Skip to content

Study Evaluating CMC-544 In B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

A Phase 1 Study Of Cmc-544 Administered As A Single Agent In Subjects With B-cell Non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00073749
Enrollment
79
Registered
2003-12-05
Start date
2003-08-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2018-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, B-Cell

Keywords

B-Cell, Non-Hodgkin's, Lymphoma

Brief summary

To determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), the tolerability, and the initial safety profile of CMC-544 in subjects with B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL).

Interventions

DRUGInotuzumab ozogamicin [CMC-544]

CMC-544, IV, dose escalation trial

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who have been previously diagnosed with CD22-positive, B-cell NHL, according to WHO classification, which has progressed after at least 2 prior therapies of probable clinical benefit * At the expanded cohort, part 2 of the study, subjects must have one of the following: * Follicular lymphoma previously treated with at least one dose of rituximab, but have not received radioimmunotherapy * Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma * Age 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

* Candidate for potentially curative therapies in the opinion of the investigator * Chronic lymphocytic leukemia * Burkitt's lymphoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)Baseline up to Day 28DLT was classified as per National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0 and defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 21 days (or 28 days for participants treated every 4 weeks) days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity except grade 3 alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, any grade 4 febrile neutropenia, any grade 4 thrombocytopenia or any bleeding episode requiring platelet transfusion, any grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (for a duration of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 7 days), delayed recovery (less than or equal to \[\<=\] grade 1 or baseline) from a toxicity that delays the initiation of the next dose by more than 14 days.
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD): Part 1 (Dose Escalation Cohorts)Baseline up to Day 28MTD was defined as highest dose level for which no more than 1 participant in a dose cohort experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 21 days (or 28 days for participants treated every 4 weeks) days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity except grade 3 alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, any grade 4 febrile neutropenia, any grade 4 thrombocytopenia or any bleeding episode requiring platelet transfusion, any grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (for a duration of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 7 days), delayed recovery (less than or equal to \[\<=\] grade 1 or baseline) from a toxicity that delays the initiation of the next dose by more than 2 weeks.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 225)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) are defined as any new event reported after first dose of study drug up to 42 days after last dose of study drug, or any event that is worse in severity than at any time during the baseline period. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs).
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Grades Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on SeverityBaseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 225)AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE severity was defined to be the maximum toxicity grade of the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) experienced by the participants during the study. AE was assessed according to severity; Grade 1 (mild AE), Grade 2 (moderate AE), Grade 3 (severe AE), Grade 4 (life-threatening or disabling AE), Grade 5 (death related to AE). Participants with Grade 3 or higher grades TEAEs were reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS): Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)Baseline up to Year 5Interval OS was based on Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was defined as the time period from the first dose of study drug until the date of death, censored at the participant's last contact date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Duration of Overall Response (DoR): Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)Duration of overall response was defined as the time from the date that measurement criteria were met for CR, CRu, or PR (whichever status was recorded first) until the first date that relapsed disease was objectively documented as per International Response Criteria for NHL, taking as reference for relapsed disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Time-to-Tumor Progression: Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)Time to tumor progression was defined as the interval from the start of the treatment until the first date on which relapsed disease or progression is documented, censored at the last disease assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)Participants with BOR=with complete response(CR),unconfirmed CR(CRu) or partial response (PR) as per International Response Criteria for NHL. CR: Total disappearance of all detectable clinical,radiographic sign of disease/related symptoms,normalization biochemical abnormalities related to NHL;if enlarged before therapy all lymph nodes,nodal masses,other organs regressed to normal size and spleen regressed in size,undetectable on physical exam,clear bone marrow infiltrate. CRu: CR but allows for residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter and all individual nodes previously merged were regressed by \>75% in product diameters and indeterminate bone marrow. PR:\>=50% decrease in sum of products of greatest diameters(SPD) of 6 largest dominant nodes/nodal masses,no increase in size of other nodes/spleen/liver, 50% decrease in SPD of splenic,hepatic nodules,involvement of other organs considered assessable,not measurable disease with exception of splenic,hepatic nodules.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as the time interval from the first dose of study medication until the first date on which relapsed disease, or progression (as per the International Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma) or death, was documented, censored at the last tumor evaluation date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Intent-to-treat Population-Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as the time interval from the first dose of study medication until the first date on which relapsed disease, or progression (as per International Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma) or death, was documented, censored at the last tumor evaluation date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Overall Survival (OS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)Baseline up to Year 5OS was based on Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was defined as the time period from the first dose of study drug until the date of death, censored at the participant's last contact date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Evaluable Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)Baseline up to 42 days after last dose (Day 225)Participants (having follicular or diffuse lymphoma) with objective response based assessment of CR, CRu or PR as per International Response Criteria for NHL. CR: Total disappearance of all detectable clinical, radiographic sign of disease/related symptoms, normalization biochemical abnormalities related to NHL; if enlarged before therapy all lymph nodes, nodal masses, other organs regressed to normal size and spleen regressed in size, undetectable on physical exam, clear bone marrow infiltrate. CRu: CR but allows for residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter and all individual nodes previously merged were regressed by \>75% in product diameters and indeterminate bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, spleen or liver, 50% decrease in SPD of splenic, hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs considered assessable, not measurable disease with exception of splenic, hepatic nodules.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead in+ Expanded Cohorts)Baseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (Day 225)Participants (having follicular or diffuse lymphoma) with objective response based assessment of CR, CRu or PR as per International Response Criteria for NHL. CR: Total disappearance of all detectable clinical, radiographic sign of disease/related symptoms, normalization biochemical abnormalities related to NHL; if enlarged before therapy all lymph nodes, nodal masses, other organs regressed to normal size and spleen regressed in size, undetectable on physical exam, clear bone marrow infiltrate. CRu: CR but allows for residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter and all individual nodes previously merged were regressed by \>75% in product diameters and indeterminate bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, spleen or liver, 50% decrease in SPD of splenic, hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs considered assessable, not measurable disease with exception of splenic, hepatic nodules.

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study was conducted in 2 parts. Part 1: Dose escalation cohorts of inotuzumab ozogamicin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) included 21 days and 28 days dose administration cycles. Part 2: Expanded cohort using the MTD regimen identified in Part 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 0.4 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 1
Participants with CD22-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) received 0.4 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) intravenous (IV) dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1 of each cycle, for at least 4 cycles unless there was an evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cycle was of 21 days.
2
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 0.8 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 2
Participants with CD22-positive B-cell NHL received 0.8 mg/m\^2 IV dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1 of each cycle, for at least 4 cycles, unless there was an evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cycle was of 21 days.
5
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.34 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 3
Participants with CD22-positive B-cell NHL received 1.34 mg/m\^2 IV dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1 of each cycle, for at least 4 cycles, unless there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cycle was of 21 days.
11
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 4
Participants with CD22-positive B-cell NHL received 1.8 mg/m\^2 IV dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1 of each cycle, for at least 4 cycles, unless there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cycle was of 21 days.
6
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 2.4 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 5
Participants with CD22-positive B-cell NHL received 2.4 mg/m\^2 IV dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1 of each cycle, for at least 4 cycles, unless there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cycle was of 21 days.
6
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Lead-in Cohort
Participants with CD22-positive B-cell NHL received 1.8 mg/m\^2 IV dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1 of each cycle, for at least 4 cycles, unless there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cycle was of 28 days.
6
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Expanded Cohort
Participants with CD22-positive B-cell NHL received 1.8 mg/m\^2 IV dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin on Day 1 of each cycle, for at least 4 cycles, unless there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Each cycle was of 28 days.
43
Total79

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
Overall StudyAdverse Event0364210
Overall StudyDeath01100029
Overall StudyDiscontinuation of Study by Sponsor0000004
Overall StudyDisease Progression2032313
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0000002
Overall StudyOther0000020
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0010020
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0100102

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInotuzumab Ozogamicin 0.4 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 1Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 0.8 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 2Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.34 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 3Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 4Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 2.4 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 5Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Lead-in CohortInotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Expanded CohortTotal
Age, Continuous50.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.44
73.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.59
65.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56
56.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.96
60.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.82
57.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.25
57.30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.91
59.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants23 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants3 Participants7 Participants6 Participants5 Participants4 Participants20 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 25 / 511 / 116 / 66 / 66 / 643 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 21 / 53 / 113 / 64 / 60 / 615 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD): Part 1 (Dose Escalation Cohorts)

MTD was defined as highest dose level for which no more than 1 participant in a dose cohort experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 21 days (or 28 days for participants treated every 4 weeks) days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity except grade 3 alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, any grade 4 febrile neutropenia, any grade 4 thrombocytopenia or any bleeding episode requiring platelet transfusion, any grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (for a duration of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 7 days), delayed recovery (less than or equal to \[\<=\] grade 1 or baseline) from a toxicity that delays the initiation of the next dose by more than 2 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 2 of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD): Part 1 (Dose Escalation Cohorts)1.8 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2)
Primary

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)

DLT was classified as per National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0 and defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 21 days (or 28 days for participants treated every 4 weeks) days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity except grade 3 alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, any grade 4 febrile neutropenia, any grade 4 thrombocytopenia or any bleeding episode requiring platelet transfusion, any grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (for a duration of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 7 days), delayed recovery (less than or equal to \[\<=\] grade 1 or baseline) from a toxicity that delays the initiation of the next dose by more than 14 days.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin. Here number of participant analyzed (N) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Lead-in + Expanded CohortsNumber of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.34 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 3Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)2 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 4Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)1 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 2.4 mg/m^2: Dose Escalation Cohort 5Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)2 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Lead-in + Expanded CohortsNumber of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Grades Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE severity was defined to be the maximum toxicity grade of the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) experienced by the participants during the study. AE was assessed according to severity; Grade 1 (mild AE), Grade 2 (moderate AE), Grade 3 (severe AE), Grade 4 (life-threatening or disabling AE), Grade 5 (death related to AE). Participants with Grade 3 or higher grades TEAEs were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 225)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Grades Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity24 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Lead-in + Expanded CohortsNumber of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Grades Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity42 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) are defined as any new event reported after first dose of study drug up to 42 days after last dose of study drug, or any event that is worse in severity than at any time during the baseline period. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs).

Time frame: Baseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 225)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs29 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs11 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Lead-in + Expanded CohortsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs49 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2: Lead-in + Expanded CohortsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs15 participants
Secondary

Duration of Overall Response (DoR): Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)

Duration of overall response was defined as the time from the date that measurement criteria were met for CR, CRu, or PR (whichever status was recorded first) until the first date that relapsed disease was objectively documented as per International Response Criteria for NHL, taking as reference for relapsed disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)

Population: Evaluable population was analyzed. DoR included evaluable participants who achieved CR, CRu, or PR. Here 'N' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Duration of Overall Response (DoR): Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma80.00 days
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Duration of Overall Response (DoR): Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular Lymphoma233.0 days
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)

Participants with BOR=with complete response(CR),unconfirmed CR(CRu) or partial response (PR) as per International Response Criteria for NHL. CR: Total disappearance of all detectable clinical,radiographic sign of disease/related symptoms,normalization biochemical abnormalities related to NHL;if enlarged before therapy all lymph nodes,nodal masses,other organs regressed to normal size and spleen regressed in size,undetectable on physical exam,clear bone marrow infiltrate. CRu: CR but allows for residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter and all individual nodes previously merged were regressed by \>75% in product diameters and indeterminate bone marrow. PR:\>=50% decrease in sum of products of greatest diameters(SPD) of 6 largest dominant nodes/nodal masses,no increase in size of other nodes/spleen/liver, 50% decrease in SPD of splenic,hepatic nodules,involvement of other organs considered assessable,not measurable disease with exception of splenic,hepatic nodules.

Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)

Population: Evaluable population was analyzed. Participants with diffuse or follicular lymphoma were analyzed. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 and Part 2 (Lead-in Cohort).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)CR: With Follicular Lymphoma1 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)CR: With Diffuse Lymphoma2 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)CRu: With Follicular Lymphoma3 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)CRu: With Diffuse Lymphoma0 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)PR: With Follicular Lymphoma8 participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR): Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)PR: With Diffuse Lymphoma5 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)

OS was based on Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was defined as the time period from the first dose of study drug until the date of death, censored at the participant's last contact date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Time frame: Baseline up to Year 5

Population: Evaluable population: All participants who received at least 2 doses of study drug, had baseline tumor CT scan, and at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment for anti-cancer clinical activity. Here 'N' represents number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 of study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Overall Survival (OS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma274 days
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Overall Survival (OS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular LymphomaNA days
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS): Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)

Interval OS was based on Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was defined as the time period from the first dose of study drug until the date of death, censored at the participant's last contact date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Time frame: Baseline up to Year 5

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants. Here 'N' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Overall Survival (OS): Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma194 days
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Overall Survival (OS): Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular Lymphoma1147 days
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)

PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as the time interval from the first dose of study medication until the first date on which relapsed disease, or progression (as per the International Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma) or death, was documented, censored at the last tumor evaluation date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)

Population: Evaluable population: All participants who received at least 2 doses of study drug, had baseline tumor computed tomography (CT) scan, and at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment for anti-cancer clinical activity. Here 'N' represents number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 of study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma103 days
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Evaluable Population- Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular Lymphoma311 days
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Intent-to-treat Population-Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)

PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as the time interval from the first dose of study medication until the first date on which relapsed disease, or progression (as per International Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma) or death, was documented, censored at the last tumor evaluation date. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants. Here 'N' represents number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Intent-to-treat Population-Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma49.5 days
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Intent-to-treat Population-Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular Lymphoma254 days
Secondary

Time-to-Tumor Progression: Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)

Time to tumor progression was defined as the interval from the start of the treatment until the first date on which relapsed disease or progression is documented, censored at the last disease assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed in participants with follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks up to Year 1, then every 12 weeks up to Year 2, and then every 6 months until tumor progression or death (up to Year 5)

Population: Evaluable population was analyzed. Here N signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 and Part 2 (Lead-in Cohort) of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Time-to-Tumor Progression: Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma105 days
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Time-to-Tumor Progression: Part 2 (Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular Lymphoma339 days
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Evaluable Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)

Participants (having follicular or diffuse lymphoma) with objective response based assessment of CR, CRu or PR as per International Response Criteria for NHL. CR: Total disappearance of all detectable clinical, radiographic sign of disease/related symptoms, normalization biochemical abnormalities related to NHL; if enlarged before therapy all lymph nodes, nodal masses, other organs regressed to normal size and spleen regressed in size, undetectable on physical exam, clear bone marrow infiltrate. CRu: CR but allows for residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter and all individual nodes previously merged were regressed by \>75% in product diameters and indeterminate bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, spleen or liver, 50% decrease in SPD of splenic, hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs considered assessable, not measurable disease with exception of splenic, hepatic nodules.

Time frame: Baseline up to 42 days after last dose (Day 225)

Population: Evaluable population: All participants who received at least 2 doses of study drug, had baseline tumor CT scan, and at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment for anti-cancer clinical activity. Here 'N' represents number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 of study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Evaluable Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma25 percentage of participants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Evaluable Population: Part 2 (Lead-in + Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular Lymphoma73.68 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead in+ Expanded Cohorts)

Participants (having follicular or diffuse lymphoma) with objective response based assessment of CR, CRu or PR as per International Response Criteria for NHL. CR: Total disappearance of all detectable clinical, radiographic sign of disease/related symptoms, normalization biochemical abnormalities related to NHL; if enlarged before therapy all lymph nodes, nodal masses, other organs regressed to normal size and spleen regressed in size, undetectable on physical exam, clear bone marrow infiltrate. CRu: CR but allows for residual lymph node mass \>1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter and all individual nodes previously merged were regressed by \>75% in product diameters and indeterminate bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, spleen or liver, 50% decrease in SPD of splenic, hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs considered assessable, not measurable disease with exception of splenic, hepatic nodules.

Time frame: Baseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (Day 225)

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants. Here 'N' signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. This outcome measure was not planned to be analyzed in Part 1 of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead in+ Expanded Cohorts)With Diffuse Lymphoma15.38 percentage of particpants
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin: Dose Escalation Cohorts 1 to 5Percentage of Participants With Objective Response- Intent-to-treat Population: Part 2 (Lead in+ Expanded Cohorts)With Follicular Lymphoma68.12 percentage of particpants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026