Skip to content

Middle School to High School Transition Project: Depression and Substance Abuse Prevention

Middle School to High School Transition Project

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00071513
Acronym
CAST-T/HSTS
Enrollment
497
Registered
2003-10-28
Start date
2003-03-31
Completion date
2007-06-30
Last updated
2016-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Substance-Related Disorders

Keywords

Adolescent, Substance Abuse, At-risk

Brief summary

This study will implement a school-based program to prevent depression, academic failure, and substance use in at-risk adolescents transitioning from middle school to high school.

Detailed description

The transition from middle school to high school presents important challenges for adolescents. Programs that enhance personal efficacy and social support resources may prevent at-risk students from developing behaviors that can lead to substance use, academic failure, and depression. This study will implement a skills-based program called Coping and Support Training for the Transition (CAST-T) as a preventive intervention for at-risk students. At-risk students in eighth grade will be randomly assigned to receive either CAST-T or school as usual. The CAST-T program will initially be delivered in twelve sessions over 6 weeks in the middle school setting. The program includes booster sessions, case management, structured home-based parent education, and support and skills training throughout the transition period. Participants will be assessed from the beginning of eighth grade to the end of ninth grade. Vulnerability to academic problems and depression will be assessed with school records and self-report scale scores.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCAST-T/HSTS

Skills training small group.

BEHAVIORALBrief Intervention

Assessment of needs and referral to services as needed.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At-risk for substance abuse, academic failure, and depression * Enrolled in eighth grade in Seattle Public Schools * English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Score above the clinical cutoff on the Youth Self Report Aggressive subscale

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)Baseline to 18 monthsThe Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire is a 13 item measure of level of self reported depressive symptoms. Each item in scored on a 3-point Likert scale as follows: True (0), Sometimes (1), and Not True (2) rated within the timeframe of the previous two weeks. A total score is obtained; scores can range from 0 to 26. Total scores of 12 or higher may signify that a child/adolescent is suffering from depression. Higher scores on this scale suggest a worse outcome or greater endorsement of depressive symptoms. Change is measured based on two time points baseline to the 18 months follow-up assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
School Attachment18 monthsSchool attachment measure consisted of 4 items. Item responses range from 0 (unsatisfied, rarely attended, not involved, etc.) to 6 (highly satisfied, regularly attended, very involved, etc). Scores could range from 0 to 36 with higher scores indicating more positive school attachment. Item were: My overall satisfaction with classes was… Overall, how safe did school feel last semester… Overall, how friendly did school feel… How involved were you in school activities…

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

8th graders in 6 middle schools completed the screening battery; those with 15+ on the Moods and Feelings Questionnaire and below the clinical cutoff on the Youth Self Report, Aggressive subscale were eligible. 716 met criteria; 497 were randomized. 123 families or youth declined; the rest could not be contacted.

Pre-assignment details

Participants recruited across 4 annual cohorts, included 241 youth randomized to HSTS and 256 to the Brief Intervention (BI). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at baseline in terms of gender, race, and socioeconomic status (SES) as well as baseline comparisons of target variables (depression, hopelessness, anxiety, anger).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CAST-T/HSTS
HSTS condition combined the Brief Intervention and the HSTS protocol. HSTS introduced skills to enhance personal control (management of depression, anger and stress), self-esteem, decision making and interpersonal communications. Skills were taught in school based small groups to foster social support with outreach to teachers, peers, and parents. HSTS skills groups were held in the spring of 8th grade followed by four one-on-one booster sessions delivered to the students as 9th graders by HSTP leaders; parents participated in four educational sessions. HSTS objectives are: 1) to increase the acquisition of coping skills competencies by teaching and practicing strategies taught; 2) to increase social support resources by building a supportive network; 3) to increase the youth's engagement in positive social activities; and 4) to motivate parents to increase their support via parent educational sessions. CAST/HSTS Preventive Intervention: Brief Intervention
241
Brief Intervention
Brief Intervention: After each youth and parent completed baseline questionnaires the youth participated in a 1 on 1 standardized clinical follow-up with a trained clinician (blind to study condition) to review areas of concern, based on questionnaire responses including stressors at school, home, and with peers, level of support available and how to access support. The teen and clinician then planned a feedback call to parents, allowing teens to shape requests for support from parents as well as understand exactly what information would be shared with parents. Feedback call to parents reviewed concerns and made recommendations for services as needed. A similar procedure was followed after each assessment for all participants who indicated a risk of clinical depression or self-harm. CAST/HSTS Preventive Intervention: Brief Intervention
256
Total497

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-up AssessmentWithdrawal by Subject66
Intervention ComponentWithdrawal by Subject23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCAST-T/HSTSBrief Intervention
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
497 Participants241 Participants256 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous13.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
13.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83
13.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
Region of Enrollment
United States
497 participants241 participants256 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
314 Participants149 Participants165 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
183 Participants92 Participants91 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2410 / 256
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2410 / 256

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)

The Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire is a 13 item measure of level of self reported depressive symptoms. Each item in scored on a 3-point Likert scale as follows: True (0), Sometimes (1), and Not True (2) rated within the timeframe of the previous two weeks. A total score is obtained; scores can range from 0 to 26. Total scores of 12 or higher may signify that a child/adolescent is suffering from depression. Higher scores on this scale suggest a worse outcome or greater endorsement of depressive symptoms. Change is measured based on two time points baseline to the 18 months follow-up assessment.

Time frame: Baseline to 18 months

Population: The main study hypothesis was that at-risk middle school students randomly assigned to participate in the CAST-T/HSTS versus the Brief Intervention would demonstrate a greater reduction in self-reported depressive symptoms after the 8th grade intervention as well as lower rate of increase in depressive symptoms at the 18 mos. follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CAST-T/HSTSChange in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)2.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.18
Brief InterventionChange in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Comparison: Mean changes in Short Moods and Feelings measure of depression was the unit of analysis.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: A secondary hypothesis of the study was that attachment to school and/or perceptions of school supportiveness would mediate the effect of the HSTS intervention on depressive symptoms.p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

School Attachment

School attachment measure consisted of 4 items. Item responses range from 0 (unsatisfied, rarely attended, not involved, etc.) to 6 (highly satisfied, regularly attended, very involved, etc). Scores could range from 0 to 36 with higher scores indicating more positive school attachment. Item were: My overall satisfaction with classes was… Overall, how safe did school feel last semester… Overall, how friendly did school feel… How involved were you in school activities…

Time frame: 18 months

Population: T-test differences for HSTS versus Brief Intervention on the School Attachment scale.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CAST-T/HSTSSchool Attachment4.53 units of a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Brief InterventionSchool Attachment3.95 units of a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026