Skip to content

Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone With or Without Gemcitabine in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Gem-CHOP: A Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Combined With CHOP in Untreated Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00079261
Enrollment
25
Registered
2004-03-10
Start date
2004-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, Small Intestine Cancer

Keywords

contiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage III adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, stage IV adult diffuse large cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, adult grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis, small intestine lymphoma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying giving combination chemotherapy together with gemcitabine to see how well it works compared to giving combination chemotherapy alone in treating patients with previously untreated aggressive stage II, stage III, or stage IV non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Compare the complete response rate (confirmed or unconfirmed) in patients with previously untreated aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone with vs without gemcitabine. Secondary * Compare the safety profile of these regimens in these patients. * Compare the feasibility of these regimens, defined as the proportion of courses given as scheduled, in these patients. * Compare freedom from treatment failure in patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, International Prognostic Index score (0-2 vs 3-5), and histology (B cell vs T cell). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive CHOP chemotherapy comprising cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, and vincristine IV on day 1 and oral or IV prednisone on days 1-5. * Arm II: Patients receive CHOP chemotherapy as in arm I and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8. In both arms, treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 3 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. Patients achieving partial response or complete or unconfirmed complete response receive an additional 5 courses of therapy (for a total of 8 courses). Patients are followed every 3 months for 3 years, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 76-82 patients (38-41 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.

Interventions

DRUGCHOP regimen
DRUGcyclophosphamide
DRUGdoxorubicin hydrochloride
DRUGgemcitabine hydrochloride
DRUGprednisone
DRUGvincristine sulfate

Sponsors

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of 1 of the following WHO subtypes: * Diffuse large B large cell lymphoma (including all clinical and morphologic variants) * Grade 3 follicular lymphoma * Extranodal T/NK cell lymphoma, nasal type * Enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma * Hepato-splenic T cell lymphoma * Peripheral T cell lymphoma, unspecified * Angioimmunoblastic lymphoma * Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, systemic type * Stage II-IV disease * At least 1 site of measurable disease (e.g., lymph node or lymph node mass) * The following subtypes are not allowed: * Mantle cell lymphoma * Burkitt's lymphoma * Precursor B or T cell lymphoma * Primary cutaneous B or T cell lymphoma * No CNS involvement by lymphoma PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age * 18 to 70 Performance status * Not specified Life expectancy * Not specified Hematopoietic * WBC \> 3,000/mm\^3 * Neutrophil count \> 1,000/mm\^3 * Platelet count \> 100,000/mm\^3 Hepatic * Bilirubin \< 2.5 times normal (unless due to lymphoma) * ALT and AST \< 2.5 times normal (unless due to lymphoma) Renal * Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL Cardiovascular * No severe cardiac disease that would preclude study participation or limit life expectancy Pulmonary * FEV\_1 and DLCO ≥ 75% of predicted (unless due to lymphoma) * No severe pulmonary disease that would preclude study participation or limit life expectancy Other * Not pregnant or nursing * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * HIV negative * No other prior or concurrent malignancy except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix * No severe neurologic or metabolic disease that would preclude study participation or limit life expectancy * No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that would preclude study compliance and follow-up PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy * No concurrent monoclonal antibodies Chemotherapy * No other concurrent chemotherapy Endocrine therapy * Not specified Radiotherapy * No prior radiotherapy * No concurrent radiotherapy Surgery * Not specified Other * No prior cytotoxic agents * No prior treatment for NHL * No other concurrent anticancer therapy * No other concurrent investigational drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Complete response as assessed by Cheson criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Toxicity as assessed by CTC 2.0
Proportion of courses given as scheduled
Freedom from treatment failure as assessed by Cheson criteria

Countries

Belgium, Croatia, Egypt, France, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026