Skip to content

Dosing Study of Replagal in Patients With Fabry Disease

Study of Weekly Dosing Regimens of Replagal in Patients With Fabry Disease With Incomplete Clinical Response to Long-Term Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00068107
Enrollment
13
Registered
2003-09-08
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fabry Disease

Keywords

Lysosomal Storage, Renal Insufficiency, Stroke, Hypohidrosis, Peripheral Neuropathy, Fabry Disease

Brief summary

This study will determine the safety and effectiveness of increasing Replagal infusions in certain patients with Fabry disease. Replagal is a genetically engineered form of Alpha-galactosidase A, an enzyme that normally breaks down a fatty substance called globotriaosylceramide (Gb3). In patients with Fabry disease, Alpha-galactosidase A does not function properly and, therefore, Gb3 builds up, causing problems with the kidneys, heart, nerves, and blood vessels. Patients with Fabry disease who are participating in NIH protocol 00-N-0185 or 02-N-0220 may be eligible for this study. This includes patients who are currently taking Replagal but whose kidney function continues to worsen, or patients who have certain test results that are much improved after Replagal infusion. Participants will receive Replagal infusions (0.2 mg/kg body weight) through a vein once a week (as opposed to the previous dosage of once every 2 weeks) for up to 2 years. The first infusion, and some others, are given at the NIH Clinical Center, but most are administered by the patient's local doctor. Vital signs are measured before, immediately after, and 1 hour after each infusion. Baseline evaluations are done on an inpatient basis at the NIH Clinical Center over a 1-week period before and after the first Replagal infusion and at 6-month intervals during the study. Tests include a check of vital signs (temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate, and blood pressure); weight measurement; physical and neurological examinations; routine blood and urine tests; 24-hour urine collection; electrocardiogram; and review of treatment side effects. In addition, the following tests are done: * Quantitative sensory testing: This is a non-invasive test to measure the ability to sense warm, cold and vibration in the hand and foot. * QSART: This test measures the amount of sweat in a particular area of skin that did not sweat enough. A small amount of a medicine called acetylcholine is put on the skin and made to enter the skin using a very small electric current. * Doppler skin blood flow: This test measures blood flow to the blood vessels of the skin. A machine takes pictures of blood flow in the skin of the forearm using a laser beam. Pictures are taken before and during application of medicines that cause blood vessels to dilate. Acetylcholine is used on one forearm and nitroprusside is used on the other. The medication is made to enter the skin using a small el...

Detailed description

Objectives: The goal of this study is to determine whether higher frequency of dosing of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) can either significantly slow the decline of renal function or continuously sustain the normalization of other objective functions in patients with Fabry disease who have been receiving intravenous infusions of Replagal (agalsidase alfa) at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg of body weight administered every 2 weeks. Study Population: Patients with Fabry disease who are currently on clinical research protocols 00-N-0185/TKT011 or 02-N-0220/TKT015 and who have demonstrated progressive decline in calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of at least 5 ml/min/year on ERT or who consistently show transient improvement in objective functions (such as sweating) in the few days post-infusion. Design: This is an open label study comparing one dosing regimen with a previous less intensive dosing regimen. Patients will receive a dose of 0.2 mg/kg of body weight every week. Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure will be a change in the mean linear rate of decline of the estimated calculated GFR. The main hypothesis is that a more frequent administration of the previous dose of Replagal will significantly reduce the mean slope of the decline of the calculated glomerular filtration rate GFR compared with the currently observed slope on a dose of 0.2 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks. At the 2-year time point, the dose will be increased to 0.4 mg/kg only in the patients whose GFR continues to significantly decline. Secondary outcome measures will be globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in plasma and urinary sediment, quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test, quantitative sensory testing. Study duration is 2 years with a possibility of additional one-year extensions.

Interventions

enzyme replacement therapy

Sponsors

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Baylor Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with Fabry disease participating in 00-N-0185/TKT011 or 02-N-0220/TKT015 may be eligible. No other Fabry patients will be eligible. Patients losing GFR at a rate greater than 5 ml/min/year despite ERT with agalsidase alfa for greater than or equal to 2.5 years in 00-N-0185/TKT/003/006/011 Study or ERT over greater than or equal to 1.0 years in 02-N-0220/TKT/010/015 Study. Patients who at least twice demonstrated significant improvement or normalization of sweat function (by QSART or thermoregulatory sweat test) or reduction in serum creatinine by at least 10% but return to the pre-infusion state before the subsequent biweekly enzyme infusion. Patients who freely agree to participate in this study and understand the nature, risks and benefits of this study and give their written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with Fabry disease, who are not already part of 00-N-0185/TKT011 or 02-N-0220/TKT015. Patients on these protocols who have stable serum creatinine (or a lesser rise in serum creatinine than stipulated in the inclusion criteria), and do not show other objective evidence of incomplete clinical response between biweekly infusions (e.g. sweat function). Patients who have begun dialysis or who have received a renal transplant. Patients who cannot tolerate the study procedures or who are unable or unwilling to travel to the study center as required by this protocol. Patients with an intercurrent medical condition that would render them unsuitable for mthe study e.g. HIV, diabetes. The reason is that the pathologies of these conditions will be significant confounders in assessing the effect of the experimental therapy and its adverse events. Patients who in the opinion of the investigator (for whatever reason) are thought to be unsuitable for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)Relagal was administered every 2 weeks for 2-4 years pre-study, Relagal was administred weekly during the study (approx. 4.5-10 years)The rate of decline in renal function, as measured by estimation of glomerular filtration rate at baseline when participants were receiving agalsidase alfa (Relagal) every 2 weeks and when participants were receiving weekly infusion of Relagal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in PlasmaBaseline and last observation (up to 10 years)
Globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine SedimentBaseline and last observation (up to 10 years)
Number of Participants With a Change in Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex TestBaseline and last observation (up to 10 years)Quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART) is a measure of sweat function
Quantitative Sensory Testingpre-study was 2-4 years, during study sensory testing measured for approx. 4.5-5 yearsFor quantitative sensory testing, the outcome variable (detection threshold score) was analyzed for all combinations of location (foot, hand, and thigh) and test (cold, vibration, and warm). Possible threshold scores may range from 1-25. Score values of \>25 were set to 25. Higher scores indicate higher sensory detection threshold. Therefore, lower score is better. Time, measured in years, was centered at the date in which patients switched treatment regimen. All available measurements were used. A linear mixed model analysis was used to test for differences in the linear association between time and detection threshold score pre-and-post ERT regiment change while accounting for the correlation among observations from the same individual. Specifically, the model contained a subject specific random intercept with year as a fixed effect and knot at time of the treatment change.
Doppler Skin Blood Flow10 years

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

13 participants were recruited; 1 participant was excluded because of stable kidney function; 12 started treatment

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants were followed on a prior protocol and found to have a mean slope on Replagal (agalsidase alfa) infused every 2 weeks of -0.66 +- 0.24 ml/min/month.
13
Total13

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall Studyend-stage renal disease6
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
Age, Continuous41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

The rate of decline in renal function, as measured by estimation of glomerular filtration rate at baseline when participants were receiving agalsidase alfa (Relagal) every 2 weeks and when participants were receiving weekly infusion of Relagal.

Time frame: Relagal was administered every 2 weeks for 2-4 years pre-study, Relagal was administred weekly during the study (approx. 4.5-10 years)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsEstimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)eGFR on infusions every 2 wks-0.66 ml/min/monthStandard Deviation 0.24
All ParticipantsEstimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)eGFR on infusions weekly-0.32 ml/min/monthStandard Deviation 0.34
Comparison: eGFR measured pre-study was compared to eGFR during the studyp-value: 0.01t-test, 2 sided
95% CI: [8.4, 323.8]
Secondary

Doppler Skin Blood Flow

Time frame: 10 years

Population: Doppler skin blood flow was not collected in this study because it was judged to not be useful early in the study.

Secondary

Globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasma

Time frame: Baseline and last observation (up to 10 years)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 53.17 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 83.69 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 32.43 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 94.25 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 66.78 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 102.59 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 24.62 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 116.62 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 73.32 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 126.56 nanomole/mL
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 12.35 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 126.63 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 14.10 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 25.58 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 32.62 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 53.60 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 65.04 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 73.21 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 84.51 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 91.91 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 103.41 nanomole/mL
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Plasmaparticipant 115.62 nanomole/mL
Secondary

Globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sediment

Time frame: Baseline and last observation (up to 10 years)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 149 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 2126 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 3248 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 5136 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 63026 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 73128 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 112342 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 12624 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 81393 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 9137 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All ParticipantsGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 101457 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 71682 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 11888 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 10488 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 289 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 9370 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 382 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 11213 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 5162 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 8450 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 6652 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
All Participants at Last ObservationGlobotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in Urine Sedimentparticipant 12169 nanomole/(gram of Creatinine)
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Change in Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test

Quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART) is a measure of sweat function

Time frame: Baseline and last observation (up to 10 years)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With a Change in Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test0 participants
Secondary

Quantitative Sensory Testing

For quantitative sensory testing, the outcome variable (detection threshold score) was analyzed for all combinations of location (foot, hand, and thigh) and test (cold, vibration, and warm). Possible threshold scores may range from 1-25. Score values of \>25 were set to 25. Higher scores indicate higher sensory detection threshold. Therefore, lower score is better. Time, measured in years, was centered at the date in which patients switched treatment regimen. All available measurements were used. A linear mixed model analysis was used to test for differences in the linear association between time and detection threshold score pre-and-post ERT regiment change while accounting for the correlation among observations from the same individual. Specifically, the model contained a subject specific random intercept with year as a fixed effect and knot at time of the treatment change.

Time frame: pre-study was 2-4 years, during study sensory testing measured for approx. 4.5-5 years

Population: Number of participants with a sufficient number of data points to estimate slope

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingCold Sensory on Foot (difference pre- to post-)0.3863 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.2784
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingCold Sensory testing on Foot (pre-study)-0.2108 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1366
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingVibration Sensory testing on Foot (pre-study)0.3353 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1004
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingVibration on Foot (difference pre- to post-)-0.3912 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.2041
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingWarm Sensory testing on Foot (pre-study)-0.08536 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.09264
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingWarm on Foot (difference pre- to post-)0.4169 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1887
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingCold Sensory testing on Hand (pre-study)-0.1026 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1413
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingCold on Hand (difference pre- to post-)0.5141 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.2874
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingVibration Sensory testing on Hand (pre-study)0.2279 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.07427
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingVibration on Hand (difference pre- to post-)-0.1966 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1503
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingWarm Sensory testing on Hand (pre-study)-0.2138 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1179
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingWarm on Hand (difference pre- to post-)1.1781 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.2401
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingCold Sensory testing on Thigh (pre-study)0.2502 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1437
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingCold on Thigh (difference pre- to post-)-0.2991 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.2884
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingWarm Sensory testing on Thigh (pre-study)-0.549 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.1124
All ParticipantsQuantitative Sensory TestingWarm on Thigh (difference pre- to post-)0.8255 units on a scale/yearStandard Error 0.2258

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026