Skip to content

Study Comparing Risperidone vs Placebo as add-on Therapy in Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder Who Are Sub-optimally Responding to Standard Therapy.

A Double-blind, Randomized, Prospective Study to Evaluate Adjunctive Risperidone Versus Adjunctive Placebo in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Sub-optimally Responsive to Standard Psychotropic Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00086112
Enrollment
301
Registered
2004-06-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2012-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Disorders

Keywords

Anxiety, antipsychotic

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of risperidone as an adjunctive treatment in patients with GAD who demonstrate a less-than-optimal response to their current anxiolytic treatment.

Detailed description

Many patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) do not benefit or show only partial benefit from current psychotropic therapies. This trial was conducted for the purpose of determining the effectiveness of risperidone as an adjunctive treatment in patients with GAD who demonstrate a less-than-optimal response to their current anxiolytic treatment (either allowed antidepressants, benzodiazepines, or buspirone, or combination). Patients were randomized (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance) to either risperidone or placebo for 4 - 6 weeks of double-blind (neither the patient nor the physician knows whether drug or placebo is being taken, or at what dosage) treatment. Patients randomized to risperidone continued on their current anxiolytic treatment (treatment for anxiety) and received risperidone 0.25 mg per day for the first 3 days, 0.5 mg per day for days 4 through 14, and 1 mg per day for days 15 through 28 of the trial. If clinically indicated, on day 29, the dose could be increased to 2 mg per day for the rest of the trial (4 to 6 additional weeks). At each dose level, risperidone was taken by mouth in a single daily dose. Patients were asked questions every one or two weeks, depending on the phase of the trial, to determine efficacy (effectiveness) and safety. The study hypothesis is that risperidone will be more effective as an adjunct to standard psychotropic treatments for symptoms of Generalized Anxiety Disorder than placebo, as measured by a composite of the four most troubling symptoms identified at baseline. Risperidone 0.25 mg per day for the first 3 days, 0.5 mg per day for days 4 through 14, and 1 mg per day for days 15 through 28 of the trial. If clinically indicated, on day 29, the dose could be increased to 2 mg per day for the rest of the trial (4 to 6 additional weeks). At each dose level, risperidone was taken by mouth in a single daily dose.

Interventions

DRUGrisperidone oral tablets

Sponsors

Janssen, LP
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy on the basis of physical exam * Treatment with one or more allowed antidepressants and/or anxiety medications for at least the past 8 weeks * Judgement of the clinician that the patient has shown a sub-optimal response to this treatment * Current diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder * Maintained on a stable, therapeutic dose(s) of the allowed medication(s) for at least the past four weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other serious medical illnesses * Active use of cocaine or heroin * History of suicide attempt in past 12 months * Changes to antidepressant/anti-anxiety regimen (medication or dose) within the four weeks preceding study baseline (Day 1) * History of clozapine use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in a composite self-rating of the four most troubling symptoms identified at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline and actual values for other efficacy variables (HAM-A, PGIS, CGI-S, SDS, and Q-LES-Q; safety assessment through adverse event reports, laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and concomitant medications.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026