Skip to content

Evaluation of Efficacy and Mechanisms of an Antiinflammatory Intervention for Chemotherapy Related Mucosal Injury

Evaluation of Efficacy and Mechanisms of an Anti-Inflammatory Intervention for Chemotherapy Related Mucosal Injury

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00031551
Enrollment
27
Registered
2002-03-08
Start date
2002-03-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2017-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stomatitis

Keywords

Stomatitis, Oropharyngeal pain, TNF, Etanercept, Bone marrow transplantation, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Oral cavity, Oral mucous membranes, Randomized controlled clinical trial, Inflammation

Brief summary

This study consisted of two parts: the pilot study and the main study. The purpose of the pilot study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of planned laboratory techniques to assess for TNF-alpha gene expression from unstimulated saliva, plasma, and mucosal epithelial cells in patients who have chemotherapy-related stomatitis. Main Study Description: Stomatitis is defined as inflammation of the mucous membranes of the oral cavity and oropharynx characterized by tissue erythema, edema, and atrophy, often progressing to ulceration. Stomatitis is a biologically complex, multifactorial, cancer treatment-related oral condition experienced by many oncology patients, which often leads to a cascade of negative sequelae including oropharyngeal pain, critical treatment alterations or cessation, and decreased quality of life. The optimal treatment strategies for stomatitis have not been established. There is a critical need to examine the pathogenesis of and to evaluate interventions for stomatitis and related acute oropharyngeal pain in the randomized controlled clinical trial setting using valid and reliable stomatitis assessment tools to both advance the science of cancer treatment-related oral toxicities and improve patient care. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to elucidate the role of inflammation in stomatitis by testing the effects of a novel tumor necrosis factor (TNF) fusion protein etanercept, (Enbrel, Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA) on the incidence and severity of stomatitis. The actions of this fusion protein, which binds specifically to TNF preventing its interaction with cellular receptors and altering the inflammatory cascade, may provide insight into the role of inflammation in stomatitis. An etanercept effect is defined as a prevention or amelioration of stomatitis and acute oropharyngeal pain and/or changes in levels of tissue mediators. If stomatitis is primarily a consequence of a mucosal inflammatory response, then we hypothesize that this oral condition will be responsive to binding of TNF(alpha). Elaboration of the role of inflammatory cell signaling associated with stomatitis and the effect of TNF(alpha) may elucidate the mechanisms related to the pathogenesis of stomatitis and to other mucosal conditions. Patients who are scheduled to receive autologous or allogenic peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplant will be invited to participate in this study during a regularly scheduled pre-treatment visit. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Patients will be randomized to receive either etanercept mouthwash or placebo, which will both be administered by protocol schedule. Stomatitis and oropharyngeal pain will be measured at baseline and at specified post-chemotherapy time points corresponding with the predicted stomatitis onset, peak, and healing time course. TNF(alpha) levels in buccal mucosa, analyzed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction techniques, and blood levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and inflammatory mediators will also be measured at baseline and at specified post-chemotherapy time points corresponding with the predicted stomatitis onset, peak, and healing time course.

Detailed description

This study consisted of two parts: the pilot study and the main study. The purpose of the pilot study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of planned laboratory techniques to assess for TNF-alpha gene expression from unstimulated saliva, plasma, and mucosal epithelial cells in patients who have chemotherapy-related stomatitis. Main Study Description: Stomatitis is defined as inflammation of the mucous membranes of the oral cavity and oropharynx characterized by tissue erythema, edema, and atrophy, often progressing to ulceration. Stomatitis is a biologically complex, multifactorial, cancer treatment-related oral condition experienced by many oncology patients, which often leads to a cascade of negative sequelae including oropharyngeal pain, critical treatment alterations or cessation, and decreased quality of life. The optimal treatment strategies for stomatitis have not been established. There is a critical need to examine the pathogenesis of and to evaluate interventions for stomatitis and related acute oropharyngeal pain in the randomized controlled clinical trial setting using valid and reliable stomatitis assessment tools to both advance the science of cancer treatment-related oral toxicities and improve patient care. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to elucidate the role of inflammation in stomatitis by testing the effects of a novel tumor necrosis factor (TNF) fusion protein etanercept, (Enbrel) (Registered Trademark), Immunex Corporation, Seattle, WA) on the incidence and severity of stomatitis. The actions of this fusion protein, which binds specifically to TNF preventing its interaction with cellular receptors and altering the inflammatory cascade, may provide insight into the role of inflammation in stomatitis. An etanercept effect is defined as a prevention or amelioration of stomatitis and acute oropharyngeal pain and/or changes in levels of tissue mediators. If stomatitis is primarily a consequence of a mucosal inflammatory response, then we hypothesize that this oral condition will be responsive to binding of TNFa. Elaboration of the role of inflammatory cell signaling associated with stomatitis and the effect of TNFa may elucidate the mechanisms related to the pathogenesis of stomatitis and to other mucosal conditions. Patients who are scheduled to receive autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplant will be invited to participate in this study during a regularly scheduled pre-treatment visit. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Patients will be randomized to receive either etanercept 2.5mg in 20cc mouthwash or placebo 20cc mouthwash, which will both be administered by protocol schedule. Stomatitis and oropharyngeal pain will be measured at baseline and at specified post-chemotherapy time points corresponding with the predicted stomatitis onset, peak, and healing time course. TNFa levels in buccal mucosa, analyzed by real time polymerase chain reaction techniques, and blood levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and inflammatory mediators will also be measured at baseline and at specified post-chemotherapy time points corresponding with the predicted stomatitis onset, peak, and healing time course.

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Male or female oncology patients who are enrolled in participating stomatogenic autologous or allogeneic PBSCT/BMT protocols, and are willing to participate in this study concurrently 2. Able to understand and sign protocol consent or assent 3. Age 16 years or older

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating females 2. Unable to follow oral rinsing directions 3. Intubation 4. Chronic use of medications confounding assessment of the inflammatory response (non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, antihistamines, and steroids- with the exception of decadron that is commonly used as an antiemetic in the PBSCT/BMT setting) 5. Pre-existing oral infection or upper respiratory infection that might maximize the possibility of an infection or sepsis contributing to a drug-related adverse event 6. Known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to etanercept

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
What is the Clinical Efficacy of an Etanercept Mouthwash Used for the Treatment of Autologous or Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant or Bone Marrow Transplant Treatment-related Stomatitis?2 yearsClinical efficacy will be determined by measurement of stomatitis grade and oropharyngeal pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
What is the Toxicity of an Etanercept Mouthwash Used for the Treatment of Autologous or Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant or Bone Marrow Transplant Treatment -Related Stomatitis?2 yearsToxicity will be measured by the incidence of adverse events.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Day 9 (+/- 24 hours) after conditioning chemotherapySubjects rated pain using the Painometer, a hand-held tool with a visual analogue scale to rate overall pain intensity and a list of 14 sensory and 11 affective pain descriptors ranked by intensity values from 1 - 5. Subjects look at the list of sensory and affective words and select words that describe their pain, including Oral Pain and Oral Pain with Swallowing. . The weighted scores assigned to the words are added to obtain a pain intensity score for the sensory and the affective components. The overall pain intensity is measured on a visual analogue scale which has a range of 1 - 10 with high scores indicating higher pain intensity. The sensory and affective pain scores are otained by adding all of the respective intensity values. The range of possible sensory scores is from 0 - 48 and the range of possible affective scores is from 0 - 37. The sensory and affective scores may be added together to obtain the total pain intensity score, which may range from 0 - 85.
Pilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapyday 9 (+/- 24 hours) after conditioning chemotherapyParticipants selected from 14 word descriptors of sensory (S) pain and 11 word descriptors of affective (A) pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Main Study Participants
Participants were randomized to one of the following two interventions but the study was not unblinded. 1. Etanercept 2.5 mg in 20cc mouthwash is swished and spit by the participant every 6 hours. The experimental mouthwash starts one day before conditioning chemotherapy is administered to the participant and continues until oral pain intensity and stomatitis severity scores are both 0, or by bone marrow transplant (BMT) Day +14, whichever occurs first. 2. Placebo 20cc mouthwash is swished and spit by the participant every 6 hours. The placebo mouthwash starts one day before conditioning chemotherapy is administered to the participant and continues until oral pain intensity and stomatitis severity scores are both 0, or by bone marrow transplant day (BMT) Day +14, whichever occurs first.
2
Pilot Study
Participants were enrolled in the pilot study to collect descriptive data about pain perception and laboratory techniques.
25
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrew due to chemotherapy effects20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMain Study ParticipantsPilot StudyTotal
Age, Continuous59 years46 yearsNA years
Cancer Diagnosis
Breast Cancer
0 participants7 participants7 participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Hodgkin's Lymphoma
0 participants4 participants4 participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Leukemia
0 participants4 participants4 participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Multiple Myeloma
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Cancer Diagnosis
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
1 participants8 participants9 participants
Cancer stage
Accelerated Phase
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Cancer stage
First Remission
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Cancer stage
Second Remission
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Cancer stage
Stage II
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Cancer stage
Stage III
1 participants13 participants14 participants
Cancer stage
Stage IV
0 participants5 participants5 participants
Cancer stage
Unknown
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Cancer stage
Unstaged
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Education
College Graduate
1 participants7 participants8 participants
Education
Grade School
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Education
Graduate School
1 participants4 participants5 participants
Education
High School
0 participants5 participants5 participants
Education
Some College
0 participants7 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific Islander
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
0 participants6 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
2 participants16 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants25 participants27 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants13 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants12 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 20 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

What is the Clinical Efficacy of an Etanercept Mouthwash Used for the Treatment of Autologous or Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant or Bone Marrow Transplant Treatment-related Stomatitis?

Clinical efficacy will be determined by measurement of stomatitis grade and oropharyngeal pain.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Participants withdrew and analyses were terminated before any data collected.

Secondary

What is the Toxicity of an Etanercept Mouthwash Used for the Treatment of Autologous or Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant or Bone Marrow Transplant Treatment -Related Stomatitis?

Toxicity will be measured by the incidence of adverse events.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashWhat is the Toxicity of an Etanercept Mouthwash Used for the Treatment of Autologous or Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant or Bone Marrow Transplant Treatment -Related Stomatitis?5 event
Other Pre-specified

Pilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)

Subjects rated pain using the Painometer, a hand-held tool with a visual analogue scale to rate overall pain intensity and a list of 14 sensory and 11 affective pain descriptors ranked by intensity values from 1 - 5. Subjects look at the list of sensory and affective words and select words that describe their pain, including Oral Pain and Oral Pain with Swallowing. . The weighted scores assigned to the words are added to obtain a pain intensity score for the sensory and the affective components. The overall pain intensity is measured on a visual analogue scale which has a range of 1 - 10 with high scores indicating higher pain intensity. The sensory and affective pain scores are otained by adding all of the respective intensity values. The range of possible sensory scores is from 0 - 48 and the range of possible affective scores is from 0 - 37. The sensory and affective scores may be added together to obtain the total pain intensity score, which may range from 0 - 85.

Time frame: Day 9 (+/- 24 hours) after conditioning chemotherapy

Population: One subject was in critical condition at day 9 after CT, preventing data collection at this time

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Pain, affective Dimension0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Overall pain intensity0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing: Overall pain intensity0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing: Pain, Sensory Dimension0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Pain, Sensory Dimension0.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing: Pain, Affective Dimension0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing:Sensory & Affective Dimension0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Pain, Sensory and affective Dimensions0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing:Sensory & Affective Dimension9.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.71
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Pain, Sensory and affective Dimensions8.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.79
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing: Overall pain intensity2.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.38
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing: Pain, Affective Dimension4.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.25
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Pain, Sensory Dimension4.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.58
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Pain, affective Dimension3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.35
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Pain with Swallowing: Pain, Sensory Dimension5.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.69
Main Study: Placebo MouthwashPilot Study: Mean Ratings of Oral Mucositis-related Oropharyngeal Pain Intensity on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy (CT)Oral Pain: Overall pain intensity1.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Other Pre-specified

Pilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning Chemotherapy

Participants selected from 14 word descriptors of sensory (S) pain and 11 word descriptors of affective (A) pain.

Time frame: day 9 (+/- 24 hours) after conditioning chemotherapy

Population: One subject was in critical condition at day 9 after CT, preventing data collection at this time

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Dull, burning, crushing, pressing12.5 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Aching16.7 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Hurting20.8 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Hurting Group 216.7 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Burning, sharp20.8 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyAffective words: Annoying25.0 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Cramping, radiation, sharp4.2 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory: Splitting, shooting, stabbing, tearing8.3 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Sore29.2 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: torturing, splitting, crushing4.2 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyS:Cramping, shooting, radiating, stabbing, tearing8.3 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Dull, aching, pressing12.5 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapySensory words: Sore Group 229.2 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyAffective words: Terrifying, torturing4.2 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyAffective: Killing, tiring, unbearable, sickening8.3 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyA: Nagging, agonizing, troublesome, miserable12.5 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyAffective words: Torturing4.2 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyAffective words: Killing, unbearable, terrifying8.3 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyA: Agonizing, troublesome, tiring, sickening12.5 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyAffective words: Miserable, nagging16.7 percentage of participants
Main Study: Etanercept MouthwashPilot Study: Percentage of Participants Using Word Descriptors of Sensory and Affective Pain Selected by Subjects on Day 9 (+/- 24 Hours) After Conditioning ChemotherapyAffective words: Annoying Group 220.8 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026