Skip to content

Fluoride Varnish Randomized Clinical Trial

Comprehensive Oral Health Center for Discovery: New Strategies for Enhancing Tissue Integrity and Repair Early Childhood Caries: Prevention and Treatment Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00066963
Enrollment
376
Registered
2003-08-08
Start date
2002-10-31
Completion date
2006-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Keywords

Early Childhood Caries

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of fluoride varnish (FV) applied once or twice a year with counseling to counseling alone in preventing early childhood caries (ECC) (tooth decay in children under the age of five).

Detailed description

This project was a prospective, randomized clinical trial (RCT) among initially caries-free children from about six months old (when primary teeth erupt) up to age three at two public health facilities in San Francisco, one serving a primarily Latino and one a primarily Asian population. The RCT 1) Compared the efficacy of once or twice/year fluoride varnish (FV) application and counseling to counseling alone in preventing early childhood caries (ECC); 2) Assessed pre-intervention salivary markers (biologic and chemical), behavioral and demographic factors as predictors of ECC; 3) Compared the efficacy of these interventions between sites serving different ethnic populations with a high prevalence of ECC; and 4) Determined the salivary fluoride release profile following exposure to fluoride varnish.

Interventions

DEVICEFluoride Varnish

0.1 mL (1 drop) applied on each of 2 arches

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 36 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion * Children \< 44 months old * Caries-free * 4 erupted maxillary incisors * Residing in fluoridated community (San Francisco) Exclusion * Cleft Palate * Developmental or learning disabilities * Children with transient residence (homeless, migrant, foster home) * Children with an another household member participating in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Caries Incident Casestwo yearsA trained, calibrated dentist blinded to treatment arm performed visual-tactile dental exams at 1 and 2 years post-baseline. Group-specific number of incident cases were reported as the number of individual participants with caries at a follow-up visit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

January 2001 - July 2002. Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants & Children (WICs); Womens resource center; medical clinics; pre-schools; dental clinics

Pre-assignment details

Cleft lip or palate, developmental or learning disabilities, older than 36 mos; younger than 6 mos,immuno-compromised, born outside SF Bay Area where water is non-fluoridated, lack parental consent; lack 4 maxillary incisors, have caries, other family member in study, transient parents, ineligible to use SF Health Dept service

Participants by arm

ArmCount
No Intervention: Counseling Only
Counseling Only (0FV)
126
Experimental: FV Every 12mo for 24mo + Counsel
Preventive fluoride varnish every 12mo for 24mo plus Counseling (2FV)
124
Experimental: FV Every 6mo for 24mo + Counsel
Preventive fluoride varnish every 6mo for 24mo plus Counseling (4FV)
126
Total376

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental: FV Every 12mo for 24mo + CounselExperimental: FV Every 6mo for 24mo + CounselNo Intervention: Counseling OnlyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
124 Participants126 Participants126 Participants376 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous1.8 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
1.8 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.8 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.8 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
124 participants126 participants126 participants376 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants64 Participants68 Participants198 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants62 Participants58 Participants178 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1000 / 931 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1000 / 930 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Caries Incident Cases

A trained, calibrated dentist blinded to treatment arm performed visual-tactile dental exams at 1 and 2 years post-baseline. Group-specific number of incident cases were reported as the number of individual participants with caries at a follow-up visit.

Time frame: two years

Population: intention-to-treat with any follow-up information. multiple imputation for sensitivity analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Counseling OnlyNumber of Caries Incident Cases42 participants
FV 1x/Year + CounselingNumber of Caries Incident Cases23 participants
FV 2x/Year + CounselingNumber of Caries Incident Cases14 participants
Comparison: Planned sample size of 384 participants (128/study arm) (alpha = 0.05, power = 90%, 50% attrition, χ2 test) to detect caries incidence differences, based on caries incidence in the literature (20% to 50% over two years). 50% attrition in the sample size calculation was selected based on the literature (e.g. Weinstein et al., 1994 reported 53% attrition in six months.)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.9, 7.6]Mantel Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026