Skip to content

Oral Enzastaurin in Participants With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

A Phase 2 Study of Oral Enzastaurin HCl in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00088205
Enrollment
60
Registered
2004-07-23
Start date
2004-03-31
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2020-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

Brief summary

The purposes of this study are to determine the safety of oral enzastaurin and any side effects that might be associated with it and whether enzastaurin can help participants with mantle cell lymphoma.

Interventions

DRUGenzastaurin

500 milligrams (mg), oral, daily, up to six 28-day cycles

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mantle cell lymphoma * Previous treatment for mantle cell lymphoma * Previously relapsed mantle cell lymphoma with no more than 4 chemotherapy regimens. * Have discontinued all previous therapies for cancer, except corticosteroids up to 25 milligrams per day (mg/day) * Adequate organ function

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to swallow tablets * Must not have significant heart problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Progression (FFP) for at Least 3 CyclesBaseline through at least 3 cycles of treatment (28-day cycle)Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. The percentage of FFP was computed as the number of participants documented to be progression free after 3 cycles of treatment divided by the number of treated participants and then multiplied by 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Baseline to measured progressive disease or death due to any cause up to 22.01 monthsPFS time was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. Progression-free survival time was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were still alive and who had not had documented progressive disease.
Overall Survival (OS)Baseline to date of death from any cause at least up to 23.10 monthsOS was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of death due to any cause. For each participant who was not known to have died as of the data-inclusion cut-off date, OS was censored for that analysis at the date of the last assessment visit prior to the cut-off date.
Duration of CR, CRu, PR or Stable Disease (SD) [Duration of Overall Response]Date of progression or death due to any cause up to 22.01 monthsDuration of overall response for responders was measured from the date that measurement criteria were met for CR, CRu, PR or SD (whichever status occurred first) until the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas Guidelines, CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions. CRu was the disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, normal appearance of spleen and greater than 75% regression in lymph node mass. PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the six largest dominant nodes. SD was when the response was poorer than partial response with no new lesions consistent with progressive disease. Duration of response was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for responders who were still alive and had not had documented progressive disease.
Time to New TreatmentBaseline to date of new treatment up to 23.10 monthsTime to new treatment was as the time from enrollment to the date new treatment for the cancer under study was initiated. Time to new treatment was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were not documented to have initiated a new treatment.
Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6 (28-day cycle)The B symptoms, tumor-related symptoms, participant functioning, and health-related quality of life were assessed with FACT-Lym v. 4. FACT-Lym v. 4 consists of 42 items with 5-point rating scales for each item, where 0 = not at all and 4 = very much. Physical well-being, social/family well-being and functional well-being subscales consist of 7 items each with scores ranging from 0-28. The emotional well-being subscale consists of 6 items with a score ranging from 0-24. The lymphoma tumor - specific subscale consists of 15 items with a score ranging from 0-60. Fact-Lymphoma total score ranges from 0-168. A higher score represents better quality of life.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) Plus Unconfirmed Complete Response (CRu) Plus Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response Rate)Baseline to 22.01 months
Number of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) StainingBaselineIHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine PKCβ expression. Staining intensity was measured on a semiquantitative scale of 0 (or negative) to 3 (high intensity). The final score combined the components of staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and was defined as \[1 \* (percentage of cells staining at 1)\] + \[2 \* (percentage of cells staining at 2)\] + \[3 \* (percentage of cells staining at 3)\]. Score ≥100 and staining intensity ≥2 indicates high expression for PKCβ, while score \<100 and staining intensity ≤1 indicates low expression for PKCβ.
Number of Participants With High Ki-67 Expression by IHC StainingBaselineIHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine Ki-67 expression. High expression is defined as the percentage of positive cells ≥40%.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)Each cycle (28-day cycle) up to 21 cycles and 30-day follow-upData presented are the number of participants who experienced SAEs, AEs, deaths due to progressive disease (PD), and deaths due to AEs while on treatment and death during the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.
Average Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes)Cycles 1 [1-4 hours (h) and 4-8 h postdose], 2 (predose, 2-4 h and 6-8 h postdose), and 3 (predose and 2-8 h postdose) of Day 1 of each 28-day cycleThe Steady-state plasma concentrations of total analytes (enzastaurin plus its active metabolite, LSN326020) observed after once-daily dosing were evaluated using sparse sampling methodology.
Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status)Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6Overall health status and participant utility values were measured with the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. EuroQol-5D describes health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into 3 levels: 1 (no problem), 2 (some problem), and 3 (extreme problem). The questionnaire records the level of problems on each of 5 dimensions and is converted into the EuroQol-5D index based on preference weights (Dolan 1997), where a score of 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.

Countries

Australia, France, Germany, Netherlands

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participant flow reports those participants who discontinued from study drug. Only participants without confirmed progressive disease at the 30-day post-therapy visit were assessed for progression by radiological method every 3 months until disease progression.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enzastaurin
500 mg oral dose administered once daily, in the morning, during each 28-day cycle of therapy for planned duration of treatment up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or for any other cause of discontinuation. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease occurred.
60
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event4
Overall StudyDeath Due to Study Disease4
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyProgressive Disease51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnzastaurin
Age, Continuous66.0 years
Baseline B Symptoms
High (4-5)
8 Participants
Baseline B Symptoms
Low (0-1)
9 Participants
Baseline B Symptoms
Medium (2-3)
39 Participants
Baseline B Symptoms
Not available
4 Participants
Participants with High Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
60 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
54 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Progression (FFP) for at Least 3 Cycles

Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. The percentage of FFP was computed as the number of participants documented to be progression free after 3 cycles of treatment divided by the number of treated participants and then multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline through at least 3 cycles of treatment (28-day cycle)

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EnzastaurinPercentage of Participants With Freedom From Progression (FFP) for at Least 3 Cycles35.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Average Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes)

The Steady-state plasma concentrations of total analytes (enzastaurin plus its active metabolite, LSN326020) observed after once-daily dosing were evaluated using sparse sampling methodology.

Time frame: Cycles 1 [1-4 hours (h) and 4-8 h postdose], 2 (predose, 2-4 h and 6-8 h postdose), and 3 (predose and 2-8 h postdose) of Day 1 of each 28-day cycle

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had evaluable data for Cav,ss.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
EnzastaurinAverage Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes)Enzastaurin627 nanomoles/liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 74.4
EnzastaurinAverage Steady-State Plasma Concentration (Cav,ss,) of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes (Pharmacokinetics of Enzastaurin and Total Analytes)Total analytes1160 nanomoles/liter (nmol/L)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status)

Overall health status and participant utility values were measured with the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. EuroQol-5D describes health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into 3 levels: 1 (no problem), 2 (some problem), and 3 (extreme problem). The questionnaire records the level of problems on each of 5 dimensions and is converted into the EuroQol-5D index based on preference weights (Dolan 1997), where a score of 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.

Time frame: Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had EuroQol-5D assessed at baseline and Cycles 2, 4, and 6.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EnzastaurinChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status)Baseline0.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
EnzastaurinChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status)Cycle 20.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
EnzastaurinChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status)Cycle 40.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
EnzastaurinChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Quality of Life-5D (EuroQol-5D) Index Score (Overall Health Status)Cycle 60.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Change in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)

The B symptoms, tumor-related symptoms, participant functioning, and health-related quality of life were assessed with FACT-Lym v. 4. FACT-Lym v. 4 consists of 42 items with 5-point rating scales for each item, where 0 = not at all and 4 = very much. Physical well-being, social/family well-being and functional well-being subscales consist of 7 items each with scores ranging from 0-28. The emotional well-being subscale consists of 6 items with a score ranging from 0-24. The lymphoma tumor - specific subscale consists of 15 items with a score ranging from 0-60. Fact-Lymphoma total score ranges from 0-168. A higher score represents better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Cycles 2, 4 and 6 (28-day cycle)

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had FACT-Lym assessed at baseline and Cycles 2, 4 and 6.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Physical Well-being- Baseline22.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.298
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Physical Well-being- Cycle 222.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.49
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Physical Well-being- Cycle 422.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.52
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Physical Well-being- Cycle 621.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.406
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Social Family Well-being- Baseline21.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.792
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Social Family Well-being- Cycle 220.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.165
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Social Family Well-being- Cycle 419.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.421
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Social Family Well-being- Cycle 621.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.021
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Emotional Well-being- Baseline17.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.547
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Emotional Well-being- Cycle 217.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.953
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Emotional Well-being- Cycle 417.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.961
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Emotional Well-being- Cycle 617.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.514
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Functional Well-being- Baseline16.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.768
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Functional Well-being- Cycle 216.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.05
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Functional Well-being- Cycle 416.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.076
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Functional Well-being- Cycle 617.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.871
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Lymphoma Subscale- Baseline46.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.78
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Lymphoma Subscale- Cycle 246.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.841
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Lymphoma Subscale- Cycle 446.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.555
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Lymphoma Subscale- Cycle 646.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.108
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Baseline123.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.21
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Cycle 2122.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Cycle 4122 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.67
EnzastaurinChange in Scores From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Version 4 ( FACT-Lym v.4)Fact-Lymphoma Total Score- Cycle 6124.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.92
Secondary

Duration of CR, CRu, PR or Stable Disease (SD) [Duration of Overall Response]

Duration of overall response for responders was measured from the date that measurement criteria were met for CR, CRu, PR or SD (whichever status occurred first) until the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas Guidelines, CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions. CRu was the disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, normal appearance of spleen and greater than 75% regression in lymph node mass. PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the six largest dominant nodes. SD was when the response was poorer than partial response with no new lesions consistent with progressive disease. Duration of response was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for responders who were still alive and had not had documented progressive disease.

Time frame: Date of progression or death due to any cause up to 22.01 months

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and met criteria for CR, CRu, PR or SD. Participants censored = 2.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzastaurinDuration of CR, CRu, PR or Stable Disease (SD) [Duration of Overall Response]5.55 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)

Data presented are the number of participants who experienced SAEs, AEs, deaths due to progressive disease (PD), and deaths due to AEs while on treatment and death during the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Each cycle (28-day cycle) up to 21 cycles and 30-day follow-up

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)SAEs20 Participants
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)Other non-serious AEs54 Participants
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)Deaths due to PD4 Participants
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)Deaths due to AEs0 Participants
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs) (Safety of Enzastaurin)Deaths during 30-day follow-up6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With High Ki-67 Expression by IHC Staining

IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine Ki-67 expression. High expression is defined as the percentage of positive cells ≥40%.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided tissue specimens from the initial diagnosis for Ki-67 expression analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With High Ki-67 Expression by IHC Staining4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Staining

IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine PKCβ expression. Staining intensity was measured on a semiquantitative scale of 0 (or negative) to 3 (high intensity). The final score combined the components of staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and was defined as \[1 \* (percentage of cells staining at 1)\] + \[2 \* (percentage of cells staining at 2)\] + \[3 \* (percentage of cells staining at 3)\]. Score ≥100 and staining intensity ≥2 indicates high expression for PKCβ, while score \<100 and staining intensity ≤1 indicates low expression for PKCβ.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided tissue specimens from the initial diagnosis for PKCβ expression analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) StainingScore ≥100 and staining intensity ≥214 Participants
EnzastaurinNumber of Participants With Protein Kinase C Beta (PKCβ) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) StainingScore <100 and staining intensity ≤14 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of death due to any cause. For each participant who was not known to have died as of the data-inclusion cut-off date, OS was censored for that analysis at the date of the last assessment visit prior to the cut-off date.

Time frame: Baseline to date of death from any cause at least up to 23.10 months

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants censored = 39.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzastaurinOverall Survival (OS)22.01 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) Plus Unconfirmed Complete Response (CRu) Plus Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response Rate)

Time frame: Baseline to 22.01 months

Population: Zero participants were analyzed as no participant achieved CR, CRu or PR.

Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS time was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. Progression-free survival time was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were still alive and who had not had documented progressive disease.

Time frame: Baseline to measured progressive disease or death due to any cause up to 22.01 months

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants censored = 3.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzastaurinProgression-Free Survival (PFS)1.97 months
Secondary

Time to New Treatment

Time to new treatment was as the time from enrollment to the date new treatment for the cancer under study was initiated. Time to new treatment was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were not documented to have initiated a new treatment.

Time frame: Baseline to date of new treatment up to 23.10 months

Population: All enrolled participants with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants censored =16.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzastaurinTime to New Treatment3.52 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026