Skip to content

Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

CSP #474 - Radial Artery vs. Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (Radial Artery)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00054847
Enrollment
733
Registered
2003-02-13
Start date
2003-02-28
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2014-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

CABG, cardiovascular, chronic diseases, clinical trial, heart, multi-site trial, prospective

Brief summary

VA patients with coronary artery disease and who have agreed to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery would be randomized to receive either radial artery or saphenous vein to the study vessel. The primary outcome variable is graft patency at one year.

Detailed description

Primary Hypothesis: Radial artery grafts will have a higher graft patency rate at one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) compared to saphenous vein grafts. Secondary Hypotheses: Determine if there are any differences in clinical outcomes, cost and quality of life in patients receiving radial artery versus saphenous vein grafts. Intervention: 1) Saphenous vein graft. This is the standard conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting to all areas of the heart except the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. 2) Radial artery. This is the experimental conduit. Preference should be given to harvesting from the non-dominant arm. Primary Outcomes: 1-year post CABG surgery patency rates Study Abstract: Although the radial artery was introduced as a potential conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting in the 1970s, enthusiasm for its use was limited by the technical difficulty of harvesting the vessel and problems with perioperative vascular spasm. In spite of this, some surgeons persisted based on their belief that arterial conduits would be better than vein grafts, in terms of long-term patency. With the development of new harvesting techniques and the introduction of calcium channel blockers to prevent vasospasm, the use of the radial artery graft has increased in recent years. This use of the radial artery as a conduit is not based on any long-term prospective data regarding its patency. However, because the VA has been a leader in defining the long-term efficacy/patency of saphenous vein and internal mammary grafts, it is appropriate for the VA to investigate radial artery grafts. In fact, the VA under its Cooperative Studies Program, is probably the only health care delivery system that has the ability to undertake this study. Study Design: The study is a prospective, randomized, unblinded clinical trial. The population consists of VA patients with coronary artery disease documented by coronary arteriography and who have agreed to undergo coronary artery bypass surgery. Medical conditions which could affect blood flow through the patient's arm are the main exclusion criteria. These include Raynaud's symptoms, positive Allen test, neurologic or musculoskeletal disease affecting the arm and patients with one arm. Patients who are eligible and agree to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to receive one radial artery graft or one saphenous vein graft to the following vessels: left anterior descending if internal mammary not used, circumflex, diagonal, and right coronary artery. The surgeon will determine the subject vessel preoperatively by selecting the vessel that is suitable for grafting. The stratification factors will be the participating hospital and which vessel is to be bypassed, left anterior descending versus all other vessels. History, physical examination, laboratory tests, and cardiac catheterization will be performed at baseline and at one year. Follow-up clinic visits will be at two weeks, three, six, and nine months post CABG. Coronary angiography will be performed one week and one year post surgery. Quality of life and hand/leg functional status will be assessed at baseline, three months, and one year. Cost measures will be captured. Biostatistical Considerations: For this trial, a sample size of 874 randomized patients will be required. This will provide 90% power to detect a difference in one-year patency rates of 92% for the radial artery versus 83% for the saphenous vein and an expected one-year catheter completion rate of 65%. This is a five year study. There will be four years of patient accrual and one year of follow-up. Nine participating VA medical centers will be expected to randomize two patients per month.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsaphenous vein graft

Saphenous vein harvested from the arm is used as a conduit for CABG.

Radial artery harvested from the arm is used as a conduit for CABG.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients needing coronary artery bypass grafts.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who require only a single vessel bypass and in whom the internal mammary artery will be used for that graft * Patients with previous stripping and ligation of saphenous veins and in whom no venous conduit is available for bypass * Patients with Raynaud's symptoms * Patients who have a creatinine above 2.0 mg/dL or require hemodialysis * Patients with a positive Allen test * Patients with cardiogenic shock * Patients who are unable to give consent * Patients allergic to contrast material * Patients undergoing repeat CABG or any form of robotic surgery * Patients who do not have full use of both arms * Patients who are pregnant * Patients with neurologic or musculoskeletal disease affecting the arm * Patients who refuse to participate * Patient requires any concomitant valve operation in the mitral, aortic, or pulmonary position. Isolated tricuspid annuloplasty is acceptable, but tricuspid valve replacement excludes the patient from consideration. * Patient requires concomitant Dor or Maze procedure * Patient is in another research study * No suitable radial target (there is no non-LAD vessel with a \>70% stenosis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Compare 1-year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Grafts Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery.1 yearThe primary end point was angiographic graft patency at 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery, defined as any opacification of distal target by injection of the graft. The window for the 1-year angiogram was 2 to 24 months. This window was chosen to capture early clinically indicated angiograms and late selective angiograms in patients who did not have symptoms. Study grafts that were occluded at 1 week after coronary artery bypass graft surgery were considered occluded at 1 year. One-year graft patency data were missing if patients whose study grafts were patent at 1 week did not undergo an angiogram within the time window or if the central angiography laboratory was not able to determine graft patency.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
DeathWithin 1 year of surgery.
Myocardial InfarctionWithin 1 year of bypass surgery
StrokeWithin 1 year of bypass surgery

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted from February 2003 to February 2009 at 11 Veterans Affairs medical centers among 757 participants (99% men) undergoing first-time elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Pre-assignment details

The left internal mammary artery was used to preferentially graft the left anterior descending coronary artery whenever possible; the best remaining recipient vessel was randomized to radial artery vs saphenous vein graft.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Saphenous Vein Graft
Saphenous Vein Graft saphenous vein graft : Saphenous vein harvested from the arm is used as a conduit for CABG.
367
Radial Artery Graft
Radial Artery radial artery graft : Radial artery harvested from the arm is used as a conduit for CABG.
366
Total733

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadial Artery GraftSaphenous Vein GraftTotal
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Canadian Functional Class
I
79 participants75 participants154 participants
Canadian Functional Class
II
115 participants115 participants230 participants
Canadian Functional Class
III
127 participants132 participants259 participants
Canadian Functional Class
IV
44 participants44 participants88 participants
Canadian Functional Class
Missing
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus
154 participants153 participants307 participants
Comorbidities
Heart Failure
28 participants15 participants43 participants
Comorbidities
Hypertension
289 participants287 participants576 participants
HDL38.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
39.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
38.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
LDL104.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.4
105.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39.6
104.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 39
Previous Myocardial Infarction
No Previous Myocardial Infarction
220 participants224 participants444 participants
Previous Myocardial Infarction
Previous Myocardial Infarction
146 participants143 participants289 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
31 participants30 participants61 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Did not specify
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
4 participants7 participants11 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
331 participants329 participants660 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
365 Participants362 Participants727 Participants
Smoking History
Current smoker
86 participants99 participants185 participants
Smoking History
Ex-smoker
220 participants217 participants437 participants
Smoking History
Missing data
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Smoking History
Never smoked
59 participants49 participants108 participants
Target Vessel
Circumflex
203 participants215 participants418 participants
Target Vessel
Left Anterior Descending
51 participants53 participants104 participants
Target Vessel
Right Coronary Artery
112 participants99 participants211 participants
Total Cholesterol178.8 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.8
177.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.4
177.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.2
Triglycerides193.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 143.6
186.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 118.4
189.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 131.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
152 / 367161 / 366
serious
Total, serious adverse events
172 / 367158 / 366

Outcome results

Primary

To Compare 1-year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Grafts Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery.

The primary end point was angiographic graft patency at 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery, defined as any opacification of distal target by injection of the graft. The window for the 1-year angiogram was 2 to 24 months. This window was chosen to capture early clinically indicated angiograms and late selective angiograms in patients who did not have symptoms. Study grafts that were occluded at 1 week after coronary artery bypass graft surgery were considered occluded at 1 year. One-year graft patency data were missing if patients whose study grafts were patent at 1 week did not undergo an angiogram within the time window or if the central angiography laboratory was not able to determine graft patency.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: All analyses were performed according to intention to treat. The study was designed to have 90%power to detect 1-year patency rates of 92% in radial artery vs 83% in saphenous vein grafts, with a 2-sided type I error of 5% and an expected 1-year catheterization completion rate of 65%. .

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Saphenous Vein GraftTo Compare 1-year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Grafts Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery.269 grafts
Radial Artery GraftTo Compare 1-year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Grafts Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery.266 grafts
Comparison: The study was designed to have 90% power to detect 1-year patency rates of 92% in radial artery vs 83% in saphenous vein grafts, with a 2-sided type I error of 5%and an expected 1-year catheterization completion rate of 65%.p-value: 0.8295% CI: [0.62, 1.84]Chi-squared
Secondary

Death

Time frame: Within 1 year of surgery.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Saphenous Vein GraftDeath7 participants
Radial Artery GraftDeath9 participants
p-value: 0.61Chi-squared
Secondary

Myocardial Infarction

Time frame: Within 1 year of bypass surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Saphenous Vein GraftMyocardial Infarction5 participants
Radial Artery GraftMyocardial Infarction4 participants
p-value: >0.99Chi-squared
Secondary

Stroke

Time frame: Within 1 year of bypass surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Saphenous Vein GraftStroke6 participants
Radial Artery GraftStroke7 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026