Skip to content

Lymph Node Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Identification in Patients With Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Identification in Patients With Stage1B1 Cervical Carcinoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00070317
Enrollment
102
Registered
2003-10-07
Start date
2004-06-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2017-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma, Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Stage I Cervical Cancer

Brief summary

This clinical trial is studying how well lymph node mapping and sentinel lymph node identification work in finding lymph node metastases in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Diagnostic procedures, such as lymph node mapping and sentinel lymph node identification, performed before and during surgery, may improve the ability to detect lymph node metastases in patients who have cervical cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the sensitivity of the sentinel lymph node in the determination of lymph node metastases, using preoperative or intraoperative lymphatic mapping, in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. II. Determine the false-negative predictive value of the sentinel lymph node in the determination of lymph node metastases in these patients. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients receive radiolabeled technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid injected around the tumor 6 hours prior to or after induction of anesthesia right before surgery. Patients then undergo radical hysterectomy and complete pelvic and low para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Intraoperatively, patients undergo lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node identification using isosulfan blue or methylene blue injected at 4 locations in the cervix and a hand-held gamma counter.

Interventions

Undergo lymphangiography using isosulfan blue or methylene blue

Undergo lymphatic mapping

Undergo lymphangiography using isosulfan blue or methylene blue

DRUGMethylene Blue

Undergo lymphangiography using isosulfan blue or methylene blue

PROCEDURERadionuclide Imaging

Undergo radionuclide imaging with technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid

PROCEDURESentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Undergo complete pelvic and low para-aortic lymphadenectomy

Undergo radionuclide imaging with technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid

PROCEDURETherapeutic Conventional Surgery

Undergo radical hysterectomy

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Gynecologic Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of carcinoma of the cervix of 1 of the following cellular types: * Squamous cell carcinoma * Adenocarcinoma * Adenosquamous cell carcinoma * Stage IB1 disease (no greater than 4 cm) * No unequivocal evidence of metastases * Adequate surgical candidate * No known allergy to triphenylmethane compounds * No prior pelvic irradiation * No prior retroperitoneal surgery * More than 4 weeks since prior cold knife or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) cone biopsy * Prior cone biopsy allowed provided current disease is stage IB1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SensitivityAt the time of surgerySensitivity is defined as the proportion of patients who test as positive sentinel node among the patients who have lymph node metastases.
False Negative Predictive Value (FNPV)At the time of SurgeryThe proportion of patients with FNPV among patients who tests as negative sentinel node, where FNPV is defined as a person who tests as negative sentinel node but who actually has lymph node metastases

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This trial was opened to patient entry on June 21, 2004 and was closed to entry July 21, 2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Diagnostic
Patients receive radiolabeled technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid injected around the tumor 6 hours prior to or after induction of anesthesia right before surgery. Patients then undergo radical hysterectomy and complete pelvic and low para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Intraoperatively, patients undergo lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node identification using isosulfan blue or methylene blue injected at 4 locations in the cervix and a hand-held gamma counter. Isosulfan Blue: Undergo lymphangiography using isosulfan blue or methylene blue Lymph Node Mapping: Undergo lymphatic mapping Lymphangiography: Undergo lymphangiography using isosulfan blue or methylene blue Methylene Blue: Undergo lymphangiography using isosulfan blue or methylene blue Radionuclide Imaging: Undergo radionuclide imaging with technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Undergo complete pelvic and low para-aortic lymphadenectomy Technetium Tc-99m Sulfur Colloid: Undergo radionuclid
89
Total89

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyIneligible-Improper prior treatment2
Overall StudyIneligible-Inadequate pathology6
Overall StudyIneligible required test not done1
Overall StudyIneligible Wrong Cell type/primary/stage3
Overall StudyInevaluable (Never Treated)1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDiagnostic
Age, Customized
20-29 years
6 Participants
Age, Customized
30-39 years
23 Participants
Age, Customized
40-49 years
31 Participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
17 Participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
9 Participants
Age, Customized
70-79 years
2 Participants
Age, Customized
80-89 years
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
89 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 89
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 89

Outcome results

Primary

False Negative Predictive Value (FNPV)

The proportion of patients with FNPV among patients who tests as negative sentinel node, where FNPV is defined as a person who tests as negative sentinel node but who actually has lymph node metastases

Time frame: At the time of Surgery

Population: Eligible and evaluable patients who tested as negative sentinel node and have lymph node sampling

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DiagnosticFalse Negative Predictive Value (FNPV)5.9 Percentage of participants
Primary

Sensitivity

Sensitivity is defined as the proportion of patients who test as positive sentinel node among the patients who have lymph node metastases.

Time frame: At the time of surgery

Population: Eligible and evaluable patients with lymph node metastasis and identified sentinel node

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DiagnosticSensitivity85.7 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026