weekly during Weeks 1 through 7, and twice weekly thereafter (Weeks 8 through 12) and once weekly after Week 12 until dysphagia resolved to grade ≤ 1 but not beyond Week 16. Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) dysphagia scale according to the following: Grade 1: Symptomatic, able to eat regular diet; Grade 2: Symptomatic and altered eating/swallowing (e.g., altered dietary habits, oral supplements), IV fluids indicated \<24 hours; Grade 3: Symptomatic and severely altered eating/swallowing (e.g., inadequate oral caloric or fluid intake), IV fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) indicated ≥24 hours; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences (e.g., obstruction, perforation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal Dysphagia GradeStart of treatment through Week 16The mean maximal grade of dysphagia for each participant during the study. Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) dysphagia scale according to the following: Grade 1: Symptomatic, able to eat regular diet; Grade 2: Symptomatic and altered eating/swallowing (e.g., altered dietary habits, oral supplements), IV fluids indicated \<24 hours; Grade 3: Symptomatic and severely altered eating/swallowing (e.g., inadequate oral caloric or fluid intake), IV fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) indicated ≥24 hours; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences (e.g., obstruction, perforation).
Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) DysphagiaStart of treatment through Week 16Participants underwent acute dysphagia assessments twice weekly during Weeks 1 through 7, and twice weekly thereafter (Weeks 8 through 12) and once weekly after Week 12 until dysphagia resolved to grade ≤ 1 but not beyond Week 16. Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) dysphagia scale according to the following: Grade 1: Symptomatic, able to eat regular diet; Grade 2: Symptomatic and altered eating/swallowing (e.g., altered dietary habits, oral supplements), IV fluids indicated \<24 hours; Grade 3: Symptomatic and severely altered eating/swallowing (e.g., inadequate oral caloric or fluid intake), IV fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) indicated ≥24 hours; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences (e.g., obstruction, perforation).
Number of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in RadiotherapyWeek 1 to Week 6The number of participants with unplanned breaks in radiotherapy of ≥ 5 days or who discontinued radiotherapy during Week 1 to Week 6.
Duration of Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaStart of treatment through Week 16Duration of grade 2 or higher dysphagia was calculated in days from the onset (first occurrence of grade ≥ 2) to the resolution (grade ≤ 1 after the last grade ≥ 2) of dysphagia. Participants with no assessments were assumed as having grade ≥ 2 dysphagia and with a duration of the mean duration of all participants.
Number of Participants HospitalizedBaseline to Week 16
Maximal Body Weight LossBaseline through Week 12Maximal weight loss observed from Baseline through to Week 12.
Maximal Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status IncreaseBaseline through Week 12Maximal increase from Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. ECOG is a scale to assess how a patient's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; Grade 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature; Grade 2: Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; Grade 3: Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; Grade 4: Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair; Grade 5: Dead.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted from 06 January 2005 until 20 December 2007 (last participant's last visit for the acute dysphagia evaluation phase). At the time of this report, the long-term safety follow-up period is ongoing.

Pre-assignment details

100 patients were initially enrolled at 25 sites, however, data from one site could not be used and is excluded from this results analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received a single intravenous (IV) dose of placebo administered 3 days before the initiation of concurrent chemo/radiotherapy, then once weekly during Weeks 1 through 6, typically for a total of 7 doses.
46
Palifermin
Participants received a single IV dose of palifermin at 180 μg/kg administered 3 days before the initiation of concurrent chemo/radiotherapy, then once weekly during Weeks 1 through 6, typically for a total of 7 doses.
49
Total95

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event52
Overall StudyDeath42
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyOther30
Overall StudyPhysician Decision11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalPalifermin
Age, Continuous64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
Disease Stage
Stage 3A
14 participants33 participants19 participants
Disease Stage
Stage 3B
32 participants62 participants30 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 0
21 participants42 participants21 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 1
23 participants49 participants26 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 2
2 participants4 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African-American
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Causcasian
43 Participants86 Participants43 Participants
Randomization Strata
3A, 0-1, <5%
10 participants21 participants11 participants
Randomization Strata
3A, 0-1, 5-10%
4 participants10 participants6 participants
Randomization Strata
3A, 2, <5%
1 participants3 participants2 participants
Randomization Strata
3A, 2, 5-10%
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Randomization Strata
3B, 0-1, <5%
24 participants49 participants25 participants
Randomization Strata
3B, 0-1, 5-10%
6 participants11 participants5 participants
Randomization Strata
3B, 2, <5%
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Randomization Strata
3B, 2, 5-10%
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants29 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants66 Participants34 Participants
Weight Loss Over Last 3 Months
< 5%
35 participants72 participants37 participants
Weight Loss Over Last 3 Months
5 - 10%
11 participants23 participants12 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 4648 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
30 / 4621 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Dysphagia

Participants underwent acute dysphagia assessments twice weekly during Weeks 1 through 7, and twice weekly thereafter (Weeks 8 through 12) and once weekly after Week 12 until dysphagia resolved to grade ≤ 1 but not beyond Week 16. Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) dysphagia scale according to the following: Grade 1: Symptomatic, able to eat regular diet; Grade 2: Symptomatic and altered eating/swallowing (e.g., altered dietary habits, oral supplements), IV fluids indicated \<24 hours; Grade 3: Symptomatic and severely altered eating/swallowing (e.g., inadequate oral caloric or fluid intake), IV fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) indicated ≥24 hours; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences (e.g., obstruction, perforation).

Time frame: Start of treatment through Week 16

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaYes32 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaNo13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaNo assessment1 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaYes30 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaNo18 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher DysphagiaNo assessment1 participants
p-value: 0.355Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Duration of Grade 2 or Higher Dysphagia

Duration of grade 2 or higher dysphagia was calculated in days from the onset (first occurrence of grade ≥ 2) to the resolution (grade ≤ 1 after the last grade ≥ 2) of dysphagia. Participants with no assessments were assumed as having grade ≥ 2 dysphagia and with a duration of the mean duration of all participants.

Time frame: Start of treatment through Week 16

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDuration of Grade 2 or Higher Dysphagia32.4 daysStandard Deviation 30.1
PaliferminDuration of Grade 2 or Higher Dysphagia25.3 daysStandard Deviation 28
p-value: 0.3189Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maximal Body Weight Loss

Maximal weight loss observed from Baseline through to Week 12.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 12

Population: Full analysis set with available data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximal Body Weight Loss4.63 kilogramsStandard Deviation 4.13
PaliferminMaximal Body Weight Loss5.44 kilogramsStandard Deviation 4.33
p-value: 0.1996Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maximal Dysphagia Grade

The mean maximal grade of dysphagia for each participant during the study. Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) dysphagia scale according to the following: Grade 1: Symptomatic, able to eat regular diet; Grade 2: Symptomatic and altered eating/swallowing (e.g., altered dietary habits, oral supplements), IV fluids indicated \<24 hours; Grade 3: Symptomatic and severely altered eating/swallowing (e.g., inadequate oral caloric or fluid intake), IV fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) indicated ≥24 hours; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences (e.g., obstruction, perforation).

Time frame: Start of treatment through Week 16

Population: Full analysis set participants with dysphagia assessments.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximal Dysphagia Grade1.9 gradeStandard Deviation 1
PaliferminMaximal Dysphagia Grade1.8 gradeStandard Deviation 0.9
p-value: 0.5086Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Maximal Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Increase

Maximal increase from Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. ECOG is a scale to assess how a patient's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; Grade 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature; Grade 2: Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; Grade 3: Capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; Grade 4: Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any selfcare. Totally confined to bed or chair; Grade 5: Dead.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 12

Population: Full analysis set participants with available ECOG data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximal Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Increase1.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PaliferminMaximal Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Increase0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.0621Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants Hospitalized

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants HospitalizedNot hospitalized15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants HospitalizedHospitalized31 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants HospitalizedHospitalized34 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants HospitalizedNot hospitalized15 participants
p-value: 0.8639Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) Dysphagia

Participants underwent acute dysphagia assessments twice weekly during Weeks 1 through 7, and twice weekly thereafter (Weeks 8 through 12) and once weekly after Week 12 until dysphagia resolved to grade ≤ 1 but not beyond Week 16. Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0) dysphagia scale according to the following: Grade 1: Symptomatic, able to eat regular diet; Grade 2: Symptomatic and altered eating/swallowing (e.g., altered dietary habits, oral supplements), IV fluids indicated \<24 hours; Grade 3: Symptomatic and severely altered eating/swallowing (e.g., inadequate oral caloric or fluid intake), IV fluids, tube feedings, or total parenteral nutrition (TPN) indicated ≥24 hours; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences (e.g., obstruction, perforation).

Time frame: Start of treatment through Week 16

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) DysphagiaYes13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) DysphagiaNo32 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) DysphagiaNo assessment1 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) DysphagiaYes11 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) DysphagiaNo37 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Severe (Grade 3 or Higher) DysphagiaNo assessment1 participants
p-value: 0.4976Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in Radiotherapy

The number of participants with unplanned breaks in radiotherapy of ≥ 5 days or who discontinued radiotherapy during Week 1 to Week 6.

Time frame: Week 1 to Week 6

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in RadiotherapyYes15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in RadiotherapyNo29 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in RadiotherapyDid not receive radiotherapy2 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in RadiotherapyYes9 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in RadiotherapyNo38 participants
PaliferminNumber of Participants With Unplanned Breaks in RadiotherapyDid not receive radiotherapy2 participants
p-value: 0.1115Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026