Skip to content

Ginger in Treating Nausea in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Cancer

A Phase II/III Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) For Nausea Caused By Chemotherapy For Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00040742
Enrollment
745
Registered
2003-01-27
Start date
2003-03-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2015-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nausea, Vomiting

Keywords

nausea, vomiting

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Ginger may help reduce or prevent nausea. It is not yet known if antiemetic drugs are more effective with or without ginger in treating nausea caused by chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying giving antiemetic drugs together with ginger to see how well they work compared to antiemetic drugs alone in treating nausea in patients who are receiving chemotherapy for cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Compare the efficacy of 1 course of ginger vs placebo when administered in regimens containing a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist antiemetic and dexamethasone (or the equivalent dose of IV methylprednisolone) in controlling chemotherapy-related nausea at course 2 of chemotherapy in patients with cancer. * Compare the efficacy of 3 different doses of ginger in controlling chemotherapy-related nausea in these patients. * Determine the adverse effects of ginger when given 3 days before chemotherapy administration in these patients. * Determine the adverse effects of these antiemetic regimens during the 4 days after chemotherapy. * Compare the chemotherapy-related anticipatory nausea in patients treated with these antiemetic regimens. * Compare the quality of life during the 4 days after chemotherapy in patients treated with these antiemetic regimens. * Compare the chemotherapy-related nausea at course 3 of chemotherapy in these patients after 2 courses of ginger vs placebo. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms. Day 1 of each course is defined as the day of chemotherapy administration. * Placebo: Patients receive oral placebo twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. * 0.5g Ginger: Patients receive oral low-dose ginger and oral placebo twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. * 1.0g Ginger: Patients receive oral intermediate-dose ginger and oral placebo twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. * 1.5g Ginger: Patients receive oral high-dose ginger twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. Patients in each arm also continue receiving their scheduled antiemetic regimen comprising a 5-hydroxytryptamine type-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist (ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron, and dolasetron mesylate) and dexamethasone (DM) (or the equivalent dose of IV methylprednisolone (MePRDL)) on day 1 of courses 2 and 3. Symptoms are assessed on day -3 to day 1 of courses 2 and 3 and on days 1-4 of courses 1-3. Quality of life is assessed on day 4 of courses 1-3. Nausea and vomiting are assessed 4 times daily on days 1-4 of courses 1-3. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 706 patients will be accrued for this study within 3 years.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTginger

Given orally

OTHERplacebo

Given orally

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Gary Morrow
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Diagnosis of cancer and be scheduled to receive at least 3 courses of chemotherapy * Scheduled to receive chemotherapy with no planned interruption by radiotherapy or surgery * Chemotherapy courses must be separated by at least 2 weeks from day 1 to day 1 of next course * Must have experienced nausea of any degree of severity after completion of the first study-related course of chemotherapy * Received a prior 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist antiemetic (ondansetron, granisetron, tropisetron, or dolasetron mesylate) with dexamethasone (DM) given at any dose and by any route (or equivalent dose of IV methylprednisolone (MePRDL)) on day 1 of course 1 of chemotherapy * Scheduled to receive a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist antiemetic with DM (or equivalent dose of IV MePRDL) on day 1 of courses 2 and 3 of chemotherapy * No symptomatic brain metastases PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: * 18 and over Performance status: * Not specified Life expectancy: * Not specified Hematopoietic: * Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm\^3 at second course of chemotherapy * No prior bleeding or blood coagulation disorder (e.g., thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction) Hepatic: * No prior coagulation factor deficiency Renal: * Not specified Cardiovascular: * No prior vascular defect Other: * Able to understand English * No concurrent or impending bowel obstruction PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: * No concurrent interferon therapy Chemotherapy: * See Disease Characteristics * At least 6 months since other prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: * Not specified Radiotherapy: * See Disease Characteristics * No concurrent radiotherapy Surgery: * See Disease Characteristics Other: * No concurrent warfarin or heparin for therapeutic anticoagulation * Concurrent low-dose warfarin for maintenance of venous access allowed * Concurrent rescue medications for control of symptoms caused by the cancer or its treatment allowed as clinically indicated

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline of Peak Acute Nausea3-4 days on study drugNausea evaluated on a 7-point semantic rating scale anchored by 1 = Not at all nauseated and by 7 = Extremely nauseated. Acute nausea calculated as the maximum of the Day 1 Evening and Night nausea ratings. Change from post-intervention (cycle 2 of chemotherapy) - baseline (cycle 1 of chemotherapy) of peak acute nausea used as the outcome measure. Negative values for this outcome are favorable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Nausea Severity3-4 days on study drugNausea evaluated on a 7-point semantic rating scale anchored by 1 = Not at all nauseated and by 7 = Extremely nauseated. Acute nausea calculated as the average of the Day 1 Evening and Night nausea ratings. Change from post-intervention (cycle 2 of chemotherapy) - baseline (cycle 1 of chemotherapy) of average acute nausea used as the outcome measure. Negative values for this outcome are favorable.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Patients receive oral placebo twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. placebo: Given orally
149
0.5g Ginger
Patients receive oral low-dose ginger and oral placebo twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. ginger extract: Given orally placebo: Given orally
134
1.0g Ginger
Patients receive oral intermediate-dose ginger and oral placebo twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. ginger extract: Given orally placebo: Given orally
141
1.5g Ginger
Patients receive oral high-dose ginger twice daily on days -3 to 3 of chemotherapy courses 2 and 3. ginger extract: Given orally
152
Total576

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1516219
Overall StudyChemotoxicity4352
Overall StudyDeath0010
Overall StudyIncomplete Forms61045
Overall StudyOther medical7555
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7151013

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal1.5g GingerPlacebo0.5g Ginger1.0g Ginger
Age, Continuous52.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.68
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.62
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.58
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.69
Baseline average nausea, Day12.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
2.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
2.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Baseline nausea at its worst2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
2.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
2.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Education
College Grad
216 participants54 participants60 participants47 participants55 participants
Education
H.S. Grad
336 participants95 participants82 participants78 participants81 participants
Education
Some/No HS
23 participants3 participants6 participants9 participants5 participants
Education
Unknown
1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Marital status
Married
420 participants114 participants107 participants96 participants103 participants
Marital status
Not Married
156 participants38 participants42 participants38 participants38 participants
Previous chemotherapy
No
251 participants70 participants68 participants57 participants56 participants
Previous chemotherapy
Unknown
2 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants
Previous chemotherapy
Yes
323 participants82 participants81 participants75 participants85 participants
Previous radiation therapy
No
533 participants144 participants136 participants125 participants128 participants
Previous radiation therapy
Unknown
2 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants
Previous radiation therapy
Yes
41 participants8 participants13 participants7 participants13 participants
Previous surgery
No
75 participants23 participants18 participants19 participants15 participants
Previous surgery
Yes
501 participants129 participants131 participants115 participants126 participants
Quality of life(FACT-G)72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
71 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-White
36 participants10 participants11 participants8 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
2 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
538 participants142 participants137 participants126 participants133 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
521 Participants142 Participants135 Participants122 Participants122 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants10 Participants14 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Tumor site
Alimentary
43 participants8 participants14 participants11 participants10 participants
Tumor site
Breast
427 participants117 participants107 participants100 participants103 participants
Tumor site
Genitourinary
10 participants2 participants2 participants3 participants3 participants
Tumor site
Gynecologic
31 participants5 participants11 participants6 participants9 participants
Tumor site
Hematologic
24 participants8 participants3 participants4 participants9 participants
Tumor site
Lung
33 participants10 participants10 participants7 participants6 participants
Tumor site
Other
8 participants2 participants2 participants3 participants1 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 1887 / 1833 / 1878 / 187
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1880 / 1831 / 1870 / 187

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline of Peak Acute Nausea

Nausea evaluated on a 7-point semantic rating scale anchored by 1 = Not at all nauseated and by 7 = Extremely nauseated. Acute nausea calculated as the maximum of the Day 1 Evening and Night nausea ratings. Change from post-intervention (cycle 2 of chemotherapy) - baseline (cycle 1 of chemotherapy) of peak acute nausea used as the outcome measure. Negative values for this outcome are favorable.

Time frame: 3-4 days on study drug

Population: Eligible patients 18 years of age or older, able to understand English, diagnosed with cancer, may have received more than one chemotherapy cycle and scheduled for at least three additional cycles; randomization stratified by CCOP site. A computer-generated random numbers table assigned patients to one of four treatment arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline of Peak Acute Nausea0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
0.5g GingerChange From Baseline of Peak Acute Nausea-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
1.0g GingerChange From Baseline of Peak Acute Nausea-0.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
1.5g GingerChange From Baseline of Peak Acute Nausea-0.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Comparison: H0: Mean difference between 0.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between 0.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.017Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: H0: Mean difference between 1.0g and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between 1.0g and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.036Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: H0: Mean difference between 1.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between 1.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.431Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Placebo vs. Any Ginger. H0: Mean difference between \[(0.5g +1.0g +1.5g) / 3\] and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between \[(0.5g +1.0g +1.5g) / 3\] and placebo of change from baseline of Peak Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Average Nausea Severity

Nausea evaluated on a 7-point semantic rating scale anchored by 1 = Not at all nauseated and by 7 = Extremely nauseated. Acute nausea calculated as the average of the Day 1 Evening and Night nausea ratings. Change from post-intervention (cycle 2 of chemotherapy) - baseline (cycle 1 of chemotherapy) of average acute nausea used as the outcome measure. Negative values for this outcome are favorable.

Time frame: 3-4 days on study drug

Population: Eligible patients 18 years of age or older, able to understand English, diagnosed with cancer, may have received more than one chemotherapy cycle and scheduled for at least three additional cycles; randomization stratified by CCOP site. A computer-generated random numbers table assigned patients to one of four treatment arms.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAverage Nausea Severity0.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.58
0.5g GingerAverage Nausea Severity-0.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.67
1.0g GingerAverage Nausea Severity-0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.64
1.5g GingerAverage Nausea Severity-0.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.68
Comparison: H0: Mean difference between 0.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between 0.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.046Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: H0: Mean difference between 1.0g and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between 1.0g and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.076Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: H0: Mean difference between 1.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between 1.5g and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.738Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Placebo vs Any Ginger. H0: Mean difference between \[(0.5g +1.0g +1.5g) / 3\] and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea = 0.~Ha: Mean difference between \[(0.5g +1.0g +1.5g) / 3\] and placebo of change from baseline of Average Acute Nausea \> 0. (Two-sided)p-value: 0.013Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026