Skip to content

Assessing Quality of Life of Patients With Prostate Cancer

An International Field Study Of The Reliability And Validity Of The EORTC QLQ-C30 And A Disease-Specific Questionnaire Module (QLQ-PR25) For Assessing Quality Of Life Of Patients With Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00041301
Enrollment
625
Registered
2003-01-27
Start date
2002-03-31
Completion date
2005-11-30
Last updated
2012-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

stage I prostate cancer, stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, stage III prostate cancer, stage IV prostate cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing prostate cancer treatment may help determine the intermediate and long-term effects of the treatment on these patients. PURPOSE: Clinical trial to study the effectiveness of two questionnaires in assessing quality of life of patients who have prostate cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Assess the scale structure, psychometric validity, and reliability of quality of life measurements using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the prostate cancer-specific QLQ-PR25 questionnaires in patients with stage I-IV prostate cancer. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to stage of disease (local or locally advanced disease vs metastatic disease). Patients complete EORTC QLQ-C30 and prostate cancer-specific QLQ-PR25 questionnaires before therapy and at 3 months after the start of therapy. Patients in stratum II also complete questionnaires at 6 months after the start of therapy. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 375 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

qol questionnaires

Sponsors

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed prostate cancer * Stratum I: * Clinically localized primary prostate cancer * T1-T3, G1-G3, N0, M0 * Plan to undergo a radical prostatectomy OR * Local or locally advanced primary prostate cancer * T1-T4, G1-G3, N0, M0 * Plan to undergo radiotherapy with curative intent * Stratum II: * Metastatic prostate cancer * T1-T4, G1-G3, N1, M0-M1 OR * T1-T4, G1-G3, N0-1, M1 * Plan to receive hormonal treatment * No anti-androgen monotherapy * No cerebral metastases PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: * Any age Performance status: * Not specified Life expectancy: * Not specified Hematopoietic: * Not specified Hepatic: * Not specified Renal: * Not specified Other: * Mentally fit to complete a questionnaire * Literate in the language of the questionnaires * No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that would preclude compliance * No other concurrent malignancy except basal cell skin cancer * No concurrent participation in other quality of life investigations that would preclude study participation PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: * Not specified Chemotherapy: * Not specified Endocrine therapy: * See Disease Characteristics * No prior neoadjuvant hormonal treatment * Planned adjuvant hormonal therapy (orchiectomy, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue, or maximal androgen blockade) is allowed for patients in stratum I Radiotherapy: * See Disease Characteristics * No interstitial radiotherapy * More than 2 years since prior radiotherapy (stratum II) Surgery: * See Disease Characteristics * More than 2 years since prior prostatectomy (stratum II) Other: * No prior treatment for prostate carcinoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
psychometric validity of the PR25 modulebefore start of treatment, three months after the start of primary treatment and six months after the start of primary treatment.Quality of life scores will be evaluated for psychometric validity by: * Scale structure using multi-trait scaling analysis * Reliability using tests of internal consistency * Test-retest reliability * Validity using inter-scale correlations and known group comparisons * Sensitivity to change using two measurements of Quality of Life and ANOVA to look for the significance of changes in quality of life scores as a function of observed changes in clinical status over time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
debriefing questionnaire informationat baselinePatients will be asked to complete a short debriefing questionnaire covering questions about the time taken to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25; the need for help in completing the questionnaires and querying whether any of the questionnaire items were confusing; difficult to answer or upsetting.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026