Skip to content

Irinotecan and Docetaxel With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Phase II Trial of Irinotecan/Docetaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer, With Randomization Between Irinotecan/Docetaxel and Irinotecan/Docetaxel Plus C225 a Monoclonal Antibody to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGF-r)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00042939
Enrollment
94
Registered
2003-01-27
Start date
2003-12-09
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2023-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

pancreatic cancer, metastatic pancreatic cancer, EGF-r, irinotecan, docetaxel, cetuximab

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining chemotherapy with cetuximab may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying giving irinotecan and docetaxel together with cetuximab to see how well it works compared to irinotecan and docetaxel alone in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer .

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Determine the efficacy of irinotecan and docetaxel with or without cetuximab, in terms of objective response rate, in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. * Determine the time to progression and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens. * Determine the proportion of patients with tumors that overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm A: Patients receive docetaxel IV over 1 hour and irinotecan IV over 30 minutes weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. * Arm B: Patients receive docetaxel and irinotecan as in arm A. Patients also receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. Courses repeat in both arms every 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then periodically thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 92 patients (46 per treatment arm)

Interventions

BIOLOGICALcetuximab

Patients received cetuximab intravenous infusions, via infusion pump or syringe pump, once a week for 6 weeks.

DRUGdocetaxel

Docetaxel was administered intravenously over 60 minutes at a dose of 35 mg/m² once a week (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks rest. Docetaxel was diluted in 100-150 ml of infusion solution.

DRUGirinotecan hydrochloride

After the completion of the docetaxel infusion, irinotecan was administered intravenously over 30 minutes at a dose of 50 mg/m² once a week (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks rest.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas * Sufficient tumor tissue from fine needle aspiration, core biopsy, or open biopsy available for epidermal growth factor receptor testing * At least 1 unidimensionally measurable primary or metastatic lesionge * Age of 18 and over * ECOG performance status 0-1 * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception * Creatinine clearance \> 60 mL/min * LVEF normal * Absolute neutrophil count \> 1,500/mm\^3 * Platelet count \> 100,000/mm\^3 * Bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN)\* * SGOT or SGPT and alkaline phosphatase must meet the criteria for 1 of the following\*: * SGOT or SGPT ≤ 2.5 times ULN AND alkaline phosphatase ≤ ULN * SGOT or SGPT ≤ 1.5 times ULN AND alkaline phosphatase \> ULN but ≤ 2.5 times ULN * SGOT or SGPT ≤ ULN AND alkaline phosphatase \> 2.5 but ≤ 4 times ULN NOTE: \*Percutaneous stenting or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography may be used to normalize liver function tests

Exclusion criteria

* History of uncontrolled arrhythmias * History of congestive heart failure * History of uncontrolled angina pectoris * Prior chemotherapy * Pre-existing neuropathy ≥ grade 2 * Prior hypersensitivity to polysorbate 80 * Pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients With Objective Response Evaluated by RECIST (Solid Tumor Response Criteria)Assessed every 12 weeks until progressionPer RECIST criteria, Complete response (CR)= disappearance of all target and nontarget lesions Partial response (PR)= \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions from baseline, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. Objective response = CR + PR

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 yearProgression-free survival was defined as the shorter of: 1. The time from registration to progression. or 2. The time from registration to death without documentation of progression given that the death occured within 4 months of the last disease assessment without progression (or registration, whichever is more recent). Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s) or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.
Overall SurvivalAssessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 yearOverall survival was defined as time from registration to death from any cause.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) StatusOriginal tumor tissue samples submitted within one month of patient randomizationEGFR expression was be evaluated by staining 5-micron paraffin sections of tumor biopsies with anti-EGFR clone 2-18C9 (DAKO Corporation, Carpinteria, CA) using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique according to the instructions provided by DAKO. In brief, this includes an antigen retrieval pretreatment, the blocking of endogenous peroxidase activity, incubation with anti-EGFR antibody or a negative reagent control, staining with a detection system, visualization, and coverslipping.
Proportion of Patients With Thromboembolic EventsAssessed every 6 weeks while on treatment and for 30 days after the end of treatmentTo determine the rate of thromboembolic events in this population when prophylactic enoxaparin sodium is administered.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

E8200 opened to accrual on 7/31/2003, accrued its first patient on 12/9/2003, and was suspended on 12/2/2004 for evaluation of response and toxicity. Arm B was reactivated on 7/12/2005 after meeting the response criteria; Arm A was reactivated on 11/23/2005. Arm B and Arm A closed to accrual on 4/17/2006 and 8/23/2006, respectively, after meeting the accrual goal.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A: Irinotecan/Docetaxel
Docetaxel was administered intravenously over 60 minutes at a dose of 35 mg/m². Docetaxel was diluted in 100-150 ml of infusion solution. After the completion of the docetaxel infusion, irinotecan was administered intravenously over 30 minutes at a dose of 50 mg/m². Chemotherapy was administered once a week (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks rest. This constituted a cycle of treatment. Patients were evaluated after 2 cycles.
44
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/Cetuximab
Patients received Cetuximab intravenously once a week for 6 weeks. On day 1 of cycle 1 only, an initial dose of 400 mg/m² (over 120 minutes) was administered. Thereafter, a once-a-week maintenance dose of 250 mg/m² (infused over 60 minutes), was given. The infusion rate never exceeded 5 ml/minute. On the day of the initial dose, the administration of Cetuximab was followed by the administration of docetaxel, after a 60-minute observation period. (The observation period was 30 minutes following maintenance doses.) Docetaxel was administered intravenously over 60 minutes at a dose of 35 mg/m². Docetaxel was diluted in 100-150 ml of infusion solution. After the completion of the docetaxel infusion, irinotecan was administered intravenously over 30 minutes at a dose of 50 mg/m². Chemotherapy was administered once a week (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks rest. Cetuximab was administered once a week for 6 consecutive weeks. A cycle of treatment was 6 weeks.
43
Total87

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event67
Overall StudyDeath32
Overall StudyDeterioration of health34
Overall StudyDid not start treatment21
Overall StudyIneligible22
Overall StudyOther disease10
Overall StudyPatient non-compliance10
Overall StudyQOL diminished10
Overall StudyRising ca 19-910
Overall StudyStill on treatment10
Overall StudyTreatment break > 4 weeks01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm A: Irinotecan/DocetaxelArm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/CetuximabTotal
Age, Continuous60.2 years60.6 years60.4 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants6 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants37 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 4645 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 4636 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Patients With Objective Response Evaluated by RECIST (Solid Tumor Response Criteria)

Per RECIST criteria, Complete response (CR)= disappearance of all target and nontarget lesions Partial response (PR)= \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions from baseline, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. Objective response = CR + PR

Time frame: Assessed every 12 weeks until progression

Population: Eligible patients who began treatment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Irinotecan/DocetaxelProportion of Patients With Objective Response Evaluated by RECIST (Solid Tumor Response Criteria)0.045 Proportion of participants
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/CetuximabProportion of Patients With Objective Response Evaluated by RECIST (Solid Tumor Response Criteria)0.07 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Status

EGFR expression was be evaluated by staining 5-micron paraffin sections of tumor biopsies with anti-EGFR clone 2-18C9 (DAKO Corporation, Carpinteria, CA) using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique according to the instructions provided by DAKO. In brief, this includes an antigen retrieval pretreatment, the blocking of endogenous peroxidase activity, incubation with anti-EGFR antibody or a negative reagent control, staining with a detection system, visualization, and coverslipping.

Time frame: Original tumor tissue samples submitted within one month of patient randomization

Population: Eligible and treated patients with EGFR stain results available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Irinotecan/DocetaxelEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) StatusPositive29 participants
Arm A: Irinotecan/DocetaxelEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) StatusNegative1 participants
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/CetuximabEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) StatusPositive30 participants
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/CetuximabEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) StatusNegative1 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as time from registration to death from any cause.

Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Population: Eligible patients who began treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Irinotecan/DocetaxelOverall Survival6.5 months
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/CetuximabOverall Survival5.3 months
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival was defined as the shorter of: 1. The time from registration to progression. or 2. The time from registration to death without documentation of progression given that the death occured within 4 months of the last disease assessment without progression (or registration, whichever is more recent). Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s) or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.

Time frame: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Population: Eligible patients who began treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm A: Irinotecan/DocetaxelProgression-free Survival3.9 months
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/CetuximabProgression-free Survival4.5 months
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Thromboembolic Events

To determine the rate of thromboembolic events in this population when prophylactic enoxaparin sodium is administered.

Time frame: Assessed every 6 weeks while on treatment and for 30 days after the end of treatment

Population: Eligible and treated patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm A: Irinotecan/DocetaxelProportion of Patients With Thromboembolic Events0 Proportion of participants
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/CetuximabProportion of Patients With Thromboembolic Events0.023 Proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026