Skip to content

Bone Loss in Women With Anorexia Nervosa

IGF-1 and Bone Loss in Women Anorexia Nervosa

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00089843
Enrollment
77
Registered
2004-08-17
Start date
2003-06-30
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2020-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anorexia Nervosa

Keywords

Eating Disorders, Osteopenia

Brief summary

Women with Anorexia Nervosa have been found to have low bone density. The study will determine whether administration of low doses of a natural hormone, testosterone and/or risedronate, a medication to help prevent bone breakdown will improve or prevent bone loss in this condition.

Detailed description

II. SPECIFIC AIMS Severe osteopenia is a prevalent complication of anorexia nervosa (AN), affecting over half of all women with this disease. Loss of 25-50% of total bone mass occurs frequently and is often permanent. Although anorexia nervosa affects from 0.5-1.0% of college age women, no successful therapeutic interventions have been developed for osteoporosis in this population. Bone loss in anorexia nervosa is characterized by reduced bone formation coupled with increased bone resorption. Anorexia nervosa results in a deficiency of testosterone. Testosterone administration reduces bone resorption and data suggest that low-dose testosterone replacement therapy can increase surrogate markers of bone formation. Bisphosphonates are now well established to decrease bone resorption and improve bone density in severely osteopenic postmenopausal women. However, there are few data regarding the use of this antiresorptive therapy in women with severe pre-menopausal bone loss. Our preliminary data demonstrate that administration of a bisphosphonate decreases bone resorption and increases bone mass in women with AN after 6 and 9 months. These are the first data to demonstrate a striking increase in bone density in such women. We will test the hypothesis that a combined strategy to increase bone formation and decrease bone resorption by combining testosterone with a bisphosphonate will increase bone mass in anorexia nervosa. The following hypotheses will be tested: Specific Aim 1. Testosterone, a nutritionally dependent bone trophic factor, is a critical determinant of decreased bone formation in anorexia nervosa, and administration of physiologic testosterone will increase bone formation and lean body mass in this disease We will investigate in women with anorexia nervosa whether: A. Bone formation is reduced in association with low serum testosterone B. Testosterone deficiency is due to a combination of ovarian and adrenal defects resulting from undernutrition C. Testosterone administration reverses testosterone deficiency leading to an acute and sustained increase in bone formation and a decrease in bone resorption D. Administration of physiologic testosterone replacement stimulates increases in IGF-I levels in women with anorexia nervosa, a mechanism for increased bone formation and bone density E. Administration of physiologic testosterone replacement increases lean body mass, a major determinant of bone density Specific Aim 2. Long-term (12 months) physiologic testosterone administration combined with a bisphosphonate increases bone density by a dual anabolic and anti-resorptive strategy We will investigate in women with anorexia nervosa whether: A. Physiologic testosterone administration increases bone density B. Administration of a bisphosphonate decreases the excessive state of bone resorption and increases bone density C. Co-administration of physiologic testosterone replacement and a bisphosphonate increases bone density to a greater degree than testosterone or a bisphosphonate alone by increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption

Interventions

DRUGTestosterone

Testosterone patch 150mcg daily

Actonel (risedronate) 35mg PO one time weekly

DRUGPlacebo Actonel (risedronate)

Placebo tablet identical in appearance to active Actonel (risedronate) tablet

Placebo patch identical in appearance to testosterone patch

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Anorexia Nervosa, * Over 18, * Female, * Decreased bone density

Exclusion criteria

* Medications to increase bone density

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Mineral DensityBaseline and 12 monthsPercent change in postero-anterior (PA) spine bone mineral density as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)over a 12-month period. The differences in log-transformed values are reported as percent change.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Markers of Bone MetabolismBaseline to 12 monthstype 1 collagen C-telopeptide(CTX); The differences in log-transformed values are reported as percent change.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo Actonel and Active Testosterone Patch
Placebo Actonel tablet weekly and active testosterone patch (starting dose 150 mcg daily; increased to 300 mcg daily in subjects whose levels remained below the median on the initial dose)
19
Active Actonel and Active Testosterone Patch
Active Actonel tablet (35 mg weekly) and Active Testosterone patch (starting dose 150 mcg daily; increased to 300 mcg daily in subjects whose levels remained below the median on the initial dose)
20
Active Actonel and Placebo Testosterone
Active Actonel tablet (35 mg weekly) and Placebo Testosterone Patch
20
Placebo Testosterone Patch and Placebo Actonel
Placebo Testosterone Patch and placebo Actonel tablet
18
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1456

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Actonel and Active Testosterone PatchActive Actonel and Placebo TestosteronePlacebo Actonel and Active Testosterone PatchPlacebo Testosterone Patch and Placebo ActonelTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants20 Participants19 Participants18 Participants77 Participants
Age, Continuous25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
25.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
27.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
26.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
26.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants20 participants19 participants18 participants77 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants20 Participants19 Participants18 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1916 / 2016 / 2012 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 191 / 205 / 202 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Bone Mineral Density

Percent change in postero-anterior (PA) spine bone mineral density as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)over a 12-month period. The differences in log-transformed values are reported as percent change.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: 1 subject was excluded from analysis. A factorial analysis was performed and determines the effect of each intervention separately, whether or not a subject received the 2nd intervention. Therefore, data from all 76 subjects who participated were used to determine the effect of each intervention on our endpoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Actonel (Risedronate) 35 mg WeeklyBone Mineral Density3.2 percent change
TestosteroneBone Mineral Density-0.6 percent change
Comparison: Factorial analysisp-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.8, 4.6]Factorial analysis
Comparison: Factorial analysisp-value: 0.4195% CI: [-2, 0.8]Factorial analysis
Secondary

Markers of Bone Metabolism

type 1 collagen C-telopeptide(CTX); The differences in log-transformed values are reported as percent change.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Population: 1 subject was excluded from analysis. A factorial analysis was performed and determines the effect of each intervention separately, whether or not a subject received the 2nd intervention. Therefore, data from all 76 subjects who participated were used to determine the effect of each intervention on our endpoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Actonel (Risedronate) 35 mg WeeklyMarkers of Bone Metabolism-41 percent change of CTX
TestosteroneMarkers of Bone Metabolism-11 percent change of CTX
Comparison: Factorial analysisp-value: 0.002Factorial analysis
Comparison: Factorial analysisp-value: 0.39Factorial analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 7, 2026