Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Eflornithine and Bicalutamide Compared With Eflornithine Alone, Bicalutamide Alone, and No Neoadjuvant Therapy in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Brachytherapy or Radical Prostatectomy

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase IIb Clinical Trial of 2-Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) Versus Bicalutamide (CASODEX) Alone and in Combination in Patients With Prostate Cancer in the Period Prior to Radical Prostatectomy or Brachytherapy: Modulation of Tissue and Molecular Biomarkers in Human Prostate Tissue Serum

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00086736
Enrollment
34
Registered
2004-07-12
Start date
2001-11-30
Completion date
2003-11-30
Last updated
2013-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

stage I prostate cancer, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as eflornithine, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Androgens can stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Drugs used in hormone therapy, such as bicalutamide, may fight prostate cancer by stopping the adrenal glands from producing androgens. Combining eflornithine with bicalutamide may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant eflornithine and bicalutamide with that of eflornithine alone, bicalutamide alone, and no neoadjuvant therapy in treating patients who are undergoing brachytherapy or radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Compare levels of polyamine spermine, polyamine putrescine, and spermidine in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy or radical prostatectomy and treated with neoadjuvant eflornithine and bicalutamide vs eflornithine alone vs bicalutamide alone vs no neoadjuvant therapy. * Compare the expression of surrogate biomarkers (i.e., serum prostate-specific antigen, tissue levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki67, and TGF-alpha, apoptosis assays \[ICH-PARP and TUNEL\], and cytomorphometric indices) in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients are stratified according to Gleason score (\< 7 vs ≥ 7). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive oral eflornithine and oral bicalutamide once daily. * Arm II: Patients receive oral eflornithine and oral bicalutamide placebo once daily. * Arm III: Patients receive oral eflornithine placebo and oral bicalutamide once daily. * Arm IV: Patients receive oral eflornithine placebo and oral bicalutamide placebo once daily. In all arms, treatment continues for 28 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients then undergo either prostatectomy or brachytherapy, as determined by the patient, on day 29. Patients are followed at 4 weeks. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 44 patients (11 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 11 months.

Interventions

DRUGbicalutamide
DRUGoral eflornithine placebo
DRUGoral bicalutamide placebo

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed prostate cancer * Localized disease * Paraffin blocks from diagnostic biopsies available * Planning to undergo brachytherapy or prostatectomy PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age * 18 and over Performance status * ECOG 0-3 Life expectancy * Not specified Hematopoietic * Hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL * WBC ≥ 3,500/mm\^3 * Platelet count ≥ 125,000/mm\^3 Hepatic * Bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL * SGOT and SGPT ≤ 2 times normal * No history of liver disease (e.g., hepatitis, cirrhosis, or jaundice) Renal * Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL Cardiovascular * No symptomatic coronary artery disease * No uncontrolled hypertension * No acute myocardial infarction within the past year Other * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * No more than 10 decibels baseline hearing loss at any frequency by full bilateral audiometry within the past month * No hypersensitivity to eflornithine or bicalutamide * No other prior or active malignancy except nonmelanoma skin cancer or other cancer curatively treated at least 5 years ago with no evidence of recurrent or residual disease * No concurrent acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition that would preclude study participation PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy * No concurrent immunotherapy Chemotherapy * No other concurrent chemotherapy Endocrine therapy * More than 1 year since prior antiandrogen, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist, bicalutamide, finasteride, or diethylstilbestrol * No other concurrent antiandrogen, LHRH agonist, finasteride, or diethylstilbestrol Radiotherapy * See Disease Characteristics * No other concurrent radiotherapy Surgery * See Disease Characteristics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean difference in levels of Polyamine spermine, polyamine putrescine, and spermidine between subjects in each of the 4 groups4 weeks after surgical intervention

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026