Skip to content

MOBILE Study - A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) Regimens in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis

Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Groups, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Monthly Oral Administration of 100 mg and 150 mg Ibandronate With 2.5 mg Daily Oral Ibandronate in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00048061
Enrollment
1609
Registered
2002-10-25
Start date
2002-04-30
Completion date
2004-12-31
Last updated
2018-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Menopausal Osteoporosis

Brief summary

This study will compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens of oral Bonviva tablets in women with post-menopausal osteoporosis. Patients will also receive daily supplementation with vitamin D and calcium. The anticipated time of study treatment is 2+ years, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcium

500 mg/day

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin D

400 IU/day

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
55 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women 55-80 years of age; * post-menopausal for \>= 5 years; * ambulatory.

Exclusion criteria

* malignant disease diagnosed within the previous 10 years (except basal cell cancer that has been successfully removed); * breast cancer within the previous 20 years; * allergy to bisphosphonates; * previous treatment with an intravenous bisphosphonate at any time; * previous treatment with an oral bisphosphonate within the last 6 months, \>1 month of treatment within the last year, or \>3 months of treatment within the last 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) Bone Mineral DensityFrom Baseline (Month 0) to Month 12Relative change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is the percentage change from baseline of BMD of vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process to such a degree that accurate measurement of BMD would be considered jeopardized by the central reading center after 12 months of treatment. It is calculated as the sum of bone mineral content divided by the sum of area of all lumbar vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process at Month 12. Participants available at particular time point for assessment were included in the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24Months 12 and 24A participant is a responder if the mean femoral neck BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
Relative Change From Baseline at Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDFrom Baseline (Month 0) to Month 24Relative change in BMD is the percentage change from baseline of BMD of vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process to such a degree that accurate measurement of BMD would be considered jeopardized by the central reading center after 24 months of treatment. It is calculated as the sum of bone mineral content divided by the sum of area of all lumbar vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process at Month 24.
Absolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDFrom Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24The absolute change (g/cm\^2) from baseline in mean BMD of the lumbar spine (L2 - L4) at one and two years. A difference in the mean values between the active groups and the control was calculated.
Relative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFrom Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24Proximal femur BMD was measured by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry at baseline, after one and two years of treatment and was read by a central reading center.
Absolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24Proximal femur BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline, after one and two years of treatment and was read by a central reading center
Percentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24Months 12 and 24A participant is a responder if the mean lumber spine (L2 - L4) BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24Months 12 and 24A participant is a responder if the mean total hip BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24Months 12 and 24A participant is a responder if the mean trochanter BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24Months 12 and 24A participant is a responder if the mean trochanter and lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24Months 12 and 24A participant is a responder if the mean femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.
Relative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6, 12, 24Serum CTX, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, was assessed using the Elecsys S-CTX-I assay (an ElectroChemiLuminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) Technique).
Absolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24Serum CTX, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, was assessed using the Elecsys S-CTX-I assay (an ElectroChemiLuminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) Technique).
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventUp to Month 24An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Number Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesUp to Month 24Marked laboratory abnormalities were defined as those values that were outside the reference range and showed a clinically relevant change from baseline. The reference range for hemoglobin was 110-200 (gram per liter \[g/L\]), hematocrit was 0.31-0.56 fraction, white blood cells (WBC) was 3.0-18.0 (10\*9/L), serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT/ALT) was 0-110 IU/L, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was 0.0-14.3 (millimoles per Liter \[mmol/L\]), Chloride was 95-115 (mmol/L), Potassium was 3.0 - 6.0 (mmol/L), Sodium was 130-150 (mmol/L), Calcium was 2.00-2.90 (mmol/L), Phosphate was 0.75 - 1.60 (mmol/L) and Creatinine was 0- 154 (micromoles/liter \[umol/L\].
Percentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24Months 12 and 24A participant is a responder if the mean total hip and mean lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted from 26 April 2002 to 08 Dec 2004 across 65 centers in the world.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1609 participants were randomized, of which 1602 received the study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ibandronate 2.5 mg
Participants received 2.5 mg ibandronate PO daily and an oblong placebo tablet PO monthly Participants also received calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 IU/day.
395
Ibandronate 50/50 mg
Participants received 100 mg ibandronate PO monthly taken on a single day (2 X 50 mg tablets) and round placebo tablet PO daily. Participants also received calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 IU/day.
396
Ibandronate 100 mg
Participants received 100 mg ibandronate PO monthly divided over two consecutive days (50 mg tablet/day) and a round placebo tablet PO daily. Participants also received calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 IU/day.
396
Ibandronate 150 mg
Participants received 150 mg ibandronate PO monthly taken on a single day and a round placebo tablet PO daily. Participants also received calcium 500 mg /day and vitamin D 400 IU/day.
396
Total1,583

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event41324437
Overall StudyDid not follow-up5545
Overall StudyEarly improvement6530
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3245
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20292932

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIbandronate 2.5 mgIbandronate 50/50 mgIbandronate 100 mgIbandronate 150 mgTotal
Age, Continuous65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.61
66.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.71
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.38
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.64
66.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.58
Sex: Female, Male
Female
395 Participants396 Participants396 Participants396 Participants1583 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
190 / 395190 / 396191 / 396182 / 396
serious
Total, serious adverse events
38 / 39554 / 39655 / 39645 / 396

Outcome results

Primary

Relative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) Bone Mineral Density

Relative change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is the percentage change from baseline of BMD of vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process to such a degree that accurate measurement of BMD would be considered jeopardized by the central reading center after 12 months of treatment. It is calculated as the sum of bone mineral content divided by the sum of area of all lumbar vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process at Month 12. Participants available at particular time point for assessment were included in the analysis.

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Month 12

Population: The per-protocol(PP) population included participants in Intent-to-treat(ITT) population who were randomized, received at least one dose of medication and had at least one valid efficacy(BMD or Serum CTX)follow-up data point;defined as any measurement that can be scientifically compared to baseline measurement, and had no major protocol violations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) Bone Mineral Density3.7427 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.0149
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) Bone Mineral Density4.3395 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.9557
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) Bone Mineral Density4.0328 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.6815
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) Bone Mineral Density4.7611 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.8931
p-value: 0.04595% CI: [0.013, 1.216]ANOVA
p-value: 0.33895% CI: [-0.312, 0.906]ANOVA
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.395, 1.605]ANOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD

The absolute change (g/cm\^2) from baseline in mean BMD of the lumbar spine (L2 - L4) at one and two years. A difference in the mean values between the active groups and the control was calculated.

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 12 months, n = 314, 322, 306, 3140.028 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0291
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 24 months, n = 294, 294, 278, 2910.036 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0337
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 24 months, n = 294, 294, 278, 2910.039 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0355
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 12 months, n = 314, 322, 306, 3140.033 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0298
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 12 months, n = 314, 322, 306, 3140.030 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0271
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 24 months, n = 294, 294, 278, 2910.042 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0313
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 12 months, n = 314, 322, 306, 3140.036 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.029
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMDAt 24 months, n = 294, 294, 278, 2910.049 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.033
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.

Proximal femur BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline, after one and two years of treatment and was read by a central reading center

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.014 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0204
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.018 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0225
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.018 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0228
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.023 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0241
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.011 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.023
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 24, n = 315,319,306,3160.012 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0265
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 24, n = 315,319,306,3160.013 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0272
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.027 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0259
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.016 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0205
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.020 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0238
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.021 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0241
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.011 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0226
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.026 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0237
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.022 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0206
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.030 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0263
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 24, n = 315,319,306,3160.017 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0248
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.012 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0228
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.020 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.019
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.014 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0224
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Femoral neck At Month 24, n = 315,319,306,3160.020 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0257
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.031 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0199
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2900.035 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0231
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Total hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.022 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.019
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD.Trochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3160.026 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.0211
Secondary

Absolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24

Serum CTX, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, was assessed using the Elecsys S-CTX-I assay (an ElectroChemiLuminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) Technique).

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 12, n = 272, 276, 276, 267-0.323 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.2292
Ibandronate 2.5 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 24, n = 221, 215, 211, 235-0.285 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.2052
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 24, n = 221, 215, 211, 235-0.298 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.198
Ibandronate 50/50 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 12, n = 272, 276, 276, 267-0.326 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.2212
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 24, n = 221, 215, 211, 235-0.312 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.2398
Ibandronate 100 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 12, n = 272, 276, 276, 267-0.340 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.2287
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 12, n = 272, 276, 276, 267-0.377 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.2135
Ibandronate 150 mgAbsolute Change In Baseline in Serum CTX to Months 12 and 24Month 24, n = 221, 215, 211, 235-0.340 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.2062
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Event

An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: Up to Month 24

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of the study medication, and who have at least one follow-up data point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventAny AE302 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventSAE38 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventSAE54 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventAny AE313 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventAny AE318 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventSAE55 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventAny AE317 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventSAE45 Participants
Secondary

Number Of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities

Marked laboratory abnormalities were defined as those values that were outside the reference range and showed a clinically relevant change from baseline. The reference range for hemoglobin was 110-200 (gram per liter \[g/L\]), hematocrit was 0.31-0.56 fraction, white blood cells (WBC) was 3.0-18.0 (10\*9/L), serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT/ALT) was 0-110 IU/L, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was 0.0-14.3 (millimoles per Liter \[mmol/L\]), Chloride was 95-115 (mmol/L), Potassium was 3.0 - 6.0 (mmol/L), Sodium was 130-150 (mmol/L), Calcium was 2.00-2.90 (mmol/L), Phosphate was 0.75 - 1.60 (mmol/L) and Creatinine was 0- 154 (micromoles/liter \[umol/L\].

Time frame: Up to Month 24

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of the study medication, and who have at least one follow-up data point. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Low, n = 389,390,385,3830 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride Low, n =3 89,390,385,3843 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesALT (SGPT) High, n = 390,390,385,3859 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit Low, n = 389,387,382,3852 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCreatinine High, n = 390,390,385,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesBUN High, n = 390,390,385,3852 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium High, n = 390,390,385,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin High, n = 389,389,382,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Low, n = 389,389,382,3853 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate Low, n = 390,390,385,3852 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Low, n = 389,390,385,3842 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium High, n = 389,390,385,3840 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC Low, n = 389,389,382,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate High, n = 390,390,385,3854 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Low, n = 389,390,385,3841 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit Low, n = 389,387,382,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin High, n = 389,389,382,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Low, n = 389,389,382,3853 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC Low, n = 389,389,382,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesALT (SGPT) High, n = 390,390,385,3858 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesBUN High, n = 390,390,385,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCreatinine High, n = 390,390,385,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride Low, n =3 89,390,385,3843 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Low, n = 389,390,385,3830 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium High, n = 389,390,385,3840 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium High, n = 390,390,385,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate High, n = 390,390,385,3853 Participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate Low, n = 390,390,385,3852 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Low, n = 389,390,385,3840 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC Low, n = 389,389,382,3854 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin High, n = 389,389,382,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride Low, n =3 89,390,385,3840 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium High, n = 390,390,385,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium High, n = 389,390,385,3841 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Low, n = 389,390,385,3830 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit Low, n = 389,387,382,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesBUN High, n = 390,390,385,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Low, n = 389,389,382,3856 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesALT (SGPT) High, n = 390,390,385,3858 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate Low, n = 390,390,385,3852 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCreatinine High, n = 390,390,385,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 100 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate High, n = 390,390,385,3853 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCreatinine High, n = 390,390,385,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride Low, n =3 89,390,385,3843 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate High, n = 390,390,385,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium Low, n = 389,390,385,3831 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin Low, n = 389,389,382,3853 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit Low, n = 389,387,382,3853 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium High, n = 389,390,385,3842 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin High, n = 389,389,382,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium Low, n = 389,390,385,3840 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate Low, n = 390,390,385,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesCalcium High, n = 390,390,385,3851 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesALT (SGPT) High, n = 390,390,385,3858 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesBUN High, n = 390,390,385,3850 Participants
Ibandronate 150 mgNumber Of Participants With Marked Laboratory AbnormalitiesWBC Low, n = 389,389,382,3854 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24

A participant is a responder if the mean femoral neck BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31671.1 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28969.2 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28971.1 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31672.4 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31669.0 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28978.7 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31675.3 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Femoral Neck BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28981.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24

A participant is a responder if the mean femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31062.4 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28763.4 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28763.9 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31064.5 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31060.9 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28771.0 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31068.7 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Femoral Neck and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28775.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24

A participant is a responder if the mean lumber spine (L2 - L4) BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,322,306,31483.8 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 294,294,278,29186.4 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 294,294,278,29187.8 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,322,306,31487.6 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,322,306,31486.6 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 294,294,278,29187.8 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,322,306,31490.8 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Lumbar Spine (L2 - L4) BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 294,294,278,29193.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24

A participant is a responder if the mean total hip and mean lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31065.6 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28770.5 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28775.3 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31072.3 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31077.6 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28779.3 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31083.5 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Total Hip and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28787.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24

A participant is a responder if the mean trochanter and lumbar spine BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31068.8 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28775.7 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28777.3 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31075.5 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31078.0 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28780.1 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 314,318,304,31084.2 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Mean Trochanter and Lumbar Spine BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,276,28788.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24

A participant is a responder if the mean total hip BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,30676.8 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28978.4 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28983.2 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,30681.2 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,30686.9 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28988.8 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,30690.5 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Total Hip BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28993.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24

A participant is a responder if the mean trochanter BMD had remained the same or increased above baseline.

Time frame: Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28984.2 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31680.0 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31683.1 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 50/50 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28986.6 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31688.2 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 100 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28989.9 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,28994.1 Percentage of participants
Ibandronate 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Trochanter BMD Above or Equal to Baseline at Months 12 and 24At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,31692.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Relative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMD

Proximal femur BMD was measured by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry at baseline, after one and two years of treatment and was read by a central reading center.

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 12 and 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3161.9626 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.8311
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2892.4955 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.0884
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3163.1917 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.1268
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2894.0204 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.346
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3161.7164 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.6233
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 24, n=292,291,277,2891.9087 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.2212
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 24, n=292,291,277,2892.0581 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.1189
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2894.6289 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.5518
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3162.2172 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.7504
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3163.4931 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.0876
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2892.8132 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.2408
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3161.8141 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.4391
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2893.5165 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.2831
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3163.8226 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.7077
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2895.3135 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.7335
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 24, n=292,291,277,2892.6209 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.8339
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3161.8797 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.4998
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3162.6878 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.6646
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3162.1914 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.4842
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDFemoral neck At Month 24, n=292,291,277,2893.1195 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.0549
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2894.1601 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.8335
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 24, n = 292,291,277,2896.1755 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.255
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTotal hip At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3163.0092 Percent changeStandard Deviation 2.7105
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at One Year (12 Months) and Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Proximal Femur ( Total Hip, Trochanter, Femoral Neck) BMDTrochanter At Month 12, n = 315,319,306,3164.5904 Percent changeStandard Deviation 3.9436
Secondary

Relative Change From Baseline at Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD

Relative change in BMD is the percentage change from baseline of BMD of vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process to such a degree that accurate measurement of BMD would be considered jeopardized by the central reading center after 24 months of treatment. It is calculated as the sum of bone mineral content divided by the sum of area of all lumbar vertebrae L2 - L4 that are not fractured and not affected by an osteoarthritic process at Month 24.

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Month 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol.Participants available at particular time point for assessment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change From Baseline at Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD4.9623 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.6525
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change From Baseline at Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD5.3350 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.8235
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change From Baseline at Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD5.5760 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.228
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change From Baseline at Two Years (24 Months) in Mean Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) BMD6.5503 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.5118
Secondary

Relative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24

Serum CTX, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, was assessed using the Elecsys S-CTX-I assay (an ElectroChemiLuminescence Immunoassay (ECLIA) Technique).

Time frame: From Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6, 12, 24

Population: The PP population consisted of all participants in the ITT population who had no major violations of the protocol. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 3, n = 269,278,271,276-49.5458 Percent changeStandard Deviation 30.8286
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 6, n = 270,272,274,27855.5900 Percent changeStandard Deviation 34.1672
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 12, n = 272,276,276,267-58.8244 Percent changeStandard Deviation 29.825
Ibandronate 2.5 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 24, n = 221,215,211,235-51.2360 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.9032
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 6, n = 270,272,274,278-53.9838 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.3557
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 12, n = 272,276,276,267-57.5363 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.2271
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 24, n = 221,215,211,235-51.3040 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.9844
Ibandronate 50/50 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 3, n = 269,278,271,276-46.4771 Percent changeStandard Deviation 26.5096
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 12, n = 272,276,276,267-58.1046 Percent changeStandard Deviation 33.5095
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 6, n = 270,272,274,278-55.9614 Percent changeStandard Deviation 31.2801
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 24, n = 221,215,211,235-49.5567 Percent changeStandard Deviation 44.9707
Ibandronate 100 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 3, n = 269,278,271,276-50.2368 Percent changeStandard Deviation 28.1576
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 24, n = 221,215,211,23561.8822 Percent changeStandard Deviation 28.2309
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 6, n = 270,272,274,278-66.4354 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.4762
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 3, n = 269,278,271,276-57.3433 Percent changeStandard Deviation 33.9505
Ibandronate 150 mgRelative Change In Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide of Alpha-chain of Type I Collagen [ CTX] ] to Months 3, 6, 12, and 24At Month 12, n = 272,276,276,267-67.0703 Percent changeStandard Deviation 41.4563

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026