Skip to content

Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Medulloblastoma, Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor, or Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor

Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Medulloblastoma, Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor, or Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00085202
Enrollment
416
Registered
2004-06-11
Start date
2003-08-31
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2024-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors

Keywords

untreated childhood medulloblastoma, untreated childhood supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, childhood atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, untreated childhood pineoblastoma

Brief summary

Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. Autologous stem cell transplant may be able to replace blood-forming cells that were destroyed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy. It is not yet known which radiation therapy regimen combined with chemotherapy and donor stem cell transplant is more effective in treating medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. This phase III trial is studying two different regimens of radiation therapy when given together with chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant to see how well they work in treating patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: * To assess the relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival probability for patients with medulloblastoma. * To estimate the frequency of mutations associated with SHH and WNT tumors (as defined by gene expression profiling) via targeted sequencing performed in an independent cohort of WNT and SHH tumors (also defined by gene expression profiling).

Detailed description

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: * To compare the effects of a computer-based training system specifically targeting language, reading, and learning skills (Fast ForWord, Scientific Learning Corporation) with the current standard of care on reading decoding skills as measured by individual academic testing. * To monitor for treatment failure in the posterior fossa of patients whose tumor bed receives a reduced volume of radiation. * To correlate radiation dosimetry of target and normal tissues with rate and patterns of failure and longitudinal measures of audiometric, endocrine and cognitive effects. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: * To estimate the change in neuropsychological performance from the neuropsychology assessment battery (intellect, academic achievement and cognitive ability) and examine the relationship of these changes to risk group, age at diagnosis, and parent measures. * To evaluate the differences between neurotoxicity in the average-risk patient group with that in the high-risk group through qMRI, and fMRI. * To develop or refine novel models relating impact of medulloblastoma therapy on neurocognitive performance to quantitative and functional neuroimaging measures. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease risk (high-risk disease vs average-risk disease). Patients in both strata undergo peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow harvest. * Stratum 1 (high-risk group): * Radiotherapy: Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. * High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT): Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy comprising vincristine IV followed by cisplatin IV over 6 hours on day -4 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days -3 and -2. Patients undergo autologous SCT on day 0. Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 1 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients receive vincristine IV on day 6. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. * Stratum 2 (average-risk group): * Radiotherapy: Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. * High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT: Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1. Some patients undergo a neuropsychology assessment at baseline, before chemotherapy, and then annually for 5 years. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 3 months until month 30 (2.5 years) after diagnosis and then every 6 months until month 72 (6 years) after diagnosis.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALfilgrastim

Given subcutaneously

DRUGcisplatin

Given IV

DRUGcyclophosphamide

Given IV

DRUGvincristine

Given IV

PROCEDUREautologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

RADIATIONradiation therapy

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks.

Sponsors

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed diagnosis of 1 of the following: * Medulloblastoma * Supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) * PNET variants (ependymoblastoma, pineoblastoma, CNS neuroblastoma) * Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) * Definitive surgery for CNS tumor within the past 31 days * Meets one of the following risk criteria: * Average-risk disease * Localized disease with no overt evidence of invasion beyond the posterior fossa (or supratentorial compartment for PNET or ATRT) by intraoperative observations of the neurosurgeon AND postoperative CT scan or MRI * T4 disease eligible if all of the following are true: * Gross total resection determined by intraoperative observations of the neurosurgeon AND postoperative CT scan or MRI * Residual tumor or imaging abnormality whose size is \< 1.5 cm\^2 * No evidence of CNS or extraneural metastasis by MRI of the spine (with and without contrast agent) or CT-based myelogram AND by cytologic examination of the lumbar cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) 14-28 days after surgery * Brain stem invasion allowed in the absence of residual tumor (tumor \< 1.5 cm\^2 by imaging) * High-risk disease meeting one of the following criteria: * Metastatic disease within the neuraxis (i.e., evidence of subarachnoid dissemination by imaging and/or cytologic examination of CSF) * Presence of residual disease \> 1.5 cm\^2 at the primary site after surgery PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age * 3 to 21 at diagnosis Performance status * Lansky 30-100% (\< 10 years old) * Karnofsky 30-100% (≥ 10 years old) (except for posterior fossa syndrome) Life expectancy * Not specified Hematopoietic * Hemoglobin \> 8 g/dL * WBC \> 2,000/mm\^3 * Absolute neutrophil count \> 500/mm\^3 * Platelet count \> 50,000/mm\^3 Hepatic * ALT \< 5 times normal * Bilirubin \< 3.0 mg/dL Renal * Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL OR * Creatinine clearance \> 70 mL/min Other * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy * Not specified Chemotherapy * No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy * Prior corticosteroid therapy allowed Radiotherapy * No prior radiotherapy Surgery * See Disease Characteristics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive Tumors2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participantsThe relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival was assessed in 122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and with ERBB2 protein assessments. If the ERBB2 value was greater than zero, the ERBB2 was defined as positive for the participant. If the ERBB2 value was zero, the ERBB2 was defined as negative. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma were grouped by ERBB2 positive/negative assessment and risk group into 4 groups. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.
Frequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT Tumorswithin 3.5 years following completion of accrualThe frequency of mutations for the main genes associated with SHH and WNT tumors identified via targeted sequencing based on formalin fixed paraffin embedded material is provided.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After EnrollmentAt 5 years after enrollmentAssessment of associative memory at 5 years after enrollment. Assessment of associative memory score at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.
Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at EnrollmentAt enrollmentAssessment of Processing Speed at enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.
Reading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups5 years postdiagnosisSOC is standard-of-Care control group. Patients randomly assigned to the control group received the current standard of care. RI is Reading Intervention Group. Patients randomly assigned to Reading Intervention Group which is with The Fast ForWord program. Assessment of reading decoding was completed using the Woodcock Johnson, Third Edition (WJIII) Tests of Achievement (Woodcock, McGraw, & Mather, 2001), with particular attention given to the reading and reading-related abilities. Two subtests were completed: (1) Letter-Word Identification, and (2) Word Attack, a test requiring the patient to read phonologically regular nonwords. The combination of these two subtests provided a standardized composite score of overall reading decoding ability with a population mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Scores of 90-110 are considered to be in the average range, while those 80-89 are considered low-average (refer: Journal of Pediatric Psychology 39(4) pp. 450-458, 2014).
Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at EnrollmentAt enrollmentAssessment of Perceptual Speed at enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.
Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After EnrollmentAt 5 years after enrollmentAssessment of Perceptual Speed at 5 years after enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.
Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After EnrollmentAt 5 years after enrollmentAssessment of Processing Speed at 5 years after enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.
Number of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior FossaAnnually for 6 years post irradiationTo monitor for treatment failure in the posterior fossa of patients whose tumor bed receives a reduced volume of radiation.
Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at EnrollmentAt enrollmentAssessment of associative memory at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

416 participants were enrolled between 9/9/2003 and 3/7/2013.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 416 participants enrolled, three were ineligible and taken off study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Average-Risk Group
Participants assigned to the average-risk arm had localized tumor without overt evidence of invasion beyond the posterior fossa (or supratentorial compartment for PNET's/ATRT). Participants with T4 disease met the following criteria: gross total resection defined as residual tumor or imaging abnormality whose size was \<1.5 cm\^2 on postoperative CT or MR images, no evidence of CNS or extraneural metastasis, and brain stem invasion by the tumor in the absence of imaging evidence of residual tumor (tumor size \<1.5 cm\^2).
269
High-Risk Group
Participants assigned to the high-risk arm were determined to have the presence of metastatic disease within the neuraxis (i.e., evidence of subarachnoid dissemination), OR presence of residual disease (≥1.5 cm\^2) at the primary site after surgery.
144
Total413

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyBone involvement confirmed by bone scan01
Overall StudyExcessive toxicity65
Overall StudyNon-specified35
Overall StudyPhysician Decision41
Overall StudyProgressive disease111
Overall StudyStill on therapy20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAverage-Risk GroupHigh-Risk GroupTotal
Age, Continuous8.42 years7.87 years8.33 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
105 Participants56 Participants161 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
164 Participants88 Participants252 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
236 / 269118 / 144
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 26917 / 144

Outcome results

Primary

Frequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT Tumors

The frequency of mutations for the main genes associated with SHH and WNT tumors identified via targeted sequencing based on formalin fixed paraffin embedded material is provided.

Time frame: within 3.5 years following completion of accrual

Population: Only patients with WNT and SHH tumors with available tissue for targeted sequencing were analyzed for frequency of mutation. WNT and SHH subgroups were identified by methylation profiling.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU2 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A0 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC0 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI20 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID20 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP1 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE13 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA20 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA0 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D2 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM0 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB10 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW70 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH17 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA70 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C0 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X0 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN0 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP530 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA40 Participants
Overall StudyFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF40 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN0 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D2 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA40 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP530 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A1 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU0 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH10 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI20 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB10 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP2 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA0 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C1 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE10 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA20 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID20 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA71 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF40 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X0 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM0 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC0 Participants
Average-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW70 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE10 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB10 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA40 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH10 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA21 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID20 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP530 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI20 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF40 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA70 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C0 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW70 Participants
High-Risk GroupFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA20 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI20 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP530 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF40 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA70 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID20 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH10 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE10 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA40 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB10 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A0 Participants
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW70 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE10 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW71 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI20 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB11 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID20 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP535 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH14 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM1 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA40 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF41 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA20 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA70 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X3 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C2 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA2 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A1 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN3 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA1 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB118 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X7 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH10 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP533 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP1 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI21 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF40 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C1 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW74 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE10 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA44 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA70 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID21 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV SomaticFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA20 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP530 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE10 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW70 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF40 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA70 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI20 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH10 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA20 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID20 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A0 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA40 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB10 Participants
SHH Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID20 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPIK3CA0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGSE10 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSUFU0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsFBXW70 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsARID1A0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2C0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsKMT2D0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsSMARCA40 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsAPC1 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsDDX3X0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTEN0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCTNNB10 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTCF40 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsPTCH10 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsATM0 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsTP530 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsEPHA70 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsGLI20 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsBRCA20 Participants
WNT Pathway - SNV GermlineFrequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT TumorsCREBBP0 Participants
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.

122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma were grouped by ERBB2 positive/negative assessment and risk group into 4 groups. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

Time frame: 2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants

Population: Analysis was completed for the first 122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and with fresh tissue and ERBB2 protein assessments. Participants with a diagnosis of PNET, PNET variants, or ATRT were not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Overall StudyProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.83.3 probability of PFS at 2 years
Average-Risk GroupProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.69.6 probability of PFS at 2 years
High-Risk GroupProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.93.5 probability of PFS at 2 years
ERBB2 Negative & High RiskProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.71.4 probability of PFS at 2 years
p-value: 0.0206Log Rank
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive Tumors

The relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival was assessed in 122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and with ERBB2 protein assessments. If the ERBB2 value was greater than zero, the ERBB2 was defined as positive for the participant. If the ERBB2 value was zero, the ERBB2 was defined as negative. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

Time frame: 2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants

Population: Analysis included the first 122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and with fresh tissue and ERBB2 protein assessments. Participants with a diagnosis of PNET, PNET variants, or ATRT were not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Overall StudyProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive TumorsPositive ERBB279.2 probability of PFS at 2 years
Overall StudyProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive TumorsNegative ERBB286.7 probability of PFS at 2 years
Average-Risk GroupProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive TumorsPositive ERBB283.3 probability of PFS at 2 years
Average-Risk GroupProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive TumorsNegative ERBB293.5 probability of PFS at 2 years
High-Risk GroupProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive TumorsPositive ERBB269.6 probability of PFS at 2 years
High-Risk GroupProgression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive TumorsNegative ERBB271.4 probability of PFS at 2 years
p-value: 0.8001Log Rank
p-value: 0.5195Log Rank
p-value: 0.7696Log Rank
Secondary

Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

Assessment of associative memory at 5 years after enrollment. Assessment of associative memory score at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame: At 5 years after enrollment

Population: Children with medulloblastoma who were age 3-21 years at diagnosis and were enrolled on SJMB03 at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. Patients were excluded if the cumulative RT plan (Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) and boost) could not be retrieved; if the baseline preRT Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) scan was of poor quality, preventing delineation of brain substructures; or if the patient had completed fewer than two specific neurocognitive evaluations for this objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall StudyAssociative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment98.73 score on a scaleStandard Error 16.94
Average-Risk GroupAssociative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment93.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 13.7
Secondary

Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

Assessment of associative memory at enrollment. Associate memory score is a representative measurement of learning and recalling pictograph representations of words. It measures associative memory (Long-Term Retrieval). Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame: At enrollment

Population: Children with medulloblastoma who were age 3-21 years at diagnosis and were enrolled on SJMB03 at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. Patients were excluded if the cumulative RT plan (Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) and boost) could not be retrieved; if the baseline preRT Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) scan was of poor quality, preventing delineation of brain substructures ; or if the patient had completed fewer than two specific neurocognitive evaluations for this objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall StudyAssociative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment93.61 score on a scaleStandard Error 22.25
Average-Risk GroupAssociative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment98.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 18.56
Secondary

Number of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior Fossa

To monitor for treatment failure in the posterior fossa of patients whose tumor bed receives a reduced volume of radiation.

Time frame: Annually for 6 years post irradiation

Population: Analysis included 100 average risk participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma who had cumulative radiotherapy dose profiles and treatment failure volumes data available. All participants included in analysis who were still at risk and on-study were followed for a minimum of 6 years. Participants with a diagnosis of PNET, PNET variants, or ATRT were not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Overall StudyNumber of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior Fossa6 Participants
Secondary

Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

Assessment of Perceptual Speed at 5 years after enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame: At 5 years after enrollment

Population: Children with medulloblastoma who were age 3-21 years at diagnosis and were enrolled on SJMB03 at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. Patients were excluded if the cumulative RT plan (Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) and boost) could not be retrieved; if the baseline preRT Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) scan was of poor quality, preventing delineation of brain substructures; or if the patient had completed fewer than two specific neurocognitive evaluations for this objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall StudyPerceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment78.68 score on a scaleStandard Error 21.58
Average-Risk GroupPerceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment72.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 27.32
Secondary

Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

Assessment of Perceptual Speed at enrollment. It measures rapidly locating and circling identical numbers from a set of numbers which reflects perceptual speed. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame: At enrollment

Population: Children with medulloblastoma who were age 3-21 years at diagnosis and were enrolled on SJMB03 at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. Patients were excluded if the cumulative RT plan (Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) and boost) could not be retrieved; if the baseline preRT Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) scan was of poor quality, preventing delineation of brain substructures; or if the patient had completed fewer than two specific neurocognitive evaluations for this objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall StudyPerceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment82.06 score on a scaleStandard Error 19.99
Average-Risk GroupPerceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment90.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 18.23
Secondary

Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment

Assessment of Processing Speed at 5 years after enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame: At 5 years after enrollment

Population: Children with medulloblastoma who were age 3-21 years at diagnosis and were enrolled on SJMB03 at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. Patients were excluded if the cumulative RT plan (Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) and boost) could not be retrieved; if the baseline preRT Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) scan was of poor quality, preventing delineation of brain substructures; or if the patient had completed fewer than two specific neurocognitive evaluations for this objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall StudyProcessing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment84.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 24.36
Average-Risk GroupProcessing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment75.71 score on a scaleStandard Error 25.71
Secondary

Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment

Assessment of Processing Speed at enrollment. This score measure of Processing Speed based on Visual Matching and Decision Speed tests. Mean=100, SD=15, Average Range 85-115. Higher is better.

Time frame: At enrollment

Population: Children with medulloblastoma who were age 3-21 years at diagnosis and were enrolled on SJMB03 at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. Patients were excluded if the cumulative RT plan (Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) and boost) could not be retrieved; if the baseline preRT Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) scan was of poor quality, preventing delineation of brain substructures; or if the patient had completed fewer than two specific neurocognitive evaluations for this objective.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall StudyProcessing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment83.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 18.53
Average-Risk GroupProcessing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment87.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 19.73
Secondary

Reading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups

SOC is standard-of-Care control group. Patients randomly assigned to the control group received the current standard of care. RI is Reading Intervention Group. Patients randomly assigned to Reading Intervention Group which is with The Fast ForWord program. Assessment of reading decoding was completed using the Woodcock Johnson, Third Edition (WJIII) Tests of Achievement (Woodcock, McGraw, & Mather, 2001), with particular attention given to the reading and reading-related abilities. Two subtests were completed: (1) Letter-Word Identification, and (2) Word Attack, a test requiring the patient to read phonologically regular nonwords. The combination of these two subtests provided a standardized composite score of overall reading decoding ability with a population mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Scores of 90-110 are considered to be in the average range, while those 80-89 are considered low-average (refer: Journal of Pediatric Psychology 39(4) pp. 450-458, 2014).

Time frame: 5 years postdiagnosis

Population: Of the 126 MB patients enrolled, 41 were not eligible. This left 85 patients considered eligible for the randomization study. Of the 85 eligible patients,81 were randomized to either SOC (n= 38) or to RI (n =43). The parents of only four patients did not consent to the intervention study. Two patients randomized to the RI group, and four patients in the SOC group, were excluded due to having only a single assessment, which resulted in 75 patients (RI=41, SOC=34) over a 5-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Overall StudyReading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care GroupsBaseline104.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.902
Overall StudyReading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care GroupsChange over time-1.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4849
Average-Risk GroupReading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care GroupsBaseline102.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.604
Average-Risk GroupReading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care GroupsChange over time-1.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4883
Comparison: Change over timep-value: 0.6231t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Baselinep-value: 0.572t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026