Skip to content

Atherosclerosis Prevention in Pediatric Lupus Erythematosus (APPLE)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Test the Safety and Efficacy of Lipitor (Atorvastatin) in Reducing the Progression of Carotid IMT in Early Childhood SLE

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00065806
Enrollment
221
Registered
2003-08-04
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2013-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Keywords

Pediatric lupus, Atherosclerosis, SLE, HMG CoA reductase inhibitor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is: 1. To assess the efficacy of a lipid-lowering agent (atorvastatin) on the development of atherosclerosis that predisposes children with SLE to cardiovascular events in adulthood. 2. To assess the safety of intermediate-term (36 months) treatment of children and young adults with atorvastatin. 3. To further characterize the course of SLE in children and young adults, by establishing a cohort of pediatric SLE patients to be followed prospectively. 4. To establish a mechanism for conducting clinical trials in rare pediatric rheumatic diseases using the Children's Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA).

Detailed description

Children and adolescents with SLE represent 15% of all SLE patients. Children with SLE suffer high morbidity that affects many organ systems, reduces their quality of life, and shortens their lifespan. As more children with SLE survive into adulthood, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease has emerged as a major concern. SLE is a significant risk factor for myocardial infarction and death in young premenopausal women with SLE, even after controlling for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Acceleration of atherogenesis in SLE most likely reflects SLE-associated vascular immune and inflammatory changes. Although limited, the data on cardiovascular and lipid abnormalities in children with SLE implicate atherosclerosis as an important cause of long-term morbidity and mortality. The 3-hydroxy-3-methlglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, reduce mortality and morbidity from atherosclerosis in adults and have intrinsic anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory properties. These anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory activities may have particular benefit in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis in SLE. This trial will evaluate atorvastatin in children with SLE in the largest cohort of pediatric SLE patients ever studied prospectively. Children in this study will be randomized to receive either atorvastatin or a placebo. All children will be followed for 3 years, during which they will have 15 study visits. Study visits will generally last 2 hours and will include medical interview, medication review and pill count, physical examination, and blood and urine tests. Cardiovascular-specific outcome measures will include assessments of high sensitivity CRP; fasting lipid profile; homocysteine level; apolipoprotein A, B1, and Lp(a); carotid intima media thickness (IMT); and tensor diffusion/MRI.

Interventions

DRUGAtorvastatin

Participants weighing more 50 kg will receive 10 mg of atorvastatin po qd as a starting dose, which will be increased to 20 mg po qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50 kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.

Participants weighing more 50 kg will receive 10 mg of placebo po qd as a starting dose, which will be increased to 20 mg po qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50 kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.

Sponsors

Laura Schanberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised diagnostic guidelines for SLE * Weight of 25 kg (55 lbs) or more * Outpatient * Ability to complete self-report questionnaires in either English or Spanish * Willingness to comply with recommended diet * Acceptable methods of contraception

Exclusion criteria

* Drug-induced lupus * Liver disease (ALT or aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2 X normal value) * Myositis (CK greater than 3 X normal value) * Inability to obtain adequate-quality IMT images * Current use of oral or parenteral tacrolimus or cyclosporine * Dialysis or serum creatinine reater than 2.5 mg/dL * Active nephrotic syndrome (urinary protein greater than 3 g/24 h and serum albumin less than 2.3 g/dl) * Total cholesterol greater than 350 mg/dL * Xanthoma * Familial hypercholesterolemia * Pregnant or breastfeeding * Use of estrogen-containing contraceptives (e.g., Lo-Ovral) * Unable to adhere to study regimen * Life-threatening non-SLE illness that would interfere with ability to complete the study * Current drug or alcohol abuse * Anticipated poor compliance * Participation in another drug intervention study within 30 days of study enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean-Mean Common Carotid IMT (CIMT)Change from baseline to 36 monthsFor the common carotid arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right common far wall mean, left common near wall mean and left common far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean common CIMT for each participant visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean-Mean CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor each side, segment and wall, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 12 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right common far wall mean, right bifurcation near wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, right internal near wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left common near wall mean, left common far wall mean, left bifurcation near wall mean, left bifurcation far wall mean, left internal near wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 12 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Max Common CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor each side and wall of the common carotid arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right common near wall max, right common far wall max, left common near wall max and left common far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max common CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Max Internal CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor each side and wall of the internal carotid arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right internal near wall max, right internal far wall max, left internal near wall max and left internal far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max internal CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Mean Internal CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor the internal carotid arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right internal near wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left internal near wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean internal CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Max Bifurcation CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor each side and wall of the bifurcation arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right bifurcation near wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, left bifurcation near wall max and left bifurcation far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max bifurcation CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Mean Bifurcation CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor the bifurcation arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right bifurcation near wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, left bifurcation near wall mean and left bifurcation far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean bifurcation CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Max Far Wall CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor the far wall measurements for each side and segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 6 summary variables (right common far wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, right internal far wall max, left common far wall max, left bifurcation far wall max, and left internal far wall max). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max far wall CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Mean Far Wall CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor the far wall measurements for each side and segment, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 6 summary variables (right common far wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left common far wall mean, left bifurcation far wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean far wall CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Max CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor each side, segment and wall, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 12 summary variables (right common near wall max, right common far wall max, right bifurcation near wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, right internal near wall max, right internal far wall max, left common near wall max, left common far wall max, left bifurcation near wall max, left bifurcation far wall max, left internal near wall max and left internal far wall max). These 12 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Mean-Mean Near Wall CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor the near wall measurements for each side and segment, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 6 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right bifurcation near wall mean, right internal near wall mean, left common near wall mean, left bifurcation wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean far wall CIMT for each participant visit.
Change in Natural Log of mg/L for hsCRPChange from baseline to 36 months
Change in Total CholesterolChange from baseline to 36 months
Change in HDL CholesterolChange from baseline to 36 months
Change in LDL CholesterolChange from baseline to 36 months
Change in TriglyceridesChange from baseline to 36 months
Change in Lipoprotein AChange from baseline to 36 months
Change in HomocysteineChange from baseline to 36 months
Change in Mean-Max Near Wall CIMTChange from baseline to 36 monthsFor the near wall measurements for each side and segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 6 summary variables (right common near wall max, right bifurcation near wall max, right internal near wall max, left common near wall max, left bifurcation near wall max, and left internal near wall max). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max near wall CIMT for each participant visit.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 Atorvastatin
Patients will be treated with dietary intervention (AHA Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes \[TLC\] diet, \[http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/cgi-bin/chd/step2intro.cgi\]), cardiovascular risk factor reduction counseling, hydroxychloroquine, low-dose aspirin, a multivitamin containing folate, plus atorvastatin at 10 mg or 20 mg depending on the patient's weight. Patients weighing more than 50 kg will receive 10 mg qd atorvastatin for the first month, which will be increased to 20 mg qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months. Atorvastatin : Participants weighing more 50 kg will receive 10 mg of atorvastatin po qd as a starting dose, which will be increased to 20 mg po qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50 kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.
113
2 Placebo
Patients will be treated with dietary intervention (AHA Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes \[TLC\] diet, \[http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/cgi-bin/chd/step2intro.cgi\]), cardiovascular risk factor reduction counseling, hydroxychloroquine, low-dose aspirin, a multivitamin containing folate, plus placebo at 10 mg or 20 mg depending on the patient's weight. Patients weighing more than 50 kg will receive 10 mg qd placebo for the first month, which will be increased to 20 mg qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months. Placebo atorvastatin : Participants weighing more 50 kg will receive 10 mg of placebo po qd as a starting dose, which will be increased to 20 mg po qd at the Day 30 visit and continue through month 36. Participants weighing less than 50 kg will receive a maximum of 10 mg po qd for 36 months.
108
Total221

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1 Atorvastatin2 PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
87 Participants87 Participants174 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants21 Participants47 Participants
Age Continuous15.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
15.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
15.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
95 Participants89 Participants184 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants19 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
94 / 11395 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
34 / 11340 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mean-Mean Common Carotid IMT (CIMT)

For the common carotid arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right common far wall mean, left common near wall mean and left common far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean common CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Mean Common Carotid IMT (CIMT)0.0010 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Mean Common Carotid IMT (CIMT)0.0024 mm
Secondary

Change in HDL Cholesterol

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in HDL Cholesterol-0.43 mg/dl
2 PlaceboChange in HDL Cholesterol0.89 mg/dl
Secondary

Change in Homocysteine

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Homocysteine1.84 μmoles/liter
2 PlaceboChange in Homocysteine1.76 μmoles/liter
Secondary

Change in LDL Cholesterol

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in LDL Cholesterol-27.63 mg/dl
2 PlaceboChange in LDL Cholesterol-1.48 mg/dl
Secondary

Change in Lipoprotein A

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Lipoprotein A2.00 mg/dl
2 PlaceboChange in Lipoprotein A6.34 mg/dl
Secondary

Change in Mean-Max Bifurcation CIMT

For each side and wall of the bifurcation arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right bifurcation near wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, left bifurcation near wall max and left bifurcation far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max bifurcation CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Max Bifurcation CIMT0.0033 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Max Bifurcation CIMT0.0072 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Max CIMT

For each side, segment and wall, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 12 summary variables (right common near wall max, right common far wall max, right bifurcation near wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, right internal near wall max, right internal far wall max, left common near wall max, left common far wall max, left bifurcation near wall max, left bifurcation far wall max, left internal near wall max and left internal far wall max). These 12 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Max CIMT0.0037 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Max CIMT0.0064 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Max Common CIMT

For each side and wall of the common carotid arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right common near wall max, right common far wall max, left common near wall max and left common far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max common CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Max Common CIMT0.0006 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Max Common CIMT0.0008 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Max Far Wall CIMT

For the far wall measurements for each side and segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 6 summary variables (right common far wall max, right bifurcation far wall max, right internal far wall max, left common far wall max, left bifurcation far wall max, and left internal far wall max). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max far wall CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Max Far Wall CIMT0.0045 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Max Far Wall CIMT0.0082 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Max Internal CIMT

For each side and wall of the internal carotid arterial segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 4 summary variables (right internal near wall max, right internal far wall max, left internal near wall max and left internal far wall max). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max internal CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Max Internal CIMT0.0090 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Max Internal CIMT0.0144 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Max Near Wall CIMT

For the near wall measurements for each side and segment, the maximum CIMT over the 4 angles of interrogation was selected to produce 6 summary variables (right common near wall max, right bifurcation near wall max, right internal near wall max, left common near wall max, left bifurcation near wall max, and left internal near wall max). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-max near wall CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Max Near Wall CIMT0.0024 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Max Near Wall CIMT0.0038 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Mean Bifurcation CIMT

For the bifurcation arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right bifurcation near wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, left bifurcation near wall mean and left bifurcation far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean bifurcation CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Mean Bifurcation CIMT0.0030 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Mean Bifurcation CIMT0.0055 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Mean CIMT

For each side, segment and wall, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 12 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right common far wall mean, right bifurcation near wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, right internal near wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left common near wall mean, left common far wall mean, left bifurcation near wall mean, left bifurcation far wall mean, left internal near wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 12 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Mean CIMT0.0033 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Mean CIMT0.0049 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Mean Far Wall CIMT

For the far wall measurements for each side and segment, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 6 summary variables (right common far wall mean, right bifurcation far wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left common far wall mean, left bifurcation far wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean far wall CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Mean Far Wall CIMT0.0042 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Mean Far Wall CIMT0.0064 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Mean Internal CIMT

For the internal carotid arterial segment, mean CIMT values were averaged across angles by side and wall to produce 4 summary variables (right internal near wall mean, right internal far wall mean, left internal near wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean internal CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Mean Internal CIMT0.0067 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Mean Internal CIMT0.0082 mm
Secondary

Change in Mean-Mean Near Wall CIMT

For the near wall measurements for each side and segment, mean CIMT values were averaged over the 4 angles of interrogation to produce 6 summary variables (right common near wall mean, right bifurcation near wall mean, right internal near wall mean, left common near wall mean, left bifurcation wall mean and left internal far wall mean). These 6 summary variables were then averaged to estimate a single mean-mean far wall CIMT for each participant visit.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Mean-Mean Near Wall CIMT0.0022 mm
2 PlaceboChange in Mean-Mean Near Wall CIMT0.0028 mm
Secondary

Change in Natural Log of mg/L for hsCRP

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Natural Log of mg/L for hsCRP-0.13 natural log of mg/L
2 PlaceboChange in Natural Log of mg/L for hsCRP0.27 natural log of mg/L
Secondary

Change in Total Cholesterol

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Total Cholesterol-30.30 mg/dl
2 PlaceboChange in Total Cholesterol-0.72 mg/dl
Secondary

Change in Triglycerides

Time frame: Change from baseline to 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
1 AtorvastatinChange in Triglycerides-11.04 mg/dl
2 PlaceboChange in Triglycerides-5.62 mg/dl

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026