Skip to content

CSP #512 - Options in Management With Anti-Retrovirals

CSP #512 - Options in Management With Anti-Retrovirals (OPTIMA), Management of Patients With HIV Infection for Whom First and Second-line Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy Has Failed

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00050089
Acronym
OPTIMA
Enrollment
368
Registered
2002-11-22
Start date
2001-01-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2015-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AIDS, HIV Infections

Keywords

AIDS, antiretrovirals, ART, drug-free period, HAART, HIV, human immunodeficiency virus, randomized, structured treatment interruptions

Brief summary

This 'pragmatic' trial is a 2X2 open randomized study of patients in advanced HIV disease who have failed on conventional Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) regimens including all three classes of anti-HIV drugs. The first randomization will allocate patients to an intended 3-month antiretroviral drug-free period (ARDFP) or No ARDFP. The second randomization will allocate patients to Mega-ART (5+ drugs) or to Standard-ART (up to 4 drugs). The total study duration is 6.5 years with 5 years of intake and 1.5 year (minimum) of follow-up; median duration of patient follow-up is about 4 years. The target sample size is 390 patients and will provide 75% power to detect a 30% reduction in the hazard rate for the primary endpoint with mega-ART. Sixty-four sites will be participating in the trial--24 VA, 19 UK and 21 Canada.

Detailed description

Primary Hypothesis: Compared to patients in Standard Antiretroviral Therapy (ART), patients in Mega-ART assuming full compliance, will experience a 30% reduction in the hazard of reaching a clinical endpoint (AIDS event or death). Secondary Hypotheses: Time to development of a new, non-HIV related serious adverse event, health related quality of life, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 clinical or laboratory adverse events and changes in virological and immunological markers (CD4 cell count, viral load, resistance profiles) will vary between the different treatment strategies. Interventions: Eligible patients will be randomized to one of four treatment strategy arms: 1. No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) and Standard-ART 2. No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) and Mega-ART 3. Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (ARDFP) and Standard-ART 4. Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (ARDFP) and Mega-ART Note: The 'first' randomization will be ARDFP vs No ARDFP. Patients randomized to No ARDFP will receive their 'second' randomization at the same time. However, patients randomized to an Antiretroviral Drug Free Period (ARDFP) will receive their 'second' randomized assignment (Standard or Mega-ART) at the end of the ARDFP. Note: All Serious Adverse Events were coded using the MedDRA coding dictionary; other (not serious) Adverse Events were collected as part of the study but were not coded using MedDRA or any other standardized coding dictionary. This is the first trial of a Tri-National collaboration effort between the UK MRC, the Canadian CIHR and the VA CSP. The OPTIMA Trial was reviewed and approved by CSEC on October 12, 2000. The pre-kickoff meeting was held on March 21, 2001 in Washington, DC. The VA study kickoff meeting was held in Dallas, TX on May 16-18, 2001 and the Canadian kickoff was held in Toronto on May 29, 2001. The UK will have individual site initiation. As of October 17, 2005 there have been 357 patients enrolled in OPTIMA, at 64 sites in the three countries (279 in the VA, 41 in Canada and 37 in the UK). To date there are 64 sites actively participating in the study (24 in the VA, 19 in UK and 21 in Canada). Last date of patient follow-up was December 31, 2007.

Interventions

OTHERNo Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

DRUGStandard ART vs Mega ART

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

Sponsors

Medical Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to provide informed consent * Age of 18 years or more * Serologic or virologic diagnosis of HIV infection * Failure of at least two different multi-drug regimens that include drugs of all 3 classes that the patient can tolerate or laboratory evidence of resistance to drugs in each of the 3 classes * Had at least 3 months of current ART and are still on treatment * Two most recent results (which can include screening) on current ART of CD4 count less than or equal to 300 cells/mm3 or less than or equal to 15%, and a plasma viral load greater than or equal to 5,000 copies/ml (Roche Amplicor, v1.0), or greater than or equal to 2,500 copies/ml (by bDNA: Bayer v3.0/Chiron v3.0 or PCR:Roche Amplicor Monitor/COBAS v1.5)

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy, breast-feeding or planned pregnancy * Likelihood of poor protocol follow-up or if Mega-Art is not feasible (due to significant intolerance of many ARV drugs) * Serious, uncontrolled major opportunistic infection (OI) within 14 days of screening * Likelihood of early death due to non-HIV disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or DeathFrom date of randomization until onset of primary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 yearsNew or recurrent AIDS event or Death were compared between Standard-ART (standard) and Mega-ART (intensification)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse EventFrom date of randomization until onset of secondary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 yearsNew, on-study non-HIV related Serious Adverse events were compared between Standard-ART (standard) and Mega-ART (intensification)
Number of Participants With New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse EventFrom date of randomization until onset of secondary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 yearsNew, on-study non-HIV related Serious Adverse events were compared between ARDFP (interruption) and No ARDFP (continuation)

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 368 participants were enrolled in the trial: 41 in Canada, 39 in the UK and 288 in the US-VA.

Pre-assignment details

339 participants were randomized to factorial design(Canada=41;UK=10;US-VA=288). 29 participants in the UK were enrolled in a protocol-approved option, where they were allowed to select one of the factors and be randomized to the other. All 29 selected the ARDFP vs No ARDFP factor and were randomized to the Standard-ART vs Mega-ART factor.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
No ARDFP + Standard ART
Standard Antiretroviral Treatment regimen
91
No ARDFP + Mega ART
Intensive Antiretroviral Treatment regimen
84
ARDFP + Standard ART
Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption and Standard ART
86
ARDFP + Mega ART
Antiretroviral Treatment Interruption and Intensive ART
78
Total339

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo ARDFP + Mega ARTARDFP + Standard ARTARDFP + Mega ARTTotalNo ARDFP + Standard ART
Age, Continuous48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.92
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58
48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.99
Age, Customized
31-40 years
11 participants12 participants15 participants54 participants16 participants
Age, Customized
41-50 years
41 participants36 participants30 participants142 participants35 participants
Age, Customized
51-60 years
28 participants31 participants28 participants120 participants33 participants
Age, Customized
>60 years
4 participants7 participants5 participants23 participants7 participants
AIDS at entry
No
38 participants42 participants27 participants139 participants32 participants
AIDS at entry
Yes
46 participants44 participants51 participants200 participants59 participants
CD4 cells/mm3127 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 107
130 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 106
127 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 106
130 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 108
136 cells/mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 112
CD4 level
CD4 <=100 cells/mm^3
38 participants36 participants33 participants145 participants38 participants
CD4 level
CD4 >100 cells/mm^3
46 participants50 participants45 participants194 participants53 participants
Concomitant Medications
Lipid Lowering
20 participants33 participants21 participants98 participants24 participants
Concomitant Medications
Other antiviral
30 participants30 participants33 participants136 participants43 participants
Hepatitis B (HBsAg)
No
80 participants71 participants70 participants302 participants81 participants
Hepatitis B (HBsAg)
Yes
4 participants15 participants8 participants37 participants10 participants
Hepatitis C (Hep C anti-HCV)
No
63 participants59 participants66 participants262 participants74 participants
Hepatitis C (Hep C anti-HCV)
Yes
21 participants27 participants12 participants77 participants17 participants
log10 Viral Load4.75 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76
4.64 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
4.7 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
4.71 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68
4.76 log10 copies/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.55
Mode of HIV Infection
Blood
7 participants8 participants7 participants34 participants12 participants
Mode of HIV Infection
Heterosexual
19 participants22 participants19 participants80 participants20 participants
Mode of HIV Infection
Intravenous Drug Use (IVDU)
16 participants15 participants9 participants51 participants11 participants
Mode of HIV Infection
Men who have Sex with Men (MSM)
37 participants37 participants39 participants155 participants42 participants
Mode of HIV Infection
Other
5 participants2 participants4 participants17 participants6 participants
Mode of HIV Infection
Unknown
0 participants2 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants
OI medications for prophylaxis
Antibacterial
39 participants33 participants37 participants152 participants43 participants
OI medications for prophylaxis
Anti-CMV
0 participants2 participants0 participants4 participants2 participants
OI medications for prophylaxis
Antifungal
23 participants22 participants19 participants86 participants22 participants
OI medications for prophylaxis
Anti-PCP
67 participants71 participants62 participants275 participants75 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Aboriginal
0 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
30 participants36 participants31 participants138 participants41 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
9 participants9 participants12 participants36 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants2 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
45 participants38 participants35 participants160 participants42 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
11 participants10 participants8 participants41 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
2 participants3 participants3 participants10 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 participants73 participants67 participants288 participants77 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
82 Participants84 Participants76 Participants332 Participants90 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1060 / 980 / 860 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
55 / 9156 / 8454 / 8649 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death

New or recurrent AIDS event or Death were compared between Standard-ART (standard) and Mega-ART (intensification)

Time frame: From date of randomization until onset of primary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 years

Population: This includes participants randomized to Standard-ART or Mega-ART (339 via the 2X2 factorial design and 29 via the UK Option Scheme)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard-ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death83 participants
Mega-ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death82 participants
Comparison: Time-to-event (Kaplan-Meier) and stratified log-rank test was used for the comparison.p-value: 0.6995% CI: [0.856, 1.585]Log Rank
Primary

Number of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death

New or recurrent AIDS event or Death were compared between No ARDFP (continuation) and ARDFP (interruption)

Time frame: From date of randomization until onset of primary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 years

Population: This includes participants randomized to No ARDFP or ARDFP (339 via the 2X2 factorial design and 0 via the UK Option Scheme)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard-ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death70 participants
Mega-ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death87 participants
Comparison: Time-to-event (Kaplan-Meier) and stratified log-rank analysis was performed.p-value: 0.4995% CI: [0.674, 1.275]Log Rank
Primary

Number of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death

New or recurrent AIDS event or Death were compared between No ARDFP (continuation)+Standard-ART (standard), No ARDFP (continuation)+Mega-ART (intensification), ARDFP (interruption)+Standard-ART (standard) and ARDFP (interruption)+Mega-ART (intensification)

Time frame: From date of randomization until onset of primary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 years

Population: This includes participants randomized to one of the four interventions (339 via the 2X2 factorial design)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard-ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death46 participants
Mega-ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death41 participants
ARDFP + Standard ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death35 participants
ARDFP + Mega ARTNumber of Participants With New or Recurrent AIDS Event, or Death35 participants
Comparison: Stratified Log-rank test was used to compare the four treatmentp-value: 0.87Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With a New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse Event

New, on-study non-HIV related Serious Adverse events were compared between Standard-ART (standard) and Mega-ART (intensification)

Time frame: From date of randomization until onset of secondary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard-ARTNumber of Participants With a New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse Event97 participants
Mega-ARTNumber of Participants With a New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse Event88 participants
Comparison: Time-to-event (Kaplan-Meier) and stratified log-rank test was used for the comparisonp-value: 0.9295% CI: [0.75, 1.35]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse Event

New, on-study non-HIV related Serious Adverse events were compared between ARDFP (interruption) and No ARDFP (continuation)

Time frame: From date of randomization until onset of secondary outcome or end of study follow-up (12/31/2007) whichever occured first, up to 6.5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard-ARTNumber of Participants With New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse Event84 participants
Mega-ARTNumber of Participants With New, Non-HIV Related Serious Adverse Event92 participants
Comparison: Time-to-event (Kaplan-Meier) and stratified log-rank test was used for the comparison.p-value: 0.6895% CI: [0.8, 1.46]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026