Skip to content

A Study to Estimate Safety and Efficacy of Sorafenib (BAY43-9006) in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase II Multicenter Uncontrolled Trial of Sorafenib (BAY43-9006) in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00044512
Enrollment
137
Registered
2002-09-04
Start date
2002-08-31
Completion date
2008-02-29
Last updated
2014-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Keywords

Cancer, Liver Cancer, Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Brief summary

Evaluate anti-cancer activity (e.g. proportion of patients with confirmed complete response or partial response) in patients with advanced, inoperable biopsy-proven hepatocellular carcinoma.

Detailed description

In addition to the key secondary outcome parameters the following exploratory parameters were evaluated in subpopulations: * Pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of Sorafenib * Plasma and tissue tumor biomarkers

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)

Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg administered bis in die (bid, twice a day)

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) * Inoperable disease (T2-T4, any N, M0 or M1) or refused surgery * Measurable disease * At least 1 bidimensionally measurable lesion of at least 2 cm by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) * Presence of at least 1 of the following: * Alpha-fetoprotein greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN) * Hepatitis C antibody positive * Hepatitis B surface antigen positive * Child's Pugh class A or B * Candidate for systemic therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Fibrolamellar disease mixed histology * Metastatic brain or meningeal tumors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponseUntil 30 days after termination of active therapyObjective response rate of sorafenib assessed as the proportion of subjects with confirmed complete or partial response as per modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalStart of treatment to deathTime from the first date of receiving study medication to death.
Duration of Responseup to 3 years laterDuration of response was calculated from the first drug treatment date until documented progressive disease (PD). PD was 1) 25% or more increase in the sum of all target lesion areas taking as reference the smallest sum recorded at or following baseline, 2) unequivocal progression of an existing non-target lesion, or 3) appearance of a new lesion.
Time to Responseup to 3 years laterTime from the first day of receiving study drug to the date the CR or PR was documented (with confirmation).
Duration of Minor ResponseTime from MR to PDTime from the date that MR was first documented to the date that PD was first documented.
Duration of Stable Diseaseup to 3 years laterTime from the first day of receiving study drug until there was a documented PD or response.
Time to Minor Responseup to 3 years laterTime from the first day of receiving study drug to the date the MR was first documented (with confirmation). Minor response = \>25% regression.
Time to Progressionup to 3 years laterTime from the first date of receiving study drug until the first documented PD.

Countries

Belgium, France, Israel, Italy, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Only subjects with measurable, histologically or cytologically documented hepatocellur carcinoma (HCC) which was inoperable or who had refused surgery could participate in this study.

Pre-assignment details

Of 147 enrolled patients, 137 received treatment. 10 patients failed screening; reasons were: target lesions identified at baseline (3), liver function tests too high for inclusion (2), prior systemic anticancer treatment (2), creatinine too high for inclusion (1), platelets too low for inclusion (1), diagnosis of HCC not confirmed (1)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) 400 mg administered bis in die (bid, twice a day)
137
Total137

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Follow UpLost to Follow-up2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
53 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
84 Participants
Child Pugh Status
Missing
1 participants
Child Pugh Status
Status A
98 participants
Child Pugh Status
Status B
38 participants
Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG PS) at study entry
Grade 0
68 participants
Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG PS) at study entry
Grade 1
69 participants
Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG PS) at study entry
Grade 2
0 participants
Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG PS) at study entry
Grade 3
0 participants
Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (ECOG PS) at study entry
Grade 4
0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
97 Participants
Stage of Disease at study entry (TNM Classification)
Stage 1
0 participants
Stage of Disease at study entry (TNM Classification)
Stage 2
4 participants
Stage of Disease at study entry (TNM Classification)
Stage 3
42 participants
Stage of Disease at study entry (TNM Classification)
Stage 4
91 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
126 / 137
serious
Total, serious adverse events
77 / 137

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants for Each Type of Response

Objective response rate of sorafenib assessed as the proportion of subjects with confirmed complete or partial response as per modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Time frame: Until 30 days after termination of active therapy

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on subgroups of patients categorized by baseline characteristics of ECOG Performance Status, Child Pugh status, TNM stage at study entry, prior surgical procedure, hepatitis A and B status, and age.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponseComplete response (CR)0 percentage of participants
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponsePartial response (PR)2.2 percentage of participants
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponseMinor response (MR)5.8 percentage of participants
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponseStable disease (SD)54.7 percentage of participants
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponseProgressive disease (PD)13.9 percentage of participants
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponseNot available for independent review (NA)22.6 percentage of participants
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Percentage of Participants for Each Type of ResponseNot evaluable (NE)0.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Minor Response

Time from the date that MR was first documented to the date that PD was first documented.

Time frame: Time from MR to PD

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on all treated subjects and for subgroups such as baseline Child Pugh status (A vs B), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), TNM stage at study entry (II/III vs IV), hepatitis B and hepatitis C status (positive vs negative).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Duration of Minor Response122 days
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was calculated from the first drug treatment date until documented progressive disease (PD). PD was 1) 25% or more increase in the sum of all target lesion areas taking as reference the smallest sum recorded at or following baseline, 2) unequivocal progression of an existing non-target lesion, or 3) appearance of a new lesion.

Time frame: up to 3 years later

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on all treated subjects and for subgroups baseline Child Pugh status (A vs B), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), TNM stage at study entry (II/III vs IV), hepatitis B and C status (positive vs negative). The 3 subjects are censored at time of evaluation. The Median is not estimable so the reported number is biased.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Duration of Response374 days
Secondary

Duration of Stable Disease

Time from the first day of receiving study drug until there was a documented PD or response.

Time frame: up to 3 years later

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on all treated subjects and for subgroups such as baseline Child Pugh status (A vs B), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), TNM stage at study entry (II/III vs IV), hepatitis B and hepatitis C status (positive vs negative).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Duration of Stable Disease166 days
Secondary

Overall Survival

Time from the first date of receiving study medication to death.

Time frame: Start of treatment to death

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on all treated subjects and for subgroups such as baseline Child Pugh status (A vs B), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), TNM stage at study entry (II/III vs IV), hepatitis B and hepatitis C status (positive vs negative).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Overall Survival280 days
Secondary

Time to Minor Response

Time from the first day of receiving study drug to the date the MR was first documented (with confirmation). Minor response = \>25% regression.

Time frame: up to 3 years later

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on all treated subjects and for subgroups such as baseline Child Pugh status (A vs B), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), TNM stage at study entry (II/III vs IV), hepatitis B and hepatitis C status (positive vs negative).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Time to Minor Response84 days
Secondary

Time to Progression

Time from the first date of receiving study drug until the first documented PD.

Time frame: up to 3 years later

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on all treated subjects and for subgroups such as baseline Child Pugh status (A vs B), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), TNM stage at study entry (II/III vs IV), hepatitis B and hepatitis C status (positive vs negative).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Time to Progression167 days
Secondary

Time to Response

Time from the first day of receiving study drug to the date the CR or PR was documented (with confirmation).

Time frame: up to 3 years later

Population: Intention to Treat (ITT) analyses were performed on all treated subjects and for subgroups such as baseline Child Pugh status (A vs B), ECOG PS (0 vs 1), TNM stage at study entry (II/III vs IV), hepatitis B and hepatitis C status (positive vs negative).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d.Time to Response144 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026