Skip to content

Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer

A Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00079274
Enrollment
3397
Registered
2004-03-10
Start date
2004-02-01
Completion date
2012-11-01
Last updated
2026-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenocarcinoma of the Colon, Stage III Colon Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized phase III trial was originally designed to compare three different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work. As of September 1, 2004, the study was expanded to a total of 6 arms (the original 3 arms (A, B, C) and 3 additional arms which were the same as the first 3 but with cetuximab) in treating patients who have undergone surgery for stage III colon cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan hydrochloride, fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with monoclonal antibody therapy and giving them after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells. It was not known at the time this study was developed which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective after surgery in treating colon cancer. This study had several key changes, based on the results of other phase III trials. As of 6/1/2005, patients no longer received irinotecan on this study and treatment arms B, C, E, and F were discontinued. Patients on arms B and C crossed to arm A. Patients on arms E and F crossed to arm D. Patients on arms C and F who had not gotten to irinotecan continued on arms A and D, respectively. As of 8/18/2008, pre-screening for Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) status was added with mutant KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) patients put on arm G and wild-type KRAS patients randomized between arm A and arm D. Patients on arm G were treated per physician discretion and followed for disease and survival status. KRAS was determined in a central laboratory and was process for all patients on this study. The primary endpoint of this study was modified on 8/18/2008 to focus on patients having wild-type KRAS tumors. All modifications were approved by the Central Institution Review Board, local Institutional Review Boards, NCI, and the NCCTG Data Safety Monitoring Board.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients) II. Disease-free Survival III. Overall Survival IV. Toxicity OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to positive lymph node involvement (1-3 vs 4 or more), histology (high \[poorly differentiated or undifferentiated\] vs low \[well to moderately differentiated\]), and clinical T stage (T1 or T2 vs T3 vs T4). Patients are randomized to 1 of 6 treatment arms (as of 6/1/2005, patients are randomized to treatment arms I and IV only; arms II, III, V, and VI are closed to accrual). As of 8/18/2008, pre-screening for KRAS status was added with mutant KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) patients put on arm G and wild-type KRAS patients randomized between arm A and arm D. ARM A: Patients receive oxaliplatin intravenously (IV) over 2 hours, leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours, and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46-48 hours on days 1. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM B (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm I for remainder of therapy): Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 2 hours on day 1 and leucovorin calcium and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM C (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm I for remainder of therapy): Patients receive the same treatment as in arm A for 6 courses followed by the same treatment as in arm B for 6 courses (total of 12 courses). Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM D: Patients receive cetuximab\* IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM E (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm D for remainder of therapy): Patients receive cetuximab\* as in arm D and irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm B. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM F (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm D for remainder of therapy): Patients receive cetuximab\* as in arm D and chemotherapy as in arm C. ARM G (added as of 8/18/2008, mutant KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) patients): Locally directed therapy. NOTE: \*Cetuximab is administered over 2 hours at a higher dose on day 1 of course 1 only. Quality of life (QOL) is assessed at baseline, 3 months, and at the end of therapy. As of 8/18/2008, QOL was discontinued. Patients are followed for a maximum of 8 years from randomization.

Interventions

DRUGirinotecan hydrochloride

Given IV

DRUGoxaliplatin

Given IV

DRUGleucovorin calcium

Given IV

DRUGfluorouracil

Given IV

BIOLOGICALcetuximab

Given IV

Patients determined to have mutated KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) will be assigned to an event monitoring arm in which adjuvant therapy will be determined and assigned by the treating oncologist. The determination of the type of therapy, duration of treatment, and dose modification will be the responsibility of the treating oncologists.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Lead SponsorNIH
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
CollaboratorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon * Stage III disease * No resected stage IV disease * No rectal cancer * Gross inferior (caudad) margin of the primary tumor must be ≥ 12 cm from the anal verge by rigid proctoscopy * Stage III tumor must have been completely resected within the past 56 days * Must have documented en bloc resection in patients with tumor adherence to adjacent structures * Tumor-related obstructions and colonic perforation are allowed * Tumor samples must be available * At least 1 pathologically confirmed positive lymph node * No evidence of residual involved lymph node disease * Synchronous primary colon cancer allowed * No distant metastatic disease * Performance status - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2 * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3 * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3 * Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN * No uncontrolled high blood pressure * No unstable angina * No symptomatic congestive heart failure * No myocardial infarction with the past 6 months * No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease * No symptomatic pulmonary fibrosis * No symptomatic interstitial pneumonitis * No prior allergic reaction (known sensitivity) to chimerized or murine monoclonal antibody therapy * No known allergy to platinum compounds * No documented presence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) * No active uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or systemic fungal infection * HIV negative * No clinically defined AIDS * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * No men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception * No inadequately treated gastrointestinal bleeding * No ≥ grade 2 pre-existing peripheral sensory or motor neuropathy * No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or lobular carcinoma in situ in 1 breast * No other concurrent medical condition that would preclude study participation * No concurrent biologic therapy * No prior chemotherapy for colon cancer * No other concurrent chemotherapy * No prior radiotherapy for colon cancer * No concurrent targeted agents * No prior agents directed against epidermal growth factor-receptor * No other concurrent anticancer therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)At 3 yearsThe primary endpoint for this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)At 3 yearsA secondary endpoint for this study was to investigate the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.
Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Up to 3 yearsEvidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event free rates (percentage) are reported below for Wild-type KRAS Patients.
Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Up to 3 yearsEvidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event-free rates (percentage) are report below for mutant KRAS patients.
Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Assessed up to 8 yearsThe maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.
Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Assessed up to 8 yearsThe maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.

Countries

Canada, Puerto Rico, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSteven A Alberts, MD

North Central Cancer Treatment Group

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A (Combination Chemotherapy)
Patients received oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours, leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours, and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46-48 hours on days 1. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. oxaliplatin: Given IV leucovorin calcium: Given IV fluorouracil: Given IV
1,402
Arm B (Combination Chemotherapy)
Patients received irinotecan IV over 2 hours on day 1 and leucovorin calcium and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. irinotecan hydrochloride: Given IV leucovorin calcium: Given IV fluorouracil: Given IV
111
Arm C (Combination Chemotherapy)
Patients received the same treatment as in arm A for 6 courses followed by the same treatment as in arm B for 6 courses (total of 12 courses). Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. irinotecan hydrochloride: Given IV oxaliplatin: Given IV leucovorin calcium: Given IV fluorouracil: Given IV
111
Arm D (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)
Patients received cetuximab IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. oxaliplatin: Given IV leucovorin calcium: Given IV fluorouracil: Given IV cetuximab: Given IV
1,350
Arm E (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)
Patients received cetuximab as in arm D and irinotecan, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm B. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. irinotecan hydrochloride: Given IV leucovorin calcium: Given IV fluorouracil: Given IV cetuximab: Given IV
45
Arm F (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)
Patients received cetuximab as in arm D and chemotherapy as in arm C. irinotecan hydrochloride: Given IV oxaliplatin: Given IV leucovorin calcium: Given IV fluorouracil: Given IV cetuximab: Given IV
46
Arm G (Locally Directed Therapy)
Patients determined to have mutated KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) were assigned to an event monitoring arm in which adjuvant therapy was determined and assigned by the treating oncologist. The determination of the type of therapy, duration of treatment, and dose modification was the responsibility of the treating oncologists. Locally Directed Therapy: Patients determined to have mutated KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) were assigned to an event monitoring arm in which adjuvant therapy was determined and assigned by the treating oncologist. The determination of the type of therapy, duration of treatment, and dose modification was the responsibility of the treating oncologists.
332
Total3,397

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A (Combination Chemotherapy)Arm B (Combination Chemotherapy)Arm C (Combination Chemotherapy)Arm D (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)Arm E (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)Arm F (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)Arm G (Locally Directed Therapy)Total
Age, Continuous58 years57 years60 years58 years59 years60.5 years56 years58 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
64 Participants5 Participants3 Participants62 Participants4 Participants2 Participants18 Participants158 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1107 Participants103 Participants103 Participants1060 Participants38 Participants41 Participants225 Participants2677 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
231 Participants3 Participants5 Participants228 Participants3 Participants3 Participants89 Participants562 Participants
Histologic Grade
High
357 participants25 participants28 participants345 participants10 participants12 participants60 participants837 participants
Histologic Grade
Low
1045 participants86 participants83 participants1005 participants35 participants34 participants272 participants2560 participants
KRAS Status
Mutant
391 participants33 participants43 participants345 participants15 participants13 participants326 participants1166 participants
KRAS Status
Unknown
56 participants6 participants6 participants51 participants3 participants4 participants6 participants132 participants
KRAS Status
Wildtype
955 participants72 participants62 participants954 participants27 participants29 participants0 participants2099 participants
Positive Nodes
1-3
816 participants71 participants70 participants790 participants29 participants28 participants203 participants2007 participants
Positive Nodes
4+
586 participants40 participants41 participants560 participants16 participants18 participants129 participants1390 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
6 Participants1 Participants1 Participants7 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
66 Participants4 Participants2 Participants62 Participants3 Participants0 Participants12 Participants149 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
94 Participants6 Participants7 Participants96 Participants5 Participants2 Participants29 Participants239 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
8 Participants0 Participants1 Participants7 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
23 Participants0 Participants0 Participants21 Participants0 Participants1 Participants14 Participants59 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1202 Participants98 Participants100 Participants1154 Participants37 Participants43 Participants275 Participants2909 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
138 participants2 participants2 participants124 participants1 participants0 participants28 participants295 participants
Region of Enrollment
Jamaica
1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
5 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1258 participants109 participants109 participants1224 participants44 participants46 participants303 participants3093 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
662 Participants53 Participants50 Participants647 Participants20 Participants21 Participants160 Participants1613 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
740 Participants58 Participants61 Participants703 Participants25 Participants25 Participants172 Participants1784 Participants
Tumor Stage
Not Availabe
0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants
Tumor Stage
T1 or T2
198 participants18 participants14 participants213 participants5 participants5 participants56 participants509 participants
Tumor Stage
T3
1046 participants78 participants93 participants983 participants35 participants39 participants214 participants2488 participants
Tumor Stage
T4
158 participants15 participants4 participants153 participants4 participants2 participants62 participants398 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
other
Total, other adverse events
688 / 1,37853 / 10860 / 108928 / 1,32626 / 4233 / 440 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
93 / 1,3789 / 10811 / 108150 / 1,3264 / 425 / 440 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

The primary endpoint for this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.

Time frame: At 3 years

Population: The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were wild-type KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRAS Arm ADisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)74.6 percentage of participants
Wild-type KRAS Arm DDisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)71.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

A secondary endpoint for this study was to investigate the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.

Time frame: At 3 years

Population: The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were KRAS mutant (or not evaluable for KRAS) and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRAS Arm ADisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)67.1 percentage of participants
Wild-type KRAS Arm DDisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)65.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event-free rates (percentage) are report below for mutant KRAS patients.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were KRAS mutant (or not evaluable for KRAS) and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRAS Arm AOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)87.9 percentage of participants
Wild-type KRAS Arm DOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)82.7 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.2595% CI: [0.85, 1.92]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event free rates (percentage) are reported below for Wild-type KRAS Patients.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were wild-type KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRAS Arm AOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)87.3 percentage of participants
Wild-type KRAS Arm DOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)85.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.1595% CI: [0.92, 1.68]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.

Time frame: Assessed up to 8 years

Population: All patients that were mutant KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule and completed the adverse event form at least once were evaluated for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRAS Arm AToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)55.6 percentage of patients
Wild-type KRAS Arm DToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)72.3 percentage of patients
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.

Time frame: Assessed up to 8 years

Population: All patients that were wild-type KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule and completed the adverse event form at least once were evaluated for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Wild-type KRAS Arm AToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)51.1 percentage of patients
Wild-type KRAS Arm DToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)73.3 percentage of patients
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 24, 2026