Skip to content

A Study of PEGASYS (Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD)) in Combination With Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) Previously Treated With PEG-Intron + Ribavirin

An Open-label, Multicenter, Efficacy and Safety Study of Pegasys® Plus Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic HCV Infection Who Are Unable to Tolerate or Who Do Not Respond to 12 Weeks of Therapy With PEGIntron ® Plus Ribavirin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00087568
Enrollment
57
Registered
2004-07-14
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
2006-03-31
Last updated
2016-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C, Chronic

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of PEGASYS plus ribavirin in patients with CHC who could not tolerate or were not responsive to 12 weeks of therapy with PEG-Intron plus ribavirin. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is \>100 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGRibavirin

1000/1200mg po bid for 36 or 60 weeks

DRUGpeginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys]

180 micrograms weekly for 36 weeks (non-responders) or 60 weeks (non-tolerators)

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients at least 18 years of age * CHC infection, genotype 1 * unable to tolerate or not responsive to PEG-Intron + ribavirin therapy after 12 weeks of treatment * use of 2 forms of contraception during the study in both men and women

Exclusion criteria

* women who are pregnant or breast-feeding * medical condition associated with chronic liver disease (eg, hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, toxin exposures) * patients with decompensated cirrhosis * patients receiving any systemic antiviral therapy or investigational drug, other than PEG-Intron + ribavirin, 24 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Pegasys and Ribavirin Therapy Completers36 weeks for Non-Tolerators and 60 weeks for Non-RespondersTherapy completers were defined as all participants who had demonstrable viremia after 12 weeks of Pegasys plus ribavirin therapy (who were to be discontinued for lack of efficacy), non-tolerators who completed 36 weeks of Pegasys plus ribavirin therapy, and non-responders who completed 60 weeks of Pegasys plus ribavirin therapy. Study completers included all participants who completed the planned treatment period (36 weeks for non-tolerators and 60 weeks for non-responders) and the 24-week treatment-free follow-up period and participants in either group who were prematurely discontinued per protocol due to insufficient therapeutic response at Week 12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeBaseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84The number of participants with serum alanine transaminase (ALT) concentration within the normal range at each time point assessed. Upper limit of normal serum ALT for men is 43 International units per liter (IU/L) and for women is 34 IU/L.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Adverse EventsUp to Week 84An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were also to be reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.
Mean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeBaseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a questionnaire with groups of statements in which the patient is asked to select the statement that most clearly describes the way he/she has felt in the past two weeks, including today. The score for each group is tallied and the ranges of scores are used as guidelines for measuring the degree of depression. For this study, scores are defined as follows: 0 to 15 as minimal, 16 to 21 as mild, 22 to 30 as moderate, and 31 to 63 as severe. The questionnaire was in two areas (changes in sleeping pattern and changes in appetite), selections 1, 2, and 3 contained options for both more and less with respect to the area of interest. Four statements (labelled 0, 1, 2, and 3) were offered that described the area of interest, with 0 indicating no effect and 3 indicating the worst effect. The individual area scores were summed to provide a total score.
Mean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeBaseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84The Fatigue severity score (FSS) scale has a series of questions designed to assess tiredness, lack of energy, or total body give-out. Participants were to react to nine statements regarding fatigue over the previous 2 weeks, each on a scale (1 = completely agree, 7 = completely disagree). The FSS is the average of the scores on the 9 questions; ranging from 1-7, with lower scores indicating less fatigue. In addition, participants were to react to how much fatigue they had in the past 2 or 4 weeks by marking on a visual analogue scale labelled at one end with no fatigue ('0' being the best) and at the other end with greater fatigue ('100' being the worst). Longer distance on the scale from no fatigue indicated greater fatigue. FSS values are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale.
Number of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84Sustained virological response (SVR) is defined as undetectable Hepatitis C virus-ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA)(\<60 International units per milliliter) or HCV RNA for \>=2-log10 decrease in viral titre, 24 weeks after the end of treatment. A participant was classified as non-responder (SVR not achieved) if HCV RNA was detectable at the completion of antiviral treatment, at Week 24 post or at any time between Week 24 and completion of antiviral treatment. HCV RNA measured prior to or on the date of the first dose of Pegasys plus ribavirin was used as the baseline in all HCV RNA analyses.
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to Week 84Analysis was performed for hematology, clinical chemistry, thyroid function, and urinalysis. Normal ranges of the parameters were: Haematocrit (fraction): 0.37 - 0.49, Haemoglobin (g/L): 130 - 180 , Platelets (G/L): 150 - 350, White blood cell (G/L): 4.5 - 11.0, Lymphocytes (G/L): 1.00 - 4.80, Neutrophils (G/L): 1.80 - 7.70, Prothrombin Time in Seconds (sec): not defined, Prothrombin Time, normalized (ratio): 0.70 - 1.30, Partial thromboplastin Time (sec): 22.1 - 34.1, Aspartate transaminase (AST) or serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) in IU/L: 0 - 40, Alkaline Phosphatase (IU/L): 0 - 115, ALT or serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) in (IU/L): 0-55, Total Bilirubin (umol/L): 0 -17, Thyroxine (T4) (nmol/L): 58 -140, Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, \[U/mL\]): 0.0 - 5.0, Triglycerides (mmol/L): 0.45 - 1.69, Phosphate (mmol/L): 0.84 - 1.45, Uric Acid (umol/L): 214 - 506
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsFrom screening (Day -21 to Day -1) to Week 84Abnormal vital signs were defined as 1. Systolic blood pressure (BP) below 85 mm Hg or above 180 mm Hg with a change from baseline of \> 20% 2. Diastolic BP above 110 mm Hg with a change from baseline of \> 20% where systolic and diastolic BP were pressure exerted by blood on the walls of blood vessels during left ventricular systole and diastole respectively. 3. Pulse rate below 50 beats per minute and above 120 beats per minute, with a change from baseline of \> 20%, where pulse represents the palpation of heartbeat
Mean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionBaseline (Week 0), Week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60Local injection-site reactions were to be given an overall assessment based on pain or discomfort as Grade 0 for no pain or discomfort, Grade 1 for mild tenderness at the injection site, Grade 2 for moderate pain without limitation of usual activities, Grade 3 for severe pain requiring prescription non-topical analgesics or limiting usual activities, Grade 4 for a reaction that resulted in a new hospitalization, prolongation of hospitalization, death, or a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was life threatening or medically significant. Adverse events related to the injection site (injection site erythema, hematoma, pain, rash, or reaction) were reported. All of these events were reported as resolved without sequelae.
Number of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline (Week 0); Weeks 12, 36, 60 and 84Participants were asked to complete a flu-like symptom questionnaire at screening, study baseline, and at all subsequent scheduled visits. The yes/no questionnaire evaluated the incidence of headache, fever, myalgia, and chills. If a participant answered yes to the question Has the patient experienced any flu-like symptoms since the last visit? all among headache, fever, muscle aches (myalgia), and chills that applied were to be marked. If any of the experienced symptoms was newly reported or had worsened, a corresponding adverse event was to be reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted from 29 Jan 2003 to 24 Mar 2006 across 14 centers in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 80 participants (40 non-tolerators and 40 non-responders) were planned; however, 57 participants were enrolled only after receiving 12 weeks of PEG-Intron plus ribavirin therapy and received the study medication (25 non-tolerators and 32 non-responders).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Non-Responders
Participants received Pegasys 180 µg subcutaneously (SC) once a week and ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day (\< or \>=75 kg body weight, respectively), orally in divided doses for 60 weeks.
32
Non-Tolerators
Participants received Pegasys 180 µg subcutaneously (SC) once a week and ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day (\< or \>=75 kg body weight, respectively) orally in divided doses for 36 weeks.
25
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event40
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy241
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-RespondersNon-ToleratorsTotal
Age, Continuous47.0 years49.0 years49.0 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants7 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants18 Participants35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 3223 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 321 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Pegasys and Ribavirin Therapy Completers

Therapy completers were defined as all participants who had demonstrable viremia after 12 weeks of Pegasys plus ribavirin therapy (who were to be discontinued for lack of efficacy), non-tolerators who completed 36 weeks of Pegasys plus ribavirin therapy, and non-responders who completed 60 weeks of Pegasys plus ribavirin therapy. Study completers included all participants who completed the planned treatment period (36 weeks for non-tolerators and 60 weeks for non-responders) and the 24-week treatment-free follow-up period and participants in either group who were prematurely discontinued per protocol due to insufficient therapeutic response at Week 12.

Time frame: 36 weeks for Non-Tolerators and 60 weeks for Non-Responders

Population: Safety Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication (Pegasys or ribavirin) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment which defined as clinical adverse event, laboratory or vital sign data, physical examination finding, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), or Fatigue severity score (FSS).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-RespondersNumber of Pegasys and Ribavirin Therapy CompletersCompleting 60 weeks2 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Pegasys and Ribavirin Therapy CompletersCompleting 36 weeks3 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Pegasys and Ribavirin Therapy CompletersCompleting 36 weeks23 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Pegasys and Ribavirin Therapy CompletersCompleting 60 weeks23 Participants
Secondary

Mean Score for Overall Local Injection Site Reaction

Local injection-site reactions were to be given an overall assessment based on pain or discomfort as Grade 0 for no pain or discomfort, Grade 1 for mild tenderness at the injection site, Grade 2 for moderate pain without limitation of usual activities, Grade 3 for severe pain requiring prescription non-topical analgesics or limiting usual activities, Grade 4 for a reaction that resulted in a new hospitalization, prolongation of hospitalization, death, or a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was life threatening or medically significant. Adverse events related to the injection site (injection site erythema, hematoma, pain, rash, or reaction) were reported. All of these events were reported as resolved without sequelae.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60

Population: Safety Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment (a clinical adverse event, laboratory, vital sign, or physical examination finding, BDI-II score, or FSS score). 'n' = number of participants available at the time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-RespondersMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 12, (n = 27, 24)0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Non-RespondersMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 36, (n = 3, 19)0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Non-RespondersMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 4, (n = 31, 24)0.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Non-RespondersMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 48, n = (2, 0)0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Non-RespondersMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 24, (n = 2, 23)0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Non-RespondersMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 60, n = (2, 0)0.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Non-RespondersMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionBaseline, (n = 32, 25)0.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Non-ToleratorsMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 60, n = (2, 0)NA Units on a scale
Non-ToleratorsMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionBaseline, (n = 32, 25)0.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Non-ToleratorsMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 4, (n = 31, 24)0.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Non-ToleratorsMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 12, (n = 27, 24)0.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Non-ToleratorsMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 24, (n = 2, 23)0.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Non-ToleratorsMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 36, (n = 3, 19)0.05 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
Non-ToleratorsMean Score for Overall Local Injection Site ReactionWeek 48, n = (2, 0)NA Units on a scale
Secondary

Mean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over Time

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a questionnaire with groups of statements in which the patient is asked to select the statement that most clearly describes the way he/she has felt in the past two weeks, including today. The score for each group is tallied and the ranges of scores are used as guidelines for measuring the degree of depression. For this study, scores are defined as follows: 0 to 15 as minimal, 16 to 21 as mild, 22 to 30 as moderate, and 31 to 63 as severe. The questionnaire was in two areas (changes in sleeping pattern and changes in appetite), selections 1, 2, and 3 contained options for both more and less with respect to the area of interest. Four statements (labelled 0, 1, 2, and 3) were offered that described the area of interest, with 0 indicating no effect and 3 indicating the worst effect. The individual area scores were summed to provide a total score.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84

Population: Safety Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment (a clinical adverse event, laboratory or vital sign data, physical examination finding, BDI-II score, or FSS score). n = number of participants available at the particular time for assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeBaseline, (n = 32, 25)10.93 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.32
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 4, (n = 31, 24)9.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.34
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 12, (n = 27, 24)8.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.74
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 24, (n = 2, 23)3.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 36, (n = 3, 19)5.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.83
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 48, (n = 2, 21)6.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 60, (n = 2, 21)3.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.24
Non-RespondersMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 84, (n = 2, 0)1.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 84, (n = 2, 0)NA Units on a scale
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeBaseline, (n = 32, 25)15.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.56
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 36, (n = 3, 19)8.65 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.73
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 4, (n = 31, 24)10.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.64
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 60, (n = 2, 21)3.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 12, (n = 27, 24)10.76 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.97
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 48, (n = 2, 21)4.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.54
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Beck Depression Inventory Over TimeWeek 24, (n = 2, 23)11.26 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Secondary

Mean Score of Fatigue Severity Over Time

The Fatigue severity score (FSS) scale has a series of questions designed to assess tiredness, lack of energy, or total body give-out. Participants were to react to nine statements regarding fatigue over the previous 2 weeks, each on a scale (1 = completely agree, 7 = completely disagree). The FSS is the average of the scores on the 9 questions; ranging from 1-7, with lower scores indicating less fatigue. In addition, participants were to react to how much fatigue they had in the past 2 or 4 weeks by marking on a visual analogue scale labelled at one end with no fatigue ('0' being the best) and at the other end with greater fatigue ('100' being the worst). Longer distance on the scale from no fatigue indicated greater fatigue. FSS values are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84

Population: Safety Population included all the enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment (a clinical adverse event, laboratory or vital sign data, physical examination finding, or FSS score). n = number of participants available at the particular time for assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Baseline, (n = 32, 25)4.66 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 4, (n = 31, 24)4.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 12, (n = 27, 24)4.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 24, (n = 2, 23)1.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 36,(n = 3, 19)2.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 48, (n = 2, 21)2.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 60, (n = 2, 20)2.44 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 84, (n = 2, 0)1.61 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Baseline, (n = 32, 25)48.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.64
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 4, (n = 31, 24)47.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.67
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 12, (n = 27, 24)52.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.52
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 24, (n = 2, 23)54.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.09
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 36, (n = 3, 19)47.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.65
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 48, (n = 2, 21)26.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 60, (n = 2, 2031.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Non-RespondersMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 84, (n = 2, 0)21.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.26
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 84, (n = 2, 0)NA Units on a scale
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Baseline, (n = 32, 25)5.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Baseline, (n = 32, 25)61.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.38
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 4, (n = 31, 24)4.50 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 36, (n = 3, 19)48.79 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.09
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 12, (n = 27, 24)4.72 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 4, (n = 31, 24)52.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.92
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 24, (n = 2, 23)4.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 60, (n = 2, 2031.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.45
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 36,(n = 3, 19)4.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 12, (n = 27, 24)55.00 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.96
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 48, (n = 2, 21)3.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 48, (n = 2, 21)25.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.27
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 60, (n = 2, 20)2.97 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeVisual analog based FSS, Week 24, (n = 2, 23)56.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.7
Non-ToleratorsMean Score of Fatigue Severity Over TimeTotal FSS, Week 84, (n = 2, 0)NA Units on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over Time

Sustained virological response (SVR) is defined as undetectable Hepatitis C virus-ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA)(\<60 International units per milliliter) or HCV RNA for \>=2-log10 decrease in viral titre, 24 weeks after the end of treatment. A participant was classified as non-responder (SVR not achieved) if HCV RNA was detectable at the completion of antiviral treatment, at Week 24 post or at any time between Week 24 and completion of antiviral treatment. HCV RNA measured prior to or on the date of the first dose of Pegasys plus ribavirin was used as the baseline in all HCV RNA analyses.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication (Pegasys or ribavirin).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 241 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 481 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 41 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 602 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 362 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 841 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 124 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 840 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 1224 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 416 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 2421 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 3621 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 4811 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With >=2-log10 Decrease or Undetectable (<60 International Units Per Milliliter) Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic Acid Over TimeWeek 6014 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs

Abnormal vital signs were defined as 1. Systolic blood pressure (BP) below 85 mm Hg or above 180 mm Hg with a change from baseline of \> 20% 2. Diastolic BP above 110 mm Hg with a change from baseline of \> 20% where systolic and diastolic BP were pressure exerted by blood on the walls of blood vessels during left ventricular systole and diastole respectively. 3. Pulse rate below 50 beats per minute and above 120 beats per minute, with a change from baseline of \> 20%, where pulse represents the palpation of heartbeat

Time frame: From screening (Day -21 to Day -1) to Week 84

Population: Safety Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication (Pegasys or ribavirin) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment (defined as clinical adverse event, laboratory or vital sign data, physical examination finding, BDI-II score, or FSS score).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic BP high1 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic BP low1 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse-low0 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic BP high0 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsSystolic BP low0 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital SignsPulse-low1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Individual Flu-like Symptom

Participants were asked to complete a flu-like symptom questionnaire at screening, study baseline, and at all subsequent scheduled visits. The yes/no questionnaire evaluated the incidence of headache, fever, myalgia, and chills. If a participant answered yes to the question Has the patient experienced any flu-like symptoms since the last visit? all among headache, fever, muscle aches (myalgia), and chills that applied were to be marked. If any of the experienced symptoms was newly reported or had worsened, a corresponding adverse event was to be reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 12, 36, 60 and 84

Population: Safety Population included all the enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment (a clinical adverse event, laboratory or vital sign data, physical examination data, BDI-II score, or FSS score). n = number of participants available at the particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Headache, (n = 32, 25)16 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Fever, (n = 32, 25)10 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Muscle aches, (n = 32, 25)17 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Chills, (n = 32, 25)12 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Headache, (n = 27, 24)13 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Fever, (n = 27, 24)3 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Muscle aches, (n = 27, 24)8 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Chills, (n = 27, 24)2 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Headache, (n = 3, 19)2 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Fever, (n = 3, 19)1 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Muscle aches, (n = 3, 19)1 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Chills, (n = 3, 19)1 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Headache, (n = 2, 22)0 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Fever, (n = 2, 22)0 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Muscle aches, (n = 2, 22)0 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Chills, (n = 2, 22)0 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Headache, (n = 32, 25)19 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Fever, (n = 32, 25)10 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Muscle aches, (n = 32, 25)18 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Chills, (n = 32, 25)9 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Fever, (n = 32, 25)14 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Headache, (n = 32, 25)19 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Muscle aches, (n = 3, 19)8 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Fever, (n = 32, 25)14 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Chills, (n = 2, 22)1 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Muscle aches, (n = 32, 25)21 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Chills, (n = 3, 19)7 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomBaseline, Chills, (n = 32, 25)17 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Chills, (n = 32, 25)15 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Headache, (n = 27, 24)13 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Headache, (n = 2, 22)1 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Fever, (n = 27, 24)5 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Headache, (n = 32, 25)18 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Muscle aches, (n = 27, 24)10 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Fever, (n = 2, 22)0 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 12, Chills, (n = 27, 24)5 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 84, Muscle aches, (n = 32, 25)19 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Headache, (n = 3, 19)10 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 60, Muscle aches, (n = 2, 22)2 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Individual Flu-like SymptomWeek 36, Fever, (n = 3, 19)3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

Analysis was performed for hematology, clinical chemistry, thyroid function, and urinalysis. Normal ranges of the parameters were: Haematocrit (fraction): 0.37 - 0.49, Haemoglobin (g/L): 130 - 180 , Platelets (G/L): 150 - 350, White blood cell (G/L): 4.5 - 11.0, Lymphocytes (G/L): 1.00 - 4.80, Neutrophils (G/L): 1.80 - 7.70, Prothrombin Time in Seconds (sec): not defined, Prothrombin Time, normalized (ratio): 0.70 - 1.30, Partial thromboplastin Time (sec): 22.1 - 34.1, Aspartate transaminase (AST) or serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) in IU/L: 0 - 40, Alkaline Phosphatase (IU/L): 0 - 115, ALT or serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) in (IU/L): 0-55, Total Bilirubin (umol/L): 0 -17, Thyroxine (T4) (nmol/L): 58 -140, Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, \[U/mL\]): 0.0 - 5.0, Triglycerides (mmol/L): 0.45 - 1.69, Phosphate (mmol/L): 0.84 - 1.45, Uric Acid (umol/L): 214 - 506

Time frame: Up to Week 84

Population: Safety Population included all the enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment (a clinical adverse event, laboratory, vital sign, or physical examination finding, BDI-II score, or FSS score). 'n' = number of participants available at the time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTriglycerides - High (n = 32, 25)10 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit (fraction) - Low (n = 32, 25)5 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin-Low (n = 32, 25)5 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets - Low (n = 32, 25)6 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC (White blood cells)-High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC (White blood cells) - Low (n = 32, 25)11 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes - Low (n = 32, 25)6 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils - High (n = 32, 25)3 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils - Low (n = 32, 25)19 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPartial thromboplastin Time - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesProthrombin time - High (n = 32, 25)0 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT - High (n = 32, 25)14 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGPT - High (n = 32, 25)9 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline phosphatase - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate - Low (n = 32, 25)2 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesUric acid - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesThyroid-T4 - High (n = 32, 25)6 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesThyroid T4 - Low (n = 32, 25)2 participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTSH - High (n = 32, 25)3 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate - Low (n = 32, 25)3 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesProthrombin time - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit (fraction) - Low (n = 32, 25)3 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTSH - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin-Low (n = 32, 25)6 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGOT - High (n = 32, 25)8 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets - Low (n = 32, 25)3 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesUric acid - High (n = 32, 25)0 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC (White blood cells)-High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSGPT - High (n = 32, 25)9 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC (White blood cells) - Low (n = 32, 25)13 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesTriglycerides - High (n = 32, 25)9 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes - High (n = 32, 25)0 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline phosphatase - High (n = 32, 25)0 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes - Low (n = 32, 25)5 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesThyroid T4 - Low (n = 32, 25)0 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils - Low (n = 32, 25)20 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesThyroid-T4 - High (n = 32, 25)0 participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPartial thromboplastin Time - High (n = 32, 25)1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over Time

The number of participants with serum alanine transaminase (ALT) concentration within the normal range at each time point assessed. Upper limit of normal serum ALT for men is 43 International units per liter (IU/L) and for women is 34 IU/L.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 84

Population: ITT Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication (Pegasys or ribavirin).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 246 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 418 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 363 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeBaseline21 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 601 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 129 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 841 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 483 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 840 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeBaseline21 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 419 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 1219 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 2416 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 4814 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 6015 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Normal Serum Alanine Transaminase Levels Over TimeWeek 3615 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were also to be reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: Up to Week 84

Population: Safety Population included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication (Pegasys or ribavirin) and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment (defined as clinical adverse event, laboratory or vital sign data, physical examination finding, BDI-II score, or FSS score).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Eventsany SAE1 Participants
Non-RespondersNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Eventsany AE29 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Eventsany SAE1 Participants
Non-ToleratorsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Eventsany AE23 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026