Skip to content

Esophagectomy in Treating Patients With High-Grade Dysplasia of the Esophagus or Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III Esophageal Cancer

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE): A Multicenter Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00063986
Enrollment
110
Registered
2003-07-09
Start date
2004-06-24
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2023-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer

Keywords

esophageal cancer, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE)

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Laparoscopic-assisted surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopy are less invasive types of surgery for esophageal cancer that may have fewer side effects and improve recovery. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well laparoscopic-assisted surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopy work in treating patients who are undergoing esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus or stage I, stage II, or stage III esophageal cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Determine the feasibility of performing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), in terms of 30-day mortality, in patients with high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus or stage I-III esophageal cancer. * Determine the complications associated with this procedure in these patients. * Determine the rate at which conversion to open operation is required in patients undergoing this procedure. * Determine the length of the operation, duration of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing this procedure. * Determine feasibility and conversion rate of MIE after neoadjuvant therapy. * Assess the effectiveness of lymph node dissection by MIE by recording the total number of lymph nodes dissected. * Assess outcomes at follow-up to three years. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients undergo minimally invasive esophagectomy comprising video-assisted thoracoscopy to mobilize the thoracic esophagus in combination with laparoscopy to complete the esophagectomy and a neck incision to mobilize the cervical esophagus. Mortality at 30 days is assessed. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year. ACTUAL ACCRUAL: A total of 110 patients were accrued for this study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMinimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE)

Within 4 weeks of registration patients will undergo minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). However, there will be up to 5 months allowed between registration and MIE for those patients needing neoadjuvant therapy prior to undergoing MIE.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Cancer and Leukemia Group B
CollaboratorNETWORK
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * High grade dysplasia of the esophagus who would undergo esophagectomy OR esophageal cancer at stage T1-T3, N0-N1 who require esophagectomy (patients with M1 disease and/or bulky lymph node involvement were excluded). * Pathological confirmation of a diagnosis of cancer or high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus by biopsy. * Computerized tomography (CT) scan of chest and abdomen within 6 weeks prior to registration * Stomach must be available for conduit * Age of 18 and over * ECOG performance status of 0-2 * Creatinine less than 2 mg/dL * Patients with esophageal cancer who would be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation were eligible. If patients were registered prior to receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy they were allowed up to 5 months to complete therapy and any restaging that was necessary before operation was performed. * The patient was considered an appropriate candidate for surgery based on preoperative clinical staging and physiological factors prior to registration as documented in the surgical plan. Pre-operative staging should include: * Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) * Positron emission tomography (PET) scan and/or laparoscopic staging (Laparoscopic staging could be performed on the day of resection. Additional evaluation was recommended if the PET scan suggested distant metastatic disease.)

Exclusion criteria

* Cancer extending into the stomach more than 20% * Prior anti-reflux or gastric operations * Prior right thoracotomy * Prior major neck operation other than the removal of superficial skin lesion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peri-operative Mortality at 30 DaysAssessed at 30 days from surgeryThe primary endpoint is 30-day peri-operative mortality rate. Proportion of patients died within 30 days of surgery will be reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Operating TimeAssessed at surgeryThe length of the operation (total of thoracic and abdominal components) is recorded.
Duration of Intensive Care StayAssessed after surgery until patients are out of intensive careNumber of post-operative days in intensive care is reported.
Overall Length of Hospital StayAssessed after surgery until patients are out of hospitalThe number of days patients stayed in the hospital after surgery is reported.
Rate of Conversion to Open OperationAssessed at surgeryProportion of patients who required conversion to operation will be reported.
3-year Survival RateAssessed at 3 yearsPatients are followed for survival for 3 years from registration. Overall survival is defined as the time from operation to death.
30-day Peri-operative Mortality After Neoadjuvant TherapyAssessed at 30 days after surgeryProportion of patients with neoadjuvant therapy died within 30 days of operation is reported.
Rate of Conversion to Open Operation After Neoadjuvant TherapyAssessed at surgeryProportion of patients with neoadjuvant therapy required conversion to open operation is reported.
Total Number of Lymph Nodes DissectedAssessed at surgeryThe total number of lymph nodes dissected is reported to assess the effectiveness of lymph node dissection by MIE.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was activated on March 3, 2004, accrued its first patient on June 24, 2004, and closed on August 15, 2008. A total of 110 patients were accrued for this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)
Within 4 weeks of registration patients will undergo minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). However, there will be up to 5 months allowed between registration and MIE for those patients needing neoadjuvant therapy prior to undergoing MIE. Only eligible and treated patients are included in the primary analysis.
104
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyIneligible1
Overall StudyIntra-operatively ineligible4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMinimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)
Age, Continuous65 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
104 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
83 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
74 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
75 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Peri-operative Mortality at 30 Days

The primary endpoint is 30-day peri-operative mortality rate. Proportion of patients died within 30 days of surgery will be reported.

Time frame: Assessed at 30 days from surgery

Population: Eligible and treated patients are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)Peri-operative Mortality at 30 Days0.029 proportion of participants
Secondary

30-day Peri-operative Mortality After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Proportion of patients with neoadjuvant therapy died within 30 days of operation is reported.

Time frame: Assessed at 30 days after surgery

Population: 35 eligible and treated patients with neoadjuvant therapy are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)30-day Peri-operative Mortality After Neoadjuvant Therapy0.057 Proportion of patients
Secondary

3-year Survival Rate

Patients are followed for survival for 3 years from registration. Overall survival is defined as the time from operation to death.

Time frame: Assessed at 3 years

Population: Eligible and treated patients are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)3-year Survival Rate0.584 proportion of participants
Secondary

Duration of Intensive Care Stay

Number of post-operative days in intensive care is reported.

Time frame: Assessed after surgery until patients are out of intensive care

Population: Eligible and treated patients are included in this analysis. Out of 104 eligible and treated patients, duration of intensive care stay is missing for 3 patients, so the results are based on data from 101 patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)Duration of Intensive Care Stay2 Days
Secondary

Duration of Operating Time

The length of the operation (total of thoracic and abdominal components) is recorded.

Time frame: Assessed at surgery

Population: Eligible and treated patients are included in this analysis. Out of 104 eligible and treated patients, 10 patients' length of operation data were unavailable, so the results are based on data from 94 patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)Duration of Operating Time330 Minutes
Secondary

Overall Length of Hospital Stay

The number of days patients stayed in the hospital after surgery is reported.

Time frame: Assessed after surgery until patients are out of hospital

Population: Eligible and treated patients are included in this analysis. Out of 104 eligible and treated patients, duration of hospital stay is missing for 3 patients, so the results are based on data from 101 patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)Overall Length of Hospital Stay9 Days
Secondary

Rate of Conversion to Open Operation

Proportion of patients who required conversion to operation will be reported.

Time frame: Assessed at surgery

Population: Eligible and treated patients are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)Rate of Conversion to Open Operation0.087 Proportion of patients
Secondary

Rate of Conversion to Open Operation After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Proportion of patients with neoadjuvant therapy required conversion to open operation is reported.

Time frame: Assessed at surgery

Population: 35 eligible and treated patients with neoadjuvant therapy are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)Rate of Conversion to Open Operation After Neoadjuvant Therapy0.086 Proportion of patients
Secondary

Total Number of Lymph Nodes Dissected

The total number of lymph nodes dissected is reported to assess the effectiveness of lymph node dissection by MIE.

Time frame: Assessed at surgery

Population: Eligible and treated patients are included in this analysis. Out of 104 eligible and treated patients, the number of lymph nodes removed is missing for 1 patient, so the results are based on data from 103 patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE)Total Number of Lymph Nodes Dissected19 Lymph nodes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026