Mantle-Cell Lymphoma
Conditions
Brief summary
The purposes of this study are to determine the safety of oral enzastaurin and any side effects that might be associated with it and whether enzastaurin can help participants with mantle cell lymphoma.
Interventions
500 milligrams (mg), oral, daily, up to six 28-day cycles
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Mantle cell lymphoma * Previous treatment for mantle cell lymphoma * Previously relapsed mantle cell lymphoma with no more than 4 chemotherapy regimens. * Have discontinued all previous therapies for cancer, except corticosteroids up to 25 milligrams per day (mg/day) * Adequate organ function
Exclusion criteria
* Inability to swallow tablets * Must not have significant heart problems
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Progression (FFP) for at Least 3 Cycles | Baseline through at least 3 cycles of treatment (28-day cycle) | Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. The percentage of FFP was computed as the number of participants documented to be progression free after 3 cycles of treatment divided by the number of treated participants and then multiplied by 100. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | Baseline to measured progressive disease or death due to any cause up to 22.01 months | PFS time was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. Progression-free survival time was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were still alive and who had not had documented progressive disease. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Baseline to date of death from any cause at least up to 23.10 months | OS was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of death due to any cause. For each participant who was not known to have died as of the data-inclusion cut-off date, OS was censored for that analysis at the date of the last assessment visit prior to the cut-off date. |
| Duration of CR, CRu, PR or Stable Disease (SD) [Duration of Overall Response] | Date of progression or death due to any cause up to 22.01 months | Duration of overall response for responders was measured from the date that measurement criteria were met for CR, CRu, PR or SD (whichever status occurred first) until the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas Guidelines, CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions. CRu was the disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, normal appearance of spleen and greater than 75% regression in lymph node mass. PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the six largest dominant nodes. SD was when the response was poorer than partial response with no new lesions consistent with progressive disease. Duration of response was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for responders who were still alive and had not had documented progressive disease. |
| Time to New Treatment | Baseline to date of new treatment up to 23.10 months | Time to new treatment was as the time from enrollment to the date new treatment for the cancer under study was initiated. Time to new treatment was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were not documented to have initiated a new treatment. |
| Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6 (28-day cycle) | The B symptoms, tumor-related symptoms, participant functioning, and health-related quality of life were assessed with FACT-Lym v. 4. FACT-Lym v. 4 consists of 42 items with 5-point rating scales for each item, where 0 = not at all and 4 = very much. Physical well-being, social/family well-being and functional well-being subscales consist of 7 items each with scores ranging from 0-28. The emotional well-being subscale consists of 6 items with a score ranging from 0-24. The lymphoma tumor - specific subscale consists of 15 items with a score ranging from 0-60. Fact-Lymphoma total score ranges from 0-168. A higher score represents better quality of life. |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) Plus Unconfirmed Complete Response (CRu) Plus Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response Rate) | Baseline to 22.01 months | — |
| Number of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining | Baseline | IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine PKCβ expression. Staining intensity was measured on a semiquantitative scale of 0 (or negative) to 3 (high intensity). The final score combined the components of staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and was defined as \[1 \* (percentage of cells staining at 1)\] + \[2 \* (percentage of cells staining at 2)\] + \[3 \* (percentage of cells staining at 3)\]. Score ≥100 and staining intensity ≥2 indicates high expression for PKCβ, while score \<100 and staining intensity ≤1 indicates low expression for PKCβ. |
| Number of Participants With High Ki-67 Expression by IHC Staining | Baseline | IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine Ki-67 expression. High expression is defined as the percentage of positive cells ≥40%. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin) | Each cycle (28-day cycle) up to 21 cycles and 30-day follow-up | Data presented are the number of participants who experienced SAEs, AEs, deaths due to progressive disease (PD), and deaths due to AEs while on treatment and death during the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. |
| Average Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes) | Cycles 1 [1-4 hours (h) and 4-8 h postdose], 2 (predose, 2-4 h and 6-8 h postdose), and 3 (predose and 2-8 h postdose) of Day 1 of each 28-day cycle | The Steady-state plasma concentrations of total analytes (enzastaurin plus its active metabolite, LSN326020) observed after once-daily dosing were evaluated using sparse sampling methodology. |
| Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status) | Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6 | Overall health status and participant utility values were measured with the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. EuroQol-5D describes health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into 3 levels: 1 (no problem), 2 (some problem), and 3 (extreme problem). The questionnaire records the level of problems on each of 5 dimensions and is converted into the EuroQol-5D index based on preference weights (Dolan 1997), where a score of 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health. |
Countries
Australia, France, Germany, Netherlands
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participant flow reports those participants who discontinued from study drug. Only participants without confirmed progressive disease at the 30-day post-therapy visit were assessed for progression by radiological method every 3 months until disease progression.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Enzastaurin 500 mg oral dose administered once daily, in the morning, during each 28-day cycle of therapy for planned duration of treatment up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or for any other cause of discontinuation. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease occurred. | 60 |
| Total | 60 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 |
| Overall Study | Death Due to Study Disease | 4 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 |
| Overall Study | Progressive Disease | 51 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Enzastaurin |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 66.0 years |
| Baseline B Symptoms High (4-5) | 8 Participants |
| Baseline B Symptoms Low (0-1) | 9 Participants |
| Baseline B Symptoms Medium (2-3) | 39 Participants |
| Baseline B Symptoms Not available | 4 Participants |
| Participants with High Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) | 19 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 60 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 28 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 18 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 42 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 54 / 60 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 20 / 60 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Progression (FFP) for at Least 3 Cycles
Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. The percentage of FFP was computed as the number of participants documented to be progression free after 3 cycles of treatment divided by the number of treated participants and then multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline through at least 3 cycles of treatment (28-day cycle)
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Progression (FFP) for at Least 3 Cycles | 35.6 percentage of participants |
Average Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes)
The Steady-state plasma concentrations of total analytes (enzastaurin plus its active metabolite, LSN326020) observed after once-daily dosing were evaluated using sparse sampling methodology.
Time frame: Cycles 1 [1-4 hours (h) and 4-8 h postdose], 2 (predose, 2-4 h and 6-8 h postdose), and 3 (predose and 2-8 h postdose) of Day 1 of each 28-day cycle
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable data for Cav,ss.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Average Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes) | Enzastaurin | 627 nanomoles/liter (nmol/L) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.4 |
| Enzastaurin | Average Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes) | Total analytes | 1160 nanomoles/liter (nmol/L) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.4 |
Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status)
Overall health status and participant utility values were measured with the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. EuroQol-5D describes health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into 3 levels: 1 (no problem), 2 (some problem), and 3 (extreme problem). The questionnaire records the level of problems on each of 5 dimensions and is converted into the EuroQol-5D index based on preference weights (Dolan 1997), where a score of 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had EuroQol-5D assessed at baseline and Cycles 2, 4, and 6.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status) | Baseline | 0.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Enzastaurin | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status) | Cycle 2 | 0.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Enzastaurin | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status) | Cycle 4 | 0.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Enzastaurin | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status) | Cycle 6 | 0.68 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)
The B symptoms, tumor-related symptoms, participant functioning, and health-related quality of life were assessed with FACT-Lym v. 4. FACT-Lym v. 4 consists of 42 items with 5-point rating scales for each item, where 0 = not at all and 4 = very much. Physical well-being, social/family well-being and functional well-being subscales consist of 7 items each with scores ranging from 0-28. The emotional well-being subscale consists of 6 items with a score ranging from 0-24. The lymphoma tumor - specific subscale consists of 15 items with a score ranging from 0-60. Fact-Lymphoma total score ranges from 0-168. A higher score represents better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6 (28-day cycle)
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had FACT-Lym assessed at baseline and Cycles 2, 4 and 6.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Physical Well-being- Baseline | 22.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.298 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Physical Well-being- Cycle 2 | 22.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.49 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Physical Well-being- Cycle 4 | 22.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.52 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Physical Well-being- Cycle 6 | 21.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.406 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Social Family Well-being- Baseline | 21.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.792 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Social Family Well-being- Cycle 2 | 20.32 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.165 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Social Family Well-being- Cycle 4 | 19.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.421 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Social Family Well-being- Cycle 6 | 21.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.021 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Emotional Well-being- Baseline | 17.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.547 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Emotional Well-being- Cycle 2 | 17.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.953 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Emotional Well-being- Cycle 4 | 17.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.961 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Emotional Well-being- Cycle 6 | 17.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.514 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Functional Well-being- Baseline | 16.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.768 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Functional Well-being- Cycle 2 | 16.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.05 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Functional Well-being- Cycle 4 | 16.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.076 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Functional Well-being- Cycle 6 | 17.43 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.871 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Lymphoma Subscale- Baseline | 46.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.78 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Lymphoma Subscale- Cycle 2 | 46.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.841 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Lymphoma Subscale- Cycle 4 | 46.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.555 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Lymphoma Subscale- Cycle 6 | 46.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.108 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Baseline | 123.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.21 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Cycle 2 | 122.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Cycle 4 | 122 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.67 |
| Enzastaurin | Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4) | Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Cycle 6 | 124.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.92 |
Duration of CR, CRu, PR or Stable Disease (SD) [Duration of Overall Response]
Duration of overall response for responders was measured from the date that measurement criteria were met for CR, CRu, PR or SD (whichever status occurred first) until the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas Guidelines, CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions. CRu was the disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, normal appearance of spleen and greater than 75% regression in lymph node mass. PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the six largest dominant nodes. SD was when the response was poorer than partial response with no new lesions consistent with progressive disease. Duration of response was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for responders who were still alive and had not had documented progressive disease.
Time frame: Date of progression or death due to any cause up to 22.01 months
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and met criteria for CR, CRu, PR or SD. Participants censored = 2.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Duration of CR, CRu, PR or Stable Disease (SD) [Duration of Overall Response] | 5.55 months |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)
Data presented are the number of participants who experienced SAEs, AEs, deaths due to progressive disease (PD), and deaths due to AEs while on treatment and death during the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
Time frame: Each cycle (28-day cycle) up to 21 cycles and 30-day follow-up
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin) | SAEs | 20 Participants |
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin) | Other non-serious AEs | 54 Participants |
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin) | Deaths due to PD | 4 Participants |
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin) | Deaths due to AEs | 0 Participants |
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin) | Deaths during 30-day follow-up | 6 Participants |
Number of Participants With High Ki-67 Expression by IHC Staining
IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine Ki-67 expression. High expression is defined as the percentage of positive cells ≥40%.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided tissue specimens from the initial diagnosis for Ki-67 expression analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With High Ki-67 Expression by IHC Staining | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining
IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine PKCβ expression. Staining intensity was measured on a semiquantitative scale of 0 (or negative) to 3 (high intensity). The final score combined the components of staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and was defined as \[1 \* (percentage of cells staining at 1)\] + \[2 \* (percentage of cells staining at 2)\] + \[3 \* (percentage of cells staining at 3)\]. Score ≥100 and staining intensity ≥2 indicates high expression for PKCβ, while score \<100 and staining intensity ≤1 indicates low expression for PKCβ.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided tissue specimens from the initial diagnosis for PKCβ expression analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining | Score ≥100 and staining intensity ≥2 | 14 Participants |
| Enzastaurin | Number of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining | Score <100 and staining intensity ≤1 | 4 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of death due to any cause. For each participant who was not known to have died as of the data-inclusion cut-off date, OS was censored for that analysis at the date of the last assessment visit prior to the cut-off date.
Time frame: Baseline to date of death from any cause at least up to 23.10 months
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants censored = 39.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Overall Survival (OS) | 22.01 months |
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) Plus Unconfirmed Complete Response (CRu) Plus Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response Rate)
Time frame: Baseline to 22.01 months
Population: Zero participants were analyzed as no participant achieved CR, CRu or PR.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS time was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. Progression-free survival time was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were still alive and who had not had documented progressive disease.
Time frame: Baseline to measured progressive disease or death due to any cause up to 22.01 months
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants censored = 3.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | 1.97 months |
Time to New Treatment
Time to new treatment was as the time from enrollment to the date new treatment for the cancer under study was initiated. Time to new treatment was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were not documented to have initiated a new treatment.
Time frame: Baseline to date of new treatment up to 23.10 months
Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants censored =16.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzastaurin | Time to New Treatment | 3.52 months |