Skip to content

Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Tipranavir in Combination With Low Dose Ritonavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Children

Multiple-dose, Open-label, Randomized, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of Tipranavir in Combination With Low-dose Ritonavir in HIV-infected Pediatric Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00076999
Enrollment
115
Registered
2004-02-10
Start date
2003-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of tipranavir (TPV) oral formulation and soft gelatin capsules together with low-dose ritonavir in HIV-infected children and adolescents, to provide information concerning the pharmacokinetic characteristics of tipranavir and ritonavir in this age group, and to determine the relative bioavailability of the TPV liquid formulation and TPV capsule formulation in adolescents switching from liquid to capsule. The secondary objective of this study is the determination of the dose of topranavir and ritonavir (TPV/r) in children and adolescents between 2 and 18 years of age required for an adult equivalent systemic exposure of TPV/r 500 mg / 200 mg.

Interventions

DRUGTPV oral solution

Tipranavir oral solution

DRUGRTV oral solution

Ritonavir oral solution

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females between 2 and 18 years of age. 2. A confirmed diagnosis of HIV-1 infection as defined by two positive assays from two different samples taken at least two weeks apart. The two results may be any combination of the following: HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) detected by reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction(PCR) or HIV proviral deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) detected by PCR HIV culture p24 antigen detection Licensed HIV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with confirmatory Western blot 3. Viral load \> 1500 RNA copies/mL. 4. Acceptable screening laboratory values indicative of adequate baseline organ function. Laboratory values are considered acceptable if severity is no higher than Grade 1 for all tests defined by the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Table for Grading Severity of Pediatric Adverse Experiences (\> 3 months of age) with the following exceptions: Grade 2 gamma-glutamyl transferase Grade 2 cholesterol Grade 2 triglycerides 5. Signed informed consent prior to study participation from the patient or a legal guardian. Active assent must be given by the patient if the child and/or adolescent is capable of understanding the provided study information (this applies to children with the intellectual age of 7 years or greater) 6. In the opinion of the investigator, an ability to take medications and comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Female patients of childbearing potential who: have a positive serum pregnancy test at screening are breast feeding are planning on becoming pregnant are not willing to use two methods of contraception to include at least one barrier method (e.g. latex condom plus spermicidal jelly/foam) 2. Active hepatitis B or C disease defined as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity or hepatitis C (HCV) antibody or RNA positivity with aspartate aminotransferase(AST)/ alanine aminotransferase(ALT) \> Grade 2. 3. Life expectancy \< 12 months. 4. Patients who are unwilling to abstain from ingesting contraindicated medications and substances which may significantly affect plasma levels of the study medications, notably: Grapefruit juice or Seville oranges Herbal preparations containing St. John's Wort or milk thistle Garlic supplements 5. Active substance abuse. 6. Use of investigational medications or vaccines within 28 days before study entry or during the trial. Some expanded access antiretroviral medications may be acceptable, but must be approved by sponsor. 7. Requirement for any therapy for malignancy or immunomodulatory drug (e.g. interferon, cyclosporine, hydroxyurea, interleukin-2) within 28 days of study entry. Replacement intravenous gamma globulin treatment is acceptable. 8. Any active opportunistic infection within 28 days before study entry or other clinically significant findings that may compromise the outcome of the study. 9. Patients with malabsorption, severe chronic diarrhea or vomiting (more than two episodes of moderate or severe intensity, not attributed to medication therapy and lasting more than four days) within 28 days of the study. 10. Evidence or symptoms of encephalopathy or developmental delay that would reduce compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and Formulationup to 288 weeksIntensity of adverse events were graded by the investigator based on the DAIDS standardized table (Division of AIDS, National Institute of Health). DAIDS Grade 3 (Severe) and Grade 4 (Life Threatening) were identified.
Number of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and Formulationup to 288 weeksIntensity of adverse events were graded by the investigator based on the DAIDS standardized table (Division of AIDS, National Institute of Health). DAIDS Grade 3 (Severe) and Grade 4 (Life Threatening) were identified.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 100
Baseline Median Viral Load log10 Copies/mLbaseline
Number Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 24
Number Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 48
Number Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 100
Number Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 24
Number Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 48
Number Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 100
Number Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 24
Number Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)baseline, week 48
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 24
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 48
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 100
Baseline Median CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3)baseline
Median Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 24
Median Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 48
Median Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 100
Median Baseline CD4 PercentbaselinePercentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells
Median Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 24Percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells
Median Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 48Percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells
Median Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)baseline, week 100Percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells
Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8week 8
Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16week 16
Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24week 24
Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48week 48

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TPV OS 2-<6 Yrs
Patients treated with Tipranavir Oral Solution, ages 2-5
25
TPV OS 6-<12 Yrs
Patients treated with Tipranavir Oral Solution, ages 6-11
37
TPV OS 12-18 Yrs
Patients treated with Tipranavir Oral Solution, ages 12-18
24
TPV SEDDS 12-18 Yrs
Patients treated with Tipranavir SEDDS, ages 12-18
29
Total115

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event28602
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21000
Overall StudyOther reason (not specified)884113
Overall StudyProtocol Violation03409
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject04301

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTPV OS 2-<6 YrsTPV OS 6-<12 YrsTPV OS 12-18 YrsTPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsTotal
Age, Continuous4.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
9.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
14.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
15.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
10.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Antiretroviral Experienced
No
1 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants3 participants
Antiretroviral Experienced
Yes
24 participants36 participants24 participants28 participants112 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
6 participants10 participants8 participants9 participants33 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic / Latino
22 participants20 participants11 participants8 participants61 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
1 participants0 participants2 participants2 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
2 participants17 participants11 participants19 participants49 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
18 participants26 participants16 participants20 participants80 participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
0 participants9 participants7 participants13 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
3 participants14 participants13 participants11 participants41 participants
Region of Enrollment
South America and Mexico
22 participants14 participants4 participants5 participants45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants15 Participants10 Participants15 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants22 Participants14 Participants14 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 2518 / 3110 / 195 / 627 / 34
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 2513 / 318 / 191 / 67 / 34

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and Formulation

Intensity of adverse events were graded by the investigator based on the DAIDS standardized table (Division of AIDS, National Institute of Health). DAIDS Grade 3 (Severe) and Grade 4 (Life Threatening) were identified.

Time frame: up to 288 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationProthombin time prolonged1 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationNeutrophil count decreased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationTriglyceride increased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCreatinine phosphokinase increased4 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium decreased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAspartate aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium increased2 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium increased1 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPlatelets1 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium decreased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAmylase increased2 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium increased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine blood0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine protein0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium decreased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationHemoglobin0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased4 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPartial thromboplastin time prolonged1 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCholesterol increased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGlucose increased0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAspartate aminotransferase increased1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGlucose increased0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased4 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationNeutrophil count decreased1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationProthombin time prolonged1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAmylase increased4 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationTriglyceride increased1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine protein0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium decreased2 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium increased1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPlatelets0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationHemoglobin0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCholesterol increased0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium increased3 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCreatinine phosphokinase increased1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium increased0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine blood0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPartial thromboplastin time prolonged0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased2 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium decreased1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium decreased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCholesterol increased1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCreatinine phosphokinase increased3 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased2 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium increased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAmylase increased3 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine blood1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationHemoglobin1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGlucose increased1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationTriglyceride increased1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium decreased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationNeutrophil count decreased1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationProthombin time prolonged0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPartial thromboplastin time prolonged0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium decreased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium increased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium decreased1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium increased1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAspartate aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPlatelets0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine protein0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine blood0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium decreased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPlatelets0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium decreased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium increased4 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCreatinine phosphokinase increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationHemoglobin0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine protein0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAmylase increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPartial thromboplastin time prolonged0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationTriglyceride increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAspartate aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium decreased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGlucose increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationProthombin time prolonged0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationNeutrophil count decreased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased3 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCholesterol increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCholesterol increased2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationProthombin time prolonged0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationHemoglobin2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPartial thromboplastin time prolonged0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine blood4 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium decreased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAmylase increased1 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPlatelets0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased6 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCreatinine phosphokinase increased10 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationPotassium decreased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationSodium increased4 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium increased2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased3 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationUrine protein1 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationTriglyceride increased2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationCalcium decreased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationGlucose increased2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationAspartate aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Patients With Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Laboratory Abnormalities by Age Group and FormulationNeutrophil count decreased0 participants
Primary

Number of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and Formulation

Intensity of adverse events were graded by the investigator based on the DAIDS standardized table (Division of AIDS, National Institute of Health). DAIDS Grade 3 (Severe) and Grade 4 (Life Threatening) were identified.

Time frame: up to 288 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationTotal with any severe drug-related adverse events2 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased1 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationLiver function test abnormal0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHepatic enzyme abnormal0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAnemia0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationNausea0 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHyperamylasemia1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAnemia0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationTotal with any severe drug-related adverse events6 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationLiver function test abnormal1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased2 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHyperamylasemia0 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHepatic enzyme abnormal1 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationNausea1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationNausea0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHyperamylasemia0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationLiver function test abnormal0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAnemia1 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased0 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased2 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationTotal with any severe drug-related adverse events3 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHepatic enzyme abnormal0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased1 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationLiver function test abnormal0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHepatic enzyme abnormal0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAnemia0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHyperamylasemia0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationTotal with any severe drug-related adverse events2 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationNausea0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationLiver function test abnormal0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHyperamylasemia0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAlanine aminotransferase increased4 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationNausea0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationTotal with any severe drug-related adverse events5 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationAnemia0 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationGamma-glutamyl transferase increased1 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber of Severe (DAIDS Grades 3 or 4) Adverse Events Related to Drug for Treated Patients by Age Group and FormulationHepatic enzyme abnormal0 participants
Secondary

Baseline Median CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3)

Time frame: baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsBaseline Median CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3)795 cells/mm3
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsBaseline Median CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3)398 cells/mm3
TPV OS 12-18 YrsBaseline Median CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3)208 cells/mm3
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsBaseline Median CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3)330 cells/mm3
Secondary

Baseline Median Viral Load log10 Copies/mL

Time frame: baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsBaseline Median Viral Load log10 Copies/mL5.0 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsBaseline Median Viral Load log10 Copies/mL4.6 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 12-18 YrsBaseline Median Viral Load log10 Copies/mL5.1 log10 copies/mL
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsBaseline Median Viral Load log10 Copies/mL4.6 log10 copies/mL
Secondary

Median Baseline CD4 Percent

Percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells

Time frame: baseline

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Baseline CD4 Percent26 percentage of cells
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Baseline CD4 Percent19 percentage of cells
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Baseline CD4 Percent12 percentage of cells
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Baseline CD4 Percent19 percentage of cells
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Time frame: baseline, week 100

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)294 cells/mm3
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)121 cells/mm3
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)12 cells/mm3
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)45 cells/mm3
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.73ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.79ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Time frame: baseline, week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)293 cells/mm3
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)133 cells/mm3
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)24 cells/mm3
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)56 cells/mm3
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.64ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.26ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Time frame: baseline, week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)323 cells/mm3
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)143 cells/mm3
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)21 cells/mm3
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count (Cells/mm3) at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)39 cells/mm3
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.25ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.7ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells

Time frame: baseline, week 100

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)6 percentage of cells
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)4 percentage of cellsInter-Quartile Range 0.9
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)1 percentage of cellsInter-Quartile Range 0.7
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)0 percentage of cells
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.23ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.23ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells

Time frame: baseline, week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)7 percentage of cells
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)4 percentage of cellsInter-Quartile Range 0.8
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)1 percentage of cellsInter-Quartile Range 0.4
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)2 percentage of cells
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.38ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.2ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Percentage of lymphocytes that are CD4 cells

Time frame: baseline, week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)7 percentage of cells
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)5 percentage of cellsInter-Quartile Range 0.8
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)1 percentage of cellsInter-Quartile Range 0.5
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in CD4 Percent at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)3 percentage of cells
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.08ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.36ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Time frame: baseline, week 100

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-2.7 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-1.2 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-0.2 log10 copies/mL
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-0.4 log10 copies/mL
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.69ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Time frame: baseline, week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-2.5 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-1.7 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-0.4 log10 copies/mL
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-1.1 log10 copies/mL
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.02ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.47ANOVA
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

Time frame: baseline, week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-2.7 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-1.0 log10 copies/mL
TPV OS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-0.4 log10 copies/mL
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsMedian Change From Baseline in Viral Load log10 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Last Observation Carried Forward)-0.8 log10 copies/mL
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.81ANOVA
Secondary

Number Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 100

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction14 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction11 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction24 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction13 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction6 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction18 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction7 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction22 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.12Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction20 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction5 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction19 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction18 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction9 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction15 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction13 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction16 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.02Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 0.78Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction19 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction6 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction23 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction14 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction8 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction16 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction9 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With at Least 1 log10 Viral Load Reduction From Baseline at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction20 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16

Time frame: week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Non-compliance9 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Compliance16 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Non-compliance14 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Compliance20 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Compliance10 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Non-compliance9 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Compliance13 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 16Non-compliance13 participants
Secondary

Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24

Time frame: week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Compliance17 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Non-compliance8 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Non-compliance17 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Compliance17 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Compliance6 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Non-compliance10 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Compliance14 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 24Non-compliance11 participants
Secondary

Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48

Time frame: week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Compliance19 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Non-compliance5 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Non-compliance18 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Compliance11 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Compliance5 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Non-compliance8 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Compliance11 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 48Non-compliance11 participants
Secondary

Number Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8

Time frame: week 8

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Compliance16 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Non-compliance8 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Non-compliance13 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Compliance21 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Compliance13 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Non-compliance8 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Compliance10 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With Compliance With Tipranavir Treatment Between 95 and 120 Percent at Week 8Non-compliance18 participants
Secondary

Number Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 100

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction14 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction11 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction26 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction11 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction6 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction18 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction7 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction22 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.06Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction16 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction9 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction22 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction15 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction8 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction16 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction10 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction19 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.12Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction18 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction7 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction24 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction13 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction8 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction16 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction9 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction20 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.01Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 100

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction12 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction13 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction26 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction11 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction5 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction19 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction6 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 100 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction23 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.18Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction10 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction15 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction25 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction12 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction6 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction18 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction8 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 24 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction21 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.6Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)

Time frame: baseline, week 48

Population: Full Analysis Set included all patients treated with study medication having at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction13 participants
TPV OS 2-<6 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction12 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction24 participants
TPV OS 6-<12 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction13 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction6 participants
TPV OS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction18 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)Viral load reduction8 participants
TPV SEDDS 12-18 YrsNumber Patients With HIV RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 48 (Non-completers Considered Failures)No viral load reduction21 participants
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 2-\<6 yrs versus TPV OS 6-\<12 yrsp-value: 0.2Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison of TPV OS 12-18 yrs versus TPV SEDDS 12-18 yrsp-value: 1Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026