Melanoma, Metastases
Conditions
Keywords
melanoma, metastatic melanoma, skin cancer
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of MDX-010 (ipilimumab, BMS-734016) (anti-CTLA4) in combination with MDX-1379 (gp100, BMS-734019) in patients with previously treated, unresectable Stage III or IV melanoma. Survival time will be evaluated, as well as patient responses and time to disease progression. Eligible patients are those who in response to a single regimen containing interleukin-2 (IL-2), dacarbazine, and/or temozolomide, have 1) relapsed following an objective response (partial response/complete response \[PR/CR\]); 2) failed to demonstrate an objective response (PR/CR); or 3) could not tolerate such a regimen due to unacceptable toxicity. Patients will be randomized into one of three groups, and will receive one of the following treatments: MDX-010 alone, MDX-1379 alone, or MDX-010 in combination with MDX-1379.
Detailed description
Melanoma accounts for approximately 5% of all skin cancers in the United States, but it accounts for about 75% of all skin cancer deaths. In 2004, the expected prevalence of melanoma is 627,252, with about 119,178 of these cases being Stage III or IV (metastatic melanoma). First line treatments for metastatic melanoma, usually IL-2, dacarbazine and/or temozolomide, are associated with significant toxicities. MDX-010 (anti-CTLA4) antibodies are designed to keep the immune system running by blocking CTLA-4 from down-regulating T cell activation. MDX-1379 is made up of two peptides that are pieces of a bigger melanoma protein (gp100). These peptides bind to HLA-A2 which is then recognized by T cells.
Interventions
3mg/kg (intravenous \[iv\] infusion over 90 minutes), every 3 weeks for 4 doses
2mL (2 subcutaneous injections of 2 mL each, 1 to each thigh), every 3 weeks for 4 doses.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosed with malignant melanoma * Measurable unresectable Stage III or IV melanoma * HLA-A\*0201 positive * Previous treatment with & failure/relapse/inability to tolerate IL-2, dacarbazine and/or temozolomide * At least 4 weeks since prior treatment * Negative pregnancy * Life expectancy greater than 4 months * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance of 0 or 1 * Required lab values * Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) negative
Exclusion criteria
* Prior malignancies which the patient has not been disease free for over 5 years, except treated and cured basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or any other cancer * Ocular melanoma * Active, untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastasis * Prior treatment with MDX-010 (anti-CTLA4) antibody * Prior treatment with any cancer therapeutic vaccine * Active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune disease * Pregnancy or nursing * Hypersensitivity to Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant (IFA) (Montanide ISA-51) * Underlying medical conditions deemed hazardous if treated with study drug * Concomitant therapy with anti-melanoma drugs, chemotherapies, other investigational therapies, chronic use of systemic corticosteroids * Unable to provide informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 in Combination With gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone | From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks) | OS was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. If a participant did not expire, the subject was censored at the time of last contact (last known alive date). 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | Month 12, Month 18, Month 24 | The probability that a subject is alive at 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months following randomization, estimated via the non-parametric method (Kaplan-Meier method). For calculating 95% CI, bootstrap method was used with 20000 simulated trials. |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks) | PFS was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the progression or the date of death. A subject who died without prior progression was considered to have progressed on the date of death. PFS was determined by investigator. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
| Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24 | Week 12, Week 24 | PFS at Week 12 was defined as the probability that the subject was progression-free at 12 weeks and 24 weeks following the start of randomization. It was computed via Kaplan-Meier method, truncated at Week 12 and Week 24. PFS was determined by investigator. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
| Time to Progression (TTP) | from time of randomization to date of PD or death due to PD (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]) | TTP was defined as the number of days between the date of the randomization and date of PD or death due to PD. For subjects who had not progression and remained alive, TTP was censored on the date of last assessment; those who remained alive and had no recorded post-baseline assessment, TTP was censored on the date of randomization; those who remained alive and had randomized but were not treated, TTP was censored at the date of randomization; for those who died without reported disease progression, TTP was censored on the date of death. |
| Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | BOR was determined between Weeks 12 and Week 24 confirmation at least 4 weeks later at Cycle 1. | Investigator's assessment, modified World Health Organization criteria. CR: disappearance of all lesions by 2 consecutive observations \>=4 weeks apart, no evidence of PD. PR: \>=50% ↓ in sum of products of longest diameter & greatest perpendicular diameter of all target lesions compared to baseline by 2 observations \>=4 weeks apart. SD: Neither sufficient ↓ to qualify for PR nor sufficient ↑ to qualify for PD. PD: ↑ \>=25% in sum of products of longest diameter & greatest perpendicular diameter of target lesions compared to smallest recorded sum during study, or appearance of \>= 1 new lesion. |
| Determination of Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) | Up to week 24 | Response was based on the investigators' assessment using modified WHO criteria. BORR is defined as the number of subjects whose BOR is complete or partial response (CR or PR) divided by the total number of subjects in the group. BORR was comprised of responder and non-responder. The definition of a responder in BORR was either confirmed CR or PR, and a non-responder was defined as stable disease (SD), progressed disease (PD), unconfirmed CR (uCR), unconfirmed PR (uPR), and not evaluated. |
| Time to Response | From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks) | Time to response was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date when measurement criteria are met for BOR of CR or PR, as determined by investigator. |
| Duration of Response | from time of initial drug administration to date of PD or death due to PD (the end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]) | Kaplan-Meier medians along with Brookmeyer and Crowley 95% confidence intervals (CI) for were computed. Duration of response was defined in subjects whose BOR was CR or PR as the number of days between the date of response (CR or PR) and the date of PD or the date of death (whichever occurs first). |
| Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 Monotherapy Versus gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone and MDX-010 in Combination With gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus MDX-010 Monotherapy | From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks) | OS was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. If a participant did not expire, the subject was censored at the time of last contact (last known alive date). 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. |
| Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | from Week 24 to end of study (the end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]) | Response was based on the investigators' assessment using modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Delayed response is defined as post Week 24 overall response for the subjects who have PD before or at Week 24. Evaluation of delayed overall response is compared to baseline assessment. Delayed response includes delayed late CR, delayed late PR, delayed late SD, continued PD, unknown, and missing after Week 24. The delayed response of CR and PR also must have been confirmed. |
| Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Baseline (Day 1, Cycle1), Week 12 | The 30 items were grouped into the following: 1 global QOL scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). All scores were linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. For global QOL and functional items, a higher score represents a better level of functioning (100=best/0=worst). For symptom items, a higher score represents a higher level of symptoms (0=no symptom at all/100=very much severe). |
| Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]). | An AE was defined as any undesirable sign, symptom, clinically significant laboratory abnormality, or medical condition occurring after starting study treatment, even if the event was not considered to be treatment-related. Adverse events are graded using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 3.0. If CTCAE grading does not exist for an adverse event, the intensity of mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), and life-threatening (4) were used. |
| Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]). | An immune related adverse event (irAE) was defined as an adverse event of unknown etiology, associated with study drug exposure and consistent with an immune phenomenon. The irAEs were programmatically determined from a predefined list of MedDRA version 12.0 high-level group terms, high-level terms and preferred terms of all ipilimumab related adverse event. The category of Other irAEs includes blood, eye, immune, infections, renal, and respiratory systems. |
| Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | On-study laboratory results are results reported after the first dose date and within 70 days of last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]). | ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count. CTCAE v3.0 Grades 0 through 4 of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 0=Normal, Grade 1=Mild AE, Grade 2=Moderate AE, Grade 3=Severe AE, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE. |
| Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]). | ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase. CTCAE v3.0 Grades 0 through 4 of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 0=Normal, Grade 1=Mild AE, Grade 2=Moderate AE, Grade 3=Severe AE, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE. |
| Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]). | CTCAE v3.0 Grades 0 through 4 of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 0=Normal, Grade 1=Mild AE, Grade 2=Moderate AE, Grade 3=Severe AE, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE. |
| Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations | vital signs and physical examination were evaluated at screening and at Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and every 3 months thereafter | Clinically meaningful changes were according to investigator. Vital sign measurements include height, weight, temperature, pulse, and resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure. |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) | Up to week 24 | Response was based on the investigators' assessment using modified WHO criteria. DCR is defined as the number of subjects whose BOR is CR, PR, or SD divided by the total number of subjects in the group. |
Countries
Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, South Africa, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Of the 1783 participants who enrolled and were screened for study participation, a total of 676 subjects were randomized.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 Ipilimumab was administered at a dosage of 3 mg/kg as an intravenous (IV) infusion administered over 90 minutes every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses, together with gp100. Gp100 consisted of 2 separate peptide components: Peptide A, a peptide with sequence YLEPGPVTV (gp100:280-288\[288V\]) and Peptide B, a peptide with the sequence IMDQVPFSV (gp100:209-217\[210M\]). Each peptide was prepared with Montanide ISA-51. One dose of gp100 consisted of the administration of Peptide A, at a dosage of 2 mL or 1 mg, and Peptide B, at a dosage of 2 mL or 1 mg. After Week 12, subjects who met re-induction criteria could receive further cycles of their randomized study therapy. | 403 |
| Ipilimumab Monotherapy Ipilimumab was administered at a dosage of 3 mg/kg as an intravenous (IV) infusion administered over 90 minutes every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses, together with matching vaccine placebo. The vaccine placebo consisted of sterile 0.9% sodium chloride. After Week 12, subjects who met re-induction criteria could receive further cycles of their randomized study therapy. | 137 |
| gp100 Gp100 consisted of 2 separate peptide components: Peptide A, a peptide with sequence YLEPGPVTV (gp100:280-288\[288V\]) and Peptide B, a peptide with the sequence IMDQVPFSV (gp100:209-217\[210M\]). Each peptide was prepared with Montanide ISA-51. One dose of gp100 consisted of the administration of Peptide A, at a dosage of 2 mL or 1 mg, and Peptide B, at a dosage of 2 mL or 1 mg. After Week 12, subjects who met re-induction criteria could receive further cycles of their randomized study therapy. | 136 |
| Total | 676 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 306 | 100 | 119 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Subject Withdrew Consent | 10 | 2 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | gp100 | Total | Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Ipilimumab Monotherapy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 57.4 years | 56.2 years | 55.6 years | 56.8 years |
| Age, Customized < 65 years | 94 participants | 480 participants | 291 participants | 95 participants |
| Age, Customized >=65 years | 42 participants | 196 participants | 112 participants | 42 participants |
| Duration of Melanoma | 5.65 years | 5.05 years | 5.09 years | 4.34 years |
| Lactate Dehydrogenase <=ULN | 81 Participants | 417 Participants | 252 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Lactate Dehydrogenase unknown | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Lactate Dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal (ULN) | 52 Participants | 254 Participants | 149 Participants | 53 Participants |
| Melanoma Stage M0 | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Melanoma Stage M1a | 11 Participants | 62 Participants | 37 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Melanoma Stage M1b | 23 Participants | 121 Participants | 76 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Melanoma Stage M1c | 98 Participants | 483 Participants | 285 Participants | 100 Participants |
| Prior Interleukin-2 Therapy No | 103 Participants | 522 Participants | 314 Participants | 105 Participants |
| Prior Interleukin-2 Therapy Yes | 33 Participants | 154 Participants | 89 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 1 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 5 Participants | 30 Participants | 18 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 129 Participants | 638 Participants | 380 Participants | 129 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 63 Participants | 275 Participants | 156 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 73 Participants | 401 Participants | 247 Participants | 81 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 124 / 131 | 362 / 380 | 124 / 132 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 55 / 131 | 155 / 380 | 52 / 132 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 in Combination With gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone
OS was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. If a participant did not expire, the subject was censored at the time of last contact (last known alive date). 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks)
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 in Combination With gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone | 9.95 months |
| gp100 | Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 in Combination With gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus gp 100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone | 6.44 months |
12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates
The probability that a subject is alive at 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months following randomization, estimated via the non-parametric method (Kaplan-Meier method). For calculating 95% CI, bootstrap method was used with 20000 simulated trials.
Time frame: Month 12, Month 18, Month 24
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 18-Month Survival Rate | 0.300 probability |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 12-Month Survival Rate | 0.436 probability |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 24-Month Survival Rate | 0.216 probability |
| gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 18-Month Survival Rate | 0.332 probability |
| gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 12-Month Survival Rate | 0.456 probability |
| gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 24-Month Survival Rate | 0.235 probability |
| gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 12-Month Survival Rate | 0.253 probability |
| gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 24-Month Survival Rate | 0.137 probability |
| gp100 | 12-, 18-, and 24-Month Survival Rates | 18-Month Survival Rate | 0.163 probability |
Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD)
Investigator's assessment, modified World Health Organization criteria. CR: disappearance of all lesions by 2 consecutive observations \>=4 weeks apart, no evidence of PD. PR: \>=50% ↓ in sum of products of longest diameter & greatest perpendicular diameter of all target lesions compared to baseline by 2 observations \>=4 weeks apart. SD: Neither sufficient ↓ to qualify for PR nor sufficient ↑ to qualify for PD. PD: ↑ \>=25% in sum of products of longest diameter & greatest perpendicular diameter of target lesions compared to smallest recorded sum during study, or appearance of \>= 1 new lesion.
Time frame: BOR was determined between Weeks 12 and Week 24 confirmation at least 4 weeks later at Cycle 1.
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Progressed Disease | 239 participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Stable Disease | 58 participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Complete Response | 1 participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Partial Response | 22 participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Not Evaluated, Missing, or Unknown | 83 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Stable Disease | 24 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Complete Response | 2 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Partial Response | 13 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Progressed Disease | 70 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Not Evaluated, Missing, or Unknown | 28 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Not Evaluated, Missing, or Unknown | 32 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Progressed Disease | 89 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Complete Response | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Stable Disease | 13 participants |
| gp100 | Best Overall Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressed Disease (PD) | Partial Response | 2 participants |
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12
The 30 items were grouped into the following: 1 global QOL scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). All scores were linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. For global QOL and functional items, a higher score represents a better level of functioning (100=best/0=worst). For symptom items, a higher score represents a higher level of symptoms (0=no symptom at all/100=very much severe).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1, Cycle1), Week 12
Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose or any partial dose of study medication. N=number of participants analyzed, n=number of participants with measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Sleep Disturbance (n=225, 83, 76) | 6.5 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Social (n=227, 83, 76) | -5.6 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Diarrhea (n=223, 82, 78) | 6.4 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Dyspnea (n=222, 81, 77) | 3.5 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Fatigue (n=226, 82, 78) | 10.6 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Role Change (n=226, 83, 78) | -9.3 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Pain (n=227, 83, 78) | 5.6 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Nausea and Vomiting (n=226, 83, 78) | 4.6 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Financial Impact (n=226, 83, 76) | 0.0 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Constipation (n=225, 83, 77) | 5.2 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Cognitive (n=226, 83, 78) | -3.1 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Physical (n=226 83, 78) | -6.2 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Appetite Loss (n=225, 83, 78) | 8.5 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Emotional (n=227, 83, 78) | -1.5 units on a scale |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Global QOL (n=226, 83, 77) | -7.4 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Appetite Loss (n=225, 83, 78) | 11.6 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Global QOL (n=226, 83, 77) | -8.8 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Physical (n=226 83, 78) | -5.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Role Change (n=226, 83, 78) | -10.5 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Cognitive (n=226, 83, 78) | -4.3 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Emotional (n=227, 83, 78) | -3.6 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Social (n=227, 83, 76) | -7.5 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Fatigue (n=226, 82, 78) | 12.5 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Nausea and Vomiting (n=226, 83, 78) | 3.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Pain (n=227, 83, 78) | 7.9 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Dyspnea (n=222, 81, 77) | 5.3 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Sleep Disturbance (n=225, 83, 76) | 10.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Constipation (n=225, 83, 77) | 1.9 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Diarrhea (n=223, 82, 78) | 9.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Financial Impact (n=226, 83, 76) | 3.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Dyspnea (n=222, 81, 77) | 9.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Emotional (n=227, 83, 78) | -1.5 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Diarrhea (n=223, 82, 78) | 2.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Sleep Disturbance (n=225, 83, 76) | 11.0 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Cognitive (n=226, 83, 78) | -3.4 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Appetite Loss (n=225, 83, 78) | 10.3 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Role Change (n=226, 83, 78) | -13.7 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Global QOL (n=226, 83, 77) | -10.4 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Constipation (n=225, 83, 77) | 11.8 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Nausea and Vomiting (n=226, 83, 78) | 4.4 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Fatigue (n=226, 82, 78) | 14.5 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Physical (n=226 83, 78) | -10.1 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Pain (n=227, 83, 78) | 11.9 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Social (n=227, 83, 76) | -4.2 units on a scale |
| gp100 | Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Instrument at Week 12 | Financial Impact (n=226, 83, 76) | 1.7 units on a scale |
Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations
Clinically meaningful changes were according to investigator. Vital sign measurements include height, weight, temperature, pulse, and resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Time frame: vital signs and physical examination were evaluated at screening and at Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and every 3 months thereafter
Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose or any partial dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations | Clinically Meaningful Vital Sign Changes | 0 participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations | Clinically Meaningful Physical Examination Changes | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations | Clinically Meaningful Vital Sign Changes | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations | Clinically Meaningful Physical Examination Changes | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations | Clinically Meaningful Vital Sign Changes | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Clinically Meaningful Changes in Vital Signs and Physical Examinations | Clinically Meaningful Physical Examination Changes | 0 participants |
Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24)
Response was based on the investigators' assessment using modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Delayed response is defined as post Week 24 overall response for the subjects who have PD before or at Week 24. Evaluation of delayed overall response is compared to baseline assessment. Delayed response includes delayed late CR, delayed late PR, delayed late SD, continued PD, unknown, and missing after Week 24. The delayed response of CR and PR also must have been confirmed.
Time frame: from Week 24 to end of study (the end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks])
Population: Number of subjects with BOR of PR/SD (80 subjects ipi + gp100 , 37 ipi , 15 gp100) plus number of subjects with BOR of PD that had subsequent evaluation (8 ipi + gp100, 3 ipi, 3 gp100).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Partial Response Beyond Week 24 | 3 participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Complete Response Beyond Week 24 | 1 participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Stable Disease Beyond Week 24 | 3 participants |
| gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Partial Response Beyond Week 24 | 2 participants |
| gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Complete Response Beyond Week 24 | 3 participants |
| gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Stable Disease Beyond Week 24 | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Complete Response Beyond Week 24 | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Stable Disease Beyond Week 24 | 0 participants |
| gp100 | Delayed Response (Response Beyond Week 24) | Partial Response Beyond Week 24 | 0 participants |
Determination of Best Overall Response Rate (BORR)
Response was based on the investigators' assessment using modified WHO criteria. BORR is defined as the number of subjects whose BOR is complete or partial response (CR or PR) divided by the total number of subjects in the group. BORR was comprised of responder and non-responder. The definition of a responder in BORR was either confirmed CR or PR, and a non-responder was defined as stable disease (SD), progressed disease (PD), unconfirmed CR (uCR), unconfirmed PR (uPR), and not evaluated.
Time frame: Up to week 24
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Determination of Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Determination of Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) | 10.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Determination of Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) | 1.5 percentage of participants |
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Response was based on the investigators' assessment using modified WHO criteria. DCR is defined as the number of subjects whose BOR is CR, PR, or SD divided by the total number of subjects in the group.
Time frame: Up to week 24
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 20.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 28.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Disease Control Rate (DCR) | 11.0 percentage of participants |
Duration of Response
Kaplan-Meier medians along with Brookmeyer and Crowley 95% confidence intervals (CI) for were computed. Duration of response was defined in subjects whose BOR was CR or PR as the number of days between the date of response (CR or PR) and the date of PD or the date of death (whichever occurs first).
Time frame: from time of initial drug administration to date of PD or death due to PD (the end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks])
Population: Responders only in intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study. Patients who did not progress or died were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Duration of Response | 11.47 months |
| gp100 | Duration of Response | NA months |
| gp100 | Duration of Response | NA months |
Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 Monotherapy Versus gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone and MDX-010 in Combination With gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus MDX-010 Monotherapy
OS was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. If a participant did not expire, the subject was censored at the time of last contact (last known alive date). 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks)
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 Monotherapy Versus gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone and MDX-010 in Combination With gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus MDX-010 Monotherapy | 9.95 months |
| gp100 | Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 Monotherapy Versus gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone and MDX-010 in Combination With gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus MDX-010 Monotherapy | 10.12 months |
| gp100 | Overall Survival (OS) (Time-to-Death) Difference Between MDX-010 Monotherapy Versus gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Alone and MDX-010 in Combination With gp100 Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Versus MDX-010 Monotherapy | 6.44 months |
Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs)
An immune related adverse event (irAE) was defined as an adverse event of unknown etiology, associated with study drug exposure and consistent with an immune phenomenon. The irAEs were programmatically determined from a predefined list of MedDRA version 12.0 high-level group terms, high-level terms and preferred terms of all ipilimumab related adverse event. The category of Other irAEs includes blood, eye, immune, infections, renal, and respiratory systems.
Time frame: On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]).
Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose or any partial dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Skin irAEs (any grade) | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Gastrointestinal irAEs | 6.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study Severe irAEs | 11.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Any On-Study irAEs | 58.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Liver irAEs (any grade) | 2.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Neurological irAEs | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Endocrine irAEs | 1.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Liver irAEs | 1.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study irAEs Leading to Discontinuation | 5.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Endocrine irAEs (any grade) | 3.9 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Other irAEs | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Neurological irAEs (any grade) | 0.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Death Due to irAEs | 1.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Other irAEs (any grade) | 3.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Skin irAEs | 2.4 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Gastrointestinal irAEs (any grade) | 32.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study Serious irAEs | 10.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Endocrine irAEs | 3.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Any On-Study irAEs | 61.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study Severe irAEs | 15.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study Serious irAEs | 13.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study irAEs Leading to Discontinuation | 8.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Death Due to irAEs | 1.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Gastrointestinal irAEs (any grade) | 29.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Gastrointestinal irAEs | 7.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Liver irAEs (any grade) | 3.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Liver irAEs | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Endocrine irAEs (any grade) | 7.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Skin irAEs (any grade) | 43.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Skin irAEs | 1.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Neurological irAEs (any grade) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Neurological irAEs | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Other irAEs (any grade) | 4.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Other irAEs | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study Severe irAEs | 3.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Skin irAEs (any grade) | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Death Due to irAEs | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Other irAEs | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Skin irAEs | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study irAEs Leading to Discontinuation | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Other irAEs (any grade) | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Neurological irAEs (any grade) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | On-Study Serious irAEs | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Any On-Study irAEs | 31.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Liver irAEs | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Neurological irAEs | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Endocrine irAEs (any grade) | 1.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Liver irAEs (any grade) | 4.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Gastrointestinal irAEs | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Severe (>= Grade 3) Endocrine irAEs | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) | Gastrointestinal irAEs (any grade) | 14.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death
An AE was defined as any undesirable sign, symptom, clinically significant laboratory abnormality, or medical condition occurring after starting study treatment, even if the event was not considered to be treatment-related. Adverse events are graded using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 3.0. If CTCAE grading does not exist for an adverse event, the intensity of mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), and life-threatening (4) were used.
Time frame: On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]).
Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose or any partial dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | On-Study AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 9.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Any On-Study AE | 98.4 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Severe (>=Grade 3) On-Study AEs | 50.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Serious On-Study AEs | 40.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Related On-Study AEs | 88.9 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | AEs with Outcome of Death | 6.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Related AE with Outcome of Death | 2.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Related On-Study AEs | 80.2 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Related AE with Outcome of Death | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Any On-Study AE | 96.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Serious On-Study AEs | 42.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | AEs with Outcome of Death | 9.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Severe (>=Grade 3) On-Study AEs | 55.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | On-Study AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 13.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Severe (>=Grade 3) On-Study AEs | 52.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Serious On-Study AEs | 39.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Related AE with Outcome of Death | 1.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Related On-Study AEs | 78.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | On-Study AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 3.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | Any On-Study AE | 97.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With On-Study Adverse Events (AEs) and AEs With an Outcome of Death | AEs with Outcome of Death | 6.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24
PFS at Week 12 was defined as the probability that the subject was progression-free at 12 weeks and 24 weeks following the start of randomization. It was computed via Kaplan-Meier method, truncated at Week 12 and Week 24. PFS was determined by investigator. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Time frame: Week 12, Week 24
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24 | Week 12 | 0.491 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24 | Week 24 | 0.164 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24 | Week 12 | 0.577 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24 | Week 24 | 0.240 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24 | Week 12 | 0.485 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Week 12 and Week 24 | Week 24 | 0.100 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities
ANC=Absolute Neutrophil Count. CTCAE v3.0 Grades 0 through 4 of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 0=Normal, Grade 1=Mild AE, Grade 2=Moderate AE, Grade 3=Severe AE, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE.
Time frame: On-study laboratory results are results reported after the first dose date and within 70 days of last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]).
Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose or any partial dose of study medication. N=Number of participants analyzed; n=number of participants with given laboratory evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 3 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 1-4(n=352, 121, 126) | 66.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 2 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 48.9 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 1 (n=349, 121, 126) | 4.9 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 51.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 0 (n=349, 121, 126) | 94.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 12.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.9 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.9 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 15.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 4.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 37.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 46.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 97.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 33.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.4 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 3-4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3-4(n=352, 121, 126) | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 1-4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 5.4 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 4.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 14.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 44.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 40.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 14.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 55.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 95.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 93.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 6.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 0 (n=349, 121, 126) | 90.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 1 (n=349, 121, 126) | 9.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 2 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 3 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 1-4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 9.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 3-4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 34.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 47.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 1-4(n=352, 121, 126) | 65.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3-4(n=352, 121, 126) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 1-4(n=352, 121, 126) | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 2 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 9.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 3 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 15.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 46.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 1-4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 8.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 3-4 (n=349, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 34.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 22.2 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 4.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3-4(n=352, 121, 126) | 9.5 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 42.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 53.2 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 4.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | ANC, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 96.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 25.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 0 (n=349, 121, 126) | 91.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Hemoglobin, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 4.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet Count, Grade 1 (n=349, 121, 126) | 8.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Hematological Abnormalities | White Blood Cells, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 7.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities
ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase. CTCAE v3.0 Grades 0 through 4 of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 0=Normal, Grade 1=Mild AE, Grade 2=Moderate AE, Grade 3=Severe AE, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE.
Time frame: On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]).
Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose or any partial dose of study medication. N=Number of participants analyzed; n=number of participants with given laboratory evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.9 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 4.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.4 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 13.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.1 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 19.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 127) | 1.4 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 83.2 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 127) | 2.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 127) | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 128) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 16.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 26.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 128) | 4.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 128) | 19.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 80.4 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 128) | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 16.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0.6 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 128) | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 19.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 24.0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 71.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 23.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 28.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 127) | 93.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 127) | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 127) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 6.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 128) | 71.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 128) | 20.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 128) | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 28.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 3.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 2.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 84.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 15.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 0 (n=352, 121, 126) | 81.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 1 (n=352, 121, 126) | 12.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 128) | 71.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 128) | 24.2 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 15.1 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 28.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 128) | 3.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 127) | 98.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 3-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 1-4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 18.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 4 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | Total Bilirubin, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 127) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | AST, Grade 3 (n=352, 121, 126) | 0.8 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Liver Abnormalities | ALT, Grade 2 (n=352, 121, 126) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities
CTCAE v3.0 Grades 0 through 4 of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 0=Normal, Grade 1=Mild AE, Grade 2=Moderate AE, Grade 3=Severe AE, Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE.
Time frame: On-study adverse events include all AEs reported between the first dose and 70 days after the last dose of study therapy (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks]).
Population: All subjects who received at least 1 dose or any partial dose of study medication. N=Number of participants analyzed; n=number of participants with given laboratory evaluation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 128) | 8.8 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 128) | 89.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 10.5 percentage of participants |
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 128) | 1.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 128) | 88.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 128) | 9.9 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 128) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 11.6 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 1 (n=353, 121, 128) | 9.4 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 3-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 1-4 (n=353, 121, 128) | 11.7 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 3 (n=353, 121, 128) | 0 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 2 (n=353, 121, 128) | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| gp100 | Percentage of Participants With Worst On-Study Renal Abnormalities | Creatinine, Grade 0 (n=353, 121, 128) | 88.3 percentage of participants |
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the number of days between the date of randomization and the date of the progression or the date of death. A subject who died without prior progression was considered to have progressed on the date of death. PFS was determined by investigator. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for median were computed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks)
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study. Subjects who neither progressed nor died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 2.76 months |
| gp100 | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 2.86 months |
| gp100 | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | 2.76 months |
Time to Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the number of days between the date of the randomization and date of PD or death due to PD. For subjects who had not progression and remained alive, TTP was censored on the date of last assessment; those who remained alive and had no recorded post-baseline assessment, TTP was censored on the date of randomization; those who remained alive and had randomized but were not treated, TTP was censored at the date of randomization; for those who died without reported disease progression, TTP was censored on the date of death.
Time frame: from time of randomization to date of PD or death due to PD (end of the study was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed [264 weeks])
Population: Intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Time to Progression (TTP) | 2.76 months |
| gp100 | Time to Progression (TTP) | 2.86 months |
| gp100 | Time to Progression (TTP) | 2.76 months |
Time to Response
Time to response was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date when measurement criteria are met for BOR of CR or PR, as determined by investigator.
Time frame: From randomization until the end of the study, which was defined as the time at which 481 deaths were observed (264 weeks)
Population: Responder subjects in intent-to-treat population, as randomized. All subjects who were randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipilimumab Plus gp100 | Time to Response | 3.324 months | Full Range 0.9561 |
| gp100 | Time to Response | 3.176 months | Full Range 0.7629 |
| gp100 | Time to Response | 2.743 months | Full Range 0.0697 |