Skip to content

Herceptin (Trastuzumab) in Treating Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER) 2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer

A Randomized Three-Arm, Multicenter Comparison of 1 Year and 2 Years of Herceptin Versus No Herceptin in Women With HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer Who Have Completed Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00045032
Acronym
HERA
Enrollment
5099
Registered
2003-01-27
Start date
2001-11-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2017-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate Herceptin treatment for 1 year and 2 years (versus observation/no Herceptin) in women with HER2-overexpressing primary breast cancer who have completed (neo-)adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, definitive surgery, and radiotherapy, if applicable. Efficacy and safety will be assessed for 10 years from randomization for each participant. All participants will continue to be followed for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant.

Interventions

DRUGHerceptin

Herceptin will be given as a loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg via IV infusion 3 weeks later and thereafter every 3 weeks.

Sponsors

Breast International Group
CollaboratorOTHER
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
CollaboratorNETWORK
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
CollaboratorNETWORK
ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation
CollaboratorNETWORK
Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-metastatic primary invasive breast cancer overexpressing HER2 (determined by immunohistochemistry 3+ or positive fluorescence in situ hybridization test) that has been histologically confirmed, adequately excised, axillary node positive or negative, and tumor size at least T1c according to Tumor/Node/Metastasis (TNM) staging * Completion of at least 4 cycles of (neo-)adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, definitive surgery, and radiotherapy, if applicable * Known hormone receptor status * Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to (≥) 55 percent (%)

Exclusion criteria

* Prior invasive breast carcinoma * Other malignancies except for curatively treated basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix * Clinical T4 tumors * Cumulative doxorubicin exposure greater than (\>) 360 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m\^2) or epirubicin \>720 mg/m\^2 or any prior anthracyclines unrelated to the present breast cancer * Peripheral stem cell or bone marrow stem cell support * Prior mediastinal irradiation except for internal mammary node irradiation for the present breast cancer * Non-irradiated internal mammary nodes or supraclavicular lymph node involvement * Prior anti-HER2 therapy for any other reason or other prior biologic or immunotherapy for breast cancer * Concurrent anti-cancer treatment in another investigational trial * Serious cardiac or pulmonary conditions/illness, or any other conditions that could interfere with planned treatment * Poor hematologic, hepatic, or renal function * Pregnancy or lactation * Women of childbearing potential or less than 1 year post-menopause unwilling to use adequate contraceptive measures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpYear 2DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpYear 2DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.
DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 3DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 5DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 7DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 8DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years)DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.
DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 3DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 5DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 7DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 8DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 9DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 10DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported.
DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Percentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported.
DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
Percentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
Percentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
Percentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
Percentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one RDFS event was reported.
RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of RDFS events (i.e., the RDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years)DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years)Secondary cardiac endpoint events included NYHA Class I or II CHF with a drop in LVEF measured by multiple-gated acquisition or electrocardiogram, unless the subsequent assessment of LVEF indicated a return to levels that did not meet the definition of a significant LVEF drop. A significant LVEF drop was defined as an absolute reduction of at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value \<50%. The percentage of participants with at least one secondary cardiac endpoint event was reported, excluding those with both a primary and secondary cardiac endpoint event. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial.
Percentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years)Primary cardiac endpoint events included the occurrence of any of the following between randomization and new therapy for recurrent disease: symptomatic New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF) confirmed by a cardiologist with a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value less than (\<) 50%, and documentation of definite or probable cardiac death. Definite cardiac death included CHF, myocardial infarction, or primary arrhythmia. Probable cardiac death included unexpected sudden death within 24 hours of a cardiac event (syncope, cardiac arrest, chest pain, infarction, arrhythmia) without documented etiology. The percentage of participants with at least one primary cardiac endpoint event was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial.
DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Percentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpYear 2OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-UpYear 2OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years)OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events.
Percentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years)OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events.
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported.
RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Percentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpFrom Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported.
RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYears 3, 5, 7, 8RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After the release of initial study results, participants in the Observation Arm without disease recurrence were given the opportunity to cross over to receive 1 or 2 years of adjuvant Herceptin. Efficacy analyses were still performed according to original randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Observation Arm
Participants who completed definitive surgery and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy were observed for efficacy and safety until 10 years from individual randomization and for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant. No Herceptin was provided.
1,697
Herceptin 1-Year Arm
Participants who completed definitive surgery and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy received a loading dose of Herceptin as 8 mg/kg via IV infusion on Day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg via IV infusion 3 weeks later and thereafter every 3 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, whichever occurred first. Participants were observed for efficacy and safety until 10 years from individual randomization and for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant.
1,702
Herceptin 2-Year Arm
Participants who completed definitive surgery and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy received a loading dose of Herceptin as 8 mg/kg via IV infusion on Day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg via IV infusion 3 weeks later and thereafter every 3 weeks for 2 years or until disease recurrence, whichever occurred first. Participants were observed for efficacy and safety until 10 years from individual randomization and for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant.
1,700
Total5,099

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event/Intercurrent Illness227
Overall StudyDeath222417
Overall StudyFailure to Return576261
Overall StudyInsufficient Therapeutic Response542437445
Overall StudyOther9384105
Overall StudyOther Protocol Violation201
Overall StudyRefused/Did Not Cooperate/Withdrew1429384
Overall StudyViolation of Selection Criteria at Entry366

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicObservation ArmHerceptin 1-Year ArmHerceptin 2-Year ArmTotal
Age, Continuous49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.06
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.09
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1697 Participants1702 Participants1700 Participants5099 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1,076 / 1,7441,389 / 1,6821,440 / 1,673
serious
Total, serious adverse events
143 / 1,744269 / 1,682344 / 1,673

Outcome results

Primary

DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up78.18 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up85.80 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up73.60 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up87.50 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Time frame: Year 10

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up62.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up69.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up68.5 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Time frame: Year 3

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up75.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up81.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up83.4 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Year 3

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up75.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up81.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up83.5 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Time frame: Year 5

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up70.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up75.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up76.4 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Year 5

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up70.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up75.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up76.5 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Time frame: Year 7

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up65.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up72.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up72.5 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Year 7

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up66.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up72.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up72.5 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Time frame: Year 8

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up64.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up71.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up70.7 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Year 8

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up64.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up71.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up71.0 percentage of participants
Primary

DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Time frame: Year 9

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up63.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up70.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up69.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up35.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up29.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up30.5 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.68, 0.86]
95% CI: [0.69, 0.87]
Primary

Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up33.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up27.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up27.8 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.67, 0.86]
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.67, 0.85]
Primary

Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up13.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up7.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0Log Rank
95% CI: [0.34, 0.53]
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up12.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up7.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.44, 0.67]
Secondary

DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 378.6 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 574.2 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 770.8 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 869.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 875.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 384.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 776.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 579.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 875.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 580.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 776.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 385.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 389.4 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 584.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 781.4 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 880.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 879.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 390.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 781.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 584.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 386.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 581.0 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 777.2 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 875.9 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 975.0 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 1073.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 973.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 389.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 875.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 581.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 1073.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-UpYear 777.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 379.8 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 576.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 774.0 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 873.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 879.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 385.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 780.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 582.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 880.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 583.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 780.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 388.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 390.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 586.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 784.6 percentage of participants
Observation ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 883.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 884.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 392.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 784.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmDTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 587.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 584.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1075.0 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 976.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 390.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1272.9 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1173.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 779.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 981.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 392.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 586.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 783.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1080.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1180.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1279.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1081.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 588.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1279.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1180.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 981.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 784.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 394.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 390.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 584.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 779.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 877.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 882.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 392.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 783.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 586.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 882.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 588.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 784.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 394.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 788.6 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1085.4 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 591.4 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1184.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 986.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1284.1 percentage of participants
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 396.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1283.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 397.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 592.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 788.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 985.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1085.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-UpYear 1184.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up94.98 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up95.88 percentage of participants
Secondary

OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: Year 2

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up94.39 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmOS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up97.28 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up19.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up19.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.962695% CI: [0.85, 1.17]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years)

Population: FAS Population 1-Year Herceptin Versus 2-Year Herceptin (1Y2Y): Participants without a DFS event and still under follow-up at the pre-defined landmark of 366 days after randomization, analyzed when intent-to-treat principle was applied for comparison of 1 year versus 2 years of Herceptin.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up25.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up26.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.796295% CI: [0.89, 1.17]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up28.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up23.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up23.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.67, 0.87]
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.65, 0.85]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up25.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up19.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up18.8 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.62, 0.83]
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.59, 0.79]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up15.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up15.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.682395% CI: [0.8, 1.15]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up23.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up18.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up18.4 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.64, 0.86]
95% CI: [0.62, 0.83]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up20.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up16.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up16.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0005Log Rank
95% CI: [0.65, 0.88]
p-value: 0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.63, 0.86]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years)

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up14.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up14.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.915695% CI: [0.84, 1.21]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up2.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up1.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.003Log Rank
95% CI: [0.28, 0.79]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up

OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)

Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up2.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up1.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.2379Log Rank
95% CI: [0.47, 1.21]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

Primary cardiac endpoint events included the occurrence of any of the following between randomization and new therapy for recurrent disease: symptomatic New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF) confirmed by a cardiologist with a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value less than (\<) 50%, and documentation of definite or probable cardiac death. Definite cardiac death included CHF, myocardial infarction, or primary arrhythmia. Probable cardiac death included unexpected sudden death within 24 hours of a cardiac event (syncope, cardiac arrest, chest pain, infarction, arrhythmia) without documented etiology. The percentage of participants with at least one primary cardiac endpoint event was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years)

Population: Safety Population: All participants randomized/enrolled in the study according to actual treatment received. Hence, participants assigned to Herceptin who received no study treatment were analyzed in the Observation Arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up0.11 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up1.07 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up1.02 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up29.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up23.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up22.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.64, 0.83]
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.61, 0.79]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one RDFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y. In contrast to other study endpoints, RDFS compared to the Observation Arm was not a planned endpoint according to study protocol. Only RDFS in Herceptin 1-Year Arm versus Herceptin 2-Year Arm was a planned endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up22.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up21.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.725195% CI: [0.84, 1.13]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up19.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up18.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.475595% CI: [0.8, 1.11]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up

Secondary cardiac endpoint events included NYHA Class I or II CHF with a drop in LVEF measured by multiple-gated acquisition or electrocardiogram, unless the subsequent assessment of LVEF indicated a return to levels that did not meet the definition of a significant LVEF drop. A significant LVEF drop was defined as an absolute reduction of at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value \<50%. The percentage of participants with at least one secondary cardiac endpoint event was reported, excluding those with both a primary and secondary cardiac endpoint event. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years)

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up0.86 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up4.40 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up7.29 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up19.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up18.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.4595% CI: [0.8, 1.1]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmPercentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up29.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up23.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmPercentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up22.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.64, 0.83]
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
95% CI: [0.61, 0.79]
Secondary

RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of RDFS events (i.e., the RDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y. In contrast to other study endpoints, RDFS compared to the Observation Arm was not a planned endpoint according to study protocol. Only RDFS in Herceptin 1-Year Arm versus Herceptin 2-Year Arm was a planned endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 387.3 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 581.9 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 778.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 877.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 877.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 389.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 778.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 583.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 376.4 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 571.9 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 769.0 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 868.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 875.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 382.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 775.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 578.4 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 875.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 579.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 776.7 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 386.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 387.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 583.1 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 780.2 percentage of participants
Observation ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 879.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 880.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 390.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 781.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmRFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 584.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 376.5 percentage of participants
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 572.1 percentage of participants
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 769.2 percentage of participants
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 868.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 875.3 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 382.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 775.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 578.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 876.2 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 580.1 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 777.0 percentage of participants
Herceptin 2-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 386.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up

The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.

Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8

Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 387.7 percentage of participants
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 583.2 percentage of participants
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 780.4 percentage of participants
Observation ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 879.8 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 880.6 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 390.9 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 781.5 percentage of participants
Herceptin 1-Year ArmTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-UpYear 584.7 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 12, 2026