Skip to content

An Investigational Drug on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Aortic Stenosis (Narrowing of the Major Blood Vessel of the Heart)(MK-0653A-043 AM4)(COMPLETED)

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of Ezetimibe + Simvastatin on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00092677
Enrollment
1873
Registered
2004-09-28
Start date
2001-01-31
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Stenosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether treatment with an investigational drug as compared to placebo will reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with aortic stenosis.

Interventions

Duration of Treatment: 4 years

DRUGComparator: Placebo

matching Placebo

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 45 to 85 with mild abnormalities of the aortic valve as confirmed by an echocardiogram.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients previously in a trial using the study drug, or currently taking any medications that are not allowed in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of MCE (Major Cardiovascular Events)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Composite endpoint of MCE consists of cardiovascular death, AVR (aortic valve replacement) surgery, CHF(congestive heart failure) as a result of progression of aortic stenosis, nonfatal MI (myocardial infarction), CABG (coronary artery bypass) surgery, PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention), hospitalized unstable angina, and nonhemorrhagic stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of AVE (Aortic Valve Events)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Composite endpoint of AVE (aortic valve events) consists of AVR surgery, CHF (as a result of progression of AS), or cardiovascular death
Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of ICE (Ischemic Cardiovascular Events)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Composite endpoint of ICE (ischemic cardiovascular events) consists of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, CABG, PCI, hospitalized unstable angina, and nonhemorrhagic stroke
Change From Baseline in Peak Transaortic Jet VelocityBaseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years) or pre-aortic valve replacementMean change from baseline in peak transaortic jet velocity

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Hospitalization for Unstable AnginaEntire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced hospitalization for unstable angina
Nonhemorrhagic StrokeEntire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced nonhemorrhagic stroke
Cardiovascular DeathEntire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced cardiovascular death
Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Total Cholesterol From Baseline to End of Follow-upBaseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.
Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-upBaseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.
Percent Change in Time Weighted Average High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-upBaseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.
Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Triglycerides From Baseline to End of Follow-upBaseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.
Death (Any Cause)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that died (any cause)
Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced aortic valve replacement (AVR)
Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Due to Progression of Aortic Stenosis (AS)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) due to progression of aortic stenosis (AS)
Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI)Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)Number of participants that experienced nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Phase III. Study Initiation Date (FPI) was 06-Jan-2003 and Study Completion Date (LPO) was 17-Apr-2008. Primary therapy period 02-Mar-2001 to 31-Mar-2008 includes start date of therapy from the Simvastatin in Aortic Stenosis (SAS) study. 173 study centers worldwide (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, Norway, and Sweden)

Pre-assignment details

Included patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis as assessed on echocardiography, not requiring lipid-lowering therapy, and without known coronary heart disease or diabetes mellitus. 4 week placebo/diet run-in period was followed by treatment period lasting until 4 years after the last patient was randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EZ/Simva 10/40 mg
Ezetimibe 10 mg + Simvastatin 40 mg
944
Placebo929
Total1,873

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdminstrative59
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEZ/Simva 10/40 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous67.7 years67.4 years67.5 years
High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)1.49 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
1.49 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
1.49 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)3.62 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93
3.59 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.91
3.60 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.92
Peak Transaortic Jet Velocity3.09 m/sec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.55
3.10 m/sec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.54
3.09 m/sec
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.54
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
940 participants928 participants1868 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
363 Participants360 Participants723 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
581 Participants569 Participants1150 Participants
Total Cholesterol5.76 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04
5.73 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99
5.74 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
Triglycerides (TG)1.42 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71
1.42 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68
1.42 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.69

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
703 / —706 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
471 / —465 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of MCE (Major Cardiovascular Events)

Composite endpoint of MCE consists of cardiovascular death, AVR (aortic valve replacement) surgery, CHF(congestive heart failure) as a result of progression of aortic stenosis, nonfatal MI (myocardial infarction), CABG (coronary artery bypass) surgery, PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention), hospitalized unstable angina, and nonhemorrhagic stroke

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgNumber of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of MCE (Major Cardiovascular Events)333 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of MCE (Major Cardiovascular Events)355 Participants
p-value: 0.59195% CI: [0.826, 1.115]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peak Transaortic Jet Velocity

Mean change from baseline in peak transaortic jet velocity

Time frame: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years) or pre-aortic valve replacement

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients who were randomized, took at least one dose of blinded study therapy and had a baseline and at least one post-randomization assessment without regard to protocol violations or compliance with study medication. 180 patients were excluded from peak transaortic jet velocity due to missing measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Transaortic Jet Velocity0.613 m/secStandard Deviation 0.586
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peak Transaortic Jet Velocity0.618 m/secStandard Deviation 0.612
p-value: 0.82995% CI: [-0.063, 0.051]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of AVE (Aortic Valve Events)

Composite endpoint of AVE (aortic valve events) consists of AVR surgery, CHF (as a result of progression of AS), or cardiovascular death

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgNumber of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of AVE (Aortic Valve Events)308 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of AVE (Aortic Valve Events)326 Participants
p-value: 0.73295% CI: [0.833, 1.137]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Number of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of ICE (Ischemic Cardiovascular Events)

Composite endpoint of ICE (ischemic cardiovascular events) consists of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, CABG, PCI, hospitalized unstable angina, and nonhemorrhagic stroke

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgNumber of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of ICE (Ischemic Cardiovascular Events)148 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants That Experienced One or More Components of the Composite Clinical Endpoint of ICE (Ischemic Cardiovascular Events)187 Participants
p-value: 0.02495% CI: [0.628, 0.967]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR)

Number of participants that experienced aortic valve replacement (AVR)

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgAortic Valve Replacement (AVR)267 Participants
PlaceboAortic Valve Replacement (AVR)278 Participants
p-value: 0.96895% CI: [0.842, 1.179]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Cardiovascular Death

Number of participants that experienced cardiovascular death

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgCardiovascular Death47 Participants
PlaceboCardiovascular Death56 Participants
p-value: 0.34495% CI: [0.563, 1.222]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) Due to Progression of Aortic Stenosis (AS)

Number of participants that experienced Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) due to progression of aortic stenosis (AS)

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgCongestive Heart Failure (CHF) Due to Progression of Aortic Stenosis (AS)25 Participants
PlaceboCongestive Heart Failure (CHF) Due to Progression of Aortic Stenosis (AS)23 Participants
p-value: 0.77195% CI: [0.617, 1.917]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

Number of participants that experienced coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgCoronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)69 Participants
PlaceboCoronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)100 Participants
p-value: 0.01595% CI: [0.503, 0.929]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Death (Any Cause)

Number of participants that died (any cause)

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgDeath (Any Cause)105 Participants
PlaceboDeath (Any Cause)100 Participants
p-value: 0.79995% CI: [0.788, 1.363]Regression, Cox
Post Hoc

Death Due to Cancer

Number of participants that died due to cancer

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgDeath Due to Cancer39 Participants
PlaceboDeath Due to Cancer23 Participants
p-value: 0.05295% CI: [0.996, 2.791]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Hospitalization for Unstable Angina

Number of participants that experienced hospitalization for unstable angina

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgHospitalization for Unstable Angina5 Participants
PlaceboHospitalization for Unstable Angina8 Participants
95% CI: [0.199, 1.86]Regression, Cox
Post Hoc

Incident Cancer

Number of participants with incident cancer

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: One patient from the 944 patients randomized to ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg did not receive study medication and was not included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgIncident Cancer105 Participants
PlaceboIncident Cancer70 Participants
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [1.111, 2.035]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Number of participants that experienced nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI)

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgNonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI)17 Participants
PlaceboNonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI)26 Participants
p-value: 0.14795% CI: [0.345, 1.173]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Nonhemorrhagic Stroke

Number of participants that experienced nonhemorrhagic stroke

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgNonhemorrhagic Stroke33 Participants
PlaceboNonhemorrhagic Stroke29 Participants
p-value: 0.64795% CI: [0.682, 1.85]Regression, Cox
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.

Time frame: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients who were randomized, took at least one dose of blinded study therapy and had a baseline and at least one post-randomization assessment without regard to protocol violations or compliance with study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgPercent Change in Time Weighted Average High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up6.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 17.7
PlaceboPercent Change in Time Weighted Average High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up2.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 16.1
p-value: <=0.00195% CI: [2.4, 5.5]ANOVA
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.

Time frame: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients who were randomized, took at least one dose of blinded study therapy and had a baseline and at least one post-randomization assessment without regard to protocol violations or compliance with study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgPercent Change in Time Weighted Average Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up-53.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 18.7
PlaceboPercent Change in Time Weighted Average Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to End of Follow-up-3.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 20.6
p-value: <=0.00195% CI: [-51.8, -48.2]ANOVA
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Total Cholesterol From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.

Time frame: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients who were randomized, took at least one dose of blinded study therapy and had a baseline and at least one post-randomization assessment without regard to protocol violations or compliance with study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgPercent Change in Time Weighted Average Total Cholesterol From Baseline to End of Follow-up-34.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 13.5
PlaceboPercent Change in Time Weighted Average Total Cholesterol From Baseline to End of Follow-up-2.7 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 11.8
p-value: <=0.00195% CI: [-33.3, -31]ANOVA
Other Pre-specified

Percent Change in Time Weighted Average Triglycerides From Baseline to End of Follow-up

Mean percent change (time-weighted average over follow-up) from baseline: Time-weighted average calculated using values at week 8, week 24, year 1 and every 6 months with time interval (days) between 2 successive values used as the weighting factor. For the first follow-up value, the weight was the number of days from randomization.

Time frame: Baseline to End of follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Full Analysis Set: All patients who were randomized, took at least one dose of blinded study therapy and had a baseline and at least one post-randomization assessment without regard to protocol violations or compliance with study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgPercent Change in Time Weighted Average Triglycerides From Baseline to End of Follow-up-14.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 27.6
PlaceboPercent Change in Time Weighted Average Triglycerides From Baseline to End of Follow-up5.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 30.4
p-value: <=0.00195% CI: [-22.6, -17.3]ANOVA
Other Pre-specified

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)

Number of participants that experienced percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Time frame: Entire follow-up (median = 4.35 years)

Population: Intention-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EZ/Simva 10/40 mgPercutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)8 Participants
PlaceboPercutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)17 Participants
95% CI: [0.197, 1.057]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026