Breast Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate Herceptin treatment for 1 year and 2 years (versus observation/no Herceptin) in women with HER2-overexpressing primary breast cancer who have completed (neo-)adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, definitive surgery, and radiotherapy, if applicable. Efficacy and safety will be assessed for 10 years from randomization for each participant. All participants will continue to be followed for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant.
Interventions
Herceptin will be given as a loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg via IV infusion 3 weeks later and thereafter every 3 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Non-metastatic primary invasive breast cancer overexpressing HER2 (determined by immunohistochemistry 3+ or positive fluorescence in situ hybridization test) that has been histologically confirmed, adequately excised, axillary node positive or negative, and tumor size at least T1c according to Tumor/Node/Metastasis (TNM) staging * Completion of at least 4 cycles of (neo-)adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, definitive surgery, and radiotherapy, if applicable * Known hormone receptor status * Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to (≥) 55 percent (%)
Exclusion criteria
* Prior invasive breast carcinoma * Other malignancies except for curatively treated basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix * Clinical T4 tumors * Cumulative doxorubicin exposure greater than (\>) 360 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m\^2) or epirubicin \>720 mg/m\^2 or any prior anthracyclines unrelated to the present breast cancer * Peripheral stem cell or bone marrow stem cell support * Prior mediastinal irradiation except for internal mammary node irradiation for the present breast cancer * Non-irradiated internal mammary nodes or supraclavicular lymph node involvement * Prior anti-HER2 therapy for any other reason or other prior biologic or immunotherapy for breast cancer * Concurrent anti-cancer treatment in another investigational trial * Serious cardiac or pulmonary conditions/illness, or any other conditions that could interfere with planned treatment * Poor hematologic, hepatic, or renal function * Pregnancy or lactation * Women of childbearing potential or less than 1 year post-menopause unwilling to use adequate contraceptive measures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year) | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year) | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 2 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 2 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. |
| DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years) | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. |
| DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 3 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events. |
| DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 5 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events. |
| DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 7 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events. |
| DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 8 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events. |
| DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 9 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events. |
| DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 10 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported. |
| DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| Percentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported. |
| DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| Percentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy. |
| TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy. |
| Percentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy. |
| TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy. |
| DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy. |
| Percentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy. |
| DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy. |
| Percentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one RDFS event was reported. |
| RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of RDFS events (i.e., the RDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years) | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years) | Secondary cardiac endpoint events included NYHA Class I or II CHF with a drop in LVEF measured by multiple-gated acquisition or electrocardiogram, unless the subsequent assessment of LVEF indicated a return to levels that did not meet the definition of a significant LVEF drop. A significant LVEF drop was defined as an absolute reduction of at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value \<50%. The percentage of participants with at least one secondary cardiac endpoint event was reported, excluding those with both a primary and secondary cardiac endpoint event. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial. |
| Percentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years) | Primary cardiac endpoint events included the occurrence of any of the following between randomization and new therapy for recurrent disease: symptomatic New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF) confirmed by a cardiologist with a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value less than (\<) 50%, and documentation of definite or probable cardiac death. Definite cardiac death included CHF, myocardial infarction, or primary arrhythmia. Probable cardiac death included unexpected sudden death within 24 hours of a cardiac event (syncope, cardiac arrest, chest pain, infarction, arrhythmia) without documented etiology. The percentage of participants with at least one primary cardiac endpoint event was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial. |
| DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 | DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events. |
| Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year) | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| Percentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year) | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 2 | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 2 | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure. |
| Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. |
| OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years) | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. |
| OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events. |
| Percentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years) | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. |
| OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 | OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events. |
| Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported. |
| RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
| Percentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years) | RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported. |
| RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Years 3, 5, 7, 8 | RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
After the release of initial study results, participants in the Observation Arm without disease recurrence were given the opportunity to cross over to receive 1 or 2 years of adjuvant Herceptin. Efficacy analyses were still performed according to original randomization.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Observation Arm Participants who completed definitive surgery and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy were observed for efficacy and safety until 10 years from individual randomization and for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant. No Herceptin was provided. | 1,697 |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm Participants who completed definitive surgery and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy received a loading dose of Herceptin as 8 mg/kg via IV infusion on Day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg via IV infusion 3 weeks later and thereafter every 3 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, whichever occurred first. Participants were observed for efficacy and safety until 10 years from individual randomization and for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant. | 1,702 |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm Participants who completed definitive surgery and systemic adjuvant chemotherapy received a loading dose of Herceptin as 8 mg/kg via IV infusion on Day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg via IV infusion 3 weeks later and thereafter every 3 weeks for 2 years or until disease recurrence, whichever occurred first. Participants were observed for efficacy and safety until 10 years from individual randomization and for survival until 10 years after enrollment of the last participant. | 1,700 |
| Total | 5,099 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event/Intercurrent Illness | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Death | 22 | 24 | 17 |
| Overall Study | Failure to Return | 57 | 62 | 61 |
| Overall Study | Insufficient Therapeutic Response | 542 | 437 | 445 |
| Overall Study | Other | 93 | 84 | 105 |
| Overall Study | Other Protocol Violation | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Refused/Did Not Cooperate/Withdrew | 142 | 93 | 84 |
| Overall Study | Violation of Selection Criteria at Entry | 3 | 6 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Observation Arm | Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 49.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08 | 49.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.06 | 49.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.09 | 49.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1697 Participants | 1702 Participants | 1700 Participants | 5099 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1,076 / 1,744 | 1,389 / 1,682 | 1,440 / 1,673 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 143 / 1,744 | 269 / 1,682 | 344 / 1,673 |
Outcome results
DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: Year 2
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 78.18 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 85.80 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: Year 2
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 73.60 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 87.50 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Time frame: Year 10
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 62.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 69.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 10 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 68.5 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Time frame: Year 3
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 75.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 81.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 83.4 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Year 3
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 75.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 81.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 3 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 83.5 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Time frame: Year 5
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 75.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 76.4 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Year 5
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 70.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 75.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 5 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 76.5 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Time frame: Year 7
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 65.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 72.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 72.5 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Year 7
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 66.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 72.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 7 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 72.5 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Time frame: Year 8
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 64.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 71.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 70.7 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Year 8
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 64.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 71.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 8 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 71.0 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Time frame: Year 9
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 63.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 70.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DFS Rate at Year 9 According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 69.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 35.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 29.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 30.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 33.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 27.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 27.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 13.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 7.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 12.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 7.5 percentage of participants |
DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 74.2 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 70.8 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 69.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 75.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 84.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 76.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 79.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 75.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 80.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 76.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 85.9 percentage of participants |
DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants free of DDFS events (i.e., the DDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 89.4 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 84.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 81.4 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 80.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 79.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 90.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 81.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 84.7 percentage of participants |
DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of DFS events (i.e., the DFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with a 10-year maximum follow-up for DFS events.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 3 | 86.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 5 | 81.0 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 7 | 77.2 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 8 | 75.9 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 9 | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 10 | 73.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 9 | 73.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 3 | 89.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 8 | 75.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 5 | 81.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 10 | 73.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | Year 7 | 77.4 percentage of participants |
DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 79.8 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 74.0 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 79.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 85.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 80.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 82.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 80.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 83.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 80.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 88.1 percentage of participants |
DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants without DTR (i.e., the DTR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 90.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 86.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 84.6 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 83.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 84.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 92.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 84.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | DTR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 87.5 percentage of participants |
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 84.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 10 | 75.0 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 9 | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 90.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 12 | 72.9 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 11 | 73.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 79.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 9 | 81.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 92.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 86.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 83.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 10 | 80.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 11 | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 12 | 79.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 10 | 81.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 88.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 12 | 79.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 11 | 80.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 9 | 81.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 84.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 94.4 percentage of participants |
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 90.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 84.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 79.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 77.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 82.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 92.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 83.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 86.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 82.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 88.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 84.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 94.4 percentage of participants |
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the final analysis with an 11-year median follow-up for OS events.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 88.6 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 10 | 85.4 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 91.4 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 11 | 84.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 9 | 86.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 12 | 84.1 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 96.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 12 | 83.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 97.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 92.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 88.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 9 | 85.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 10 | 85.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 11 | 84.4 percentage of participants |
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: Year 2
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 94.98 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 95.88 percentage of participants |
OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants alive (i.e., the OS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 1-year median follow-up analysis. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: Year 2
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 94.39 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | OS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 97.28 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 19.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DDFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 19.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
DFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer or second non-breast malignancy other than basal or squamous carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one DFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum of 10 years)
Population: FAS Population 1-Year Herceptin Versus 2-Year Herceptin (1Y2Y): Participants without a DFS event and still under follow-up at the pre-defined landmark of 366 days after randomization, analyzed when intent-to-treat principle was applied for comparison of 1 year versus 2 years of Herceptin.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 25.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 26.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
DDFS events included distant tumor recurrence, second primary cancer, or contralateral breast cancer. The percentage of participants with at least one DDFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 28.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 23.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Distant Disease-Free Survival (DDFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 23.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 25.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 19.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Distant Tumor Recurrence (DTR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 18.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants with DTR was reported. DTR included distant tumors ignoring local and regional recurrences, contralateral breast cancer, and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 15.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With DTR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 15.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | 23.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | 18.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 20.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 16.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 16.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 11 years)
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | 14.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 11-Year Median Follow-Up | 14.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 2.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With OS Events in Herceptin 2-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 1.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up
OS events referred to death from any cause. The percentage of participants who died was reported. The analysis of the Herceptin 1-Year Arm against the Observation Arm after 1-year median follow-up, as reported below, was performed by the Sponsor in 2006 following database cleaning. The analysis of the Herceptin 2-Year Arm against the Observation Arm was performed for an IDMC in 2005 at a time the Sponsor was blinded. Therefore, these data are reported under a separate Outcome Measure.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 1 year)
Population: FAS Population. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the number with data for the endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 2.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) Events in Herceptin 1-Year Arm Compared to Observation: 1-Year Median Follow-Up | 1.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
Primary cardiac endpoint events included the occurrence of any of the following between randomization and new therapy for recurrent disease: symptomatic New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF) confirmed by a cardiologist with a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value less than (\<) 50%, and documentation of definite or probable cardiac death. Definite cardiac death included CHF, myocardial infarction, or primary arrhythmia. Probable cardiac death included unexpected sudden death within 24 hours of a cardiac event (syncope, cardiac arrest, chest pain, infarction, arrhythmia) without documented etiology. The percentage of participants with at least one primary cardiac endpoint event was reported. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years)
Population: Safety Population: All participants randomized/enrolled in the study according to actual treatment received. Hence, participants assigned to Herceptin who received no study treatment were analyzed in the Observation Arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 0.11 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 1.07 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Primary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 1.02 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 29.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 23.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) Events Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 22.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants with at least one RDFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y. In contrast to other study endpoints, RDFS compared to the Observation Arm was not a planned endpoint according to study protocol. Only RDFS in Herceptin 1-Year Arm versus Herceptin 2-Year Arm was a planned endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 22.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Restricted Disease-Free Survival (RDFS) Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 21.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants with at least one RFS event was reported.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 19.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With RFS Events in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 18.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up
Secondary cardiac endpoint events included NYHA Class I or II CHF with a drop in LVEF measured by multiple-gated acquisition or electrocardiogram, unless the subsequent assessment of LVEF indicated a return to levels that did not meet the definition of a significant LVEF drop. A significant LVEF drop was defined as an absolute reduction of at least 10 percentage points from Baseline and to a value \<50%. The percentage of participants with at least one secondary cardiac endpoint event was reported, excluding those with both a primary and secondary cardiac endpoint event. The 95% CI was calculated by the Pearson-Clopper method for a one-sample binomial.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (maximum up to 10 years)
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 0.86 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 4.40 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Secondary Cardiac Endpoint Events Compared to Observation: 10-Year Maximum Follow-Up | 7.29 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 19.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With TR in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 18.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants with TR of the present breast cancer was reported. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: From Baseline until time of event (median of 8 years)
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | Percentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 29.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 23.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | Percentage of Participants With Tumor Recurrence (TR) Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | 22.6 percentage of participants |
RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
RDFS events included loco-regional or distant recurrence of breast cancer, development of contralateral breast cancer, or death from any cause. The percentage of participants free of RDFS events (i.e., the RDFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y. In contrast to other study endpoints, RDFS compared to the Observation Arm was not a planned endpoint according to study protocol. Only RDFS in Herceptin 1-Year Arm versus Herceptin 2-Year Arm was a planned endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 87.3 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 81.9 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 78.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 77.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 77.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 89.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 78.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RDFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 83.0 percentage of participants |
RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 76.4 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 71.9 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 69.0 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 68.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 75.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 82.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 75.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 78.4 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 75.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 79.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 76.7 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 86.0 percentage of participants |
RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
RFS events included local, regional, or distant tumor recurrence. The percentage of participants free of RFS events (i.e., the RFS rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 87.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 83.1 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 80.2 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 79.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 80.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 81.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | RFS Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 84.5 percentage of participants |
TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 72.1 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 69.2 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 68.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 75.3 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 82.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 75.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 76.2 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 80.1 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 77.0 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 2-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis Compared to Observation: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 86.1 percentage of participants |
TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up
The percentage of participants without TR of the present breast cancer (i.e., the TR-free rate) and corresponding 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis based on available data at the time of the 8-year median follow-up analysis. TR included local, regional, or distant tumor ignoring contralateral breast cancer and second non-breast malignancy.
Time frame: Years 3, 5, 7, 8
Population: FAS Population 1Y2Y
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 87.7 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 83.2 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 80.4 percentage of participants |
| Observation Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 79.8 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 8 | 80.6 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 3 | 90.9 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 7 | 81.5 percentage of participants |
| Herceptin 1-Year Arm | TR-Free Rate According to Kaplan-Meier Analysis in 1-Year Versus 2-Year Herceptin: 8-Year Median Follow-Up | Year 5 | 84.7 percentage of participants |